Jul 25, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. Perspective: Execution in Wisconsin: Only the working class can stop police state terror

The police execution of Corey Ruiz in Madison, Wisconsin on Wednesday has provoked an eruption of social anger throughout the state and across the country.

Ruiz, a 38-year-old father and longtime Madison resident, was identified by police as a “suspect” after he was reportedly seen looking into parked cars. Police have not alleged that he broke into a vehicle, stole anything or committed any crime whatsoever.

*****

As of Friday, more than 48 hours after the killing, the officer who executed Ruiz had not been publicly identified, much less arrested or charged with a crime.

The intersection where Ruiz was murdered remained closed through Friday as residents transformed it into a memorial. Hundreds of workers and young people of every race have participated in protests and vigils demanding “Justice for Corey.” Additional demonstrations are planned throughout the weekend. 

*****

What was carried out on a Madison street was the local expression of a national policy directed against the working class. The objective source of this violence is the historic crisis of American capitalism. The financial oligarchy is accumulating wealth on a scale without precedent while tens of millions of workers struggle to afford food, housing and medical care.

The wealth of the world’s billionaires has climbed from $4.5 trillion 15 years ago to $20.1 trillion today. It increased by approximately 40 percent in only two years.

At the opposite pole, workers employed by some of the largest and most profitable corporations depend on government assistance to survive. The number of Amazon workers receiving food stamps or Medicaid nearly tripled between February 2020 and September 2025. Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Grubhub and Instacart collectively rank among the largest employers of workers receiving federal aid.

Public assistance is used to subsidize the poverty wages paid by giant corporations and enrich billionaires such as Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. Now even this inadequate aid is being taken away. An estimated 4 million people, including 1.5 million children, have been removed from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program over the last year.

While children are denied food, the House of Representatives this week approved a National Defense Authorization Act allocating $1.15 trillion to the military. Six Democrats voted for the bill, providing the margin to pass it. The legislation forms a central component of the Trump administration’s proposed $1.5 trillion military budget.

These resources will finance the expanding war against Iran, continued support for the Gaza genocide, the US-NATO war against Russia in Ukraine and preparations for war against China. The violence inflicted by American imperialism overseas is increasingly being directed against the working class within the United States. The military occupation of foreign countries and the occupation of American cities are two fronts of the same war.

Social inequality on this scale is incompatible with democracy. The oligarchy cannot impose poverty, war and social devastation through democratic methods. This is why Trump was returned to the White House by the oligarchy and given free rein to construct the apparatus of a presidential dictatorship. 

*****

On average, American police kill more than three people every day. The perpetrators are routinely placed on paid leave, shielded from public identification and cleared by prosecutors and internal investigations.

The Democrats and their political satellites seek to present police violence as the product of “white supremacy.” The racialist explanation conceals the essential class function of the police. The police exist to defend capitalist property and the wealth and power of the financial oligarchy against the working class.

In The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, Friedrich Engels explained that the state is not an impartial institution standing above society. It emerges from society’s division into irreconcilably hostile classes.

The state’s essential foundation, Engels explained, is a “public force” consisting “not merely of armed men, but also of material appendages, prisons and coercive institutions of all kinds.” This force grows stronger as class antagonisms sharpen. This is precisely what is taking place in the United States.  

The fight to stop police violence, abolish ICE and dismantle the immigration death squads is therefore inseparable from the fight against capitalism and for socialism.

2. Perspective: Mamdani, Netanyahu and the capitalist state 

[Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu is scheduled to attend a meeting of the UN in New York City in September, and [New York City Mayor Zohran] Mamdani had earlier stated that Netanyahu would be arrested if he did so. In the video released on Tuesday, however, Mamdani conceded that “we do not have the independent legal authority to enforce this warrant.” He concluded: “The federal government, however, does, and I call on them to join the ICC [International Criminal Court] and execute this warrant.”

The denunciations and slanders came within hours. Mike Huckabee, Trump’s ambassador to Israel, called Mamdani “an evil antisemite who deliberately lies about serious things like ‘genocide’ to stoke Jew hate” and added: “If anyone should be arrested, it’s the Mayor of NY for incitement.” Zionist organizations repeated the same line, with AIPAC declaring that the video is “based on a modern blood libel and outrageous lies.”

The popular response was very different and of objective significance. Within a day, Mamdani’s video had been viewed more than 13 million times. Mamdani won the mayoralty of the city with the largest Jewish population in the United States, many who voted for him, while denouncing Netanyahu as a war criminal. His statements about the genocide of Palestinians resonate with millions of young people who have participated in demonstrations against the genocide for nearly three years.

Mamdani’s declaration that he will not arrest Netanyahu is, as a factual matter, a reversal. As a candidate, he pledged to arrest Netanyahu if he came to New York, and as recently as July 18 he said in an interview with the New York Times that he was in “active conversation” with the city’s law department about enforcing the ICC warrant. 

Many of those who took these pledges seriously have responded to the reversal with anger. The essential criticism of Mamdani’s conduct, however, is not that he has failed to carry out a single pledge. Far more important is the light the episode sheds on the underlying bankruptcy of his entire political perspective.

Netanyahu, when he arrives in New York, will do so under the protection of the federal government—that is, of the most powerful sections of the American ruling class....

*****

That is, aside from the issues of jurisdiction involved in arresting Netanyahu, the individual Mamdani declares a war criminal enjoys the protection of the entire state apparatus, including his own government. 

It is no different with Mamdani’s pledges to defend the living standards of the working class. His promise of universal childcare has been scaled down to fit the budget of a city he cannot finance, because he cannot tax the wealthy without the permission of Albany, which will not grant it. His pledge to defend immigrants has not stopped ICE from carrying out operations in New York. He has kept the NYPD budget at $6.4 billion, while a $5.4 billion deficit prepares austerity against the workers who elected him. Each verbal proclamation has run up against the same reality. Power is in the hands of the ruling class, and the election of a “socialist” mayor has not altered that fact by one iota.

The entire perspective of the DSA is premised on a rejection of the basic principle of Marxism, that the state is not a neutral body but an instrument of class rule. The DSA promotes the fiction that the interests of the working class can be advanced within the framework of the capitalist state—and, in particular, through the Democratic Party—without the development of a movement of the working class against it.

Mamdani has drawn the practical conclusions. Since his election he has cultivated a working relationship with Trump, traveling to the White House twice to pledge collaboration. At every point where his electoral promises clashed with the interests of the ruling class, he has come down on the side of the latter. He endorsed Governor Hochul for reelection even as she issued emergency orders supplying scab labor against striking New York nurses, dispatched the NYPD to protect ICE agents from protesters, and granted permits and police protection to the pro-genocide Israel Day parade.

It is necessary to address another political issue. The focus on Netanyahu as an individual obscures what the genocide is. Netanyahu deserves to be prosecuted, but his crimes are the crimes of imperialism. Mamdani notes in his video that the bombs dropped on Gaza are made in America. But he does not indict the American state that financed and delivered them, and certainly not the Democratic Party, which under Biden organized and armed the genocide that Trump now continues.

Nor does the genocide stand alone. It is the spearhead of an eruption of imperialist violence on a world scale and of a war against the working class at home, waged through mass deportations, the destruction of democratic rights and the buildup of the apparatus of dictatorship. 

*****

Netanyahu, and all those responsible for the genocide of the Palestinian people, can and will be brought to account for their crimes. But this will be done not through the courts of the imperialist powers or the appeals of their left-wing managers but through the independent political mobilization of the international working class against the capitalist system itself.

3. Australia: Online public meeting: Fight NDIS cuts and Labor’s war on the working class!

The meeting will outline the socialist perspective needed to oppose the Labor government’s assault on disabled people, as part of its broader offensive against the working class. 

4. Pattern bargaining opens for 23,000 US Steel and Cleveland-Cliffs workers

The USW’s isolation of 800 locked-out BP Whiting oil refinery workers shows why steelworkers must organize independently of the union bureaucracy.

5. Australian industrial workers denounce death threat against Will Lehman

“When I saw the picture posted it made me feel sick to my stomach. It shows that the UAW leadership are scared of Will. Why else would you threaten him and try to intimidate him?”

6. Sturgis Hospital closes in rural Michigan

The destruction of rural healthcare is neither an oversight nor ineffective policymaking. It flows from a political and economic system in crisis, where an unprecedented concentration of wealth and power can only be maintained by plundering social resources for private profit and militarism.

7. Break the collusion between the union and management at Volkswagen!

At its online meeting July 15, the VW Action Committee launched an intensive campaign to break the control of the IG Metall union apparatus and its plant officials and begin a serious fight in defense of jobs.

8. Canadian imperialism complicit in Trump’s regime change operation in Cuba

Canadian imperialism is fully complicit in the Trump administration’s efforts to strangle Cuba’s economy and starve its people in preparation for a potential military invasion.

Since it attacked Venezuela in January, kidnapped its president, Nicolás Maduro, and seized control of its oil exports, the US has imposed an oil embargo on Cuba. The move marks a massive escalation of Washington’s decades-long economic war on the island-country and its people, whom American imperialism has never forgiven for the Cuban revolution of 1959.

