Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today:
1. This week in history: March 30-April 5
- 25 years ago:
50 years ago:
75 years ago:
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg sentenced to death for espionage
100 years ago:
- Mass “No Kings” protests draw millions across US and around the world
- David North barred from speaking at “No Kings” rally in Nuremberg, Germany
- At Romulus, Michigan rally, immigration attorney Eric Lee calls for working class movement against detention camps, dictatorship
- Romulus rally exposes Democrats’ role in covering for ICE and war
- At Toronto “No Kings” protest, anti-war sentiment collides with Democratic Party politics
- Thousands gather in front of Federal Building in Ann Arbor Michigan
- San Francisco Bay Area protesters denounce Trump, ICE and war on Iran
- Protest fills Norfolk, Virginia’s Town Point Park
- In Los Angeles, anti-Trump anger collides with Democratic Party control
- March 28 “No Kings” protests: The fight against the war on Iran is at the center of the fight against Trump’s dictatorship
4. Actors, performers oppose Trump at No Kings protests and elsewhere–the question of the Democratic Party looms largeThe scale of the March 28 protests reflected the depth of popular anger at the advance of dictatorship at home and the escalation of imperialist war abroad. A collision is unfolding between a capitalist oligarchy that is breaking with democratic forms of rule and the broad mass of the population.
The war against Iran, now one month old, was a decisive animating force for those participating. While it was downplayed by the organizations that called the protests, opposition was expressed in signs and chants in city after city. As the demonstrations were taking place, Trump was preparing a further escalation with potentially catastrophic consequences for the planet. The day after the protests, the Washington Post reported that the Pentagon is preparing for “weeks or months” of ground operations in Iran and that planning for such operations “has been in development for weeks,” under the cover of fraudulent “negotiations.”
Speaking at the No Kings rally in New York, veteran actor Robert De Niro told the crowd that he supported the anti-Trump movement “150 percent.” No other president has been such an “existential threat” to constitutional rights as Trump, he continued. “The president “must be stopped, he must be stopped now.” De Niro went on:
It’s time to say no to kings. It’s time to say no to Donald Trump. We’ve had enough. No King Trump, no unnecessary wars that rob our resources, sacrifice our brave servicemen and women and slaughter innocents. No corrupt leader enriching himself and the Epstein class buddies. No taking away healthcare from our most vulnerable neighbors, no unaffordable groceries, no unaffordable energy, no unaffordable housing and no inflation at its highest level since COVID. No government masked thugs shooting down our neighbors in the streets. Trump has to be stopped.
The actor added that Trump “can’t do all the f—-ed up things he’s been doing without the collusion of Congress and the goons in his administration…It’s diabolical…They should be afraid of us.”
*****Every honest criticism of the Trump administration and the American ruling elite’s assault on democracy, drive to dictatorship and homicidal war on Iran is welcome. Every exposure of the government’s lies, every puncturing of its public posturing helps undermine confidence in an utterly rotten political and economic system.
However, that hardly resolves all the political issues and contradictions embedded in the present situation. The leading performers mentioned—Fonda, De Niro, Springsteen and Baez—all have histories of supporting the Democratic Party or one or another of its candidates, including various “mavericks.” Springsteen and Fonda appeared on a platform in St. Paul Saturday groaning with Democratic Party politicians, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, Rep. Ilhan Omar, Gov. Tim Walz, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan and Attorney General Keith Ellison. Walz introduced Springsteen.
In their comments, the prominent actors and musicians hewed closely to the Democratic Party line. Aside from De Niro’s reference to “the collusion of Congress,” there was no mention of the Democrats’ complicity with Trump all down the line, including on the massive aggression against Iran. In regard to the latter, in keeping with the official No Kings strictures, there was again almost no mention this past weekend of this brutal conflict by any of the artists. The general implication, left hanging in the air, was that the answer to the fascist Trump was voting for the Democrats in the mid-term elections (De Niro referred limply, for example, to the solution lying in the “ballot box.”)
The Democrats, however, are not an opposition party, they are a party of imperialism, soaked in blood from head to foot. They agree in fundamentals with Trump’s reactionary and sinister measures, objectively driven by the crisis of American and world capitalism, only differing on tactical and entirely secondary questions.*****Again, the vocal opposition to Trump’s wars, at home and abroad, is timely, but the basis for a movement to drive out this administration will have to be anti-capitalist and socialist, because there is no fight against war and authoritarianism without a fight against capitalism today. This also means that a genuine anti-war, anti-fascist movement must be independent of and implacably hostile to all the political parties and organizations of the capitalist ruling class, including every wing and faction of the Democratic Party.
The growth of profound radicalism among the artists is inevitable, given the present intolerable conditions created by capitalism. The force and influence of such a movement will not depend on a sudden turnaround in the orientation of an older generation, but above all in the upsurge of the working class in struggle and the consequent emergence of genuine, fierce opposition to the entire status quo by primarily younger and more determined artists.
As Russia is being drawn into an escalating global conflict, class tensions in the country have been rising significantly. Over the last year mass layoffs have hit several key industries, including IT and various services industries, but also major state-owned companies such as the Russian Railways (RZD) and the metals producer Rusal. As of November 2025, at least 10 companies in mining, transport and machinery had shifted to shorter working weeks to cut costs, according to a report by the Moscow Times.
