Apr 24, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. California gubernatorial debate exposes right-wing character of both capitalist parties

Six candidates for California governor met Wednesday night in San Francisco in the first major televised debate since former Democratic Congressman Eric Swalwell, previously considered a leading contender, dropped out of the race following a #MeToo-style campaign and accusations of sexual misconduct. No charges have been filed against Swalwell, though an investigation has reportedly begun in New York City. 

*****

The debate featured four Democrats, billionaire former hedge fund manager Tom Steyer, former Biden Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, former Congresswoman Katie Porter and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, along with two Republicans, former Fox News host Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco.

Green Party candidate Butch Ware was not included. Ware’s campaign has denounced his exclusion from candidate forums and has claimed that, when included in polling, he receives between 2 and 4.66 percent. His campaign is also fighting a ballot access dispute after a judge rejected his bid to appear on the June ballot, a ruling Ware has said he would appeal.

*****

Hilton has increased his support since receiving Donald Trump’s endorsement earlier this month. Trump’s intervention was aimed at consolidating the Republican vote behind Hilton and preventing a split that could leave the Republicans off the ballot.

Steyer and Becerra have gained the most ground since Swalwell’s exit. State Controller Betty Yee dropped out Monday and endorsed Steyer, who has also won the backing of several unions and “Our Revolution,” the organization founded during Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign.

The endorsement of Steyer by “Our Revolution” is especially revealing. Founded during Sanders’ 2016 campaign to channel leftward-moving voters behind the Democratic Party, the organization now sells stickers declaring “Billionaires are policy failures” while endorsing a billionaire for governor. 

Steyer amassed his fortune through Farallon Capital Management, the San Francisco hedge fund he co-founded and managed for 26 years. During the debate, Mahan, repeatedly attacked Steyer over Farallon’s investments, including in Corrections Corporation of America, now CoreCivic, the largest private prison operator in the United States. Mahan’s attacks were aimed at deflecting from the support he is receiving from tech millionaires. KRON 4 reported that Mahan has raised more than $12.7 million in donations from tech executives, with large donations from Dropbox CEO Andrew Houston, Snapchat founder Evan Spiegel and Twitch co-founder Kyle Vogt.

The major issues facing workers and youth—war, inequality and the danger of fascism—were not dealt with in any serious manner. Every candidate had their pre-packaged 30-second clips and quips, each as phony as the next. Topics included California’s gas tax, a possible electric vehicle tax, how to attract private insurance companies to the state, a social media ban for youth 16 and under and proposals to lower housing costs, all within the framework of capitalism.

The central issue in the debate was not what was said but what was excluded. There was no discussion of the ongoing genocide in Gaza, US backing for Israel’s annexationist war aims in Lebanon, or the escalating US murder spree in the Pacific and Caribbean. The criminal war against Iran, the opening stages of World War III alongside the US-NATO war against Russia in Ukraine, was mentioned only in relation to rising gas prices, not as an illegal and aggressive war. Steyer described the war against Iran as “insane,” while Becerra called it “reckless,” but neither challenged American imperialism’s right to wage an aggressive, illegal war.

One of the most revealing exchanges came on homelessness. In what is no doubt an underestimate, it was reported that some 187,000 people in California are homeless. Asked to grade the current governor’s performance, every Democrat on stage gave Newsom a passing grade for his handling of the crisis. Becerra said Newsom had made efforts to “actually go out and clean some of the streets,” adding that he would give him an “A.” Porter and Mahan gave Newsom a “B,” while Steyer gave him a “B-minus.”

One of the most revealing exchanges came on homelessness. In what is no doubt an underestimate, it was reported that some 187,000 people in California are homeless. Asked to grade the current governor’s performance, every Democrat on stage gave Newsom a passing grade for his handling of the crisis. Becerra said Newsom had made efforts to “actually go out and clean some of the streets,” adding that he would give him an “A.” Porter and Mahan gave Newsom a “B,” while Steyer gave him a “B-minus.”

This praise comes less than two years after Newsom signed a 2024 executive order directing state agencies to remove homeless encampments from state property following the Supreme Court’s Grants Pass ruling, upholding a municipal ban on sleeping in public. The order marked a sharp escalation in the criminalization of homelessness, empowering the state to sweep encampments instead of addressing the social catastrophe that has left hundreds of thousands without secure housing.

At the time, the WSWS wrote: “The message is clear: The state has no intention to resolve a serious social problem like homelessness because money must be directed to the defense of the interests of the ruling class and, importantly, the preservation of the profit system that has created the most severe levels of social inequality since the 1930s, despite unprecedented wealth produced by workers.”

That every Democrat on stage praised Newsom’s handling of homelessness underscores the reactionary character of the entire party. The Democrats’ supposed “solutions” consist of repackaged police measures, austerity and funneling money to connected non-profits, all while defending the wealth and property of the financial oligarchy.

The Republicans, for their part, blamed every social crisis in California, from wildfires to homelessness and inflation, on Democratic rule and supposedly excessive “regulation” of business operations. Both Bianco and Hilton called for slashing environmental and business regulations, expanding oil production and eliminating alleged “waste, fraud and abuse” in government programs, a formula for gutting social spending and handing still greater power to corporations. Hilton attacked Becerra for briefly supporting masking during the pandemic, while he was Biden’s health and human services secretary.

Bianco’s role in the debate was especially significant. The Riverside County sheriff recently seized more than 650,000 ballots from the 2025 referendum on redistricting, as part of a bogus “voter fraud” investigation. State officials and voting rights groups have challenged the seizure, and the California Supreme Court temporarily halted the investigation while it considers the dispute.

This week CalMatters reported that internal emails showed Bianco’s investigation was driven by thin evidence and claims from fringe election-denial groups. Newly unsealed warrants did not show direct evidence of vote fraud.

Asked during the debate whether he would launch a similar investigation if he did not trust the results of the upcoming primary, Bianco refused to give a clear answer. He declared that Californians are “never going to know if our elections are secure” because “legitimate investigations” by law enforcement are being stopped by “Democrat one-party rule in California.”

The statement amounted to an open threat. Trump and the Republican Party are preparing to challenge any election result they do not like and send immigration Gestapo to the polls. Bianco, a supporter of the fascistic Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, is presenting himself as willing agent for dictatorship.

The debate revealed the dead end confronting workers and youth within the framework of the capitalist electoral politics. The Democrats offer only token reforms, empty phrases and adaptation to Republican policies. The Republicans openly agitate for police repression, deregulation and the destruction of democratic rights.

The alternative is not to be found in any section of the capitalist political establishment. The working class must intervene independently, through the building of rank-and-file committees in workplaces, schools and neighborhoods, and prepare a political and industrial counteroffensive against austerity, war and dictatorship. The fight against Trump and the fascists in Washington must be connected to the struggle against the capitalist system that has produced both parties and the social catastrophe they defend.

2. As third carrier strike group arrives, Trump orders Navy to “shoot and kill” Iranian boats in the Strait of Hormuz

On Thursday morning, Trump posted on Truth Social an order for the US Navy to take lethal action against Iranian boats that he claimed are laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz. In his 8:45 a.m. post, Trump wrote, “I have ordered the United States Navy to shoot and kill any boat, small boats though they may be (Their naval ships are ALL, 159 of them, at the bottom of the sea!), that is putting mines in the waters of the Strait of Hormuz.”

He went on, “There is to be no hesitation. Additionally, our mine ‘sweepers’ are clearing the Strait right now. I am hereby ordering that activity to continue, but at a tripled up level!”

Trump’s threat directive and authorization for immediate lethal force against Iranian boats is a war crime. There are no independently confirmed reports that Iran is currently and actively mining the Strait of Hormuz.

In any case, despite the US and its imperialist and regional supporters assertion that Iran has no right to mine the waterway, doing so is a justified defensive act following weeks of an air war by the US and Israel that has been followed by repeated threats of an imminent amphibious invasion of the country from the strait.

Meanwhile, Trump’s naval order followed the US seizure of a second oil tanker in the Indian Ocean on Thursday. The vessel was linked to Iranian oil transport and was seized as part of the administration’s broader effort to shut down Tehran’s export routes and use force to blockade the country beyond the Persian Gulf. 

*****

The vessel was reported to be Botswana-flagged, but treated by the Pentagon as “stateless” in the sense used in the interdiction notice. The military said it would decide within days whether to tow it away or transfer it to another country. The US justification was also that the action was part of a global enforcement campaign against ships tied to Tehran, with the Pentagon warning that it would pursue all such vessels internationally. 

This latest operation is also significant because it shows the war continues to expand beyond the immediate waters around Iran. As with the sinking of an unarmed Iranian naval ship on March 4 off Sri Lanka, in which at least 87 sailors were killed, the US is reaching into the Indian Ocean to intercept vessels it claims are connected to Iran.

*****

The presence of a third aircraft carrier strike group in or near the theater shows that Trump is now preparing for sustained war operations in the region. Carrier strike groups are among the most powerful tools of US military power, bringing fighter aircraft, surveillance, missile systems, destroyers and logistics support. Their deployment signals readiness for prolonged strikes, control of the seas and escalation across multiple domains. 

*****

The resignation of Navy Secretary John Phelan late Wednesday, announced by the Pentagon, is one of the clearest signs that the war against Iran is resulting in sharp conflicts at the top of the US defense establishment. While no official reason was given for Phelan’s departure, reports have pointed to differences inside the administration, and the timing strongly suggests that the conflict over the conduct of the war is intensifying.

A senior civilian naval official leaving in the middle of a major military escalation is not routine. It indicates a level of crisis within the Trump regime that is severe enough to rupture the normal chain of military command.

*****

The human toll of the war against Iran is immense. Iranian authorities have reported that the death toll has reached 3,468. Thousands of deaths in such a short period of time means widespread destruction of infrastructure, civilian suffering and social dislocation. The impact of the killing and destruction of communities, the destabilization of the country on a massive scale will have a lasting impact.

On Thursday, Lebanese and Israeli representatives met at the White House as part of ongoing talks about the Israeli invasion and annexation of southern Lebanon. The talks reportedly extended the ceasefire in Lebanon by three weeks. However, Israel has repeatedly stated that it will not withdraw from southern Lebanon during the talks, proving that this ceasefire, like the Iran ceasefire, only applies to one side in the conflict.

3. El Gamal family released from ICE detention

A federal judge ordered the release of Hayam El Gamal and her five children Thursday, ending nearly 10 months of imprisonment at the Dilley family detention center in South Texas.

The family’s attorney Christopher Godshall-Bennett announced the ruling on X within minutes of leaving the courtroom. “Just finished arguing the El Gamal family’s habeas petition in San Antonio. The Court has ordered their IMMEDIATE RELEASE,” Godshall-Bennett wrote. “I left the courtroom in tears, thrilled that this family can return to their home.”

Co-counsel Eric Lee posted: “The El Gamals are finally, finally being released.” Less than two hours later, Lee reported that ICE was stonewalling the court. “The court order has been published demanding ICE release the El Gamal family immediately and ICE has still not yet even agreed to speak to us,” he wrote from Dilley. “We have been at Dilley for an hour.” By Thursday evening Lee posted simply: “The El Gamal family is free.”

A third attorney for the family, Niels Frenzen of the USC Gould School of Law Immigration Clinic, said in a statement: “A federal judge has ordered the Government to release a family who have been unlawfully targeted and punished because of the alleged actions of their husband and father. This release order is long overdue. But the Administration’s efforts to deport the family continue, so their ordeal is not over yet.”

*****

The family—Hayam El Gamal, her 18-year-old daughter Habiba, a 16 year old, a nine year old and two five-year-old twins—had been held at the Dilley Family Residential Center since June 2025. ICE seized them two days after the June 1, 2025 Boulder, Colorado firebombing attack for which Hayam El Gamal’s husband Mohamed Sabry Soliman was arrested.

The family had no advance knowledge of the attack. An FBI agent testified to this in court. El Gamal filed for divorce from Soliman after his arrest. None of this prevented the Department of Homeland Security from shipping the family from Colorado Springs to a detention camp nearly a thousand miles away. An immigration judge set a $15,000 bond for the family on September 19, 2025. The Trump administration used legal maneuvers to block the release. They remained imprisoned for another seven months.

The Trump administration attacked the ruling within hours. Department of Homeland Security Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis denounced Biery, who was appointed to the federal bench by former US President Bill Clinton, as an “activist judge.” “Despite receiving full due process and a final order of removal, this activist judge appointed by Bill Clinton is releasing this terrorist’s family onto American streets,” Bis said. She added that the administration would “continue to fight for the removal of those who have no right to be in our country, especially national security threats.”

The statement branded an 18-year-old student, a nine year old, a 16 year old and two five year olds as terrorists. None of them has been charged with any crime.

*****

Dilley, opened as a “temporary” detention center in 2014 under the Obama administration, has been expanded and refilled under the second Trump administration with families seized in the nationwide ICE raids that began in 2025.

Biery’s ruling also halted the administration’s removal proceedings against the family so the asylum case can proceed.

4. Trump Justice Department intervenes to defend fascists and neo-Nazis

In another step towards the establishment of police-state rule under President Donald Trump, the Department of Justice and the FBI announced Tuesday they had obtained a grand jury indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center on 11 counts of financial fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy.

The charges are entirely bogus and brought in bad faith, with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel knowing that there is no case to answer, and that any court not run by Trump stooges would dismiss it as preposterous.

The organization is charged with deceiving its donors by using contributions to pay informants who were members of neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups. The SPLC is alleged to have committed “fraud” by setting up dummy accounts in financial institutions to make the payments, since a Ku Klux Klan member could hardly cash a check from a well-known civil rights organization.