Preparations for a military assault are far advanced. The Pentagon has positioned forces for an imminent strike, awaiting, according to media reports, only the White House’s final go-ahead. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is working to fabricate a pretext for yet another illegal, unprovoked war of plunder. This includes touting lurid, unsubstantiated claims that Cuba has received a handful of drones from Russia and Iran as proof that Cuba represents a threat to US national security. 

*****

Cuba is Canada’s largest bilateral trading partner in the Caribbean, with close to $1 billion exchanged per year, and Canada is Cuba’s second largest trading partner after the European Union. Canada provides Cuba with critical dietary staples, including wheat, pork and peas. Canadian tourism companies Sunwing and Blue Diamond Resorts, in partnership with the Cuban military-run Gaviota Corporation, have invested billions in the country.

With the criminal blockade of fuel supplies to Cuba, these operations have ground to a complete halt. Canadian air carriers have suspended all flights due to the inability to obtain jet fuel in Cuba or to service their aircraft there. Hotels, resorts and restaurants have shut down, throwing hundreds of thousands of Cubans out of work. Blackouts have shut down much of the country.

*****

Canadian imperialism’s investments in Cuba have been based on the assertion of its “independent” capitalist interests in the Caribbean. Canada, along with Mexico, were the only countries in the Western Hemisphere which maintained diplomatic relations with Cuba after the 1959 Revolution.

Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Canadian prime minister from 1968 to 1979, famously visited Fidel Castro in 1976, developing a close personal friendship, such that Castro was one of the pallbearers at Trudeau’s funeral in 2000. In a speech to tens of thousands in Cienfuegos, Trudeau angered Canada’s US allies by declaring, “Viva Cuba y el pueblo Cubano! Viva el primer ministro comandante Fidel Castro!” But this political theater had nothing to do with any imagined support for “socialism” and everything to do with opening up a diplomatic relationship with Cuba independent of the United States, to assert Canadian imperialist interests.

When the US Congress passed the Helms-Burton Act in 1996, sanctioning foreign investors in Cuba, Canadian imperialism responded with the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act, which protects Canadian companies from US sanctions via a suite of measures, including state-backed counter lawsuits against US claimants.

Thirty years later, the irresolvable contradictions of world capitalist development under private ownership and national management are driving American imperialism to abandon the international legal norms and arrangements which permitted both the “independent” existence of Cuba on a bourgeois nationalist basis and the “independent” interests of its erstwhile Canadian ally in Cuba’s economy.

The imperialist powers, Canada among them, are seeking to redivide the world by force. Washington has asserted the so-called “Trump corollary to the Monroe Doctrine,” which declares American imperialism’s claim to complete economic and military domination over the entire Western Hemisphere, including both Cuba and Canada.

“Canada, more than probably any other nation, is caught in a vise grip,” said Mark Entwistle, Canada’s envoy to Havana from 1993 to 1997, in an interview with Bloomberg about the vulnerability of Canada’s Cuban investments. Entwistle referred to the ongoing attempt to renegotiate favorable Canadian trade terms with the United States. Canadian interests in Cuba, he said, were being held hostage at gunpoint in these “negotiations.” 

*****

The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), which has long maintained relations with Cuba’s National Union of Public Administration Workers in Havana (SNTAP), launched a parliamentary petition in April under NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice, calling for the Carney government to “stand with Cuba” by opposing all military action and economic coercion, and expanding Canadian economic and humanitarian activities on the island. It was signed by 12,296 people and presented to parliament on May 7, but it was not debated and does not appear to have prompted a response from the Liberal government to date.

The Canadian Network on Cuba, which is supported by both the Stalinist Communist Party of Canada and the pseudo-left Socialist Action group, issued a nationalist, pro-capitalist statement demanding “the right of Canadian companies to conduct lawful business free from foreign coercion and intimidation.” It called on the government to enforce the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act in defense of Canadian capitalist interests.

NDP leader Avi Lewis has made similar bankrupt appeals, in remarks to the CUPE Ontario convention that were picked up by the Cuban embassy in Canada, he declaimed that Canadian imperialism “must come to the defense of Cuba, and fight for a free Palestine.”

What a fraud! Lewis, Socialist Action and the Communist Party know full well that the right-wing Liberal government of Mark Carney will do no such thing. Their primary purpose in making these bankrupt appeals is to divert the growing opposition to imperialist wars and aggression among workers in youth in Canada behind Canadian nationalism and impotent appeals to the political establishment. This goes hand in hand with the continued promotion of the Castro regime as “socialist” and justifications of its attempts to buy its survival by demonstrating through sweeping privatizations and other pro-market reforms that it can transform the island into a profitable source of cheap labor and natural resources for US corporations.

The Castroite regime has made no appeal to the international working class for support. As the World Socialist Web Site has explained, its current prostration before imperialism is the outcome of its bourgeois nationalist character and capitalist program. It was always hostile to the independent power of the working class. This was manifested both in its suppression of all forms of working class political and economic self-organization on the island, and the bargain that it made with the Soviet Stalinist bureaucracy, under which, in return for economic aid, it supported the Kremlin’s strangling of world revolution. 

Canadian workers must unequivocally oppose Washington’s criminal campaign to starve the Cuban working class and reverse the little that remains of the social gains of the 1959 Cuban Revolution and Canadian imperialism’s complicity in it.

Such a campaign cannot be left to the trade union bureaucracy or the NDP, and it cannot be based upon appeals to American imperialism for “rights and freedoms” for Canadian mining corporations or for the political representatives of the Canadian imperialism to come to the aid of the Cuban people. It must be animated by a socialist internationalist program—that is, the fight to mobilize workers across the Americas in a common struggle to put an end to imperialist militarism and the capitalist system that is its source. 

9. US bombards Iran for 13th straight night as White House plans “major” escalation

American warplanes and missiles struck Iran for a 13th consecutive night late Thursday and into Friday morning, hitting sites from the Strait of Hormuz to the Caspian Sea coast.

An American attack on the city of Ahvaz killed four people and wounded five, the state broadcaster IRIB reported. 

*****

The forces for the escalation are already in place. The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday on the surge of special operations forces, fighter squadrons and medics to the region.

The Times reported Friday:

Additional Air Force F-16 fighters from Germany and stealthy F-35 jets from Britain have arrived in the Middle East in recent days, joining scores of warplanes and attack drones already positioned at land bases or on two aircraft carriers, according to several U.S. military officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss operational matters.

B-2 and B-52 crews in the United States have been placed on alert, according to the same report, and a fleet of nearly 20 warships is operating in and around the Arabian Sea. Some 50,000 American troops are assigned to the war in the region and Europe.

The Journal also reported Wednesday that more than 150 additional medics had been dispatched to the US military hospital at Landstuhl, Germany—preparation for American casualties on a scale the war has not yet produced. 

*****

As it prepares a wider war, the administration is concealing the cost of the war to date. On Friday, the Pentagon’s official count of American dead in the war stood at 14, cut from 18—the deleted four being the soldiers killed in Iran’s mid-July attacks in Jordan and Iraq, whose remains Trump received at Dover Air Force Base on Wednesday. 

*****

The official count of wounded was cut the same week, from 482 to 420, without explanation. Officials have told Reuters that the true number of wounded exceeds 500. The Pentagon last briefed the press in detail in May.

Inside Iran, the death toll is mounting. The Iranian health ministry on Friday put the toll since Trump renewed the bombing campaign in late June at 59 dead and 666 wounded, in a war that has killed thousands of Iranians. 

*****

The war is strangling the world economy. After the Houthis struck Saudi tankers in the Red Sea this week, Brent crude topped $100 a barrel for the first time since May, before easing to about $96 on Friday.

A single tanker passed through the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday, the fewest since May 7. War-risk insurance for the southern Red Sea doubled for some shippers, and rerouting around Africa adds at least four weeks to a tanker’s voyage. 

*****

The conflict is widening into a regional war. The Journal reported Friday that Bahrain and Kuwait, with Emirati intelligence and air cover, secretly bombed military sites inside Iran early this month—their first direct attacks on the country. The strikes hit drone and missile storage depots, the Journal wrote, after weeks in which Iran had concentrated its fire on the two states, both of which host American bases.

Israel, which launched the war alongside Washington in February, is continuing its onslaught in Gaza. Israeli strikes killed 12 people there on Tuesday, medics said, among them a father, his wife and their four children, whose home in Gaza City was set ablaze.

10. Australian regulator deepens attack on health workers opposing Gaza genocide

In a further tightening of its censorship regime, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA), in line with the federal Labor government’s pro-Zionist agenda, has formally integrated the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism into its regulatory framework.

The move, announced on June 17 in a joint statement with Australia’s Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism Jillian Segal, represents a direct attack on the fundamental democratic rights of medical professionals. It establishes a punitive apparatus designed to intimidate and silence doctors, nurses, and healthcare workers who dare to speak out against the US-backed Israeli genocide in Gaza. 

11. Southern California grocery pharmacists authorize strike

Hundreds of grocery pharmacists have authorized strike action after months of bargaining over unsafe staffing, mounting workloads and wages at Ralphs, Albertsons, Vons and Pavilions. 