While media coverage of strikes and protests in Russia is slim, several strikes and protests have apparently taken place over the past year. According to a report by Solyanka Media, this year has seen strikes over the withholding of wages at several workplaces, including construction sites by Novoleks and facilities of Orgenergostroi. Since March 20, railway workers of the company SeverPut’Stroi have gone on strike in the Republic of Komi. One of the striking workers told the Moscow Times that they have received no full paycheck since December 2025. In February they were not paid at all. Alexandra told the outlet, “People need something to live on. I have three children, I have to pay for utilities, for school, and everyone of course also wants to eat.” According to a report dated March 25, workers from other companies that are supplied by SeverPut’Stroi also face months-long withholding of wages and are planning to join the strike.
Official figures by the agency Rosstat indicate that overdue wage arrears rose 2.3 fold and have now reached the highest level since 2016 (2.077 billion rubles or 25.169 million USD.) 14,700 workers did not receive their wages, an almost two-fold increase of 6,500 relative to 2024. In most cases, companies claim that they are unable to pay wages due to high interest rates of the Central Bank and a slowdown in the economy. Domestic demand has declined significantly, with many commentators pointing to the indebtedness of the population as a major factor.
More layoffs and wage cuts are already underway. The Russian Railways have announced plans to cut 15 percent of their staff in 2026, or around 6,000 people. Several auto plants have also announced layoffs and reduced working hours. Thus, one media report indicated that AvtoVAZ and GAZ, the two largest Russian car companies, officially transitioned to a four-day work week in September. Real incomes of auto workers have declined by some 20 percent.
The metal giant Rusal has been shutting down some of its key facilities. Thus, on January 1, Rusal’s Kremniy plant in the Irkutsk region stopped production. It was the largest silicon facility in the country. Several other factories of Rusal have shifted to reduced working weeks. Rusal is one of the country’s largest companies and one of the biggest metal producers in the world. Its workforce in Russia is estimated at between 40,000 and 50,000, the vast majority of them are factory workers. The company’s annual revenue frequently ranges around $12 billion to $15 billion.
*****The case of Boksitogorsk’s Rusal plant has provoked considerable nervousness in the ruling class with the governor of the region calling upon the Kremlin to intervene. Rusal is owned by the billionaire Oleg Deripaska who has an estimated net worth of around $7.6 billion. Perhaps even more than other oligarchs, who have amassed their wealth through the plundering of state assets during the restoration of capitalism in the former Soviet Union, Deripaska is widely hated in the working class.
In 2009, a mass protest by workers of Rusal in another monotown, Pikaliovo, led to one of the most tense class confrontations in Russia under Putin. In the wake of the 2008 crash, Rusal stopped paying its workers for months while also ceasing to pay its water and electricity bills. As a result, local authorities shut down water and electricity for the residents, prompting an angry protest by workers who stormed the local city hall and blocked the highway to demand their wages and jobs. The situation became so tense that the Kremlin considered it necessary for President Vladimir Putin to intervene. At the time, Putin chided Deripaska on public television, forcing him to get the factory back running and presenting himself as a defender of the interests of workers against the oligarch.
*****The Ukraine war, now in its fifth year, has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives with no end in sight. Ukraine also still regularly strikes targets on Russian territory, with dozens, sometimes hundreds of drones, intercepted each day. While some strikes hit residential areas, most target industrial and energy facilities and the casualties are often workers. In recent weeks, Russian forces have also been pushed back by the Ukrainian army, reportedly suffering significant casualties.Meanwhile, what is essentially already a global war has entered a new stage with the US-Israeli attack on Iran. Even while Russia might benefit in the short term from higher oil prices and the lifting of some sanctions, fundamentally the new imperialist carve-up of the entire continent targets Russia as well as China. The Russian press and pundits close to the Kremlin have also been alarmed by the prospect of the war spreading directly to the border of Russia, in both the Caucasus and Central Asia. Already, the conflict has dragged in Azerbaijan, a key country in the Caucasus which has long been built up by both the US and Israel as an important ally in a war against Iran.
In an indication of how desperate the Kremlin is in trying to reach a deal with US imperialism, the Kremlin not only abstained from a vote on a resolution condemning Iran for striking US allies in retaliation for the attack. According to a report in the Financial Times, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has also offered to stop sharing targeting intelligence with Iran, in exchange for an end to Washington’s intelligence partnership with Ukraine. Washington reportedly rejected the offer.
While haggling to reach a settlement with the imperialist powers, the Kremlin is simultaneously ratcheting up its campaign of internet censorship. Earlier this year, the Russian state blocked WhatsApp, which had been used by over two-thirds of the population. The Kremlin is also expected to shut down Telegram, the only nominally encrypted messenger still available to Russian users. Meanwhile, the rolling mobile internet shutdowns which have centered on the provinces have begun to significantly disrupt life in the country’s largest and economically most important cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. In a recent poll, 83 percent of teenagers indicated that they opposed these shutdowns.
The decision by Donald Trump to have his signature placed on the US dollar bill will no doubt be greeted by anger and hostility as another expression of his drive to establish a personalized dictatorship in the United States, implement a fascist agenda of imperial conquest abroad and a war against the democratic and social rights of the working class at home.
As critics of the decision have pointed out, the placing of a sitting president’s signature on the currency or his image on a gold coin violates the anti-monarchical principles on which the revolution was based.
But at the same time, it could well be that Trump’s decision to affix his signature to the dollar comes to be regarded as entirely appropriate, a fitting symbol of the economic, cultural and political decline of US capitalism, of which Trump, who resembles nothing so much as a Mafia gangster, is the personification.