The amount spent on this program was relatively small, about $3 million over a 10-year period (2014–2023) for an organization with an annual budget regularly topping $100 million. Eight paid informants are named in the indictment, exposing them all to retaliation by the violent fascists with whom they rubbed shoulders.

Contrary to the claim that these payments benefited the fascist groups—made by Blanche and Patel at their press conference—the United Klans, the Aryan Nations and several other groups in which the SPLC had informants are now largely moribund. In other words, the information gathered contributed to the demise of the organizations, rather than promoting them. 

*****

The SPLC was founded in 1971 as a legal resource for victims of KKK violence, and won several notable legal victories, including a judgment in 1989 that bankrupted the United Klans of America and forced the group to turn over its headquarters building to the mother of a young black man murdered by its members.

The group has become a target of the Trump administration because it has maintained a focus on exposing far-right hate groups, even as the Republican Party has been transformed into a fascist operation under the Make America Great Again label. In particular, the SPLC identified Turning Point USA as “a case study of the hard right” because of its promotion of bigotry against the LGBTQ population. It applied similar labels to the Family Research Council and Moms for Liberty, also for anti-gay bias, and the Center for Immigration Studies, identified as a hate group for citing white supremacist and antisemitic arguments against immigrants, derived from the neo-Nazi “Great Replacement Theory.”

After the assassination of Turning Point leader Charlie Kirk last September, FBI Director Patel cut all ties to the SPLC, which had regularly supplied information on white supremacist groups to the federal government. Centi-billionaire Elon Musk tweeted that the group was “guilty of incitement to murder Charlie Kirk,” backing a smear campaign against the group. Now Patel has taken a further step, obtaining an indictment, not just of the individuals who set up the dummy accounts, but of the SPLC as a whole, subjecting all its assets to potential confiscation as the proceeds of crime. 

*****

There has been relatively little response from the Democratic Party to this flagrant attack on democratic and civil rights. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer raised the issue in passing during a floor speech Wednesday, then posted a one-paragraph social media post that did not actually identify the SPLC as the target of “a vindictive campaign against the organizations that safeguard our democracy.” 

Congressional Republicans, by contrast, have raised hosannas, with Texas Republican Representative Chip Roy telling the ultra-right Daily Signal that the indictments “are an enormously important step forward,” which would lead to further prosecutions “beyond SPLC.”

Roy declared, “We know that there are significant efforts underway across agencies to continue to root out not just SPLC but the vast array of Marxists and leftists that are actively engaging in this activity to undermine our society. I think it’s important that the indictments are indicative of what we know of the SPLC, but we also know that it’s a much bigger network and the administration does, too.”

Acting Attorney General Blanche is spearheading the campaign against all potential opposition to the Trump administration for his own benefit—he wants Trump to name him to the top job permanently—by catering to the political requirements of the would-be dictator and former client. As one commentator pointed out, Blanche has not been able to find evidence to bring charges against a single person in the mushrooming scandal over the multi-millionaire sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Instead, he brings charges against a civil rights group for fighting white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

Another commentator pointed out that President Ulysses S. Grant founded the Department of Justice in 1870 “to help suppress the Ku Klux Klan in the Southern states and enforce federal civil-rights protections for formerly enslaved Americans. On Tuesday, Justice Department officials announced what may be the first Klan-friendly prosecution in the department’s history.”

That historical reference underscores the colossal dangers now facing the working class, as the Trump administration seeks to turn back the clock, not only on the gains won by working people through bitter struggle in the 20th century, but even further back.

The Democratic Party is not a force for opposing the promotion of fascism from the highest levels of the state. The Democrats refused to mobilize any serious opposition to the January 6 coup at the time, and will not mobilize one now against the authoritarian movement consolidating state power—because doing so would require an appeal to the only social force capable of defeating fascism: the working class.

The working class must build a mass independent political movement to defend democratic rights, oppose imperialist war, and fight for the socialist transformation of society.

5. Artists group launches boycott of New York cultural center 92NY over support for war, genocide

On Tuesday, daily literary website Literary Hub announced the formation of an artists’ group 92NO that calls for artists and the public to boycott events at the 92NY cultural center, formerly known as the “92nd Street Y,” because the latter has censored artists who opposed the US-Israeli genocide in Gaza and promoted speakers who support war and genocide.

92NO’s statement argues:

This stage and venue are tainted by 92NY’s actions throughout the genocide–like canceling its entire literary season over a single writer’s opposition to the genocide in Gaza, firing employees for wearing and displaying symbols with support for Palestine, or hosting events with Israeli politicians and military officials and other public figures who justify the genocide, dehumanize Palestinians, and call for war on Iran and Lebanon.

92NY is–or was–a significant cultural institution. Its speakers have included novelists James Baldwin, Nadine Gordimer and Toni Morrison—Truman Capote debuted his landmark work In Cold Blood there in 1966—and poets such as T.S. Eliot, W.H. Auden, Robert Frost and Langston Hughes. Musicians Andres Segovia, Stephen Sondheim and Yo-Yo Ma have performed or spoken there. Alvin Ailey premiered important dance works at the venue and legendary dancer-choreographer Martha Graham taught at the Y. Meryl Streep and Daniel Radcliffe, among others, have spoken there about acting.

The Y has also featured its share of bourgeois politicians, including war criminals (Donald Rumsfeld and Ari Fleischer, for example) and founders of the Zionist state (David Ben Gurion and Golda Meir). An increasing orientation to criminal types became apparent when 92NY hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2022.

The “Y” began institutional life as the Young Men’s Hebrew Association (YMHA) in 1872 to serve the social needs of younger Jews in New York City. Following the establishment of the Israeli state, at the expense of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, the 92nd Street Y’s officialdom became absorbed into the general stream of American liberalism, which supported the Zionist project. 

After the Israeli military launched its genocidal campaign in Gaza in October 2023, the Y made a pronounced and public right-wing turn that had been prepared by the commitment of most of the institution’s leadership to the Israeli state. On October 20, 2023, it abruptly canceled, or “postponed” as it claimed, an appearance by Vietnamese-American Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Viet Thanh Nguyen because he had signed an open letter published in the London Review of Books that called for a ceasefire in Gaza and was critical of Israel’s actions.

Other writers canceled their appearances at the Y in protest of this act of censorship in the days that followed, including Christina Sharpe and Saidiya Hartman, scholars and authors of creative non-fiction, and poet and novelist Dionne Brand. Poet Paisley Rekdal also decided against appearing at the venue because of 92NY’s censorship of Nguyen.

Within 48 hours, key leadership at 92NY’s Poetry Center resigned in protest at the censorship, including director Sarah Chihaya and senior program coordinator Sophie Herron. They cited a breach of the center’s mission to be a space for open literary dialogue.

92NY reacted by changing its policies about political expression among its front-facing staff, prohibiting them from “expressing any personal views about politics or social issues.” Some staff were fired.

Shortly after this, 92NY was forced to cancel its entire 2023 Fall program. Since then, the institution has sought to “recoup” by inviting some of the most deplorable figures in public and corporate life. As 92NO notes:

92NY’s Center for Culture and Arts calendar has featured an extraordinary number of war criminals, genocide apologists, corrupt billionaires, police commissioners, and right-wing pundits promoting US aggression abroad. Recent speakers include Palantir CEO Alex Karp, columnists Bret Stephens and Thomas Friedman, and CBS News chief Bari Weiss, all of whom consistently and unashamedly express anti-Palestinian racism.

The group’s statement adds:

92NY’s longstanding policy of vetting speakers with an ideological litmus test is now enshrined in their bylaws, which assert that they will block speakers who “question the legitimacy” of the State of Israel. We refuse to give our labor to an institution that explicitly silences Palestinian voices and those who support Palestinian self-determination and an end to genocide and apartheid. 

*****

The boycott of 92NY reflects the understanding by many artists and writers that things cannot go on as they have since the start of the Gaza genocide and the installation of Trump, that cultural institutions that side with the policies of war and genocide must be confronted and exposed.

6. A message from Nexteer workers:  It is time for the rank and file to take matters into our own hands!

“Fifteen years ago we were told by management and the union that this was just a ‘bump in the road.’ It’s time to pay the hard-working floor workers what is owed after 15 years of concessions.” Those were the comments of a brother at our factory to the Nexteer Workers Rank-and-File Committee.

On April 2, we voted down the rotten tentative agreement pushed by the UAW International and UAW Local 699 officials by 96.2 percent. On that very same day, UAW leaders extended the 2021 contract behind our backs and then told us it would be illegal to strike!

Since then, Local 699 officials have posted three items on the union’s Facebook page: the cancellation of a fishing tournament, an announcement of a casino bus trip, and a “sip and paint” karaoke event.

What an insult to our intelligence!

UAW President Shawn Fain and his toadies in the local union have no right to ignore our vote and overwhelming support for strike action. No contract means no work. We should be on strike right now. By defying the will of the membership, these union aparatchiks have forfeited any claims to “represent” us.

The Nexteer Rank-and-File Committee has been formed to enforce the will of Nexteer workers. We cannot wait for permission from Fain, UAW Region 1D Director Steven Dawes or Local 699 officials Jason Jimenez and Carl McKee to take action. By extending the contract, the UAW officials have only given Nexteer time to prepare for a strike and undermine its effectiveness.

We have the power—if we use it now.

The Nexteer Workers Rank-and-File Committee has drafted a list of strike demands for discussion and approval. These include:

  • Abolish all tiers—Equal pay and benefits for equal work by raising everyone’s income.
  • Major wage increases for all and COLA to keep up with inflation—No more stagnation while executives enrich themselves. 
  • A real living starting wage and a sharply reduced progression to top pay. 
  • Affordable healthcare for every worker and family—No premium hikes, no doubled weekly contributions. 
  • Enforceable limits on overtime and scheduling abuse, including binding notice requirements (ending contract violations like the “ninth hour” manipulation). 
  • Job security and anti-outsourcing protections—Full transparency and the right to oppose shifting work to lower-wage operations. 
  • Real grievance rights with enforcement, not a toothless process where the company faces no consequences. 
  • Workers’ control over safety and staffing, with elected rank-and-file safety reps empowered to halt unsafe work.

At the same time, we cannot win this struggle without financial resources. Workers should demand strike pay of at least $1,000 a week. The UAW’s nearly $1 billion strike fund is not a slush fund for the bureaucrats; it belongs to the rank and file. It must be used to sustain our fight against this multinational corporation and the Big Three automakers who want to squeeze auto parts workers for ever more profits. 

*****

The Nexteer Rank-and-File Committee endorses the campaign by Pennsylvania Mack Trucks worker Will Lehman, who is running for president against Fain and the rest of the UAW apparatus. Lehman is calling for the abolition of the UAW bureaucracy and the transfer of power to workers on the shop floor.

At the same time, Lehman has said these are not “normal times.” The illegal war against Iran is driving up the cost of gas, groceries, utilities and housing. Every trip to the gas pump and grocery store is taking a bigger bite out of our paychecks while Big Oil is making massive profits.

Now, we hear that GM and Ford executives have been in discussions with the Trump administration about converting auto plants into weapons factories. Soon we will be told that strikes are illegal, we must accept massive cuts in wages, Social Security, Medicare and other programs to pay for the war. They also want to restore the draft and send our sons and daughters to fight their wars. In reality, the only ones who benefit are the same billionaires who are robbing us at home.

It is time to take a stand! If we do, we can win the support of American Axle, Bridgewater Interiors, Dana and tens of thousands of other auto parts workers whose contracts are expiring in the coming weeks. We can also win the support of UAW members from the Big Three auto plants in Flint, Detroit and other cities, striking Harvard University academic workers and other workers.

It is time we take this struggle into our own hands. Join the Nexteer Workers Rank-and-File Committee to take up this fight. 

7. German defense minister presents new military strategy: Berlin prepares for major war against Russia

On Wednesday, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius and the Inspector General of the Bundeswehr (Armed Forces), Carsten Breuer, presented a comprehensive military strategy for the first time in the history of the Bundeswehr. Even though key parts of the document remain classified, the excerpts that have been released leave no doubt as to its nature: Germany is systematically preparing for a major war—particularly against Russia.

The secrecy itself is politically revealing. It shows that the measures, capabilities and specific war plans actually being devised go far beyond what is communicated publicly. Yet even the official summaries make clear that the German government is taking a qualitative leap forward in military rearmament and preparations for war.

*****

The military strategy follows “the idea that Germany, as the largest economy in Europe, must and will take on a leading role in NATO in a complex and increasingly acute threat situation—also militarily. It is a sign of a paradigm shift and underpins our claim to shape things,” Breuer said.

The “Overall Concept of Military Defense” consists of two parts: a military strategy and a capability profile. Until now, according to Breuer, the Bundeswehr had struggled to clearly define security policy goals and then explain how it wanted to achieve them. “The answer to this is given by the military strategy—and the answer to the means for it is given by the capability profile.”