12. Five workers killed in helmet factory fire in Sri Lanka

The inferno in the Katuwana Industrial Zone is a case of industrial murder—the direct and inevitable product of a capitalist system that subordinates human life to the relentless drive for profit.

13. Jacobin falsifies Trotsky and historical record to promote popular front in Argentina

Martín Mosquera, editor-in-chief of Jacobin América Latina, has published a lengthy strategy document, “How to Defeat Milei,” whose purpose is to supply a theoretical justification for subordinating the Argentine working class to Peronism and a “broader progressive bloc” ahead of the 2027 elections.

Jacobin Magazine is the semi-official press organ of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). The DSA is a faction of the Democratic Party in the United States. Its international wing formally affiliated in 2023 with the São Paulo Forum, the regional bloc of Chavista, Peronist, and other bourgeois-nationalist parties.

The argument is as follows: the Argentine working class has suffered a “social defeat” that rules out revolution. The fight against the fascistic administration of President Javier Milei will therefore be decided on the electoral terrain, where the left must offer Peronism “specific, critical and delimited” support; and this requires abandoning any “sectarian” insistence on working class political independence in favor of “unitary” blocs that include bourgeois and reformist forces.

Attempting to dress up his position with pseudo-Marxist credentials, Mosquera falsifies the positions of Leon Trotsky and revives a decades-old slander that Trotsky was “sectarian” on France and Spain in order to rehabilitate the Popular Front. Every element of this argument is false.

*****

To make this program respectable, Mosquera imports the claim made by Perry Anderson, the longtime editor of New Left Review, that Trotsky showed “flexibility” toward alliances with non-working class sectors against Nazism and during the Kornilov affair of August 1917, yet fell into “sectarian errors” in opposing the Popular Front in France and Spain. This is a grotesque fabrication.

It erases the distinction Trotsky spent years elaborating between a united front of workers’ organizations for defensive struggle, and a Popular Front government that subordinates the working class politically to its class enemies.

In Germany, Trotsky called for a united front of Communist (KPD) and Social Democratic (SPD) workers against the Nazis—joint action between two workers’ parties, each retaining full political independence. He never proposed a coalition government with the SPD, still less with bourgeois parties. In December 1931 he wrote: “No common platform with the Social Democracy... March separately, but strike together!” The Stalinist KPD rejected even this minimal unity, branding the SPD “social fascists”; the German working class was divided and crushed, and Hitler took power in January 1933.

The Kornilov affair, which Mosquera cites via Anderson as proof of Trotsky’s supposed flexibility, in fact demonstrates the very method he later applied to France. In August 1917 the Bolsheviks fought General Kornilov’s coup alongside troops loyal to the Provisional Government led by Alexander Kerensky, while granting Kerensky himself no political support. Lenin’s instruction, which Trotsky quoted in 1931, was: “We shall fight against Kornilov, but we do not support Kerensky... The distinction is delicate but must not be forgotten.” 

This was exactly Trotsky’s approach to Léon Blum’s Popular Front government. He did not call for frontal opposition; Mosquera quotes a June 1936 letter from Trotsky to his French supporters where he predicted that the workers’ next wave of action would be directed not at Blum but at “the two hundred families,” the Radicals, the Senate and the army command. “We do not put Léon Blum in the same sack as [the fascists] de Wendel and La Rocque,” he wrote—precisely as the Bolsheviks had distinguished Kerensky from Kornilov while fighting both. What Trotsky opposed was the Popular Front coalition itself between Blum’s Socialist Party and the Radical Party: a government answerable to the Radical Party, the party of French capital, whose function was to prevent the working class from using its own strength to take power.

Mosquera credits the Popular Front’s 1936 election victory with detonating the French general strike wave that followed, and Spain’s parallel mobilization against Franco, as proof that “confidence” in reformist leaderships can itself trigger radicalization. The record says otherwise. The June 1936 strikes expressed a revolutionary upsurge already building since the fascist riots of February 1934; the Popular Front’s actual function, once installed, was to shut that upsurge down. Stalinist leader Maurice Thorez, whose Communist Party gave outside support to the Popular Front, declared, “One must know how to end a strike,” as the Matignon accords were signed, trading temporary concessions for ordering workers back to the factories—concessions the bourgeoisie clawed back within two years.

Trotsky called the Popular Front “a society for insuring Radical bankrupts at the expense of the capital of the workers’ organizations.” By 1938, the same Radical Party was ruling by decree against the working class; and by 1940, much of it had gone over to Vichy and collaboration with the Nazi occupation forces.

During the Spanish Revolution, workers and peasants took up arms, collectivized land and factories and built militias not because the Popular Front, including the Socialists, the Stalinist CP and the Republicans, had won the 1936 elections, but because they understood, correctly, that a fascist victory meant their annihilation. The developing social revolution was in fact systematically strangled by the Popular Front government, under Stalinist direction: disarming the militias, restoring bourgeois property relations and physically liquidating revolutionaries and centrists, particularly in the POUM. Trotsky’s verdict in December 1937 was blunt: “Victory will go either to the socialist revolution or to fascism.” That was not sectarianism, but a prediction confirmed with the taking of power of Franco in 1939.

*****

The theoretical core of Mosquera’s argument is the claim that “in many cases, the masses do not radicalize despite trusting reformist leaderships, but through that trust”—that popular mobilization typically begins only once broad sectors perceive a political force capable of translating their demands into concrete results.

This inverts the historical record examined above. The working class took power in October 1917 only because they had broken politically with Kerensky and come under the leadership of the Bolshevik Party. Trust in reformist and Stalinist leaderships produced not revolutionary victory but catastrophic defeat: German workers trusted the SPD and KPD, and Hitler triumphed; the independent strike wave French workers had built was demobilized by the very government they had just elected; the Spanish revolution was strangled by the Popular Front.

*****

Jacobin says openly that the masses radicalize “through trust” in reformist leaderships, so the left must work through and inside a broad electoral front behind Peronism. The Morenoite PTS says the same thing in more militant-sounding language: the task is not to win the working class to revolutionary politics against Peronism and the union bureaucracy, but to build standing bodies in which Peronists, the politically unaffiliated and revolutionary-minded fight “together,” on the premise that programmatic clarification can wait indefinitely. Both positions converge in their opposition to tackling the same essential task—the building of an independent revolutionary party fighting for the political independence of the working class.

This convergence is not accidental. It has a definite class content. As the WSWS has explained, the pseudo-left is not a wing of the socialist movement that has made mistaken tactical choices. It is the political expression of a privileged, upper-middle-class layer—hostile to Marxism and to the independent revolutionary movement of the working class. Its material position is bound up with the parliamentary apparatus, the trade union bureaucracy, the universities and certain professions. Its historic function is to corral movements of social protest back within the safe confines of the institutions of bourgeois rule, dressed variously in the language of identity politics, national reformism or “left” electoralism. 

*****

What is missing is the revolutionary party Trotsky spent his life building against exactly this kind of “left” cover for capitalist rule. Obstructing the construction of that party is the real function shared by Jacobin’s open support for Peronism and PTS’s centrism. The International Committee of the Fourth International alone is fighting to build it in Argentina and internationally.

14. T. rex fossil sold for $50.1 million

Ever larger amounts on such “trophies” are being spent by members of the wealthy elite while support for basic science is slashed.

15. Ebola deaths pass 1,000 in the DRC, faster than any previous outbreak

It took 67 days for this outbreak to cross the grim 1,000-death milestone. The West Africa epidemic, declared on March 23, 2014, took 142 days to reach the same toll, more than twice as long.

If current growth rates hold, the outbreak would reach West Africa’s 28,616 cases about five months after declaration and its 11,310 deaths in four. West Africa took 27 months. Such projections carry uncertainty; epidemic curves bend. What is certain is that no licensed vaccine or treatment exists, and that the surveillance which would narrow the uncertainty has been cut.  

*****

Under capitalism, which diseases get medicines is decided by profit and national security priority. In the United States, countermeasures against Ebola are funded not as public health but as biodefense. The trigger is a determination by the Department of Homeland Security that a pathogen poses a material threat to national health security, which releases procurement money through the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and the Pentagon’s chemical and biological defense office.

*****

The international working class must take the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries out of private hands and place them under its own democratic control, so that what is developed answers to human need. It must turn the wealth now consumed by the war over eastern Congo’s minerals to the health infrastructure the Congolese population has been denied. This requires a unified political struggle by workers in Africa, Europe and the Americas against the imperialist order that has organized global medicine around its own security, and the building of sections of the International Committee of the Fourth International. The capacity to build a defense against Bundibugyo has existed for a decade. It was never pointed at the people now dying of it.

16. Trump imposes new tariffs on Brazil: Imperialist intimidation ahead of October’s presidential election

In a sharp escalation of Washington’s imperialist offensive against Latin America, the Trump administration is openly intervening in Brazil’s October presidential election to bring fascist candidate Flávio Bolsonaro to power.