Economically this decline and the deepening crisis to which it is giving rise is expressed nowhere more sharply than in the position of the dollar.
*****In the past four decades, starting with the stock market collapse of 1987, the largest one-day fall in history, the US financial system has been rocked by a series of financial crises, each one more serious than the last. Major turmoil in the 1990s, of which the collapse of Long Term Capital Management in 1998 was the most serious, was followed by the bursting of the dot.com bubble at the turn of the century.In the first years of the new century, it appeared, at least to short-sighted observers, principally those at the highest levels of the financial administration of the US state, that financial crises had been overcome and a veritable new epoch had dawned dubbed the “Great Moderation.”
That fiction was ripped apart by the financial crash of 2008, sparked by the outright criminal activities of banks and financial institutions and speculators, the very milieu from which Trump emerged and who he now represents at the top of the US state.
And the contradictions of the financial system erupted again in March 2020 when the US Treasury market, where US government debt is bought and sold and which forms the basis of the global financial system, froze. No buyers could be found for the supposedly safest financial asset in the world, a US government dollar-denominated bond. The Federal Reserve had to intervene with an injection of trillions of dollars to prevent a total collapse of the financial system.
Today the central question in the financial markets is not whether there is going to be another financial disaster, but what will trigger it. Will it be sparked by a withdrawal of the crucial supplies of international finance from the $30 trillion US Treasury market, leading to a liquidity crisis? Will there be a collapse of the bond market when the insatiable demands of the US state—driven by ever-increasing military spending—become too large to be met?
*****And outside the world of finance, in the real economy, there are deepening concerns. Key sections of industry have already taken a hit from the Trump tariffs and now there is the impact of the price increases flowing from the war against Iran, starting with gas and diesel but extending across a vast range of industrial commodities.The much-touted revival of American industry pledged by Trump has not materialised and mass layoffs are taking place in key areas. The “golden age” for the US economy and American workers has turned into a cruel joke as they are hit first from one side and then another.
*****The media release from the Treasury Department on the decision to put Trump’s signature on the dollar bill and to mint a gold coin with his image read as if they were written by Jonathan Swift or some other master satirist.
A statement issued in the name of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent read: “Under President Trump’s leadership, we are on a path toward unprecedented economic growth, lasting dollar dominance, and fiscal strength and stability. There is no more powerful way to recognise the historic achievement of our great country and President Donald J. Trump than US dollar bills bearing his name, and it is only appropriate that this historic currency be issued at the Semiquincentennial.”
These statements have been issued to give the impression of strength. They indicate the exact opposite. Tinpot dictatorships, racked by internal crises, conflicts and divisions, have their officials give such paeans of praise to their “great leader.” Stable regimes have no such need.
President Herbert Hoover has gone down in history because of his intimate association with the Great Depression, giving his name to the “Hoovervilles,” shanty towns of unemployed workers and displaced farmers.
But on this occasion, as American capitalism lurches into crisis, there is no Franklin Roosevelt waiting in the wings with a New Deal to avert social revolution. Roosevelt had at his disposal the enormous resources of a still rising American capitalism. Those resources have now gone. They have been replaced by a mountain of debt and paper dollars which will now have Trump’s name on them.
The crisis of American and global capitalism cannot be resolved through reforms from within the system. There are none. The only resolution is the socialist revolution by the American and international working class, unified objectively by the global character of production and now the onslaught against workers in every country emanating from the war Iran, to reconstruct society on new foundations. Trump, together with his signed dollars, and the system he represents must be cast into the rubbish bin of history.
On Saturday, as 8 million people marched across the United States and internationally in the “No Kings” protests against the Donald Trump administration, fascist operatives behind the US regime gathered in Dallas, Texas, for the CPAC 2026 (Conservative Political Action Conference). The event was addressed by Flávio Bolsonaro, who is running as the far-right’s candidate in the Brazilian presidential elections in October. Flávio is standing as the political representative of his father, the former president Jair Bolsonaro, now serving a 27-year sentence for the coup attempt that culminated in the January 8, 2023 fascist insurrection in Brasília.
In his speech before CPAC, Flávio Bolsonaro eloquently presented the fascist strategy driving his campaign. Demanding direct US imperialist intervention in the Brazilian elections, he pledged to continue the coup conspiracy for which his father was convicted.
“They called him the Trump of the Tropics,” Flávio said referring to his father. Addressing Bolsonaro’s imprisonment, the Brazilian junior fascist continued: “The formal charge is similar to what President Donald Trump faced: insurrection. Sound familiar? But the real reason is the same. … My father fought against COVID tyranny. He fought against drug cartels. He fought against global elite interests.”
Promising to follow the example of the frenzied dictatorial drive taken by the US fascist president upon returning to office, he added: “Trump 2.0 is being much better than Trump 1.0. Right? Well, Bolsonaro 2.0 will also be much better.”
Flávio also laid bare the deep connection between the Brazilian fascists’ domestic agenda and collaboration with US imperialism’s ruthless neocolonial and military aims in Latin America, particularly in the escalation of war against China. He declared:
Here’s what should really get your attention. Brazil is going to be the battleground where the future of the hemisphere will be fought, because Brazil is America’s solution to break dependence on China for critical minerals, especially rare earth elements. …
[Brazilian President Luiz Inácio] Lula [da Silva] and his party are openly anti-American. He speaks publicly about undermining the dollar as the global currency. He has aligned Brazil with China on a massive scale. He has opposed America’s interests on every single issue of foreign policy, publicly criticizing President Trump’s actions on Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, and the fight against drug trafficking. …
Opinion polls published in recent weeks have shown a rise in the number of Brazilians indicating their intention to vote for Flávio Bolsonaro, whose standing has risen continuously since his jailed father named him in December as his proxy presidential candidate.