In other words: German imperialism is once again clearly defining its predatory goals and at the same time creating the military prerequisites to enforce them. At the center is the war offensive against Russia, which was further escalated in recent days with the signing of a new “strategic partnership“ between Germany and Ukraine, and the summoning of the Russian ambassador

*****

The new strategy openly defines Russia as a central threat and orientates all military planning towards a comprehensive war against the nuclear power. The hitherto known contents of the military strategy and the associated rearmament plans include, among others: 

  • Massive personnel growth: The Bundeswehr is to be significantly enlarged. A troop strength of at least 260,000 active soldiers and a considerable expansion of the reserve are being discussed. In total, the force is to grow to at least 460,000. To achieve this growth, which is only the beginning, the reintroduction of conscription is being prepared.
  • Building up fully equipped large formations: Germany is committing itself to providing several fully operational divisions for NATO, including heavy mechanized forces for the war in Eastern Europe.
  • Permanent stationing and frontline presence: The deployment of a German combat brigade in Lithuania is part of long-term forward stationing on the Russian border.
  • Accelerated rearmament and modernization: Massive investments in heavy weapons, air defense systems, drones, cyber and space capabilities. Projects such as the serial production of modern weapon systems are being expanded.
  • Logistics and mobilization: The building up of a comprehensive military logistics structure for rapid troop deployments through Europe (“military mobility”) as well as ensuring supplies in the event of war.
  • Integration into NATO and EU structures: Germany is taking on a central leadership role in multinational command structures and operational planning. Germany will “increase cohesion between Eastern, Central and Western Europe from the center of Europe and maintain the connection to North America,” the published part of the strategy states. Thus, Germany will become “even more of a military anchor partner for its European allies” in order to “improve European ability to act.”
  •  National command and control capability: “The capability for national planning and command of operations is to be ensured at the operational level,” the document demands. This also includes “the command of multi-domain operations as well as the task contained therein for the cross-dimensional command of deep precision strikes.”
  • “Total defense”: The military strategy is explicitly interlinked with civilian structures. State, economy and society are to be orientated towards the event of war.

Even the title of the strategy “Overall Concept for Military Defense” makes clear that its implementation is not limited to the military, but encompasses the whole of society.

*****

This prepares the transition to a war economy. In an emergency, industry, infrastructure and workers are to be placed directly in the service of military operations. In its logic, this is reminiscent of earlier phases of German war preparation on the eve of the First and Second World Wars—with the difference that today it takes place under conditions of a highly developed globalized economy.

The necessary financial means for this have already been created. The “special fund” and war credits amounting to hundreds of billions of euros, supported by all the establishment parties, including the Left Party and the Greens, are financing the largest rearmament program since the end of the Second World War. 

*****

The new military strategy makes clear that German imperialism has drawn the conclusion from its historical crimes and catastrophic defeats in the two world wars of the 20th century to assert its interests once again with military force. Under conditions of growing geopolitical conflicts—between the imperialist powers themselves, above all between Europe and the US and economic crises— the ruling class is driving forward a policy that inevitably leads to catastrophe.

For workers and youth, this means they are confronted with a reality that is being systematically downplayed by official circles: The preparation for a major war is not an abstract possibility, but concrete government policy. It has nothing to do with the defense of “democracy” and “freedom” against a Russian, Iranian or any other aggressor, but, as in the past, is aimed at enforcing imperialist interests by means of destructive violence.

8. SEP holds meeting in Adelaide, South Australia on the Iran war and the fight for socialism

The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) held an important public meeting last Sunday in the South Australian city of Adelaide to discuss the illegal US war against Iran and the need for a socialist perspective. The meeting advanced the fight to build an Adelaide branch of the SEP as a component of the broader struggle to build a global movement of the working class against the threat of world war.

The meeting was held in the aftermath of the March 21 state election, which marked a deepening crisis of the two-party system in Australia and a further shift to the right by all the major parties. While the pro-business Labor government of Peter Malinauskas was returned to office, there were sharp swings against Labor in key working-class areas. The Liberals, the traditional conservative party, were reduced to a rump, as part of the party’s collapse nationally. Meanwhile, the far-right One Nation received the second-highest vote, exploiting the growing discontent with the major capitalist parties and the mounting social crisis.

Before Sunday’s meeting, the SEP campaigned in the working-class suburbs of Adelaide, including going to polling booths on election day at Salisbury and Elizabeth in the city’s north. This area, the former center of auto production, has been decimated by the closure of the car industry and resulting job losses and impoverished conditions, enforced by Labor and the corporatized trade unions.

In speaking with workers and young people, the SEP revealed widespread hostility to the war on Iran, the Australian government’s involvement in it, and the broader militarization of the country in preparation for a US-led war with China. Workers were concerned about the cost-of-living crisis, growing inequality, the deterioration of social services, and were interested in a socialist alternative to the main parties. 

*****

The reports prompted a wide-ranging discussion by participants, most of whom had never attended an SEP meeting. Questions that were raised included the history of the Iran war and how it was connected to the decades of US aggression in the Middle East under the banner of a “war on terror.” Another question was how a workers’ revolution could develop. One attendee asked how people who are drawn to left-wing politics can be won to the SEP and a genuine socialist perspective. 

Most of those attending stayed behind to have further discussion with the SEP, browse the literature table, and find out how they could become more involved. 

9. Workers and youth in Adelaide speak out on Iran war and support a socialist perspective

“I was drawn to the SEP’s internationalist perspective to unite the working class. Capitalism is breaking down, that’s why the working class needs to go on strike and organize workers at workplaces and industries independently.”

*****

The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) held a public meeting in Adelaide, the state capital of South Australia, on Sunday to discuss the US war on Iran and the outcome of the South Australian state election. It drew a number of workers and youth, both in person and online, and outlined to them a socialist perspective to stop the war and build an international movement against the outmoded capitalist system.

SEP members spoke afterwards to those attending the meeting.

10. Hunger strike at Michigan immigrant detention center

Detainees at ICE’s massive North Lake Processing Center in Baldwin, Michigan, staged a hunger strike beginning April 20, 2026. In a press release shared by No Detention Centers in Michigan (NDCM), the hunger strike was held by male detainees who cited “dangerous conditions, a lack of adequate food and medical care, and cruel legal obstacles that have kept many in captivity with no end in sight.” Detainees are also reportedly striking from their jobs within the detention center itself, including laundry, cleaning and kitchen duties. The 1,800-bed facility is the largest ICE detention center in the Midwest and currently holds approximately 1,400 detainees.

The WSWS reached out to NDCM, which maintains communication with the North Lake detainees, for a comment on the strike, which a spokesperson described as “a collective response both to the appalling conditions that people have faced at North Lake now and in the past—inadequate food, medical neglect, denial of basic resources—and to the cruel policies from ICE and immigration judges that have kept many behind bars for far too long. Some people detained at North Lake have won their habeas corpus suits, only to be denied bond. Some have asked to be deported, only to be stuck in limbo in this rural Michigan prison for months.”

NDCM reported to the WSWS that, as of April 21, a majority of men in multiple units were participating in the strike, meaning hundreds of detainees. As of April 22, one unit called off the strike after North Lake personnel told them they had no other options but to request voluntary departure or deportation, and otherwise attempted to identify the strike leaders. Detainees in other units are reportedly continuing the hunger strike. NDCM has stated that GEO Group, which operates North Lake, has punitively cancelled recreation time in response to the strike, an unsurprising move given the history of abuse and neglect at the facility.

NDCM also informed WSWS of the demands of the strikers which were communicated through an attorney and are re-published here verbatim:

1.  ICE officials come and talk to them to explain why they are being unjustly held.

2.  ICE review each detainee’s circumstances and liberate people. ICE can grant parole as they did in the past. The detainees should not have to rely on immigration judges who are not neutral.

3.  ICE should make decisions more quickly. Waiting 120 days for ICE to decide what to do is too long and inhumane.

4.  Food. There are people who are hungry and GEO employees throw food away. The food is not enough to sustain them. They are only given protein once a week. There are people having allergic reactions.

5.  Laundry. They are receiving clothes that make them itchy and having allergic reactions. They don’t know what chemicals they are using to clean the inmates clothes.

6.  Arbitrary rules must stop. They recently implemented a new 6 a.m. headcount without any notice. They make rules arbitrarily.

7.  Regular sleep. They are kept awake all night. The guards keep their radios loud, and there is noise all night that does not allow them to sleep. 

*****

The strikers’ demands and grievances are fully consistent with ICE and GEO Group’s documented record of abuses, including a network of secret detention centers. In particular, North Lake has gained notoriety for its record of illegal detentions and medical neglect since it was reopened in mid-2025. ICE reports that the average stay at North Lake is 49 days. However, many detainees have been incarcerated there for over six months. 

This hunger strike does not occur in isolation. Similar protests have been reported at ICE facilities at the Louisiana State Penitentiary in Angola, Louisiana; Otay Mesa Detention Center in San Diego, California; and the South Florida Detention Facility, so-called “Alligator Alcatraz,” in Ochopee, Florida. In 2019, hunger-striking detainees at an ICE facility in Texas were subjected to force-feeding through nasal tubes, a form of torture used at Guantanamo Bay and other CIA-run black sites. 

*****

Michigan Advance requested a comment from a GEO Group spokesperson, but the hunger strike was not addressed. Instead, the spokesperson offered only a bland recitation of an obvious company line: that detainees are supposedly provided “around-the-clock access to medical care, in-person and virtual legal and family visitation, general and legal library access, translation services, dietician-approved meals, religious and specialty diets, recreational amenities, and opportunities to practice their religious beliefs… [a]dditionally, all of GEO’s ICE Processing Centers are independently accredited by the American Correctional Association and the National Commission on Correctional Health Care.” To date, ICE itself has not issued a public comment on the strike. 

On April 21, several dozen protesters gathered outside North Lake to support the detainees on hunger strike. Several of these protesters attempted to block vehicles from exiting the facility.

In the face of this hunger strike, the only morally and politically consistent response is mass working class solidarity. The struggle to end ICE’s grotesque abuses of immigrants cannot be trusted to either capitalist party, both of which are complicit in these abuses. Nor can GEO Group, which profits from this system, be expected to reform its own practices.

This strike must be supported by coordinated action by the working class with the formation of rank-and-file committees and workplace stoppages that disrupt logistics and supply chains which sustain these detention centers.

11.  Two killed, dozens injured in West Virginia chemical plant explosion

A deadly incident at a chemical facility in Institute, West Virginia left two workers dead and dozens of others injured on Wednesday, according to official reports. Several of those hurt required hospitalization, including emergency responders who were exposed while assisting at the scene.

Located less than 20 miles from Charleston, WV, the explosion occurred at a facility operated by Catalyst Refiners, located along the Kanawha River in an area long known for its concentration of chemical manufacturing.

Local authorities said the incident occurred while crews were carrying out shutdown and cleanup work at the plant. During that process, chemicals interacted in a way that generated a hazardous gas, believed to include hydrogen sulfide. First responders were dispatched to the site, and nearby residents were advised to remain indoors for a period while crews worked to stabilize conditions. Roads surrounding the facility were temporarily shut down as specialized teams secured the area.

Emergency crews responded quickly, and a temporary shelter-in-place order was issued for nearby communities as a precaution. Several roads were closed while hazardous materials teams worked to contain the scene.

At least 20 to 30 people, including plant workers and first responders, were evaluated or treated for symptoms such as difficulty breathing, coughing and eye irritation. Some victims were transported to nearby hospitals in Charleston, West Virginia, and officials said at least one person remained in critical condition as of late Wednesday.

As of late Wednesday, authorities have not released the identities of those killed.

State and federal agencies, including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, have launched an investigation into the cause of the incident. The Kanawha Valley—sometimes referred to as “Chemical Valley”—has a long history of industrial accidents, including the 2014 Elk River chemical spill that disrupted water service for hundreds of thousands of residents. 

*****

The explosion and deaths at Catalyst Refiners is part of a growing toll of workers deaths involving industrial accidents, as companies ignore safety as they push for greater profits. 

*****

The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) has opened an investigation into the explosion at Catalyst Refiners. The CSB is an independent agency charged with determining the root causes of chemical incidents and issuing safety recommendations. Investigators typically deploy to the scene to collect physical evidence, review plant procedures and maintenance records, and interview workers, managers and emergency responders. However, the agency’s findings often take months to complete and they have no authority to enforce their finding.

Furthermore, the CSB has faced years of underfunding tied to budget cuts and political pressure, particularly under the Trump administration, which has sought to close the agency down entirely. Safety advocates say those constraints have weakened the agency’s ability to respond quickly and thoroughly to major incidents. Although the CSB continues to operate and investigate serious accidents, lack of sufficient staffing and funding undermines its ability keep pace with the volume and complexity of industrial hazards nationwide. 

*****

While large explosions draw the most attention, a quieter and more persistent concern is long-term exposure to low levels of industrial pollution among people living near chemical facilities. Research in environmental health has found that communities located close to refineries, petrochemical plants and waste-processing sites can face elevated exposure to substances such as benzene, formaldehyde and other known or suspected carcinogens.

Epidemiological studies have linked long-term exposure in these areas to higher rates of certain cancers, as well as respiratory illnesses, cardiovascular disease and adverse birth outcomes. In places like the heavily industrialized corridor along the Mississippi River known as Cancer Alley, residents and researchers have reported elevated rates of rare cancers and chronic health conditions. Similar concerns have been raised in parts of Houston, Texas and other industrial regions, where residential communities bordering industrial sites—often lower-income—experience disproportionately high exposure to airborne toxins over long periods.

Behind the growing number of industrial explosions and fatalities as well as the continuous poisoning of millions of people is the shortcutting of safety by corporations under relentless pressure by Wall Street to maximize profits.

12. Harvard Corporation demands graduate workers pay the price for Trump’s assault on academic freedom

 
Harvard College Seal, used by the Harvard Corporation 

The strike by 4,000 graduate student workers at Harvard University that began April 21 takes place under conditions of an ongoing assault on academic freedom and other democratic rights. As the Trump administration launches a scorched-earth campaign to bring higher education under the direct ideological control of the far right, Harvard’s leadership has responded not by forcefully defending democratic principles but by offloading the costs of its political conflict with Trump onto academic workers, including striking members of the Harvard Graduate Student Union-United Auto Workers (HGSU-UAW).

Harvard Corporation is seeking to restructure the university into a more efficient arm of the imperialist state and finance capital, using the threat of state-driven financial strangulation as a pretext to crush labor militancy and campus dissent.