17. Workers Struggles: Asia and Australia

Australia:

Service Stream defence facility workers reject wage-cutting enterprise agreement
 
Parks Victoria workers implement statewide work bans against Labor government wage cuts
 
Victorian public sector allied health workers stop work
 
Disability support workers strike in regional Victoria

Bangladesh:  

Thakurgaon Sugar Mill workers protest for permanent jobs and wage reform

Cambodia:  

Casino Workers protest in Phnom Penh

India:  

Punjab sanitation workers continue statewide action

Tamil Nadu power distribution workers begin indefinite action for permanent jobs
 
Gig workers hold statewide strike in Telangana state 

18. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

Bogdan Syrotiuk

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.

Jul 24, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. Perspective: Trump preparing forces for “massive attack” on Iran

The Trump administration is concentrating US military forces in the Middle East and Europe for a vast expansion of US imperialism’s war against Iran.

According to an article published Wednesday in the Wall Street Journal, “In the past week, special-operations forces have deployed to the region from their U.S. bases, according to flight-tracking data and U.S. officials. Squadrons of jet fighters have been staged across the Middle East, and bomber aircraft at bases in the U.S. and U.K. are on high alert to ramp up operations, according to one of the officials.”

According to the article, more than 150 medics have arrived in recent days at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, the largest American military hospital abroad and the first stop for troops wounded in the Middle East. This is a clear indication that the Trump administration is preparing for a major increase in American casualties.

*****

A US effort to reopen the strait by force would be a massive undertaking. Mark Montgomery, a retired U.S. Navy rear admiral, told the Financial Times in an article published Thursday that degrading Iran’s ability to launch drones and missiles could take weeks of as many as 150 to 200 American strikes a night. The FT also quoted a maritime adviser: “Iran only needs to hit one tanker to put everyone off.” 

*****

The Trump administration is driven to escalation by the logic of the war, which is now in its fifth month. American imperialism has failed to achieve any of its stated objectives, including the overthrow of the Iranian government and the seizure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which a large percentage of the world’s oil and natural gas passes. 

Every failure by the Trump administration has led to an even greater and more reckless escalation. In January, the administration encouraged and tried to arm protests inside Iran that it had hoped would overthrow the government. That operation’s failure led Trump to seek regime change by killing Iran’s leaders on February 28. These murders, too, failed to break the resistance of the Iranian population, and the administration escalated to a months-long bombing campaign that has killed more than 3,600 people and to the ongoing blockade.

Now the administration sees a massive and desperate escalation as the only way to rescue the prestige of US imperialism. In March 1965, as the Johnson administration prepared its escalation in Vietnam, Assistant Secretary of Defense John McNaughton wrote in a memorandum later published in the Pentagon Papers that 70 percent of the American purpose was “to avoid a humiliating US defeat (to our reputation as a guarantor).” That same month, the first 3,500 Marines landed at Da Nang; by the end of 1968, 536,000 American troops were in Vietnam.

A similar logic is involved in the war against Iran, under even more dangerous conditions. Washington calculates that a withdrawal after nearly five months of losses would shatter the world position of American imperialism in the eyes of its rivals, above all, China, and would represent a devastating blow to US domination.

American imperialism, staggering under massive debts, also confronts a deepening crisis of the dollar’s dominance in the world financial system. Federal debt held by the public has passed 100 percent of gross domestic product, the dollar’s share of world reserve assets has sunk to its lowest levels in three decades, and a survey of central banks published at the end of June found, for the first time, more of them planning to cut their dollar holdings over the coming decade than to increase them.

The war has the support of the entire political establishment. On Wednesday, the House passed a $1.15 trillion military authorization bill, 216-212, with six Democrats supplying the margin. After the Democrats ensured sufficient votes to pass the bill, the remainder were allowed to vote against. In January, 149 House Democrats approved the $839 billion military appropriations bill that paid for the assault on Iran launched five weeks later.

Beyond conflicts over geopolitical strategy, the main concern of the Democratic Party is to prevent the emergence of popular opposition from below. The escalation of the war is being made without any explanation or warning, from any section of the political establishment, to the American people, who have opposed the war in every major poll since it began. No section of the ruling class is telling the population of the massive escalation of the war being prepared. 

The escalation now underway will have catastrophic consequences for the population of Iran, the region and the entire world. Imperialism is in the initial stages of a global war that is continually expanding in scope. With each new stage, the danger of nuclear war grows.

The war has created the framework for a massive assault on the social position of the working class. Everything is to be subordinated to the unprecedented expenditures for war. Trump has declared the intention of the oligarchy to attack Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Food aid has already been cut off for 1.5 million children, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

The renewed bombing is having a devastating effect on US households. Gasoline passed $4 a gallon this week, up from $3.14 a month ago, and the war has cost the average household some $450 in higher energy bills, by CNBC’s estimate—more than wiping out the tax rebate Trump promised. For the first time in three years, inflation is erasing all wage gains.

The war is necessarily fueling the growth of the class struggle, in the United States and throughout the world. Already, in the first half of 2026, this movement has begun to emerge explosively. The international working class, armed with a socialist program, is the social force upon which the struggle against imperialist war must be based.

2. Japanese defense minister calls for end of “taboo” on nuclear weapons

Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi publicly declared on July 17 that Tokyo should discuss the introduction of nuclear weapons into Japan. The comments were rare coming from a sitting member of government and demonstrate Tokyo’s escalating program of remilitarization as part of the US-led war drive against China.

Speaking in an interview with the online program Genron TV, Koizumi stated, “While this is a difficult issue for Japan to discuss, one topic we cannot avoid is nuclear weapons.” These comments came shortly before the far-right defense minister headed to Europe. He cited both France and Finland as examples to emulate as Paris plans to boost its nuclear arsenal while Helsinki recently lifted a ban on the deployment of NATO nuclear weapons to the country.

Koizumi presented the issue of hosting or acquiring nuclear weapons in Japan—the only country to suffer from atomic bomb attacks—as a necessary one in case of an “emergency.” He added: “Considering this, I believe we must make even greater efforts to explain that the security environment in which Japan finds itself requires us to approach every policy with a strong sense of crisis, discussing and advancing them without any taboos.”

Since the eruption of the US/NATO-stoked war in Ukraine against Russia, Tokyo has regularly declared that “Ukraine today could be East Asia tomorrow,” accusing China of planning an attack on Taiwan as a pretext for Japan’s rapid remilitarization.

However, neither Washington’s nuclear arsenal nor Japan’s nuclear ambitions has anything to do with defense. US President Trump has reportedly asked if using low-yield nuclear weapons against Iran “was doable.” In the event of war with China, the US would no doubt resort to these weapons, making Japan a potential staging ground for such attacks.

The deployment of nuclear weapons to Japan would further destabilize the Indo-Pacific region, no doubt leading to a broader arms race and the even greater danger of a nuclear war.

Responding to Koizumi’s remarks, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian stated on Monday, “If the Japanese authorities stick to their miscalculation on the nuclear issue, push to revise the three non-nuclear principles, and deploy allies’ nuclear weapons in Japan, they not only gravely challenge the postwar international order and the international nuclear non-proliferation regime, but also breach the commitment to peace, defy what the Japanese people want, and will eventually pay a heavy price for it."

Both Washington and Tokyo have goaded Beijing for years over Taiwan, regularly challenging the One China policy, whether by dispatching high-level diplomatic missions, sending naval warships through the Taiwan Strait, or backing pro-independence sentiment on the island. Beijing is extremely sensitive to the issue, fully conscious that if Taiwan were to declare independence, it would set a precedent for the future carve-up of Chinese territory while providing the imperialist powers with a military base against the mainland.

*****

Last November, far-right Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi provocatively declared that an “emergency” on Taiwan would constitute a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan—the legal justification needed for war against China in the name of supposed “self-defense.”

In the short term, the most likely scenario would be for Tokyo to host US nuclear weapons on Japanese soil. However, Tokyo has no intention of simply being Washington’s junior partner. Rather, allowing the US to openly base nuclear weapons in Japan would set a precedent for Tokyo to go further, establishing its own nuclear arsenal. Tokyo has a stockpile of at least 8,000 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium, enough to make 1,600 nuclear weapons. Other estimates of Japan’s stockpiles are considerably higher.

With its own nuclear weapons, Japanese imperialism would be more capable of asserting its own economic and strategic interests, including at the expense of the US, as it seeks to re-establish itself as the primary power in the region.

*****

Having been eclipsed by China as the world’s second largest economy, Japan is seeking to reverse its decline by all means including military. This requires not only dispensing with the ruling class’s phony adherence to “pacifism,” but also running roughshod over the democratic rights and interests of the working class as a whole.

3. Swelling student protests rattle India’s far-right government

The protest movement took on heightened significance this week, when tens of thousands defied a government ban on their marching on the parliament buildings. True to its violent and authoritarian instincts, the Modi regime responded with ferocious police repression—tear gas, baton charges, mass detentions and the deployment of thousands of paramilitary forces.

The youth agitation follows an uprising in April of thousands of brutally exploited workers in Noida, on the outskirts of New Delhi, and in the town of Manesar in the neighboring state of Haryana. Workers in both industrial townships have been criminalized and thrown into prison just for demanding a livable wage.

India’s student youth face bleak prospects on every front: Either they are denied access to higher education through a college-entrance system rotten with corruption thereby limiting them from the outset to poverty wages; or upon graduation they confront a labor market that offers most degree-holders gig work, unemployment or underemployment.