*****Flávio Bolsonaro’s rise in the polls has provoked despair within the Workers Party (PT) which is seeking Lula’s reelection through a rerun of the “broad front” with right-wing parties with which he was elected in 2022. The catastrophic outcome of this political perspective is revealed by the fact that, six months before the elections, Flávio already appears in a technical tie with Lula.*****Lula’s collapse in the polls represents a historic indictment, not only of this current term, but of the entire experience of PT governance. Selling itself as a better manager of capitalism in Brazil, with the idea that all social classes would benefit from the growth of national capital, PT administrations have proven incapable of significantly altering the economic and social reality of the country, which remains one of the most unequal societies in the world.*****This pattern is repeated on a regional scale: the demagogic and pro-capitalist policies of the Pink Tide paved the way for the recent rise of Milei in Argentina, Kast in Chile, Paz in Bolivia and a host of other fascist-type figures across Latin America. As the World Socialist Web Site noted regarding the analogous phenomenon in Europe, “the fact that the right is strengthening has less to do with its intrinsic power than with the complete bankruptcy of what passes for the left.” The necessary political response to the rise of fascism, war, and the capitalist offensive is the construction of a revolutionary political alternative in the working class.
In an interview published Sunday in the Financial Times, US President Donald Trump announced his “preference” to “take the oil” from Iran—a massive expansion of the US war of aggression that would only be possible through a ground invasion of the country.
Trump’s statement of his intent to massively expand the war was announced one day after what organizers said were as many as 8 million people took to the streets across all 50 states in the third round of “No Kings” demonstrations—which would make them the largest single-day protests in American history. Despite efforts by the organizers to downplay opposition to the war in Iran, the demonstrations expressed the overwhelming popular opposition to it.
The Financial Times interview, conducted by Edward Luce, was published as the Pentagon ordered thousands of additional troops to the region. Trump compared the planned seizure of Iran’s oil to Venezuela, where the US intends to control the oil industry “indefinitely” following its capture of President Nicolás Maduro. “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran,” Trump said, “but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people.”
Such a move would involve seizing Kharg Island, through which most of Iran’s oil is exported. Trump told the Financial Times: “Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options.” He added: “It would also mean we had to be there for a while.”The Wall Street Journal reported separately Sunday that Trump is actively making plans for a military operation to extract nearly 1,000 pounds of uranium from Iran—“a complex and risky mission that would likely put American forces inside the country for days or longer.”*****Trump claimed he could take Kharg Island “very easily,” saying Iran has “no defense” on the island. The military’s own assessments contradict this. CNN reported that Iran has fortified the island with an estimated 30,000-40,000 personnel, air defense systems, underground trenches, land mines along the coastline and swarms of first-person-view kamikaze drones. Harrison Mann, a former Army major and Defense Intelligence Agency analyst, toldRepublican Senator Lindsey Graham compared the planned operation to Iwo Jima, one of the bloodiest battles of World War II, and said: “We did Iwo Jima, we can do this. My money’s always on the Marines.” Iran’s parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said Sunday that the US was “secretly planning a ground invasion” while publicly talking about negotiations, according to Reuters.
More than 50,000 US troops are now deployed across the Middle East, according to the New York Times. The 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU)—2,500 Marines and 2,500 sailors—arrived in the region on Friday. Another 2,200 Marines from the 11th MEU are en route aboard the USS Boxer. Roughly 2,000 paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division have been ordered to the region. The Wall Street Journal and Axios reported that the Pentagon is drawing up plans to send another 10,000 troops to the region.In Lebanon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered Sunday the expansion of what he called the “security zone” in southern Lebanon. More than 1,238 people have been killed and 3,500 wounded since Israel launched its assault on March 2, according to Lebanon’s Health Ministry, including 124 children. More than 1.2 million people have been displaced. Israeli forces have reached a tributary of the Litani River. PBS NewsHour reported that three journalists were killed Saturday in a targeted Israeli airstrike on a marked press vehicle in Jezzine.
After 30 days of war, the civilian death toll in Iran continues to climb. The human rights group Hengaw, using field documentation, reported at least 6,530 killed through Day 25, including 640 confirmed civilians. The Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) documented at least 1,551 civilian deaths, including 236 children. Iran’s Red Crescent reported more than 81,000 civilian sites damaged, including 61,000 homes and nearly 500 schools. Between 3.2 and 4 million Iranians have been internally displaced. A near-total internet blackout has sealed off 90 million people from the outside world for 30 days.
*****On the Sunday talk shows, no Democrat on any of the four major programs used the words “war crime” or “international law” in connection with the Iran war. Last weekend, former Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Donna Brazile declared on ABC’s Sunday news program: “Democrats understand that Iran has posed a threat, not just to the region, the Gulf, but to the world itself.”
The entire Democratic leadership—Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Minority Whip Katherine Clark and Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar—voted for the $839 billion military budget that funds the war.
The outgoing government, comprising the liberal Freedom Movement (GS), the Social Democrats (SD) and the Left Party (Levica), no longer has a majority of its own. GS, led by incumbent Prime Minister Robert Golob, came out on top with 28.6 percent, but only by the narrowest of margins ahead of Janez Janša’s right-wing conservative Democratic Party (SDS), which secured 28 percent. Even with the votes of the Social Democrats (6.7 percent) and the “left-wing” electoral alliance Levica-Vesna (5.5 percent), Golob does not have a majority in parliament.