The Trump administration has deployed its cabinet of reactionaries to execute a multi-pronged assault. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has terminated all professional military education and fellowships at Harvard, labeling the school a “red-hot center of Hate America activism.” Simultaneously, Education Secretary Linda McMahon has placed Harvard under “heightened cash monitoring” and is threatening its 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status. The administration has frozen $2.2 billion in multi-year grants and $60 million in multi-year contract value, while Trump himself has threatened to pursue $1 billion in “damages” over the university’s failure to suppress campus protests against the US-backed Israeli genocide in Gaza.

Utilizing the Department of Education, the state is demanding an audit of “viewpoint diversity” and the total liquidation of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. These “civil rights” pretexts are a transparent cover to force the university to align its research and hiring with the administration’s ultra-right ideology, effectively ending academic freedom. 

*****

The Harvard administration has weaponized the narrative of “financial distress” to justify wage suppression and austerity. Citing a projected $365 million deficit in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS), the university pleads poverty while sitting on a mountain of gold, including a $53.2 billion endowment. This “deficit” is a political fiction, a strategic accounting maneuver designed to facilitate a class-driven transfer of wealth from the workers who perform the essential labor of instruction to the endowment fund managed by the oligarchy. 

Graduate student workers are fighting for raises that keep up with inflation in one of the most expensive US cities. As of 2026 estimates, the median monthly rent of a one-bedroom home in Cambridge is around $3,500. Teaching Fellows at Harvard earn between $18 and $21 per hour, and many qualify for state food assistance. Harvard has countered with an insulting 2.5 percent annual raise.

*****

The Harvard Corporation is a superstructural institution, where the interests of the corporate-financial oligarchy and the imperialist state are fused. Its members do not manage a “community of scholars.” Rather, they manage an ideological production facility as an extension of their corporate portfolios.

The Democratic Party offers no alternative to Trump’s assault. President Alan Garber and the Harvard administration represent the same layer of the ruling class that, under the Biden administration, initiated the work of criminalizing student dissent by slandering anti-genocide protesters as “antisemites.”

An analysis by the World Socialist Web Site of the members of the Harvard Corporation, the governing body of the Ivy League school, revealed a veritable Who’s Who of America’s corporate-financial oligarchy and military-intelligence establishment. This includes Mariano-Florentino (Tino) Cuéllar, who served in three Democratic administrations at the White House and federal agencies, including as senior director of the National Security Council under President Obama. During this time, Obama directed “Terror Tuesday” drone assassinations, including of US citizens, the bloody regime change operations in Libya and Syria and the 2014 coup in Ukraine that paved the way for the US-NATO proxy war against Russia. 

*****

When Columbia University made a deal with the Trump administration, the Democrats were largely silent. Columbia’s capitulation stood in stark contrast to the views of the vast majority of students and faculty, many of whom had taken courageous action against dictatorship and war, risking their academic careers and personal safety.

The UAW bureaucracy is in a de facto alliance with Trump based on economic nationalism. Despite periodic rhetoric about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and cuts to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other federal funding, voiced by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) members in his PR department, UAW President Shawn Fain has simultaneously collaborated with the Biden and Trump administrations. He has promoted the UAW as a partner in “rebuilding American industry,” including advocating tariff and trade policies that subordinate international worker solidarity to national capitalist interests.

Fain publicly backed Trump’s tariffs and framed the union as a force to defend “American” jobs, going so far as to embrace the idea of the UAW serving wartime production needs. This amounts to endorsing the subordination of labor to state military aims and to corporate profit-making during a crisis, rather than organizing independent worker resistance to war.

The international union has done nothing to defend students. UAW Region 9A, led by Shawn Fain crony and DSA member Brandon Mancilla, ordered the local at Columbia to water down its political demands. When workers refused, the apparatus threatened to place the local under trusteeship. Despite two overwhelming votes to authorize strike action, the UAW has refused to sanction a walkout. 

*****

Will Lehman

Will Lehman, a Mack Trucks worker and socialist and anti-war candidate for UAW president, recently called on all UAW members to back the Harvard strikers, saying, “Your walkout is part of a growing movement of workers and young people in the United States and internationally who are entering into struggle against exploitation, repression and war.”

Harvard graduate students can only take their struggle forward in a rebellion against the UAW apparatus, which functions as the “labor lieutenant” of Harvard Corporation and the corporate and political establishment.

This is underscored by the sabotage by the UAW-aligned Harvard Union of Clerical and Technical Workers (HUCTW) leadership, which has already pushed through a sellout one-year contract featuring a flat $2,300 raise. In one of the world’s most expensive places to live, this amounts to a real-wage cut. The WSWS has called on rank-and-file workers to reject the one-year deal in the vote scheduled for May 12–13 and unite in a common fight with striking graduate students.

The success of the Harvard strike depends on breaking the grip of the UAW bureaucracy and the two capitalist political parties. Graduate workers must seize control of their own struggle through the formation of a rank-and-file committee.

13. US-Israel war on Iran is accelerating climate change

A new analysis published March 21 by the Climate and Community Institute (CCI) has quantified the greenhouse gas emissions produced in the first 14 days of the US-Israel war on Iran, finding that the conflict released more carbon pollution in two weeks than many smaller nations, such as Iceland, emit in an entire year. The findings begin to expose the full environmental cost of the war, a cost whose largest portion has yet to be emitted and will be borne by the international working class.

The analysis covers the period from February 28 to March 14, 2026, and estimates total emissions of approximately 5.1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e) across five categories: the destruction of homes and civilian buildings, the burning of oil stored in bombed refineries and tankers, fuel consumed in combat and support operations, the embodied carbon of destroyed military equipment, and the embodied carbon in missiles and drones used by all parties.

The largest source was not the weapons or the fighter jets and bombers flying from as far as western England, but the destruction of civilian infrastructure. Based on Red Crescent Society of Iran reports that approximately 20,000 civilian units were damaged or destroyed, including 16,191 residential buildings, 3,384 commercial units, 77 medical centers and 69 schools, the researchers estimated 2.4 million tCO2e in embodied emissions that will be released when rubble is cleared and infrastructure rebuilt. 

*****

The second-largest source of emissions was the destruction of oil infrastructure. The US and Israel struck storage facilities in Tehran, Shahran and Aghdasieh, while Iranian drone strikes set fires at facilities in Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Kuwait. Iran also struck at least five oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. The researchers estimated between 2.5 and 5.9 million barrels of oil were destroyed in these strikes, producing approximately 1.9 million tCO2e. Fuel consumed in combat and support operations added another 529,000 tCO2e.

Fuel used during combat was the third largest source of tCO2e, producing 529,000 metric tons. This is followed by war materiel that was destroyed and will be replaced, which will produce another 172,000 tCO2e. And the missiles and drones used across the first two weeks of the conflict used produced another 55,000 tCO2e.

Taken together, the first fourteen days produced emissions equivalent to those of the 84 lowest-emitting countries on Earth combined. At the same rate sustained over a year, the total would approach those of a medium-size fossil-fuel economy such as Kuwait.

The war’s most significant long-term consequence for climate change, however, will be the restructuring of global fossil fuel production that the conflict has already set in motion.

The researchers write that, historically, every major US-driven energy shock has been followed by a surge in new drilling, new LNG terminal construction and new fossil fuel infrastructure, all of which lock in decades of additional emissions. The war on Iran threatens to replicate and accelerate that pattern on a scale not seen since the Gulf War of 1991. 

The opinion piece accompanying the analysis also notes how the Trump administration’s doctrine of “energy dominance” is the political framework within which this war was launched. The researchers write that, “no matter which of the many reasons Trump has since provided for attacking Iran, the US intervention in Iran is now clearly about oil.”

*****

Trump has declared that the financial costs of the war, already estimated at $16.5 billion in its first two weeks, will be borne by the working class through cuts to numerous social programs, including the bedrocks of what remains of America’s social safety net, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

No doubt any remaining investment in climate change will be slashed as well. And even more long-term costs of the fossil fuel infrastructure are being locked in under the banner of “energy security.” 

*****

The war in Iran, like the wars in Ukraine and Gaza before it, makes clear that the climate crisis cannot be separated from capitalism and imperialist militarism. Every global climate summit has floundered on the inability of the capitalist states to subordinate profit to the survival of the Earth’s environment. The US military, one of the largest institutional emitters of greenhouse gases on Earth, and never required to report its emissions to any international body, is now fighting a war that will produce decades of additional fossil fuel dependence.

Effectively addressing the climate crisis is bound up with the broader mobilization of the international working class against the capitalist system and war. Part of this involves the expropriation of the fossil fuel industry, which has masterminded wars and conflicts in the Middle East for more than a century, and the transformation of energy production into a publicly owned and democratically controlled utility as part of the socialist transformation of society.

14. Australia: Labor imposes sweeping disability cuts, forcing hundreds of thousands off essential supports

The federal Labor government has unveiled a savage assault on disabled people as the centerpiece of an austerity budget next month that will slash essential social spending, while increasing funding to the military and boosting corporate profits. 

Speaking at the National Press Club on Wednesday, Health Minister Mark Butler outlined a plan to force at least 160,000 people off the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) over the next four years. Adding to the projected number of people blocked from entering the scheme over that period, the actual figure is over 300,000.

That is the spearhead of a broader gutting of the NDIS, which Butler said will “save” the federal budget $35 billion over the four-year forward estimates. That is the largest single cut to an Australian government program this century, and likely the largest ever. 

*****

This is a program of social misery for some of the most vulnerable members of the population. The 760,000 people on the NDIS depend on it to meet their daily necessities, from personal care and in-home assistance to therapy, mobility aids and support workers that make basic participation in society possible.

The reality, of which the government is fully aware, is that its cuts will claim lives, both directly through the withdrawal of essential supports and indirectly by driving disabled people and their families into impossible situations.

The claims of the Labor government that those kicked off the scheme will be provided with other supports are a lie. There simply are no such supports. When the NDIS was established in 2012, state-based disability programs were largely wound down, and there are no plans for their revival. 

*****

As part of its earlier cuts to the NDIS, the government has already introduced a system of “independent assessors,” effectively tasked with removing people from the scheme or reducing the assistance they receive. Initially targeting those with developmental delays and autism, this framework of the disabled being scrutinized by hostile government bureaucrats will be made universal.

The abolition of a diagnostically based criteria for the scheme is an attack on medicine and science. So too is Labor’s line that they are seeking to remove those with “mild” and “moderate” disabilities.

Those are not medical categories but government spin, aimed at demonizing those with disabilities and inciting popular opinion against them. As many parents of autistic children have noted, a condition that might be waved away by the government as “mild” can require vast amounts of care and assistance.

The brutality of the cuts is indicated by the fact that one of the first programs on the chopping block, for those who are not kicked off all together, is social and community participation. This broad category includes a raft of activities, whereby support workers assist people to leave their homes, attend appointments, take part in work, education, social and cultural life. 

*****

The assault Labor has unveiled is not only a declaration of war on people with disabilities, but on the working class. It proves again that this government is the ruthless instrument of the banks and the corporations, hostile to all of the fundamental interests of working people.

A political struggle must be developed, against the assault on the rights of the disabled and on all social rights. The attack on such a vulnerable cohort underscores the fundamental reality of capitalism, the subordination of all social needs to the profits of the ruling elite, enforced by governments that represent it.

15. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

A video reminder describes Syrotiuk's ongoing plight 

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.

Apr 23, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today:

1. Naming names:  Who are graduate student strikers up against at Harvard University?

The strike by 4,000 graduate student workers that began Tuesday, April 21, is not simply a local contract dispute. It is a fundamental collision between academic workers, who are members of the Harvard Graduate Student Union–United Auto Workers (HGSU-UAW), and a self-selected oligarchy of finance capital that runs and effectively owns Harvard University.

The material reality of the graduate workers is a damning indictment of the capitalist university and its board. Teaching Fellows (TFs), who perform the essential labor of instruction, earn a miserable $18 to $21 per hour. In the hyper-inflated Boston economy, these academic workers are routinely driven to apply for food assistance and visit food pantries.

Standing in obscene contrast is the Harvard Corporation, the steward of a $53.2 billion endowment managed by the Harvard Management Company—a financial behemoth that serves as a clearinghouse for global markets and the military-industrial complex.

The President and Fellows of Harvard College, known as the Harvard Corporation, are the university’s true governing power and its highest fiduciary authority. Far from a benign board of trustees, it functions as a superstructural institution where the interests of the imperialist state and finance capital are fused. Its composition reveals a “Committee of Capital” that manages ideological production as an extension of their corporate portfolios.

2. Trump Justice Department indicts Southern Poverty Law Center in frame-up to aid fascist groups

In a politically motivated frame-up by the Trump administration, aimed at criminalizing the exposure of fascist and white supremacist organizations, the Department of Justice announced Tuesday a criminal indictment targeting the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The SPLC has waged legal and political battles to expose criminal actions by fascist groups, beginning with the Ku Klux Klan during the civil rights era.

The charges, announced by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel, turn the SPLC’s use of informants inside violent far-right groups into a supposed fraud against donors, under conditions in which the Trump administration itself is packed with fascist operatives and is seeking to rehabilitate the very forces the SPLC has exposed for decades. 

*****

The cynical character of the prosecution was underscored by the statements of Blanche and Patel themselves. Announcing the indictment, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche accused the SPLC of “manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred.” Patel claimed the organization used donor money to “actually pay the leadership of these supposed violent extremist groups.” The indictment alleges more than $3 million in payments between 2014 and 2023 to eight individuals tied to groups, including the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazi organizations. 

But Blanche’s own answer to a reporter exposed the falsity of his claim. When asked about the government’s legal theory, and specifically whether the indictment alleged that these payments benefited the organizations themselves, Blanche admitted that it did not. “To the extent that there’s any link between that individual receiving the money and benefits to that organization, that’s not in the indictment,” he said.