The Indian government’s own Labor Force Survey has found that the country’s unemployment rate is the highest it has been in 45 years, a figure so politically explosive that the Modi government initially suppressed it. Of the more than 10 million young people entering the labor market each year, only a tiny fraction secure formal sector employment. This is not an accident or a temporary dysfunction—It is the structural outcome of a capitalist order that generates spectacular wealth for 229 billionaires, whose combined net worth exceeds $1 trillion, while condemning a generation to permanent precarity.

*****

The immediate roots of the current agitation can be traced to June 6, when thousands of demonstrators gathered in Delhi, India’s capital, for the first major public event of a new movement calling itself the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP)—founded as the result of the mass response to an anti-establishment social media meme. After holding protest marches in several other major cities, the CJP launched a continuous sit-in protest at Jantar Mantar in central Delhi on June 20. Eight days later, environmental and education reform activist Sonam Wangchuk began an indefinite hunger strike at the protest site in solidarity with the students.  

The initial spark was the revelation that examination questions for the NEET medical college entrance exam on May 3 had been leaked by politically well-connected, student-coaching businesses. NEET is a mandatory, brutally competitive examination through which over 2.3 million students compete annually for a mere 136,000 medical college seats. The examination was subsequently cancelled and rescheduled for June 21. The consequences were devastating: At least 12 young people, their hopes crushed and their years of preparation rendered worthless, took their own lives.

The name “Cockroach Janata Party” is a spoof of the name of the ruling Bharatiya Janata (Indian People’s) Party and a product of the growing social rage. On May 15, India’s Chief Justice Surya Kant made remarks from the Supreme Court bench denouncing the tens of millions of unemployed Indian youth as “parasites” and “cockroaches.” The contempt was not incidental—It was a naked expression of the utter disdain with which the ruling class views the masses of young people it has failed and discarded. Moreover, it was popularly recognized as such. India’s youth have transformed the slur into a symbol of defiance—even if the CJP itself does not go beyond the bounds of establishment politics and has sought to confine the protest movement to the most limited demands.

*****

On Monday, July 20, tens of thousands of demonstrators attempted a “Sansad Chalo”—March to Parliament—timed to coincide with the opening day of the parliament’s “Monsoon Session” in a show of defiance of the Modi government.  

Rattled by the scale and determination of the CJP-led movement, the government had preemptively criminalized the march and widely broadcast its ban in the hopes of intimidating the protesters.

But when this manifestly failed, the Delhi police, acting on the government’s orders, met them with a brutal show of force. Massive contingents of security personnel had been deployed to block the march before it could reach the Parliament. Police fired tear gas into crowds of demonstrators and launched repeated baton charges, indiscriminately beating young men and women who had gathered peacefully. Numerous protesters were detained, and over 200 persons were so severely beaten that they suffered from broken bones, deep skull lacerations and toxic levels of exposure to tear gas. A 21-year-old girl was so badly injured she has had to receive treatment in an ICU.

Several Delhi Metro stations were temporarily closed in a deliberate attempt to choke off the flow of demonstrators into the city center, while sweeping restrictions were imposed across parts of the capital, turning New Delhi into something resembling a city under siege.

Conspicuous among those who joined the Sansad Chalo were a number of courageous youth who had to wear bandages wrapped around their heads to cover the wounds police had inflicted on them the night before, when police violently cleared the Jantar Mantar protest site.

In the wake of Monday’s events, the protest movement has continued to grow, with the sit-in re-established at the Jantar Mantar protest site and sympathy protests held in a number of cities, including Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad and Patna. In the latter city, the capital of Bihar, India’s second most populous state, police savagely attacked a demonstration of tens of thousands on Wednesday.

On Thursday, Modi broke his silence on the youth agitation. In a short social media post he feigned concern for India’s youth and promised to set up a so-called “fast-track” court to punish those responsible for national examination leaks, of which there have been scores over the past decade.

The government is also dangling an offer of resuming the talks it held with CJP representatives on Monday.

*****

India’s bourgeois opposition parties—led, above all, by the Congress Party and its grandly named but politically hollow “INDIA” alliance—have rushed to position themselves as champions of the protesting students and youth. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, that hereditary symbol of India’s dynastic bourgeois “opposition party,” made a show of attempting to join the July 20 “Sansad Chalo” march as it headed toward Parliament. He was briefly detained by Delhi police.

*****

The organizations historically identified as the “left”—the CPM and CPI, and the trade unions, including the Stalinist-led Center of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) and All-India Trades Union Congress (AITUC)—are rightly widely discredited. In the name of opposing the Hindu supremacist BJP, they have for decades systematically suppressed the class struggle, supporting right-wing governments at the Center, imposing what they themselves describe as pro-investor policies in the states where they hold office and isolating militant workers’ struggles. 

Both the Noida workers’ agitation and the current student protest movement erupted outside the traditional establishment structures, the unions and the ostensible opposition parties. This is a reflection of the depth of the social crisis and the popular alienation with the entire establishment, “left” and right, and carries within it the seeds of something genuinely threatening to the BJP government and the capitalist ruling class as a whole.

But it also poses the central danger—as already evidenced in the politics of the CJP leadership—with which every such movement is confronted. Unless aimed at mobilizing the working class on a socialist and internationalist program, mass protests, however militant and defiant, remain vulnerable to being brought under the control, diverted and ultimately dissipated by bourgeois and pseudo-left political forces. That is what happened to the mass uprising in Sri Lanka in 2022.

*****

Socialist-minded youth must fight to turn the protest movement to the working class, beginning with the workers in Noida and the Gurgaon-Manesar industrial belt. It is the working class that has the social power to defeat the Modi government and to transform society to make social equality its guiding principle. But if this power is to be mobilized, the working class must forge its political independence from all the pro-capitalist parties, including the Stalinists, and rally the oppressed toilers behind it in the fight for a workers’ government and the socialist reorganization of society. This requires building new organizations of class struggle, independent rank-and-file committees, and above all a revolutionary working class, that is, Trotskyist, party.

4. Trump administration witch-hunts People’s Forum and BreakThrough News

Socialism AI summary:

The House Ways and Means Committee has issued subpoenas to three non-profit groups — People's Forum, Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research, and BreakThrough News — alleging they received nearly $40 million in funding from Neville Roy Singham, a multi-millionaire former tech executive now living in Shanghai. Committee chair Jason Smith and right-wing media outlets like Fox News are pushing the claim that the Chinese Communist Party is the real source of the funds, framing the investigation as an effort to close "loopholes" in tax-exempt law. The subpoenas, which the groups' attorneys have challenged on First Amendment grounds, are part of a broader anticommunist witch-hunt that also targets the Party of Socialism and Liberation (PSL), with suggestions that PSL-led campaigns against AI data center development are a Beijing-directed effort to sabotage US technological dominance.

The article identifies this as a classic "big lie" — attributing social conflict in America to "outside agitators" rather than to the objective class divisions of capitalism. It also notes that right-wing conspiracy theorists are absurdly claiming that the massive "No Kings" protests were orchestrated by Singham and George Soros. While the WSWS emphasizes its long-standing and unbridgeable political differences with the PSL and the targeted groups, it unequivocally condemns the Trump administration's witch-hunt as an attack on the democratic rights of the working class as a whole, warning that such precedents could be used against any left-wing, socialist, or working-class organization.

5. Conclusion of a four-part series: Chile’s “left” enablers of Kast’s counterrevolution

The most politically significant aspect of the current situation in Chile is the role being played by the parties of the former ruling coalition—the Broad Front (FA), the Communist Party (PC), the Socialist Party (PS), and the Party for Democracy (PPD). Under former President Gabriel Boric, these parties implemented the same law-and-order agenda, the same anti-immigrant policies, the same fiscal discipline, and the same defense of capitalist property relations that the current administration of ultra-right President José Antonio Kast is now radically intensifying.

The Kast government did not emerge from a vacuum. The millions of workers who voted for Kast in December 2025 did not do so out of enthusiasm for fascism. They voted out of desperation after having been betrayed by the pseudo-left government that promised change and delivered more of the same. Kast won 310 of Chile’s 346 communes. Jeannette Jara of the Communist Party, the candidate of the ruling coalition, captured only 36 communes and did not win a single commune in the southern regions. This was not a turn to the right; it was a rejection of a political establishment that had exhausted its credibility.

*****

The four-month evolution of the Broad Front, Communist Party, Socialist Party, and Party for Democracy in relation to the Kast government’s mega-reform cannot be understood through the lens with which these parties seek to portray themselves—as a principled “opposition” defending social rights against a far-right assault. A Marxist analysis must penetrate beneath the surface drama of negotiations, betrayals, and internal fractures to identify the class character of these organizations, the political function they perform, and the real content of their “opposition.”

Before analyzing their tactical maneuvers, we must be clear about what these organizations are.

The Broad Front is a pseudo-left formation rooted in the affluent upper-middle class. As the World Socialist Web Site has documented, it is “explicitly anti-Marxist, substituting the fight to establish the political independence of the working class with the selfish concerns of the upper-middle layers for equality in corporate boardrooms and the capitalist state.” Its historical function—identical to that of Podemos in Spain, Syriza in Greece, and the Democratic Socialists of America in the United States—is to ensnare radicalized youth and workers with left-sounding phraseology and dissipate their struggles into the dead end of parliamentary reformism.

