Dec 1, 2025

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. This week in history: December 1-7

  • 25 years ago:
UN report reveals AIDs as one of the deadliest epidemics in history

  • 50 years ago:

Indonesian dictatorship carries out US-backed invasion of East Timor

  • 75 years ago:

    United States military begins evacuation of Pyongyang  

  • 100 years ago:

Saudi forces capture Medina

2. US war crime exposed, as Trump escalates assault on Venezuela

Revelations of yet another horrific war crime committed by the US military in the southern Caribbean have surfaced, as the Trump administration is drastically escalating its unprovoked war threats against Venezuela.

According to multiple sources who spoke to the Washington Post, US Special Operations troops, acting on the direct orders of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, carried out a “double-tap” strike on a boat carrying 11 people near the shores of Venezuela on September 2.

“A missile screamed off the Trinidad coast, striking the vessel and igniting a blaze from bow to stern,” the Post reported. “For minutes, commanders watched the boat burning on a live drone feed. As the smoke cleared, they got a jolt. Two survivors were clinging to the smoldering wreck.”

One individual involved in the strike told the Post, “The order [from Hegseth] was to kill everybody.” This was the first in a series of deadly missile strikes that have sunk at least 22 small boats and killed at least 83 people from Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador and Trinidad. 

*****

This show of force, which is wildly disproportionate to the stated aim of deterring a relative handful of fishermen allegedly smuggling cocaine in boats that could never reach the US mainland, has been further escalated over the past few days. Trump off-handedly announced that the strikes at sea would soon be joined by attacks on land and issued via social media a personal decree declaring a no-fly zone over all of Venezuela.

The clear aim of this campaign is not drug interdiction but rather regime change in Caracas and the imposition of a US puppet government that would clear the way for the major US-based oil corporations to plunder Venezuela’s petroleum reserves, the largest on the planet.

The revelations regarding the September 2 double-tap strike only demonstrate that Washington’s predatory aims are being pursued with entirely criminal methods. Rather than rescue the survivors left clinging for life to the remains of their vessel, Special Operations commanders ordered a second missile strike, blowing them to bits.

*****

Even if some of the victims of the Trump administration’s Caribbean murder spree were transporting drugs, this is not a crime punishable by death, and it must be proven in a court of law, not punished by means of extra-judicial executions on the high seas. Nor is it by any stretch of the imagination an act of war. 

*****

Of course, this is not the first time that the Oval Office has been used to plot unlawful killings. Obama orchestrated drone assassinations, including of at least four American citizens, in meetings dubbed “terror Tuesdays,” while Trump ordered the 2020 assassination of senior Iranian official Qasem Soleimani, who was on a diplomatic visit to Iraq.

But there is more than a quantitative change in the current policy. What is unfolding is nothing less than the complete evisceration of the country’s political, constitutional and legal foundations and their replacement with the methods of a police state dictatorship and the law of the jungle.

Trump represents and personifies a criminal ruling oligarchy that wallows in filth, blood and obscene sums of personal wealth. He himself has weaponized the presidency for the purpose of stuffing hundreds of millions of dollars into his own pockets. According to calculations made by the Reuters news agency, the Trump family’s income has grown 17-fold to $864 million during the first half of this year, compared to the same period in 2024.

This criminality at the top finds no more telling expression than in the “full and complete pardon” Trump announced for ex-Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez, who was sentenced to 45 years in prison after being convicted in a US court for facilitating the importation of a staggering 400 tons of cocaine into the US. Hernandez was famously cited for telling one of his co-conspirators that he wanted to shove cocaine “right up the noses of the gringos.”

*****

The pardon of Hernandez makes a mockery of the Trump administration’s claims that its Latin American policy is driven by the need to rescue Americans from drug traffickers bent upon their destruction. No one in Trump’s circle or the ruling oligarchy as a whole could give a damn about overdose deaths. Rather they see drugs as a useful means of social control over the most oppressed layers of the population, as well as a lucrative source of profits for the financial sector. 

*****

The pardon was announced on the eve of Sunday’s Honduran election, together with Trump’s endorsement of Nasry “Tito” Asfura, the candidate of Hernandez’s right-wing National Party. Trump has vilified the candidate of the ruling Libre party, Rixi Moncada, as a “communist,” in large measure because the current government has broken off ties with Taiwan and established diplomatic relations with Beijing, an action taken by Washington itself nearly half a century ago. Asfura has vowed to cut off ties with both China and Venezuela if elected.

There is an undeniably maniacal character to the policy being pursued by the Trump administration throughout the region. Reflecting the increasing desperation of a ruling capitalist oligarchy trapped by the contradictions of its own failing profit system, it is trying to reverse the loss of US hegemony and the rise of China to the position of South America’s principal trading partner by means of missile strikes and intimidation.

This foreign policy constitutes an extension of a domestic policy of war against the working class. Attempting to reverse every social gain won by workers in the course of the 20th century, the US ruling class is turning to dictatorial methods, from the fascistic demonization and savage persecution of immigrants to the deployment of US troops to major American cities to fight the “enemy within.” Just as the Trump administration is murdering fishermen and migrants in the Caribbean, it will not shrink from deploying deaths squads to carry out extra-judicial executions in the US itself.

*****

The war crimes being organized from the White House will be punished only by means of a conscious political intervention by the working class throughout the Americas to put an end to the capitalist system and reorganize society to meet human need, not the profits of the oligarchs.