In other words, the administration’s headline accusation, that the SPLC was effectively funding fascist organizations, is not what the indictment actually says. The government’s theory is narrower and more cynical: not that it is illegal to pay informants but that the SPLC did not spell out to donors and banks exactly how its informant network functioned.

This is a fraud case built on innuendo. The administration tells the public that the SPLC was funding neo-Nazi and Klan organizations, while its own acting attorney general admits the indictment does not allege that the money benefited those organizations as such. The real issue for the government is that the SPLC maintained informants inside fascist groups and concealed their identities and payment channels, precisely the sort of method routinely used by the FBI and other state agencies.

*****

While the Trump crime family gorges itself on bribes, it seeks to criminalize those who expose the fascist activities of their close political supporters, including the fascist groups that spearheaded the assault on Capitol Hill on January 6, 2021.

The indictment dovetails with the broader “Stop the Steal” mythology promoted by Trump, Alex Jones and other far-right figures, who claim that the presence of informants at right-wing events proves that these movements were manufactured by the FBI, “Antifa,” the Democratic Party, the SPLC or other supposed enemies. This is an inversion of reality.

The presence of informants in organizations, such as the Oath Keepers, before January 6 did not prove that the coup was a set-up. It demonstrated that the state had warnings about the scale of the violence, and that powerful elements within the police, military and intelligence apparatus refused to act because they were sympathetic to Trump’s effort to overturn the election. 

*****

The SPLC was founded in 1971 by Morris Dees, Joseph J. Levin Jr. and Julian Bond, at a time when the late stages of the civil rights movement were still marked by Klan terror, church bombings and murders that had gone unanswered or unpunished by the state. The organization became known for litigation that bankrupted or disrupted fascist and white supremacist groups, including the United Klans of America in the 1980s and the White Aryan Resistance in the early 1990s. That history is what the Trump administration is seeking to reverse. Its message is that exposing fascists is itself criminal, while racist thugs and murderers are to be recast as victims. 

*****

The most sinister element of the indictment is its implicit claim that fascist groups were not the organic product of American capitalism, racism, militarism and the decay of bourgeois democracy but were somehow “manufactured” by liberal organizations that monitored them. This is the same conspiracy theory used to explain away January 6. It seeks to whitewash the growth of fascism by claiming that those who documented, infiltrated or exposed fascist organizations were responsible for creating them.

Under conditions in which the president openly threatens to “wipe out” whole countries, neo-Nazis and Christian nationalists direct state policy, and the police and military apparatus is being mobilized against immigrants, protesters and workers, the prosecution of the SPLC marks a further stage in the destruction of democratic rights. The target is not merely one organization. The indictment is a warning to every journalist, civil rights group, researcher and political opponent of the Trump administration: Exposing fascism will be treated as a crime, while the fascists themselves are rehabilitated as victims. 

3. United States:  Oppose the attempt to silence freedom of speech at Carroll Community College!

The International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE) at Carroll Community College (CCC) denounces the college’s recently instituted policy restricting students’ and faculty members’ freedom of expression by placing bureaucratic control over the voicing of political perspectives on campus. As the youth organization of the Socialist Equality Party in the United States, we also strongly denounce CCC’s effort to bar our supporters from its campus on unconstitutional grounds.

This policy and others like it represent a violation of free speech against an entire generation politicized by a world historic crisis. Youth have witnessed in real time the genocide of the Palestinian people backed by American weaponry; ICE agents terrorizing cities and abducting immigrants without due process; and a fascist president, Donald Trump, with open aspirations to dictatorship. Now an unprovoked war on Iran, launched in flagrant violation of international and domestic law, is devastating civilian populations.

As the American ruling class prepares the next phase of war on Iran and confrontation with Russia and China, the foundation is being laid for the reimposition of the draft—clearing the way for bloodshed unseen in generations. 

*****

CCC’s policy is not an isolated incident. A wave of anti-democratic restrictions has swept colleges in the wake of mass student opposition to the Gaza genocide. The University of Maryland enacted a similar policy following historic campus protests. In 2024, the Northern Virginia home of two students in the George Mason University chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine was raided by the FBI, the club was banned for a year, and the students were effectively expelled.

Across the United States and internationally, administrations have moved to suppress free speech on campus, hiding behind distorted claims of “disruption,” unfounded allegations of “antisemitism” leveled at anti-genocide protesters, and other pretexts.

These developments cannot be separated from the Trump administration’s accelerating drive toward dictatorship. Having already established the precedent of slashing federal funding to universities that resist its directives, the administration cut grants, froze funds, and imposed punitive measures in 2025 to force compliance with its “national priorities.”

Carroll Community College depends on state and federal funding, as well as investment from local wealthy donors, to operate. Its administration understands that permitting genuine free speech on campus—speech that challenges the existing order—could have financial consequences.

The “Freedom of Expression and Public Assembly” policy is the result: a mechanism granting CCC administrators final authority over what political views may be expressed on campus, dressed up as a measure to protect student safety and institutional operations. It does not protect students or workers. It protects the class of billionaire criminals ruling society, increasingly opposed by students and workers.

4. Growing number of potential flashpoints in global financial system

Stablecoins are a form of crypto currency which supposedly provide greater stability because they are tied to an asset, generally the US dollar. The use of stablecoins has been boosted with their promotion by the Trump administration, which last year saw passage of the so-called Genius Act giving them an official stamp of approval by setting up regulations for their use.

But according to the BIS chief the growing use of stablecoins “opens up new avenues for tax evasion.” There are estimates, he said, that stablecoins now account for most illicit transactions within the crypto system.

On their broader implications for the monetary system, he noted: “If widely adopted in their current form, stablecoins would pose policy challenges in several key areas, ranging from credit provision to monetary policy.”

*****

The issue of the role of stablecoins and their potential to cause financial disturbances is part of a broader discussion in financial circles about what could trigger the next global financial crisis. 

In the question-and-answer session during a Harvard economics class on March 30, US Fed chair Jerome Powell was asked precisely this question. His answer focused not on immediate subjects of concern, such as the role of private credit, the possibility that the massive investments in AI are a bubble which will burst or immediate problems of liquidity in credit markets, but on the longer-term stability of the US reflected in the inexorable rise in its debt.

“It will not end well if we don’t do something fairly soon,” he said.

According to Powell, the present level of debt of $39 trillion, having risen from around $9 trillion in 2007 on the eve of the global financial crisis, was sustainable but the rate of increase was not.

*****

Others share Powell’s views on the rise of US debt which is threatening the status of the US dollar and Treasury bonds as the safe haven for the global financial system. 

*****

The war against Iran has increased interest rates at the longer end of the market and that is set to continue as the Trump administration plans to increase military spending by 50 percent to $1.5 trillion in 2027.

“We are seeing Treasury yields going up again,” Metrick said. “It is clear that we can’t keep borrowing like there is no tomorrow. At some point the market will say that is enough.” 

*****

In his Harvard remarks, Powell downplayed immediate risks, including from the private credit market, which has been the subject of concern of late, saying he was “relatively relaxed” about it because the risk “we know about is something we are already trying to do something about.”

Others, however, are not so sanguine. S&P Global Ratings issued a report earlier this month in which it warned that the exposure of major banks to hedge funds and trading firms with high levels of debt was creating dangers.

The banks’ exposure to hedge fund and trading firms runs into the trillions of dollars, the S&P report noted.

Prime brokerage borrowing, which involves lending by banks to institutional clients, mostly hedge funds to facilitate their leverage and provide the money for their activities in financial markets went over $2.5 trillion in 2024, doubling in the past four years, it said.

One of the areas of greatest activity is the so-called basis trade used by hedge funds to exploit the difference between the price of Treasury bonds and their associated futures contracts. But because the difference is so small, very large amounts of loans from banks are needed to make a large profit.

According to the S&P report: “The surge of this strategy increases second-order risks across the industry. In the event of market volatility or counterparty failure, banks’ prime brokerage and securities financing desks could face substantial risks if these leveraged positions unwind rapidly.”

And the longer the war on Iran continues, the greater the likelihood of increased volatility.

A recent letter to G20 finance ministers and central bankers from Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey in his capacity as the chairman of the Financial Stability Board, a global watchdog, noted that while the war had delivered a “substantial shock” to the global economy, the financial system, so far, had absorbed it.

But the letter went on to warn of vulnerabilities including: “stretched asset valuations; the build-up in the non-bank sector of high and increasingly concentrated leverage; and liquidity mismatches [the use of short-term money to finance long-term illiquid assets], opacity and growing complexity in certain markets, notably private credit.”

It said there was “an increased likelihood that multiple vulnerabilities could crystallize at the same time, thereby amplifying the threat to financial stability and the provision of critical financial services.” 

5. “This is gaslighting. A deception”: Los Angeles school workers denounce union-backed sellout contracts

Educators, classified staff and parents across the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) are speaking out against the tentative agreements between the district and three unions. These deals were used to call off what would have been the first unified strike of 77,000 LAUSD employees and are being imposed in direct opposition to the will of rank-and-file workers.

Voting is ongoing for members of United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) and the Associated Administrators of Los Angeles (AALA); Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 99 has yet to schedule its vote.

The World Socialist Web Site (WSWS) is urging workers to reject all three contracts, which impose stagnant wages and pave the way for huge budget cuts. In an analysis published Wednesday, it urged educators “to take the initiative into their own hands by forming a network of rank-and-file committees unifying schools across the city, to prepare independent action to enforce the overwhelming democratic mandate for a strike.

“A new bargaining team, consisting solely of working educators must be formed to fight for what the district’s employees and students urgently need, not what the corporate elite who control the district claim they can afford,” the WSWS concluded. 

*****

“The union gave in,” said one worker on SEIU’s social media. “They should have walked out at 11:59 pm if their demands weren’t met.” Another popular comment declared, “You unions did a TERRIBLE JOB in bargaining. Between not walking out by midnight and settling for so much less when we had so much power—I hope members stand up and vote no.”

The behavior of the unions flows from their material interests. the bureaucracy functions as a labor-management police force, tied to the district, the Democratic Party and the financial interests behind austerity. 

*****

The World Socialist Web Site urges all educators and school workers to vote “no” on these agreements and to take the initiative into their own hands by forming rank-and-file committees at every school—independent of the union bureaucracy and the Democratic Party.

These committees must link up with the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC) to prepare a genuine, unified strike action that 77,000 workers voted for and to mount a broader political struggle to secure fully funded public education and a living wage for all school workers.

6. Australia:  Two workers killed on the job in Brisbane in three days

Last Friday and Monday, two workers were killed on job sites in Brisbane, the Queensland state capital, taking the city’s known total workplace fatalities to five in six months. These terrible deaths point to a rising toll due to unsafe conditions and increased rates of exploitation in Australia and internationally.

Only scant details have been released by the official work safety authorities, but hundreds of people have used social media platforms to send messages of support and condolences, reflecting the concern in working-class households. 

*****

Official investigations invariably take many months or years and cover over the driving forces of dangerous working conditions under capitalism—the systemic subordination of workers’ health and lives to the interests of corporate profit, including through speed-up, subcontracting and casualization. 

*****

Data from Safe Work Australia indicates that by April 9, 30 workers had died nationally in 2026, following 180 deaths in 2025. According to the latest available breakdown of the statistics, in 2024, machinery operators and drivers recorded the highest number of fatalities (61 workers, or 32 percent of all deaths) and the highest fatality rate at 6.7 deaths per 100,000 workers.

Laborers faced the second-highest risk, with a fatality rate of 4.0 per 100,000 workers and 50 deaths in 2024. The industries with the highest number of fatalities were transport, postal and warehousing (54 fatalities or 29 percent), agriculture, forestry and fishing (44 fatalities or 23 percent) and construction (37 fatalities or 20 percent).

No improvement has occurred despite industrial manslaughter becoming a criminal offence in every Australian state and territory as of late 2024. These laws are meant to punish “gross negligence” or “reckless conduct” by employers that leads to a worker’s death.

As of April 2026, there have been only six successful industrial manslaughter convictions across Australia since these laws began appearing in 2017, despite hundreds of workplace deaths being reported each year. These figures also understate the true toll because chronic occupational illnesses and unreported incidents are often excluded from official counts.

Hundreds of prosecutions have occurred for breaches of safety rules, but even companies that are convicted usually escape with token fines, amounting to a tiny fraction of their profits. 

*****

Around the world, the building of rank-and-file committees in opposition to trade union collaboration with management is essential in the fight to assert workers’ control over safety and production. Under the democratic control of workers, these committees could assess site conditions, investigate deaths and injuries, formulate demands and enforce safety measures, including through strike action. 

7. Florida’s assembly line of death:  The execution of Chadwick Willacy and the political machinery behind America’s killing season

On Tuesday, April 21, at 6:15 p.m., the state of Florida pronounced Chadwick Willacy dead at Florida State Prison near Starke. He was 58 years old and had spent more than three decades on death row for the 1990 murder of his neighbor, Marlys Sather. He was the eighth person executed this year in the US and the fifth in Florida, the latest casualty of an accelerating machinery of death overseen by Governor Ron DeSantis.

Willacy maintained his innocence to the end. In his final statement, he said simply, “I would never kill my friend.” He urged his “brothers on the row” to stay strong, apologized to his family and asked for forgiveness. Whatever the full truth of the events of 1990, the state’s certainty that it was executing the right man—based on evidence now more than three decades old—was not and could never be absolute.  