Gabriel Boric's presidency (2022–2026) was a definitive expression of this global political phenomenon. He appointed austerity-committed Mario Marcel as finance minister, slashed spending, showered the Carabineros militarized police with funds, and rammed through 15 pieces of repressive security legislation. The Broad Front is not a bulwark against the right. Rather it provides “progressive” cover for policies the right could never legitimize on its own.

The Communist Party is a Stalinist organization that severed any connection to revolutionary socialism within just a few years of its founding in 1922. By the 1930’s it had adopted Stalin’s “two-stage” theory of revolution, which subordinated the working class to the so-called “progressive national bourgeoisie,” when no such section of the ruling class existed. During the 1970–1973 Popular Unity government, the Communist Party feared the independent mobilization of the working class far more than the threat of a military coup, the results of its policy written in blood by Pinochet's forces and 17 years of dictatorship.

During the restoration of civilian rule, the Stalinist party completed its transformation into an outright bourgeois organization, serving as junior coalition partner to President Michelle Bachelet and providing critical support to Boric’s government. The new generation leading the party is, like the Broad Front, rooted in the affluent upper-middle class. Key cadre—Jeannette Jara as Labor Minister, ex-student radical Camila Vallejo as government spokesperson—administered austerity and police-state policies. In 2025, Jara ran for president on a platform that competed with the right on immigration and security. The Communist Party is not the “historic party of the Chilean working class;” it is a party of the bourgeoisie that uses the memory of workers’ past struggles to betray them.

The Socialist Party and Party for Democracy are bourgeois reformist organizations of the old center-left Coalition of Parties for Democracy (Concertación) and New Majority. For 30 years after the dictatorship, they preserved and strengthened every pillar of Pinochet’s neoliberal agenda—privatized pensions, two-tier health care, labor repression, constitutional protections for capital—while presenting themselves as the “democratic” alternative to the right.

The Socialist Party (PS) was founded in 1933 as an explicitly anti-Marxist and anti-Internationalist organization. It was from the beginning an instrument of capitalist rule, albeit with a mass working class base. Following the US-backed coup that toppled the reformist government of Socialist Party President Salvador Allende the PS was transformed into one of the instruments for the US-backed restoration of civilian rule. PS President Ricardo Lagos (2000-2006) led a neoliberal government: his corporate tax rate at 17 percent was lower than what Kast now proposes. The PPD was created as the “instrumental party to bypass the PS’s nominal socialist identity while pursuing identical policies. Neither party has any connection to the working class. Their social base is the professional-managerial strata and sectors of the bourgeoisie that prefer a more “stable” form of class rule than the far right offers.

The Christian Democratic Party, which forms part of this “opposition” bloc, is a right-wing bourgeois party. It was the party of the 1973 coup’s enablers, of the civilian restoration’s architects, and of every major neoliberal reform since 1990. Its inclusion in the “opposition” coalition is not an anomaly—it reveals the coalition’s true character.

*****

What, then, has been the political function performed by this bloc of parties over the past four months?

The answer is that they are managing the political fallout from a reform that the Chilean ruling class needs but that threatens to provoke social opposition. Their “opposition” is not directed against the capitalist system the mega-reform serves, but at mitigating the political and electoral consequences of being seen to support it. This is a division of labor. 

*****

The opposition is now threatening to appeal to the Constitutional Court over tax stability, the ultimate expression of commitment to bourgeois legality. The Constitutional Court is an institution of the capitalist state. Its function is to adjudicate disputes within the ruling class and to ensure that legislation conforms to the constitutional framework that protects private property.

What is absent from the opposition’s arguments is as significant as what is present. Nowhere does the opposition call for the working class to organize independently against the reform. Nowhere does it call for strikes, demonstrations, or mass mobilization. Nowhere does it argue that the reform should be defeated by extra-parliamentary means. Nowhere does it connect the mega-reform to the broader crisis of capitalism or call for the socialist transformation of society. That would be asking too much.

*****

Kast’s mega-reform is a declaration of class war. The working class must prepare its response—not in the corridors of Congress, where the pseudo-left begs for amendments, but in the streets, the workplaces, and the communities, through the mobilization of its collective power. The crisis of Chilean capitalism is deepening. The task is to ensure that the working class emerges from this crisis not as the victim, but as the gravedigger of the system that has produced it.

6. German political satire show Die Anstalt bows to censorship in its 100th edition

A Socialism AI summary: 

The German political satire show Die Anstalt marked its 100th edition with a broadcast marked by censorship and self-censorship. Shortly before recording, ZDF management cancelled a planned performance by musician Danger Dan and pianist Igor Levit of their anti-fascist song "Keine Angst" ("No Fear"), with ZDF director Norbert Himmler branding it "a set of instructions for left-wing, violence-prone resistance." This was an outrageous assault on artistic freedom — made all the more striking because neither Levit nor Danger Dan is a left-winger; both support the government's positions on the Gaza and Ukraine wars, and Danger Dan's group Antilopen Gang even released a song attacking Palestinian solidarity and defending Israel's war.

The presenters protested the cancellation but failed to mount a principled defense of the artists, instead distancing themselves from any "calls to vigilante justice." Their entire program was oriented toward demanding a state ban on the AfD, a party now polling near 30 percent nationally. Such a ban, Peter Schwarz argues, would mean erecting a police state in the name of fighting the right — strengthening the very police and intelligence services riddled with AfD supporters, who would inevitably deploy their power against opponents of capitalism.

The article traces how the show has degenerated over twelve years. Once a genuine satirical voice willing to take on the powerful, Die Anstalt now glorifies figures like Robert Lehr, the Adenauer-era interior minister who banned the Socialist Reich Party as a prelude to outlawing the Communist Party, and celebrates the theory of "militant democracy," which extends democratic rights only to those who do not call the existing social order into question. The show even features a sketch urging Chancellor Friedrich Merz to collaborate with the Left Party — in reality a combination that has only accelerated the AfD's growth by channeling discontent back into right-wing politics.

The ruling class turns to fascism when class antagonisms can no longer be contained by democratic means, which is why far-right parties are rising across the imperialist centers. The defeat of fascism therefore requires the international mobilization of the working class on the basis of a socialist program that unites resistance to war, fascism, and social inequality with the struggle against their common cause — capitalism. Die Anstalt's reliance on a strong state to suppress the far right represents the opposite of such a perspective.

7. New Zealand First campaigns on anti-immigrant chauvinism and militarism

Ahead of the New Zealand election, the right-wing NZ First party has called for recent migrants to be disenfranchised and for unemployed youth to be drafted into the military.

8. Third Dallas-area postal worker dies in three years amid extreme heat

Umeshkumar Thakkar, a 58-year-old rural letter carrier, is the third Dallas-Fort Worth postal carrier in just over three years to die on his route amid dangerous heat.

9. Cleveland library and hospital workers authorize strike action against low wages and unsafe conditions

Cleveland library and hospital workers are moving toward strike action as more than 100 Lorain County social service workers continue one of the longest public-sector strikes in Ohio history.

10. Workers in the US, Canada denounce threat against Will Lehman, voice support for fight against UAW bureaucracy

Will Lehman campaigns with Sterling Stamping workers

Opposition continues to mount among autoworkers and other sections of the working class to the death threat made against Will Lehman, the Mack Trucks worker and socialist candidate for president of the United Auto Workers. Workers at Stellantis and auto parts plants in the Detroit area, along with other workers in the US and Canada, have condemned the threat and voiced support for Lehman’s campaign to abolish the UAW bureaucracy and transfer power to workers on the shop floor.

The threat—an AI-generated image depicting Lehman bound, gagged and bleeding, with a masked assailant pointing an automatic rifle at this back—was made by Raymond Jensen Jr., a UAW Region 9 organizer. To date, the Fain administration has not taken any disciplinary action against Jensen, who was paid $202,000 last year, according to UAW financial records.

The threat is the response of a bureaucratic apparatus in deep crisis. UAW President Shawn Fain is the subject of a federal criminal investigation for abuse of power and retaliation against his internal rivals. At the same time, the apparatus confronts a growing rebellion from below: workers at Nexteer Automotive in Saginaw, Michigan rejected three sellout agreements by overwhelming margins, and opposition is spreading throughout parts plants where the UAW apparatus has enforced poverty wages for decades. Lehman’s campaign has given this opposition conscious political expression, and it is precisely this that the bureaucracy fears.

*****

The WSWS also spoke with Camille, a former auto parts worker from Detroit, who joined Lehman as he campaigned earlier this week at Bridgewater Interiors and the Warren Truck Assembly Plant.

“The threat against Will was honestly egregious,” she said. “While I was handing out flyers to workers, I told them Will is an advocate for the working class or else they wouldn’t be threatening him. Although it is horrible, it’s proof that he truly is fighting for a good cause.

“For these union officials, their air conditioned offices and high paid positions in the UAW are at risk because somebody is finally coming along who is going to fight for the workers. They are intimidated because they are being called out.