A right-wing alliance comprising the SDS, a three-party right-wing conservative electoral alliance and the SDS splinter group Democrats also lacks a majority of its own. The far-right party Resni.ca (Truth) with 5.5 percent could now become the kingmaker. The party was formed at the height of the coronavirus pandemic by anti-vaxxers and coronavirus deniers, and combines social backwardness with hate speech against migrants. Like the SDS, it also maintains close ties to openly fascist circles.
Yet this has not deterred Golob from a possible coalition with the far right. On Friday, he invited the leaders of all parties and alliances represented in the new parliament—with the exception of the SDS—to explore the possibility of a “government of national unity.”
The right-wing conservative alliance (New Slovenia (NSi), People’s Party (SLS) and Fokus) declined the invitation. It stated that the Golob government had been voted out and that it would only join a government led by the SDS. The remaining parties, on the other hand, offered to work with Golob’s GS on an emergency law that would allow them to bypass parliament and pass legislation in the event of protracted coalition negotiations.
Numerous political commentators consider cooperation between the previous coalition partners and Resni.ca or the Democrats to be likely. This would result in a further, significant shift to the right.
The strike by 3,800 JBS meatpackers in Greeley, Colorado has now been extended into its third week, a significant development in the growing confrontation between workers and one of the largest meatpacking corporations in the world.
Previously, officials from the United Food Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7 had indicated that it would limit the strike to two weeks. That workers remain out shows both their determination and the depth of the anger over poverty wages, dangerous working conditions and soaring healthcare costs and the company’s refusal to meet their demands.
Eduardo and Ezekiel, two workers at the Greeley plant, told the World Socialist Web Site the company, “treats the animals better than us. They don’t care about us. We are not going back until we get something good. Without us they don’t make any money.”
Mac, another meatpacker said he supports “equal conditions for workers everywhere.” Jose noted the exorbitant costs imposed on workers’ for their personal protective equipment: “It’s $800. We shouldn’t have to pay for that out of pocket.”*****Under these conditions, the company is gambling that it can outlast the strike, utilizing grinding poverty and government threats against immigrants—who are a large majority of the workforce at the plant—to soften workers up.
The proposed wage offer only underscores the contempt with which the corporation views workers. The 60 cent initial raise does not even keep pace with inflation and amounts to a real pay cut, before proposed increases to workers’ health insurance plans. Workers are being told to sacrifice while JBS reports enormous revenues and profits.
The UFCW itself says it remains “ready to meet with JBS at any time.” But talks could only lead to gains for workers if they are the ones taking the initiative, not the company. Instead, the bureaucracy’s perspective remains one of resuming normal production as soon as possible, not broadening the struggle into an industry-wide and international fight.
*****JBS is a multinational corporation with enormous resources. The UFCW’s own press release notes that JBS recorded $86 billion in revenue in 2025 and $2 billion in profits, while its stock rose on the basis of improved margins in the beef industry.JBS workers across the country should organize with the Greeley workers to shut down scab cattle processing at Cactus and other plants. Lines of communication must be established immediately between meatpackers in Greeley and workers at Cactus and other JBS facilities to accomplish this.
Workers must appeal for support across the industry and internationally. Meatpacking workers in every plant confront the same corporations, the same attacks on wages and benefits, and the same union apparatuses that seek to suppress a common fight.
This is a struggle with world dimensions because it is an international workforce fighting a multinational with operations in over two dozen countries. Recent statements of support for strike from JBS workers in Brazil shows enormous sympathy for the strike, which must be activated through global collaboration.
*****Now is the time to draw the necessary conclusions. Workers have shown they are ready to fight. What is needed is an independent, socialist perspective, that can lead to victory. Workers in Greeley interested in forming a rank-and-file committee should contact the World Socialist Web Site.
On March 25, the 210-day statutory deadline, which was imposed by the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, for the Trump administration to nominate a new director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) expired. Consequently, the premier US public health agency remains officially headless but under the de facto control of Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who simultaneously serves as director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Bhattacharya, an economist and co-author of the anti-science Great Barrington Declaration, shares Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s hostility to established public health measures. He will continue executing the duties of the office despite legally losing the title of acting director.
The expiration of the deadline comes just days after U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy issued a March 16 preliminary injunction blocking Kennedy’s overhaul of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and his sweeping rollbacks to the childhood immunization schedule. This administrative lapse also coincides with the government’s escalating efforts to validate right-wing anti-vaccine narratives, highlighted by a recently leaked federal report from an ACIP workgroup urging the formal medical codification of “COVID-19 vaccine injuries.”
It also follows the apparent stalemate in the Senate over the nomination of anti-vaxxer Dr. Casey Means as Surgeon General. Some Republican senators have balked over the nomination of an individual without a current medical license to the post, which is seen as America’s top doctor. This applies as well to Dr. Jerome Adams, Trump’s Surgeon General during his first term.
Under these conditions, pushing through a Senate-confirmed director risked a bruising confirmation battle, or the selection of a nominee who would assert the CDC’s traditional scientific independence. Keeping Bhattacharya in informal control instead ensures the agency remains paralyzed and subservient to Kennedy’s agenda at precisely the moment the federal courts are pushing back. Murphy’s ruling has sharpened the administration’s dilemma, because it must find a nominee ideologically aligned with Kennedy’s anti-vaccine crusade who can nonetheless survive Senate confirmation. Former CDC officials and public health experts are unequivocal—This is not bureaucratic neglect but a deliberate strategy to keep the agency leaderless, legally diminished and incapable of resisting HHS directives.