It would be a mistake to understand the current wave of executions in Florida as the product of one governor’s personal convictions. Since taking office, DeSantis has signed death warrants at a pace unmatched by any Florida governor in the modern era, presiding over what death penalty opponents have called the deadliest stretch of state-sanctioned killing in the state’s recent history.

The men executed in Florida share characteristics that are not coincidental: poverty, childhood trauma, intellectual disability, inadequate legal representation at trial. Court records in Willacy’s case note that his father admitted physically abusing him, with beatings beginning in early childhood, and that later mitigation evidence described a background involving abuse and drug problems. 

*****

Willacy’s death is the eighth execution carried out in the US this year, and Florida accounts for five of them. Each of those deaths involved serious unresolved questions of fairness, mental capacity or the reliability of decades-old evidence. Taken together, they reveal a system in which the formal legal machinery of appeal and constitutional protection has been steadily subordinated to the political imperative of maintaining a relentless pace of executions. 

*****

There is a bitter irony at the center of Florida’s position as the nation’s leading executing state: it is also the state with the highest number of death row exonerations. Since 1973, more than 30 people have been freed from Florida’s death row after being wrongfully convicted. The men exonerated were not freed because the system worked but usually due to the work of determined advocates, DNA evidence unavailable at trial or witnesses who recanted. The question that flows from this is: how many people has Florida already executed who did not commit the crimes for which they were condemned?

DeSantis and the state’s political establishment have chosen to answer that question with more executions, not fewer.

The men on Florida’s death row are, with vanishingly rare exceptions, poor. The overwhelming majority were represented at trial by underfunded public defenders carrying impossible caseloads. Many had the misfortune of being tried in jurisdictions where the quality of appointed counsel was determined more by courthouse politics than legal competence. Many, like Melvin Trotter and Billy Kearse, suffered from intellectual disabilities or severe mental illness that should have made them categorically ineligible for execution—but whose conditions were never adequately documented or litigated at trial.

Study after study has demonstrated that the single most reliable predictor of a death sentence in the United States is not the severity of the crime but the race of the victim. Killing a white victim dramatically increases the likelihood of a death sentence. While this is among the most extensively documented empirical findings in the social science literature on criminal justice, it has had essentially no effect on the administration of the death penalty. 

*****

The exonerations, the botched executions, the racial disparities, the executions of the intellectually disabled and the severely mentally ill are not aberrations from a sound system. They are what the system produces when operating as designed. The communities that bear the weight of violent crime are the same communities that bear the weight of mass incarceration and the social conditions that generate violence in the first place. The death penalty does not make them safer, nor does it address any of those underlying conditions. It is a costly performance of state authority, carried out in the name of those communities and against their interests.

8. The US witch-hunt against Chinese scientists and the death of Danhao Wang

Danhao Wang’s death is the direct consequence of a systematic government- and university-sponsored political operation targeting young Chinese researchers. This xenophobic purge, deeply intertwined with the capitalist military-industrial complex, is part of the broader attack on the democratic rights of all immigrants, students and working people. 

*****

Wang stood at the vanguard of semiconductor physics. Working within the laboratory of Professor Zetian Mi, Wang focused his research on a new class of materials known as wurtzite ferroelectric nitrides. Wang had authored over a hundred articles, including a landmark April 2025 paper published in the journal Nature under the title “Electric-Field-Induced Domain Walls in Wurtzite Ferroelectrics.” Wang’s findings essentially mapped the theoretical and physical blueprint for a new generation of transistors capable of vastly outperforming the existing radar technologies currently used by the military.

Additionally, because wurtzite ferroelectric nitride-based semiconductors can integrate both memory storage and logic processing within the same physical material, Wang’s research provides the potential physical substrate for “edge AI” computing. This would enable AI processing to occur directly on local, physically disconnected devices, such as autonomous combat drones, missile interceptors, or isolated battlefield sensors, without ever requiring connectivity to cloud networks.

While Wang’s research has military applications under the control of the Pentagon, the technology itself has vast potential to benefit society. Like artificial intelligence, its impact on humanity depends entirely on which social class is wielding it. Under capitalism, this genius is hijacked to build the machinery of death. Under the democratic control of the working class, these breakthroughs in efficiency and computing power could be used to improve the conditions of society as a whole, optimizing global logistics, revolutionizing medical technology, and laying the infrastructural groundwork for the elimination of scarcity. 

*****

The University of Michigan administration, led by President Domenico Grasso, views the lives of its foreign-born researchers as expendable in the pursuit of federal funding and political alignment with the Trump administration. On March 26, one week after Wang’s death, Grasso testified before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce at a hearing titled “US Universities Under Siege: Foreign Espionage, Stolen Innovation, and the National Security Threat.” Grasso pledged his administration’s total subservience to the state apparatus.

He said:

As an engineer and an army veteran, who currently holds a top secret security clearance, I’m deeply committed to protecting our nation’s security. … This commitment is illustrated by our decision to end a relationship with a university in China that is seen as a potential threat to America’s interests. We made this decision after discussion with this committee and the House Select Committee on the CCP (Chinese Communist Party).

He boasted of terminating the visas of the five Chinese researchers, telling the committee:

In isolated but serious incidents, a small number of university students and researchers from China have been arrested for unlawful activities… Once alerted, we acted swiftly and decisively—working with federal law enforcement, promptly terminating student and work visas, and severing all ties with those individuals.

By doing so, the administration stripped its researchers of all institutional protection and triggered the legal ICE traps that facilitated their prolonged incarcerations and deportations. 

*****

The University of Michigan’s institutional complicity is rooted in the financial structure of US academia, which has become heavily dependent on federal research funding from the defense and intelligence sectors. The university is a highly integrated beneficiary of the capitalist military-industrial complex, securing $100 million in direct research support from the Department of Defense for 2025 alone, an increase from $85 million the previous year.

This funding supports critical defense projects, including the development of heat-tolerant silicon carbide semiconductors for military aircraft, the engineering of autonomous off-road vehicles designed for combat zones, and the creation of imaging technology for the detection of nuclear materials. To protect this revenue stream and maintain its institutional standing in a national climate dominated by imperialist war-mongering, the university administration facilitated the purge of its own researchers, acting as accomplices to the FBI and CBP.

The militarization of universities is codified by bipartisan legislative efforts designed to build a fortress around American technological research. At the congressional hearing on March 26 where President Grasso testified, Republican Representative Michael Baumgartner promoted the “Defending Education Transparency and Ending Rogue Regimes Engaging in Nefarious Transactions Act,” known as the DETERRENT Act. This legislation is designed to increase reporting requirements for universities, using the threat of massive fines and the loss of funding to force academic institutions to police their own faculty and international students.

At the same hearing, Representative Haley Stevens, a Michigan Democrat, promoted legislation to expand the definition of partnerships with “malign foreign talent programs.” This bill, which was passed in the House, exposes an even broader swath of immigrant researchers to federal scrutiny for engaging in what was previously considered entirely routine academic exchange, shared data analysis, or even co-authorship of scientific papers with foreign nationals.

The Democratic Party is completely complicit in this McCarthyite witch-hunt. The war in Iran and the witch-hunt against Chinese researchers are interconnected aspects of a single imperialist strategy, based on the need to control the energy corridors and resources needed by China. 

Furthermore, we must understand this assault on international researchers within the context of a general attack by the ruling oligarchy on science itself. The criminalization of basic biological research, treating harmless plasmids and roundworms as threats, is part of the same phenomenon driving the assault on medical science and public health. We see it in the elevation of figures like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and the relentless, government-backed promotion of religious obscurantism and anti-vaccine and COVID lab leak conspiracy theories.

Growing sections of the capitalist ruling class are deeply hostile to scientific truth because rational, scientific inquiry exposes the irrationality, profound inequality, and inherent destructiveness of the profit system. They seek to subordinate all scientific endeavor strictly to the needs of militarism, while drowning the broader population in ignorance and backwardness to prevent a unified, scientifically literate challenge to their rule.

*****

It must be emphasized that appeals to university administrations or to the political establishment, including the Democratic Party, are futile. In every case discussed today, these institutional actors have functioned as willing conduits for state repression. The American state apparatus, fully backed by the corporate press and the institutional defenders of the status quo, has mobilized its legalistic and administrative instruments to bypass democratic constraints. The defense of persecuted researchers, the preservation of academic freedom, and the prevention of a catastrophic global conflict require a fundamental, irrevocable break from these capitalist entities.

The survival of rational, cross-border scientific cooperation depends upon the independent, coordinated political organization of the global working class. The ultra-efficient microelectronics made possible by Danhao Wang’s theoretical breakthroughs must be physically manufactured, etched, and assembled. This process rests entirely on the exploitation of a globally interconnected industrial working class. The workers in the massive semiconductor fabrication plants around the world, at TSMC in Taiwan, at Samsung and SK Hynix in South Korea, at Intel and GlobalFoundries in the United States and at SMIC in China, are the ones who turn theoretical physics into material reality.

This dire situation demands the immediate formation of independent rank-and-file committees across university campuses and within the semiconductor fabrication plants. These committees must operate independently of the pro-imperialist corporate-controlled trade union bureaucracy, university administrations, and the capitalist political parties. We must work to unite the theorists and researchers who design microelectronics with the technicians, logistics workers, and assemblers who physically manufacture them, establishing lines of communication across national borders.

 *****

Therefore, the immediate task is the formation of an independent commission of inquiry, organized and led by rank-and-file researchers, students, staff and faculty, operating entirely outside the control of the university administration and the capitalist state. This democratically controlled committee must demand the unredacted public release of all communications between the university and federal intelligence agencies. It must expose the precise nature of the harassment Dr. Wang endured, and hold fully accountable every official who sacrificed the lives and democratic rights of international scholars on the altar of the imperialist war drive. We must remove ICE from campuses, oppose all collaboration between academic administrations and federal security agencies, and fight for the full restoration of visas and academic positions to those persecuted by the state.

This meeting is a direct appeal to all workers and students, especially the international scientists and students targeted by this campaign. It is a call to understand the revolutionary tasks that stand before us. The central issue of our time is to mobilize the working class and young people, both immigrant and native-born, in a unified political struggle against capitalism, and for workers’ power and socialism. Through sustained international solidarity, armed with a scientific understanding of political economy, the working class can halt the imperialist war drive. Only the socialist transformation of society can ensure that the genius of researchers like Danhao Wang serves the flourishing of all humanity, rather than its destruction. 

9. US imperialism’s war on Iran unleashes global economic and social catastrophe for the working class

 

American imperialism’s determination to consolidate its dominance over the Middle East, one of the world’s most critical energy-producing regions, has already claimed the lives of thousands of Iranians in six weeks of brutal and indiscriminate bombardment. But the economic fallout from the US-instigated war and blockade of the Strait of Hormuz could prove even more deadly. 

*****

The United Nations Development Program estimated in a recent report that the war on Iran could cost 36 countries in the Asia-Pacific nearly $300 billion and plunge up to 8.8 million people into poverty. Five million of these people live in Iran, where the human development index has already lost 1–1.5 years due to the war.

The New York Times worried in a lengthy analysis published April 20 that countries throughout the Asia-Pacific may face “shortages [that] could push several countries into convulsions of unrest, followed by recession,” if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked for just a few more weeks. Even high-end production, including of semiconductors essential for producing chips built in Taiwan, faces problems. Prior to the war, Qatar produced a third of the world’s helium, a critical component of the semiconductor production process. But it stopped production on March 2 after an Iranian retaliatory attack hit its gas facilities. As the Times put it, cuts to chip production “would roll through everything from electronics to cars.” 

*****

Many African countries depend on imported fertilizers. The surge in natural gas prices has driven up costs for farmers, threatening lower crop yields and outright famine in areas where subsistence farming prevails. At the same time, currency depreciation in several countries is amplifying the impact of global price increases, making imports even more expensive, eroding real wages and pushing up already crippling debt repayment costs for financially strapped governments.

In Europe and North America, fuel prices have also risen sharply, placing yet another burden on working people’s budgets amid stagnant economic growth, mass layoffs and social attacks by the ruling elites in every country to pay for bloated military budgets and the enrichment of the financial oligarchy. In Germany, national airline Lufthansa announced the immediate closure of its CityLine subsidiary amid a strike by thousands of airline workers for job security and pay increases. The continent’s governments are investing trillions of euros in their own war machines to prosecute their predatory imperialist interests at the expense of workers’ livelihoods and social programs.

Across the Atlantic, the Wall Street Journal has announced the era of the “mega layoff,” with job cuts in finance, technology, entertainment and manufacturing.

By contrast, the war is proving to be a bonanza for the corporations and financial oligarchy. According to one investigation, the world’s major oil conglomerates will pull in additional profits of over $230 billion in 2026 alone.

The World Socialist Web Site has insisted that US imperialism’s war on Iran is one front in the early stages of a third world war, which includes the US/NATO war on Russia in Ukraine and preparations for a military conflagration with China. As the imperialist powers in North America and Europe scramble for the upper hand in the redivision of the world, they are totally indifferent to the impact on billions of workers from the global economic and social disaster produced by crisis-ridden capitalism and their crazed policies. But this very disaster creates the material conditions for the development of a working class movement to end the war and the capitalist profit system which is its root cause.

*****

Today, the world economy is integrated to such a degree that initial expressions of social unrest provoked by the war have already erupted in its first weeks. Beginning on April 10, tens of thousands of industrial workers in India’s national capital region launched strikes and protests against price hikes triggered by the war. Workers demanded wage increases to cover higher rents, fuel costs, and food prices. Protests have also erupted in countries as diverse as the Philippines and Ireland.

Now, as in 1917, the decisive tasks are the fight to develop a conscious, unified movement of the international working class and build a mass revolutionary party capable of leading the struggle for workers’ political power.