“There’s no way a UAW official should be able to get away with making a death threat towards somebody without any consequences. If a worker made such a threat against someone at work or online, they would be terminated. During my time at Flex-N-Gate, I saw people get fired for less, including using profanity on the line.”

The threat, Camille said, followed “a classic playbook of the higher-ups using intimidation against anybody who speaks out for workers,” a pattern that has run throughout the auto industry and every other industry for generations. “It just makes me support Will Lehman more in his mission to actually put workers’ issues on the board in the UAW and take back power against these corrupt union leaders.” 

*****

She concluded with an appeal to other workers: “Capitalism and worker exploitation, these systems were made by people, and they can be dismantled by people. As difficult as it may seem, it is not impossible to dismantle these systems. It can be done. And we can have a better life for ourselves. It is worth fighting for.” 

*****

This week, Lehman visited the Stellantis assembly and stamping plants in Sterling Heights, Warren and Detroit, the Bridgewater Interiors and Dana plants in Warren and the Nexteer plant in Saginaw. On Thursday, his campaign posted interviews with Stellantis workers at the Sterling Heights Assembly Plant and Detroit Assembly Complex-Jefferson plants.   

*****

Workers from other countries have also voiced their support. Yacine, a Montreal-area postal worker, said, “As a union worker, I wish to condemn in the strongest possible terms the death threats made against Mr. Will Lehman. This type of behavior is intolerable, illegal and can under no circumstances be normalized. The physical and psychological safety of everyone is a fundamental right. I offer my full support during this ordeal and strongly encourage reporting these acts to the competent authorities to ensure the protection of workers and uphold our rights.”

The breadth of this response testifies to the fact that workers see in the attack on Lehman an attack on themselves. What distinguishes Lehman’s campaign from those of Fain, Boyer and others is not a difference over who should administer the apparatus but a fundamentally opposed program. Lehman calls for the abolition of the bureaucracy itself and the transfer of power and decision-making to workers on the shop floor, organized in a network of rank-and-file committees and linked internationally through the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC).

Against the economic nationalism of Fain, who has tied workers to trade war and the war aims of the American ruling class, Lehman insists that autoworkers in the US can defend their jobs and living standards only by uniting with their class brothers and sisters in Mexico, Canada, China and around the world. The threat against him has only underscored what is at stake: The bureaucracy will stop at nothing to defend its privileges, and workers can defend themselves only by building an independent movement from below.

11. UAW claims ratification of Dana master wage agreement in yet another betrayal of auto parts workers

The United Auto Workers announced the ratification of the master wage agreement covering Dana auto parts workers who are members of the UAW and United Steelworkers (USW). The four-year contract covers some 4,000 workers at 14 Dana plants in the US Midwest and South. The UAW did not present an exact breakdown of the vote only claiming it was “massive.” However, the few figures obtained by the WSWS indicated substantial opposition, including the outright rejection of the deal by workers at the Dana Driveline plant in Toledo, Ohio.

A letter posted by the UAW Competitive Shop/IPS UAW Vice President Rich Boyer, who is running for UAW president against incumbent Shawn Fain [and the insurgent socialist candidate Will Lehman], stated:

Major gains were achieved through tough collective bargaining. The UAW Dana Council & USW committees and their members stood in solidarity to achieve their expectations and more for the following gains:

$3 increase at ratification with $700 retro

$30 in 2029

$8 increase for skilled trades over life of agreement

Pension maintained for all members with a $0.10 increase over life of agreement

$3000 signing bonus

40 hr bank to use for short work week

Boyer does not note that the contract would also extend the wage progression for new hires to five years, while freezing starting pay for new hires at a poverty $21 an hour over the life of the contract. Those hired after ratification will not see the $30 an hour wage under the life of the contract. Thus the deal effectively expands the divisive tier system that undermines solidarity and encourages management to victimize workers in order to maintain a supply of super-exploited workers at the bottom of the pay progression.

The contract specifically excluded workers from the Crossville, Tennessee Dana distribution center, whose top pay will be capped at $26 an hour. To secure passage, the UAW-USW included a larger ratification bonus and $700 retroactive pay to active workers. The bureaucracy also organized a snap vote, handing workers only cherry picked “highlights” and forcing them to cast ballots the very next day in many cases.

There is no protection in the contract against the layoffs that are sweeping the auto and auto parts industry, as employers use AI and automation to eliminate jobs and shift the costs of the loss of EV subsidies, tariffs and intensified global competition onto the backs of workers. Following the 2021 sellout, Dana closed plants in Auburn Hills, Michigan and Lima, Ohio.

*****

The vote at Dana follows a series of contract sellouts in the auto parts supplier industry where the UAW has colluded with management to impose sellout deals over massive rank-and-file opposition. The contracts imposed varied but uniformly substandard contract terms, with pay rates vastly inferior to even the inadequate pay levels at the Big Three assembly plants. The contracts maintain separate contract expiration dates to undermine solidarity between workers at different companies. Needless to say none of the contracts fall due on May 1, 2028, the date the Big Three contracts expire and when UAW President Shawn Fain has proclaimed his bogus general strike threat.  

*****

The suppression of opposition, the systematic overriding or ignoring of strike votes, the deliberate isolation of strikes when they occur and the refusal to organize a coordinated fight among all auto parts workers is part of a deliberate pattern by the UAW apparatus aimed at defending the interests of management.

The UAW bureaucracy is deeply integrated into the structure of the corporations and the state on which the inflated salaries of the apparatus depend. Fain has consistently voiced his support for the US war machine, often wearing a t-shirt emblazoned with a World War II bomber, and has lined up behind Trump’s trade war measures against the overseas rivals of US capitalism. The necessary corollary of this program, which is not just that of Fain, but the entire UAW bureaucracy, is the crushing of working class militancy in order to secure the “home front” in the war with Iran and the looming war with China.

This program is meeting determine opposition on the part of workers. At Nexteer, workers formed a rank-and-file committee which led the rank-and-file opposition that caused the rejection of three contracts in a row. It has also been shown in the growing support for Will Lehman, the Mack Trucks worker and socialist candidate for UAW president. Lehman is fighting for the abolition of the union apparatus and the transfer of power to workers on the shop floor through the expansion of a network of rank-and-file committees. 

12. Protests erupt in Madison, Wisconsin following police execution of Corey Ruiz

Protests and mass anger erupted in Madison, Wisconsin, Wednesday afternoon following the police execution of Corey Ruiz, a 38-year-old father and longtime resident of the city. An as-yet-unidentified Madison police officer shot Ruiz multiple times in the head in broad daylight and in front of dozens of people, many of whom recorded the incident. The footage quickly went viral because of the brutal character of the latest murder by US police and immigration agents. 

In an initial press conference Wednesday following the killing, Madison Police Department (MPD) Chief John Patterson said police received a report shortly before 1 p.m. that a person was “allegedly checking parked vehicles.” Patterson said police located the man, “but he fled on a bicycle and then traveled through some nearby backyards, we think in an attempt to get away.”

At no point during the pursuit did Patterson claim that police witnessed Ruiz committing a crime. Nor did he state that police saw him brandish a weapon or attempt to assault officers or anyone else.

Patterson said that roughly half an hour after initially spotting Ruiz, police “reconnected” with him at the intersection of Baldwin and Williamson streets. Patterson said Ruiz “either fell off or was taken off of the bicycle by officers. We’re not sure which. That’s still being determined.”

Videos circulating on social media appear to show police knocking Ruiz off the bicycle. Within seconds of Ruiz falling to the ground, four police officers, three men and one woman, have him surrounded. The male cops are seen wrestling with Ruiz, at which point one yells, “He’s got a knife.”

The female cop runs toward Ruiz, who is in the middle of the intersection trying to stand up, and yells, “Taser, Taser, Taser,” before shooting him with the electronic shock device. After being shocked, Ruiz is seen falling to the ground and curling into the fetal position.

Despite video clearly showing Ruiz subdued by the Taser, Patterson claimed in his press conference that its deployment was “unsuccessful.”

Patterson claimed that the cop who proceeded to shoot Ruiz in the head was injured at some point during the brief struggle by a “fixed-blade” knife wielded by Ruiz. It is not apparent in any of the circulating videos when this alleged injury occurred.

One of the male cops is seen placing his knee and most of his body weight on Ruiz’s left hip as he lies curled up on the pavement. Another cop raises his right leg and appears to stomp on Ruiz’s left thigh. At this point, the third male cop, who is facing Ruiz, pulls out his pistol, leans forward and shoots Ruiz approximately three times in the head.

Patterson said the cop who shot and killed Ruiz is a “veteran officer.” Video recorded after the shooting shows the officer being led away from the scene and speaking with other cops. Despite allegedly being injured by a knife, the cop is not seen seeking medical attention or applying bandages. No blood is visible on him.

After shooting Ruiz, the cops did not immediately render aid. Instead, they restrained his wrists and began going through his pockets. One cop is seen tossing what appears to be a large kitchen knife to the side. Police pulled out Ruiz’s wallet as blood from his skull poured onto the pavement, staining the street red.

Witnesses immediately reacted with horror and anger. “No, you didn’t have to kill him!” a woman yelled, adding, “I saw everything!”