*****The vacancy is not an isolated failure but the predictable outcome of the administration’s war on CDC. Dr. Susan Monarez was confirmed by the Senate on July 29, 2025—the first CDC director ever to require Senate confirmation, a change made as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Twenty-nine days later, Kennedy fired her for refusing to pre-approve his ACIP recommendations and purge career vaccine officials. Clearly any CDC director who resists the anti-vaccine agenda will be removed.The ACIP purge in June 2025 was the starkest expression of this strategy. Kennedy dismissed all 17 independent voting members and replaced them with ideological loyalists, provoking a federal lawsuit. On March 16, Judge Murphy issued a preliminary injunction that stayed the appointments of the 13 newly installed ACIP members, nullified all their 2025 votes and froze the January 5, 2026 decision memorandum that slashed the childhood immunization schedule.
The leadership vacuum mirrors a devastating internal collapse. Over the past year, mass layoffs, forced attrition and prolonged administrative leaves have cost the CDC roughly a quarter of its workforce. Frozen grants and contracts have devastated morale. Core disease surveillance is severely disrupted, and the agency’s flagship journal, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, is publishing far fewer scientific articles. While federal grants still reach state partners, severe staffing shortages mean this funding is distributed without vital technical assistance or accountability.
*****
Dismantling vaccine liability shields has been a central objective of Kennedy and the anti-vaccine movement for decades. The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005 currently insulates COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers from direct lawsuits, routing claims through the federal Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). Anti-vaccine law firms, such as Siri & Glimstad, are challenging this framework in court, seeking to open the floodgates for conventional civil litigation. Embedding an ICD-10 diagnosis for COVID-19 vaccine injuries into federal policy—even absent any scientific consensus on causation—would hand those litigants a powerful tool, one that risks bankrupting the compensation system and driving life-saving vaccines off the US market entirely.
On Wednesday, the Albanese Labor government made more explicit and blatant its move to block Iranians trying to flee the criminal US-led bombardment that has already killed and maimed thousands of civilians and destroyed basic infrastructure, including schools and hospitals.Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke used his new powers, handed to him by legislation rushed through parliament with Liberal-National Coalition support two weeks ago, to issue a “control determination order” barring access to Australia for all Iranians—currently about 7,000—holding valid tourist visas.
According to Science Alert on March 20, the Runit Dome nuclear waste dump on the Marshall Islands in the northwest Pacific is continuing to deteriorate with deepening cracks in the site’s concrete capping and the casing vulnerable to rising seas due to global warming.
The 115-metre (377 feet)-wide dome was built between 1977 and 1980 as part of a supposed military cleanup. The 18-inch thick structure holds more than 3.1 million cubic feet of radioactive soil and debris, more than 120,000 tons of material contaminated by US nuclear waste including lethal quantities of plutonium. The dome was intended as a temporary fix and, to save money, the actual bomb crater on which it was constructed was never lined.
Accelerating climate change now threatens to turn the potential catastrophe into an irreversible regional disaster. Recent reports of new cracking, the daily in‑and‑out movement of radioactive groundwater driven by the tides, and rising seas around the structure show that it may have serious consequences for the wider Pacific and its impoverished populations.
Situated mid-way between Hawaii and Australia, the Marshall Islands has a population of 53,000 people. The island chain was occupied by Allied forces in 1944 and placed under US administration in 1947. It achieved nominal independence in 1986 under a neo-colonial Compact of Free Association (CoFA) which effectively still binds it to Washington.
Between 1946 and 1958, the US carried out 67 atmospheric and underwater nuclear explosions and a series of biological weapons tests in the islands. The largest, the Castle Bravo bomb detonated in March 1954, was 1,000 times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The blast vaporised part of Runit Island and sent a mushroom cloud six kilometres into the sky. Irradiated soil from the Enewetak and Bikini atolls, used as “ground zero” for the tests, was poured into a crater left from the detonations, mixed with concrete and covered with the shallow concrete dome.
Since the construction, groundwater has penetrated the crater, beneath which lies a bed of porous coral sediment. This is the main source of leaks, but experts are concerned that parts of the dome designed to sit above sea level will not stay above water much longer. US government data already shows sea level rise at Runit and project increases that will push waves higher over the dome, exacerbating cracking and infiltration.
With rising sea levels, the Marshall Islands is forecast to see many of its 29 atolls under water within 10 to 20 years. In 2019, the WSWS reported a Los Angeles Times investigation that showed climate change is breaking open the aging and weathered dome as it “bobs up and down with the tide,” threatening to spill nuclear waste into the ocean.*****Of the 4,000 troops posted to Enewetak during the 1970s and 80s, only a few hundred are alive today, according to records from the National Association of Atomic Veterans. It was not until 2023 that the US government officially recognised the survivors as “atomic veterans” who could access disability claims. “We couldn’t go to the VA [Veterans Affairs] before that so a lot of guys couldn’t get treatment,” Celestial said.He described the clean-up effort as careless. “We didn’t do a good job,” he said. “We didn’t know what the plan was so a lot of the equipment and hot stuff we just dumped into the lagoon.”
Hundreds of Marshall Islanders were exiled across the Pacific—impoverished, their homes devastated and health imperiled. An international tribunal concluded in 1988 the US should pay $2.3 billion in claims, but Congress and US courts refused. Documents cited by the LA Times showed the US paid just $4 million.