The global nature of the crisis demands an international response, transcending national divisions and opposing militarism. Workers in Iran, the United States, Europe, Asia and Africa share a common interest in ending the war and the bankrupt capitalist order that gave rise to it. This requires the independent political mobilization of the working class on a socialist program to place the commanding heights of the economy under democratic workers’ control, ensuring that production is organized to meet human needs rather than private profit.

Under these conditions, the upcoming International May Day Online Rally 2026 assumes critical importance. It will articulate the revolutionary socialist program and perspective workers around the world require to fight imperialist war and its barbaric consequences. Register today to participate, and encourage your work colleagues and friends to do the same. 

10. US ramps up boat strikes in Latin American waters amid mounting proof that victims are fishermen

Ecuadorian fishermen aboard the vessel Don Maca have testified that they were subjected on March 26 to what they describe as a “double tap” strike by a US drone and then detained, handcuffed, hooded and held at gunpoint by soldiers aboard a US-flagged patrol vessel.

This campaign of extrajudicial killings has gone largely unreported in the US media, even as it has expanded dramatically in recent months. Not a single major US corporate media outlet has recounted the testimony of the fishermen who survived US strikes. 

*****

The fishermen report being held aboard a US vessel before being transferred to a Salvadoran patrol boat. They were taken to El Salvador after several days at sea, interrogated at a military base, and eventually handed over to immigration authorities. During this time, their families conducted a desperate search for the missing men. 

*****

The Don Maca incident is not isolated. Lawyers are investigating the disappearance of another Ecuadorian vessel, the Fiorella, missing for three months with eight crew members onboard. Survivors and relatives across the region have repeatedly testified that those targeted had no connection to drug trafficking.

Earlier this month, Hernán Flores, captain of the Negra Francisca Duarte II, described a nearly identical attack on March 17 near the Galápagos. A US drone bombed and sank his vessel, forcing the 16 crew members to jump from the burning ship and survive for eight days in lifeboats.

Several fishermen suffered severe injuries. The crew managed to stay afloat and used small boats to escape the flames. After reaching safety, they approached a nearby vessel for help, only to be met with hostility by US soldiers. They were eventually found a week later adrift by a Salvadoran ship.

Jorge Chiriboga, a lawyer representing some of the fishermen told the Ecuadorian news site Primicias, “This is an act of terror against fishermen in the exclusive economic zone of the Ecuadorian state; therefore, it is Ecuador, the state, the government that has to protect the interests of Ecuadorian citizens.”

The right-wing regime of President Daniel Noboa, heir to a billion-dollar banana fortune who holds US citizenship, has shown no interest whatsoever in defending the interests of the fishermen, handing the Pentagon the “right” to murder as many Ecuadorians as it pleases. Government officials have insinuated, without any evidence whatsoever, that the fishermen may have been involved in illicit activity. The United Nations office on forced disappearances, meanwhile, has felt compelled to demand that the government pursue the case of the eight missing crew members of the Fiorella.

In a February 2026 State of the Union address, Donald Trump jokingly remarked that US operations had been so aggressive that “nobody wants to go fishing anymore”—a remark that, in light of these testimonies, takes on a chilling literal meaning. Trump has often repeated his “joke” with apparent sadistic glee over the slaughter of innocent workers. 

Since the launch of what has been dubbed Operation Southern Spear in September, the US military has carried out at least 53 recorded strikes, killing no fewer than 181 civilians aboard fishing vessels.

Official press releases by the US Southern Command outline a relentless escalation. Between April 11 and April 19 alone, five lethal strikes took place in the Eastern Pacific. In each case, the justification rests solely on claims that vessels were traveling along “known trafficking routes.”

No verifiable evidence has been provided to substantiate these assertions.

*****

In the Caribbean, naval deployments continue, alongside intensified reconnaissance drone flights near Cuba, amid preparations for potential military operations for regime change.

The connection between these developments is unmistakable. Under the banner of combating drug trafficking, the United States is asserting military dominance over the hemisphere, treating it as its exclusive sphere of influence while countering China’s increasing investment and trade ties to the region.

The doctrine underpinning this strategy—referred to as “Greater North America” by Hegseth—bears a chilling resemblance to the expansionist ideology of Nazis’ “Greater Germany.” Like its historical predecessor, it combines territorial ambition with the systematic dehumanization of targeted populations.

The methods employed are equally revealing. The extrajudicial killing of fishermen through drone strikes—based on unverified intelligence and without due process—serves to normalize the assertion that the US state has the right to kill anyone, anywhere in the hemisphere, on the basis of mere suspicion, including in the US itself.

No confidence can be placed in any faction of the US political establishment to halt these crimes. House Democrats have filed articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth, including charges related to unauthorized war-making in Iran and the deadly strikes on suspected drug smuggling boats.

However, this effort is a sham. With Republicans controlling Congress, the impeachment has virtually no chance of success and serves primarily as a political gesture. At the same time, the Democratic Party has consistently voted to fund the very military operations it now nominally criticizes, underscoring its complicity in the ongoing bloodshed.

Nor can any reliance be placed on the so-called “left” nationalist governments in Latin America. In October, Colombian President Gustavo Petro and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum denounced the strikes as illegal. “When a missile is used against a boat with unarmed people, what is committed is an extrajudicial execution,” Petro declared.

Yet following the January 3 abduction of Maduro and the subsequent escalation of US aggression, these criticisms have given way to silence. Neither Petro nor Sheinbaum—nor Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva—raised any opposition to the ongoing killings during the so-called Progressive summit in Barcelona this weekend. 

*****

What is unfolding in the waters of the Eastern Pacific and Caribbean is not a “war on drugs,” but a campaign of terror against workers. The evidence makes clear that the bloodiest and most shameless mass murderers and criminals are not hidden in remote jungles or at sea—they are seated in positions of power in Washington D.C., directing a campaign that treats human life as expendable in the pursuit of US hegemony.

11. Bulgaria’s parliamentary election returns Radev’s Progressive Bulgaria with an absolute majority

Parliamentary elections in Bulgaria held on April 19 returned former President Rumen Radev’s Progressive Bulgaria (PB) as the clear victor, with almost 44 percent (43.91 percent) of the vote. PB will hold 130 seats in the 240-seat National Assembly. Progressive Bulgaria was established in March as a coalition of three smaller existing parties, described as being on the “left” wing of the political establishment, specifically as a vehicle for Radev’s electoral project. It only formally became a unified political party on April 17. Radev resigned the presidency in January, one year before the end of his term, in order to run in the elections.

This result gives Progressive Bulgaria an absolute majority and will allow Radev to form a government without the need for an alliance.

The snap elections come after the coalition government of GERB and the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) resigned in the wake of mass protests in December against its proposed 2026 state budget. The draft budget was supposed to be the country’s first budget in euros, with Bulgaria joining the eurozone on January 1, 2026. The budget entailed a massive expansion of the security apparatus and a record debt ceiling fueled by military credits.

*****

The vote, with a turnout of 50.2 percent, relatively high for Bulgaria, represents above all a broad rejection of the traditional political establishment. GERB had been the leading political party in the country since 2009, while the BSP has been left outside parliament for the first time since the restoration of capitalism. 

Radev is being described in Western media as “pro-Russian” because of his verbal misgivings about the war against Russia in Ukraine. His election-night declaration that he hoped for “practical relations with Russia, based on mutual respect and equal treatment” has reinforced his portrayal as President Vladimir Putin’s next “Trojan horse,” after Hungary’s former president Viktor Orbán and Slovakia’s Prime Minister Robert Fico.

Radev has himself cultivated an ambivalent attitude toward the war in order to appeal to widespread anti-war sentiment in Bulgarian society. His campaign projected the image of a moderate figure, opposed to the worst excesses of EU-imposed austerity and war preparations.

*****

That Radev was able to benefit from widespread discontent is due in no small part to the active or tacit support of many figures from the collapsing BSP and the pseudo-left formations that traditionally gravitated around it.  

*****

The character of the next administration can be glimpsed from Radev’s political past and his presidential terms.

A high-ranking military aviation officer, Radev completed extensive training courses in the United States as part of a generation of officers orienting the Bulgarian military toward US imperialism. His political rise in 2016 was tied to the post-Stalinist BSP and its increasing adoption of extreme right-wing positions. In a process that took place throughout Europe, Radev and the BSP normalized and elevated the fascistic anti-refugee positions of street groups such as Ataka.

In a period of intensifying international crisis, Radev emerged as an important political anchor for the Bulgarian ruling class.

*****

In his election victory declaration, Radev stated, “We have defeated apathy” and that “This is only the first step toward restoring trust and the social contract.” He is, however, fundamentally incapable of and unwilling to resolve any of the issues that have provoked mass protests in recent years.  

*****

Neither the advanced war preparations, nor the attacks on living standards that accompany them, nor even the “state capture” by the oligarchs are uniquely Bulgarian phenomena. Workers and youth will soon confront a Radev administration determined to defend the interests of the imperialist powers and the Bulgarian ruling class. The way forward lies through the international class struggle and the founding of a Bulgarian section of the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI). 

12. Ricky and Mad Bills to Pay (or Destiny, dile que no soy malo): “Society is also something real...”

Coincidentally, two films we discussed last year after viewing them at the San Francisco Film festival online are opening this month in theaters in the US: Ricky (directed by Rashad Frett) and Mad Bills to Pay (or Destiny, dile que no soy malo), from Joel Alfonso Vargas. 

The two films present some of the same problems, some of the same problems that a good number of American (and not simply American) “small,” “realist” dramas exhibit.

They contain truthful moments and sequences, but on the whole they sidestep vital social contradictions and accept too much of the world as immediately given.

*****

As we have argued before,

Realism about life in any meaningful sense surely involves more than simply turning on a camera. Passivity and the inability or unwillingness to criticize or render serious judgment have all too often been passed off in recent decades as evenhandedness and “lack of bias.” To look at the world with an artist’s eyes and draw no important conclusions has nothing in common with genuine objectivity.

“Since real people live on earth and in society,” the 19th century Russian critic Belinsky noted, “and not in the air, not in the clouds, where only phantoms live, the writers of our day are naturally portraying society as well as people. Society is also something real, and not imaginary, therefore its essence is made up not only of costumes and hairstyles, but also of customs, habits, concepts, relations, etc.”

It’s worth repeating: Society as such is something real, and its essence is made up not only of clothing, externals, the surface of everyday life, but also of more profound customs, habits, concepts, relations and so forth. Among the artists we need more realistic historians of contemporary society. 

13. German government prepares comprehensive control and travel restrictions for young people as part of reintroduction of conscription

The new Military Service Modernization Act being introduced by the German government imposes far-reaching restrictions on travel freedoms for young people, demonstrating how extensive its plans are for the reintroduction of conscription and the militarization of society.

A central, hitherto little-noticed paragraph stipulates that persons of conscription age—i.e., between 17 and 45 years—must obtain permission from the Bundeswehr (Armed Forces) for longer stays abroad. Specifically, this affects stays of more than three months. The military is thereby being given control over whether and for how long young people are allowed to leave the country.

This regulation was initially barely discussed in public. That changed abruptly when it became known on social media following an article in the Frankfurter Rundschau. Within a few days, a broad wave of outrage developed, particularly among youth and young adults.

The Defense Ministry reacted to the criticism with an attempt to downplay the significance of the regulation. Reference was made to the fact that similar provisions had already existed during the Cold War and had not had any major impact at the time.

This comparison is misleading. Today, longer stays abroad—for example, through gap years, work and travel or study visits—are frequently part of the life plans of many young people. In school exchanges alone, the numbers have been in the tens of thousands for years.

Even more important, however, is that the ministry has not withdrawn the regulation. Defense Minister Boris Pistorius merely announced that an administrative directive would be issued temporarily suspending the authorization requirement—as long as military service remains formally voluntary. 

This means that the legal basis remains in place. As soon as conscription is reintroduced on a mandatory basis—which is being actively prepared by the government—the restriction on freedom of travel can be put into effect at any time. 

*****

What is happening in Germany is part of an international trend. In view of growing geopolitical tensions, neocolonial wars and the preparation of new major military conflicts between the great powers, governments worldwide are once again resorting to conscription and coercive measures.

In the US, the reintroduction of the draft is being prepared in response to falling recruitment numbers. France is expanding programs for military service. In Ukraine, men of conscription age, who are being consumed as cannon fodder in the NATO war against Russia, are prohibited from leaving the country.

These measures are part of the preparations for an escalation of global conflicts, up to and including a possible direct war between major powers. 

14. Genetic evidence suggests that human evolution accelerated with the development of agriculture

A just-published article in the journal Nature—“Ancient DNA reveals pervasive directional selection across West Eurasia,” (Akbari et al, 15 April 2026)—describes how the development of agriculture in Europe and the Middle East resulted in an acceleration in human evolution in those regions over the last 10,000 years. The article was coauthored by 17 researchers from Germany, Austria, Iran and the US, headed by David Reich of Harvard University. Sophisticated statistical analyses were employed to tease out recognizable patterns from “noise.”  

This research is a valuable contribution to a materialist understanding of the mechanisms that drive evolution. At the same time, it has prompted a rabid, racist response on X (formerly Twitter) which focuses on one tenuous finding that the posters distort as demonstrating European racial superiority.

The data on which the study is based consists of DNA obtained from nearly 16,000 human remains ranging over the last 18,000 years, encompassing roughly 10,000 ancient (from fossils) and 6,000 modern individuals. This substantial database, the largest available from any region of the world, permits a detailed examination of changes in specific gene variant (allele) frequencies (i.e., evolution) ranging from a time when the peoples of the region lived exclusively by hunting and gathering through the development of agriculture. That fundamental and all-encompassing change in the economy had profound implications for human health, as well as social and political organization. 