*****

Jazzman Brown, a friend of Ruiz since they attended middle school and La Follette High School together in Madison, told Channel 3000 that Ruiz struggled with homelessness and mental health issues but was “more than his rap sheet.”

Beginning in 2007, Ruiz was convicted of several misdemeanors, including charges related to drug possession, as well as felonies that included battery or threats against a judge and resisting police.

Brown added, “He was a human. He had children, a family, people that loved him. And he did not deserve to be gunned down in front of the world.”

*****

A review by the Homelessness Policy Research Institute found that police encounters with homeless people are more likely to involve force than encounters with housed people, particularly when the victim has a mental illness. In Los Angeles, homeless people were arrested at 17 times the rate of the general population.

This persecution is bipartisan. Democrats have joined Republicans in transforming homelessness, itself the product of soaring rents, poverty wages and the destruction of social services, into a crime.

Following the Supreme Court’s 2024 Grants Pass ruling, Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom ordered state agencies to dismantle homeless encampments and later demanded that cities adopt ordinances forcing homeless people to relocate every 72 hours. Nationwide, more than 350 cities and 14 states have enacted measures criminalizing homelessness since the ruling. These policies place thousands of defenseless people in the direct line of fire of the police.

Pleading for calm Thursday, Madison’s Democratic mayor, Satya Rhodes-Conway, said “Good investigations take time,” and that she supported “peaceful” protests.

*****

There is no centralized government database tracking police killings in the United States. Journalists and researchers are forced to piece together news reports to provide insight into the near-daily police killings that occur across the country.

The billions of dollars poured into police budgets in states and cities, led by both Democrats and Republicans, have not reduced the number of people killed by police. Over the last decade, police have killed more than 1,000 people every year. In 2026, Mapping Police Violence had tracked at least 689 police killings as of early July.

The Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post, which previously tracked 10,429 people killed by police between 2015 and 2024, stopped maintaining its database following Trump’s return to the White House.

13. Volodymyr Zelensky appoints new Commander-in-Chief amid intensifying drone warfare

A brief outline assisted by Socialism AI:

a. The Leadership Shake-Up

Zelensky fired Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi and replaced him with Mykhailo Drapatyi. This followed days of protests against Zelensky's earlier dismissal of Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov — a move that "startled" NATO officials and drew criticism from figures like Vitaly Klitschko. The protesters, dominated by pro-war veterans and middle-class layers, demanded Syrskyi's removal. Drapatyi is a Fedorov ally.

b. The Real Conflict: Drone Warfare vs. Conventional Warfare

The Fedorov–Syrskyi clash was not personal but strategic. Syrskyi represented the "old guard" with Soviet-era methods. Fedorov, 35, has been hailed by the New York Times as "Ukraine's Drone Warfare Mastermind." He blocked artillery ammunition purchases in favor of drones. Drapatyi's appointment signals a decisive shift toward Fedorov's approach: massive, AI-assisted long-range drone strikes deep inside Russia — now averaging 300–350 per day.

c. The US Role and the Drone Technology

The drone campaign is enabled by Hornet attack drones — AI-assisted, $5,000 each, carrying 5 kg of explosives up to 200 km. They are developed and sold by Swift Beat, owned by Eric Schmidt, the former Google CEO deeply tied to US intelligence, the Democratic Party, and the military-industrial complex. A DC think-tank fellow publicly endorsed Drapatyi before his appointment, indicating US backing.

d. Drapatyi's Record

Drapatiyi's career is entirely bound up with the NATO proxy war: he helped suppress Donbass separatists after the 2014 coup, was awarded the "Transitional Sword of the Queen of Great Britain," and later commanded the disastrous Ukrainian invasion of Russia's Kursk region — a debacle conveniently omitted in Western coverage.

e. The Escalating Toll on Civilians

The drone campaign increasingly targets civilian and economic infrastructure:

  • Oil refineries have been hit so heavily that Russia, one of the world's largest oil producers, has begun importing oil, with thousands waiting in fuel lines for hours or days.
  • Wildberries warehouses (Russia's Amazon equivalent, delivering to millions of households and to soldiers) were struck twice — killing at least seven workers trapped in a burning warehouse, with 10% of the company's warehouse space now destroyed.
  • The Kremlin spokesperson admitted the situation is "difficult."
  • Hundreds of civilians have likely been killed this year. In a single night (July 22–23), 18 Russian regions were hit, with deaths including a 3-year-old child.
  • On the Ukrainian side, the UN recorded 1,396 civilian deaths in the first half of 2026 — a 37% increase over the same period in 2025.
The article's central point: this is not a routine military reshuffle. It marks the consolidation of a US-backed drone-warfare strategy that is escalating the war's civilian bloodshed on both sides, all while the Western media celebrates Fedorov as a "mastermind" and the human cost is systematically downplayed.

14. Australia: Second strike by Victorian teachers deepens crisis for Labor government and unions

As it has done from the outset, the Australian Education Union will do everything possible to prevent any further industrial action by wearing down opposition to its sell-out deal with the government.

15.  United Kingdom: East Midlands Railway workers to strike over safety concerns connected to the Bedford train crash

Rail, Maritime and Transport union members working at EMR, including staff responsible for onboard train operations and passenger safety, have voted for strike action over safety concerns surrounding the Hitachi-built Class 810 fleet.

16. Italy: Moroccan worker dies after police pin him face-down during arrest in Bologna, sparking protests across Italy

The killing of Abderrahim Fakir is the product of escalating police-state repression as Meloni’s government intensifies authoritarian rule against growing working-class resistance.

17. Lebanon agrees to align with US against Iran, disarm Hezbollah and accept Israeli occupation

US President Donald Trump’s meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun at the White House forms part of a broader US–Saudi strategy to isolate Iran by eliminating its influence in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq.

Aoun’s visit—brokered by Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler, Mohammed bin Salman—was aimed at securing assurances that Washington would pressure Israel to withdraw from Lebanon, increase funding for the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), support reconstruction in the devastated south, and approve loans and aid to avert economic collapse.

It came just one week after newly installed Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al‑Zaidi agreed with Trump on steps to disarm pro‑Iranian militias by the end of September, the deadline for the withdrawal of all US forces.

Aoun’s meeting followed his signing of the US‑brokered “agreement” with Israel on June 26, signalling Lebanon’s intention to end the state of war that has defined Lebanese–Israeli relations since 1948 and establish peaceful and diplomatic ties. Aoun aligned his government with Washington and Tel Aviv’s campaign to disarm Hezbollah—which, with its Shi’ite allies, forms one of Lebanon’s largest political blocs, the March 8 Alliance—and dismantle it as a political force.

*****

Hezbollah (Party of God) emerged in the 1980s during Israel’s brutal occupation of southern Lebanon from 1982 to 2000, an extension of Lebanon’s 15‑year civil war—a proxy conflict shaped by competing regional and imperialist powers and Israel’s suppression of the Palestinians. Backed by Iran and the Assad regime in Syria, the bourgeois religio‑nationalist movement drew support from impoverished Shi’ite and Palestinian communities devastated by decades of state corruption and the looting of Lebanon’s wealth by a handful of billionaires who have dominated the country since 1990. 

The party promotes corporatism, paternalism—providing vital welfare services—and religious obscurantism as a counterweight to class struggle. Together with its Shi’ite and Palestinian allies, Hezbollah forms the largest bloc in Lebanon’s sectarian and fragmented political system and remains the principal obstacle to domination by the US‑ and Gulf‑aligned financial elite. As part of Iran’s “Axis of Resistance”—which includes Hamas, Shia militias in Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen—it supports Palestinian factions in southern Lebanon and hosts a Hamas bureau in Dahiyeh, its stronghold in Beirut’s southern suburbs.

*****

The June 26 agreement to disarm Hezbollah with Israel’s help marks a decisive break with Lebanon’s decades‑long policy of recognizing Hezbollah as the semi‑official “resistance” to Israeli occupation and repression of the Palestinians, symbolized in the slogan “the people, the army and the resistance”. It confirms the announcement made last August by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam’s cabinet committing to Hezbollah’s disarmament—without which no financial aid or loans from the US, France, or the Gulf would be released to rescue Lebanon’s bankrupt economy. The agreement repudiates any notion that the state retains political independence or sovereignty.

*****

[Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz have insisted that Israeli troops will maintain an indefinite presence in southern Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza. Netanyahu boasted, “We dominate southern Lebanon, from the summit of the Beaufort, and we will remain as long as required in the security zone. We do not intend to withdraw from it.” He claimed the agreement was a “major blow” to Iran, saying that Israel, Lebanon, and the United States were telling Tehran, “This is none of your business”.

*****

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem denounced the agreement as “null and void”, calling it humiliating and a surrender of sovereignty. He vowed to continue armed resistance against Israel’s occupation of Lebanese soil and rejected provisions linking Israeli withdrawal to Hezbollah’s disarmament, warning that the agreement could ultimately lead to annexation of Lebanese territory. Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah warned that the government could not enforce the agreement “unless they go, with American support, to civil war”.

A spokesperson for the Lebanese Armed Forces stated that it was not bound by an arrangement it had neither participated in nor approved.

18. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

Bogdan Syrotiuk

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.