Washington has falsely asserted that locals now face little risk from radioactivity. At Bikini and Rongelap, residents initially returned to their islands after the US told them it was safe. The resettlement was a disaster. Cancer cases, miscarriages and deformities multiplied. By 1967, 17 of the 19 children who were younger than 10 and on the island during the Bravo detonation had developed thyroid disorders and growths. One child died of leukaemia.
Under the Compact with Washington, in exchange for limited funding and continued US military access, “all claims, past, present and future” related to nuclear testing were declared resolved. US officials now exploit this arrangement to shield Washington from any responsibility, with the legal burden for any remediation of Runit Dome resting primarily with the impoverished Marshall Islands government.
*****Today, the Marshall Islands are again assuming geo-strategic importance as part of Washington’s intensifying confrontation with Beijing. Once poisoned for nuclear weapons development, the tiny Pacific Island state is now, along with other parts of the Pacific, being secured and upgraded as a forward platform in the US-led drive to militarily encircle China.
Democratic Party candidate for US Senate in Michigan Abdul El-Sayed is appearing at back-to-back events at Michigan State University (MSU) and the University of Michigan (UM) on April 7, along with US Representative from Pennsylvania Summer Lee and podcaster Hasan Piker.
El-Sayed is one of three candidates seeking the party’s nomination for US Senate in the November midterm election. His campus tour is a calculated intervention by a faction of the Democratic Party—along with its pseudo-left satellites—to corral the growing leftward movement of students behind capitalist politics.
With Democrat Gary Peters retiring, the seat is open in a state that Trump carried in 2016, lost in 2020, and narrowly recaptured in 2024, making Michigan a key state from the standpoint of bourgeois electoral politics. Former Representative Mike Rogers has emerged as the leading candidate for the Republican Party, advancing a law‑and‑order, national security platform aligned closely with the White House.
*****The essential political function of the campus tour—which pairs the Democrat El-Sayed with a “progressive” member of Congress and a media personality branded as a leftist—is to direct opposition behind the false hope that electing Democrats in 2026 will stop the threat of fascism and the descent into a Third World War.*****Abdul El‑Sayed is a physician and former Detroit health director who first came to national prominence in 2018, when he ran in the Democratic primary for Michigan governor with the backing of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez (AOC), ultimately losing to Gretchen Whitmer, who went on to win the gubernatorial election and is currently serving a second term.
Born in Detroit in 1984 to Egyptian immigrant parents, El-Sayed has become a significant figure in Michigan Democratic Party politics, with media and Democratic Party-aligned groups referring to him as the “Mamdani of Michigan.” This is an attempt to connect him to the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member Zohran Mamdani, who won the New York City mayoral election as a Democrat in 2025.
El‑Sayed’s posture on the US‑Israeli war against Iran illustrates clearly the alignment of his politics with that of the Democratic Party. On social media he has issued posts under slogans like “NO WAR WITH IRAN,” presenting himself as an opponent of the conflict. But his actual criticism centers not on the criminal character of the war itself, but on procedural objections and Trump’s betrayal of his “America First” rhetoric.*****El‑Sayed’s criticisms are a repackaged version of this fundamental agreement between both parties, while carefully phrased to appear to align with widespread public anti-war sentiment. El-Sayed does not condemn the criminal murder by the US and Israel of the Iranian leadership, including the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, in a series of “decapitation” strikes beginning on the first day of the war.
Branding himself as a “single‑payer champion,” El‑Sayed’s program is entirely reformist and pro‑capitalist. He has presented himself as one of the most prominent advocates of Medicare for All. He proudly declares that he has “never touched corporate money” and that he is the only candidate openly running on Medicare for All, which supposedly distinguishes him from the Democratic Party establishment.
Yet El‑Sayed speaks of building a “broad-based movement” that comes together around policies that address affordability and expand public goods—not to expropriate the capitalist class and place major industries under workers’ control—but to “prove out” a policy through the Democrats.
*****Jacobin [Magazine] has praised El‑Sayed for never taking corporate money and for being the only Medicare for All candidate, presenting him as anti-establishment. The publication frames Michigan as a laboratory for demonstrating the viability of “movement” politics that can push the Democratic Party to the left on social issues, notably healthcare and affordability.
In an interview with Jacobin, El-Sayed emphasized that winning in Michigan would “suggest a way forward in the rest of the country,” meaning he had a strategy for rebranding the Democratic Party. While insisting he could “speak truth to power,” El-Sayed promised the ruling class that his proposals—single‑payer, limited debt relief, modest taxation of the wealthy—would not fundamentally threaten their wealth, property or control of the state.
This narrative is designed to obscure the lessons of Mamdani’s election-- that such figures—including Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—do not represent the working class and are not independent in any way of American imperialism. The El‑Sayed candidacy represents the same perspective in Michigan.
*****Globally, strikes and protests by workers, from autoworkers to logistics and public sector workers, indicate that a new period of class struggle is underway. As the wars and attacks on democratic rights are pushing masses of people to the left, the El‑Sayed campaign and its April 7 campus tour serve a specific political purpose: to create a dead‑end trap for the emerging mass movement and divert it back into the Democratic Party.
The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) advances a fundamentally different perspective. The SEP insists that the fight against war, fascism and social inequality requires a break from the Democrats and the independent political mobilization of the working class based on a socialist program. War is not an aberration, but the inevitable outcome of the capitalist system. Ending war means abolishing capitalism.