Hunter-gatherers tend to live in relatively small, more-or-less mobile groups relying on the seasonal abundance of particular plant and animal species for food and other useful materials. Population densities are relatively low and interaction between groups is usually limited. One result is that infectious disease transmission is restricted, technology is simple and hunger is possible if natural food sources fail. Also, social and political organization tends to be egalitarian, with different roles generally based on age and sex. This all changed with the adoption of agriculture. 

With agriculture, the scale and reliability of food is more controllable and predictable, though still subject to fluctuations. As a result, group size increases, settlements become permanent, inter-group trade develops and social and political organization become more complex. One of the negative effects is that disease transmission, both within and between groups, is increased. The period during which agriculture developed in Eurasia and Africa is known as the Neolithic (c. 10,000–2,000 BCE).

All of this is likely to affect the health and lifespan of individuals as well as their likely reproductive success, i.e., via natural/directional selection. This would be expected to affect the relative frequencies of particular gene alleles in the population that were more or less suited for survival under the changed conditions created by the transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture. 

Indeed, the new study found this to be the case in a significant number of examples. A total of 479 genetic variants were found to increase or decrease in frequency during the time span under examination. This strongly indicates that adaptation due to natural selection was taking place in many of these cases. 

Among the characteristics observed in agricultural populations were traits associated with increased tuberculosis resistance and lower body fat. The former is apparently a consequence of enhanced disease transmission resulting from larger and denser settlements and increased inter-group contacts. The latter would presumably reflect a change in the reliability of the diet. For hunter-gatherers, the uncontrollable natural variations in the abundance of wild food resources would make it advantageous to “stock up” when possible. Since food preservation and storage techniques were limited or nonexistent for most hunter-gatherers, the only available “storage” location was in the individual’s body (i.e., fat). With agriculture, the food supply would become more, if not totally, reliable, and the negative effects of obesity, such as diabetes susceptibility, would be reduced. 

*****

The article has been distorted by some right-wing commentators, notably on X, to support the conception that since populations in Western Eurasia have evolved at a greater pace than in the past, they are more “advanced” than people in other regions of the world. In particular, this research is misrepresented as evidence of a strong influence of genetics on supposed relative intelligence of different “races.”

One racist observes approvingly, “So now David Reich of Harvard has gone public about it, is it now socially acceptable to state the fact that black average IQ is far lower than white for genetic reasons?” And another, “Mass immigration from the third world will undo 18,000+ years of human evolution.” There are many more, equally foul.

What all of these commentators conveniently ignore is that the agricultural revolution took place not only in Western Eurasia but also independently in East Asia, Africa, and North and South America. And, in each area, great civilizations developed. If the advent of agriculture was a trigger for such evolutionary developments in one area, why not in the others? The lack of an equally robust body of available genetic data from the other areas is ignored in order to support the spewing of racist filth. 

These racist interpretations are manifestations of an ideology of the ruling class that seeks to divide and oppress the working class by fomenting all sorts of socially constructed mechanisms of race, language, gender, etc. These ideas will be sustained, despite all evidence to the contrary, as long as capitalism exists. 

15. London Underground drivers strike against longer shifts under four-day week plan

 

Around 1,800 train drivers are taking part in two days of strike action this week on London Underground against the introduction of a compressed four-day week by Transport for London (TfL), overseen by Labour Mayor Sadiq Khan.

The two 24-hour strikes, running from midday Tuesday to Wednesday and Thursday to Friday, are the opening stage of industrial action, with further two-day stoppages scheduled for May and June.

The Tube drivers, members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union (RMT), are opposing TfL’s restructuring agenda, which would mean longer shifts across fewer days, increasing shift lengths to eight hours 45 minutes, risking greater fatigue and concerns over safety.  

*****

The bureaucratic methods the RMT has relied on to demobilize opposition are coming apart. There is growing unease and anger among tube workers toward the RMT’s collusion with TfL and Khan.

In waging a week-long strike last September, tube workers were not seeking “peace” and concessions but laying down red lines. The strikes were part of a wider fightback against the Starmer government over deepening inequality, austerity and its scapegoating of migrants for the collapse of public services.

*****

The unity of London Underground workers must be asserted against the union apparatus and the sectional divisions it sows. United action is needed to win workers’ demands for pay restoration, adequate staffing, decent hours and safe working conditions.

As the World Socialist Web Site put forward:

“This fight requires forming rank-and-file committees to link up all grades across London Underground to renew the struggle for a shorter working week abandoned by Dempsey. It must include an appeal to ASLEF drivers to oppose their leadership and build a united struggle.

“The claim that there is no money for a genuine shorter working week must be rejected. London is the seat of the financial oligarchy, embodying the divide between those who produce wealth and those who live off it.

“London Underground operates as a profit-making concern, with government subsidy withdrawn in 2018 and running costs covered by passenger revenue based on the highest fares of any metro system in the world.

“A properly funded public system means ending tax giveaways to big business and the billions diverted to war—expenditures set to escalate further through the government’s participation in the illegal war against Iran.”

16. Right-wing led fuel protests bring Ireland to a halt

The recent fuel protests in Ireland, involving farmers, hauliers and small business owners, underscore mounting social tensions driven by the deepening global crisis. Though rooted in legitimate grievances over soaring costs, the absence of an independent working-class movement allowed right-wing and even far-right forces to dominate.

In March, just weeks after the outbreak of the US-Iran war, the Fine Gael/Fianna Fáil coalition government led by Taoiseach Micheál Martin announced a temporary package of €250 million which reduced petrol by €0.10 per liter and diesel by €0.20. This was obliterated by further price increases as the Middle East crisis intensified. By early April, petrol cost around €1.91 a liter and diesel €2.14, compared with €1.70 and €1.69 as recently as January.

In response, for four days, ports, motorways, central Dublin and the country's only oil refinery were blockaded by hundreds of vehicles driven by farmers, agricultural contractors, hauliers, builders, bus operators and taxi drivers. At one point, a majority of petrol stations were reported as running dry.

The refusal of Ireland’s trade unions to mobilize workers against the coalition government has enabled right-wing influencers and politicians to fill the void. Irish Congress of Trade Unions (ICTU) general secretary Owen Reidy issued a statement on March 24, saying the government’s paltry relief package was “welcome” and calling for measures such as “remote working to save on petrol costs” as “a cost-free response for employers and the Exchequer”! He warned that failure to act would make heightened wage demands “a real risk”. The ITCU represents unions with 600,000 members.

The protests stemmed from a meeting in the Midland Hotel, Portlaoise, March 29, attended by around 400 people. Farmer and contractor James Geoghegan, who emerged as one of the protest leaders, has repeatedly appeared on the social media channels of far-right, anti-migrant, anti-vaxxer “citizen journalist” Philip Dwyer.

Geoghegan was involved in large protests earlier this year in Athlone against the EU-Mercosur trade deal which threatens to undermine much of the beef farming industry in Ireland, with cheaper meat imports to the trade bloc.

Geoghegan reported a committee was formed with representatives from agricultural contracting, farming, plant and bus hire, and the haulage sector. There were “100 - 200 men driving trucks,” who were “ready to park up their trucks in the middle of the roads, wherever they are told to go and at whatever time they are told to do it...”

The meeting was addressed by the Independent Ireland party's founder and member of parliament, Michael Collins, who highlighted the share of fuel revenue taken by the government in taxation. Taxation makes up more than half the price of both diesel and petrol in Ireland.

Independent Ireland is a right-wing, anti-migrant, anti-abortion party committed to law and order and business deregulation. Much of their pitch is to small business owners, precisely those layers squeezed by the fuel crisis.

Days later, an Irish Haulage Farming Construction Contractors Amalgamation was formed. The new grouping sent a letter to the government demanding a fuel price cap, the suspension of carbon tax on fuel and financial support for households and business.

Protests began to be organized on social media around Facebook pages such as “The People of Ireland Against Fuel Price Protest”, a long-standing page run by tow truck operator and anti-migrant campaigner Sonny Boyd.

Other prominent figures include Christopher Duffy, an agricultural contractor, whose Facebook page includes vile comments about Muslims and that he would not care if environmental campaigner Greta Thunberg was “raped or beaten”. Numerous far-right social media commentators, in Ireland and internationally, offered support to the protests.

On April 7, rolling roadblocks were reported on major motorways, including the M6 from Galway, M8, M7 and M1, as protestors made their way to Dublin and to protests in dozens of rural towns and villages. Over 150 trucks, tractors and heavy goods vehicles blockaded Dublin's O'Connell Street where a rally of hundreds of people was held. Luas tram and bus services were disrupted across the city. Large assemblies of vehicles and protestors were also reported in Midleton, Tullamore, Cashel, Castlebar and Rosslare.

A blockade was set up at the Whitegate oil refinery in Cork, which supplies about 40 percent of Ireland's petrol. The refinery entrance was blocked by trucks and tractors and around 60 people.

Another blockade, maintained by up to 100 demonstrators, was set up outside a fuel depot in Galway. For four days, no fuel left the depot, although all other traffic was allowed to pass. Rosslare harbor and Europort were also closed by protestors.

The blockades stopped fuel deliveries to Ireland's 1,200 or so petrol stations, with as many as 700 running out of fuel over the next few days. By April 10, health services were running out of fuel, appointments were cancelled, medicine deliveries impacted, and water treatment and animal feed supplies were delayed. Bus services to Dublin Airport were impacted by rolling roadblocks, leading to passengers walking along the motorway hard shoulder to the airport.

A panicked coalition government announced further limited palliative measures, worth €500 million, while moving to clear the protests. Measures announced included a 10-cent reduction in petrol and diesel tax, a delay in implementing carbon tax increases and support schemes for farmers and fisheries. Prices at petrol stations began to fall slightly over the following days.

Irish state finances—heavily dependent on tech company headquarters—are unusually healthy, with a budget surplus of €12.4 billion (3.7 percent of gross national income) recorded in 2025, so the sums dispensed were the least required to quell the protests.

Despite crushing housing costs, an overstretched health service and countless indicators of social stress impacting the population, the coalition—which coined €33 billion in corporate tax receipts last year—chose to divert much of its surplus into sovereign wealth and savings funds.

*****

Millions of workers are being hit by the same fuel price increases and a surge in the cost of living. However, the fact that protests over fuel cost increases were politically dominated by the far-right is a dangerous situation. One brought about by the role of the trade union bureaucracy in suppressing independent class action by the working class. 

17. Bus drivers in East London strike against low pay and fatigue, defying strike-breaking operation by Stagecoach

Bus drivers working for Stagecoach in Bow, East London, are holding the second of three one-day strikes on Friday April 24, following a three-day walkout last month. They are fighting schedules that are causing dangerous levels of fatigue. A further strike is planned for May 15.

The Unite members are facing a concerted strike-breaking operation by Stagecoach. Scabs have been recruited from other cities, and the company had offered a bribe to any Bow driver willing to break the strike. Pickets shouted, “shame on you!” and “£50!”, the sum for which they sold out their colleagues.

On the picket line last Friday, workers raised the need for unity across London if the strike breaking operation is to be defeated and working conditions defended. But Unite is following the opposite strategy, even blocking a joint fight with Stagecoach drivers at nearby Lea Interchange Bus Company.

World Socialist Web Site reporters spoke with drivers on the picket line at Bow. They described the conditions they face and their determination to fight. 

*****

Joe [a driver] said, “The problem that we are facing is more or less, drivers are not united. We are not united at all. We are not like the trains, the Underground. We are not like them. Which is very, very sad indeed. All because of all this privatization that came in Margaret Thatcher’s time. So, it’s brought some sort of divisions.”

Privatization had proven a disaster, “It’s all about profit making. That’s it. The only way they can make their profits is to squeeze drivers. And we suffer. We are the driving force for their success, so why do they have to squeeze a lot from us? That is not right.”

Another driver joined the discussion to add, “It’s not only us we are looking after. It’s the new drivers that are coming in. It’s important for them also.” New drivers are placed on inferior pay. “A lot of them come in and find that the conditions are not good. A lot of people leave and a lot of them have accidents also.”

*****

The needs of bus workers and passengers for a high quality, safe and affordable public transport system must be prioritized against the profit requirements of the private transport operators and the austerity diktats of a Starmer government that is slashing public spending to prepare for escalating wars of aggression.

18. Workers Struggles: Africa, Europe & Middle East

Africa

Kenya:

Over 3,500 health workers set to hold all-out strike at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital

Mozambique:

Pay strike by medical interns continues

Nigeria:

Teachers strike over pay arrears and poor conditions

South Africa:

Workers in Marikana protest outside mining company demanding jobs
 
Community health workers march through Cape Town demanding permanent contracts
 
Protest march in Johannesburg in defense of immigrants  

Zimbabwe:

Nurses launch strike at several hospitals

Europe

Belgium:

Thousands of national postal workers in Wallonia continue strike against cost-cutting job reforms

Norway:

Thousands of hospitality workers strike for better pay and conditions

Portugal:

Tens of thousands march in Lisbon against proposed changes in labor laws

Spain:

Air traffic controller stop work over staffing levels and poor working conditions

United Kingdom:

London Underground train drivers strike over threat of imposed four-day working rota
Support staff at Cambridge University, England strike over pay

Teachers at London school walk out over workload and to protest unfair practices

Teachers at Weymouth school, England walk out

Further stoppages by UK mental health support workers in Manchester over pay 

Middle East

Israel:

Software company workers protest outside CEO’s home over company plans to change working agreements
 
Shipping company workers strike over redundancy threat as company is taken over 

Iran:

Workers’ protests resume under shadow of renewed US war threat

19. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

Bogdan Syrotiuk holds a copy of John Reed's Ten Days That Shook the World 

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.