The SEP fights for the construction of rank‑and‑file committees in workplaces and schools, independent of the trade union bureaucracy and the Democratic and Republican parties, to organize strikes and mass action, including a general strike against austerity, layoffs and war. It calls for the expropriation of the banks and major corporations, placing them under democratic control as public utilities; the cancellation of student and medical debt; the guarantee of free, high‑quality healthcare and education; and the defense of democratic rights.
n the first days of March 2026, the Philippine National Security Council (NSC) announced it had uncovered and dismantled a Chinese espionage network operating inside government agencies. The online news outlet Rappler simultaneously published a three-part investigative series claiming Filipino civil servants had been recruited to pass military secrets to Chinese handlers. The Philippine military amplified the claims. Senator Risa Hontiveros of the Akbayan party demanded new surveillance powers and the suspension of visa-free entry for Chinese nationals.
The announcement and escalating allegations against and attacks on China for “spying” come as the Ferdinand Marcos Jr administration confronts an immense economic and social crisis caused by the spike in prices and curtailed supply of oil as a result of Washington’s war on Iran. There are strong indications that Marcos is looking to distance the Philippines from the United States and improve relations with China.
Theresa Lazaro, head of the Department of Foreign Affairs, announced that the Philippines was planning on conducting joint patrols of the South China Sea with China. A leading Marcos ally, Senator Erwin Tulfo, head of the Foreign Relations committee, called for the re-examination and possible scrapping of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) that allows the basing of US forces in the country and the deployment of US missile systems targeting China. On March 24, Marcos told Bloomberg that there would be a “reset” of relations between Manila and Beijing, and called for joint oil and gas exploration in the South China Sea.
Opposing this reset are many of the top brass of the Philippine military and the pseudo-left party Akbayan, which out of its merger with the elite Liberal Party, has become the most vocal proponent of Washington’s war drive against China in the Philippines.
It is in this context that the espionage campaign—whose immediate origins lie in a March 4 NSC press release and a Rappler series sourced entirely from military officials—must be understood.*****The identification of this alleged operation as a Chinese government intelligence program rests on the NSC’s assertion that anonymous informants transmitted documents to un-named Chinese nationals. This is not merely flimsy: it is unsubstantiated allegations piled upon baseless claims.
The March 2026 allegations are the latest in a sustained cycle that has been running since 2024, each episode following the same template: an announcement by security officials, media amplification, and charges that fail to materialize.
*****There is a long history of espionage conducted against the Philippines, including the rigging of elections, the subversion of democracy, and sabotaging of popular sovereignty—but it was waged not by China but by the United States.
CIA officer Edward Lansdale arrived in the Philippines in 1950, ran psychological warfare against the Hukbalahap peasant insurgency, managed the 1953 presidential election—writing Ramon Magsaysay’s campaign speeches, funding his campaign through CIA channels, and running a smear operation against Magsaysay’s rival. Philippine presidents were funded by the CIA; cabinet ministers and members of Congress were paid CIA assets. The Philippines served as the training laboratory for counterinsurgency methods exported across Asia and Latin America; the techniques developed there were carried to South Vietnam and to the Bay of Pigs in Cuba. Clark Air Base and Subic Bay were the platforms from which the United States bombed Cambodia and Vietnam.
The operations have never stopped. US Marine Corps MQ-9A Reaper drones now fly continuous surveillance missions over the South China Sea from Basa Air Base in Pampanga—an EDCA site—providing real-time intelligence on Chinese vessels to US Indo-Pacific Command. A permanent US special forces task force, Task Force Ayungin, is embedded in Philippine maritime operations. The intermediate-range Typhon missile system, capable of striking the Chinese mainland, has been deployed to Philippine soil.
Washington, in a secret psychological warfare campaign documented by Reuters in 2024, operated hundreds of fake social media accounts in Tagalog and other Philippine languages to sabotage the Chinese-manufactured Sinovac vaccine—distributing fabricated claims that it was “rat poison”—during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.
There are no Chinese drones flying from Philippine bases. There are no Chinese special forces embedded in Philippine commands. There are no Chinese missiles aimed at Washington on Philippine territory. China has never rigged a Philippine election, bought off a candidate, or flown bombing missions from its shores.
The scurrilous campaign against Chinese nationals and Chinese Filipinos waged by Akbayan and the Philippine military serve to buttress the violently tottering framework of the US empire in the Philippines, but it does more than this. In the context of explosive social unrest, Akbayan is bringing back into circulation the age-old racist scapegoating of the Chinese. They are employing the language of the pogrom.
Social Democratic Party leader Lars Klingbeil has reacted to the SPD’s recent election defeats with a frontal attack on pensions, working conditions, health insurance and other social achievements.
The DSA's role in the Los Angeles mayoral race exposes its function as an appendage of the Democratic Party in blocking the independent political mobilization of the working class.
A comparison with the environmental settings and biological adaptations of nearly 6,000 terrestrial mammalian species demonstrates the profound advantages of human cultural adaptations.
General Muhoozi Kainerugaba is grovelling, to signal the loyalty of the Ugandan regime to US imperialism.
The growth of Reform UK was used by the Together Alliance, to mount a “get the vote out” drive for the Labour Party, backed as necessary by the Green Party.
The 230 Unite union members are determined to overcome a deal failing to give them parity with their First South Yorkshire colleagues in Sheffield, just 18 miles away.
22. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!
The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.