3. Italy’s general strike and protest of November 28–29: A political eruption of the working class against war and austerity

Italy’s national general strike of November 28, followed by mass protests on November 29 coinciding with the International Day of Solidarity with Palestine, marks the third countrywide strike in as many months.

The two events express a rising movement of the Italian working class against the authoritarian, pro-war policies of the Meloni government, and more broadly of the international working class against attacks on democratic rights, imperialist war and genocide. The proposed 2026 budget law, the “Manovra 2026,” provided the immediate trigger, but the strike wave reflects far deeper opposition to social inequality, wage erosion, militarization and Italy’s role in NATO’s global war plans.

The November 28 strike, called by the base unions USB, CUB, COBAS, SGB and others, mobilized tens of thousands in transport, healthcare, education, public administration and private industry across the country. Rail and air travel were heavily disrupted, with a 24-hour rail walkout beginning the evening of November 27 and ITA Airways canceling at least 26 flights. Urban transit networks slowed or ground to a halt. Motorway workers walked out. Healthcare workers stopped work while maintaining emergency services. Schools, municipal offices and logistics hubs participated widely.

*****

The strike is a political eruption of the working class against a capitalist government that is dragging the population into deeper poverty while aligning the country with ever more dangerous global conflicts. 

*****

The Italian strike wave is part of a broader international offensive by workers against inflation, inequality and war. From Germany to France, from the UK to the United States, from the Middle East to Latin America, the objective conditions for a global movement against capitalism are emerging. The potential of this movement is nothing less than revolutionary.

In Italy the events of November 28–29 represent a political turning point. The working class has entered the stage of history once again as a powerful force, challenging not only the Meloni government, but the entire trajectory of war, austerity and authoritarianism pursued by the capitalist class. The task now is to develop the leadership and organization required to unify these struggles, break free of the union bureaucracies and link the fight against war with the fight for international socialism.

4. DSA member Rae Huang announces candidacy for Los Angeles mayor

Rae Huang, a Presbyterian pastor, nonprofit executive and member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), has announced her candidacy for the June 2, 2026, Los Angeles mayoral election, challenging incumbent Democratic Mayor Karen Bass.

Millions of workers and young people are searching for an alternative to the policies of austerity, repression and war offered from the two corporate-controlled parties in the US. There is growing opposition to Trump’s fascistic drive to establish a dictatorship, the war on immigrants, the destruction of social programs and the global eruption of war and genocide. In Los Angeles, Bass’s administration has become a byword for austerity, law-and-order policing and unrestrained support for real-estate developers.

Bass’s 2025-26 budget has fueled opposition among workers facing overwork, stagnant wages and crumbling services. Her response to January’s wildfires, after slashing fire department funding and leaving positions vacant, intensified public anger over the inadequate response to climate disasters.

Bass has positioned herself as a law-and-order Democrat, denouncing the slogan “Defund the Police” and expanding the LAPD budget, even as the department joins federal immigration raids—exposing the fraud of her “sanctuary” rhetoric. Her homelessness policy follows the same pattern: while declaring a state of emergency and launching “Inside Safe,” she has channeled funds to developers, cleared encampments and warehoused the unhoused in overpriced private facilities.

Under these conditions, little-known figures such as New York’s Zohran Mamdani and Seattle’s Katie Wilson have gained sudden support. Huang is of the same political type, and like Mamdani and Wilson, her campaign is a political trap.

*****

The DSA currently occupies key positions within the state apparatus in Los Angeles. The DSA-aligned city council members Huang points to as proof of a “new kind of leadership” have, in practice, upheld the status quo: backing developer-driven homelessness policies, supporting giveaways to big business and standing behind the union bureaucracy as it sabotaged the struggles of city and county workers in recent months.

The city has four city council members who identify with or orbit the DSA. After celebrating Mamdani’s victory in New York as a supposed triumph for the “left,” they now line up squarely behind the political establishment in Los Angeles. Nithya Raman and Eunisses Hernandez hail Bass as “the most progressive mayor we’ve ever had,” while Hugo Soto-Martínez dispenses with the pretense of independence from the political establishment altogether and endorses Bass outright.

Indeed, at the time of Bass’s rise to mayor, the DSA offered only mild criticisms and even falsely portrayed her as having once been a “socialist,” a myth used to politically legitimize her within left-leaning circles.

More broadly, the DSA functions as a faction of the Democratic Party and an increasingly critical role as a bulwark of class rule.

The experience of Zohran Mamdani in New York demonstrates the political role of these DSA-backed campaigns. After posturing as a champion of the “left,” Mamdani appointed his transition team: a roster of right-wing Democratic Party operatives, selected not from the working class but from the political establishment and corporate-aligned nonprofits.

Even more revealing was Mamdani’s meeting with Donald Trump, ushering a “partnership” and legitimizing the fascistic president at the very moment he was deepening his assault on democratic rights and confronting growing popular opposition.

5. Kshama Sawant runs for Congress posing as an independent socialist

Kshama Sawant has launched her 2026 congressional campaign under conditions of an acute crisis of American capitalism. The Trump administration, facing mounting opposition from workers and young people and a deepening economic crisis, is intensifying its Gestapo-like assault on immigrants. It is escalating its trade war against the world and overseeing mass layoffs and declining living standards for the broad mass of the American population, alongside staggering increases in wealth for the financial oligarchy. In line with record levels of social inequality, it is carrying out an assault on democratic rights unprecedented in US history.

Internationally, American imperialism is backing Israel’s genocide in Gaza, continuing the US-NATO war against Russia, preparing war against Venezuela, and laying the basis for military conflict with China.

It is within this explosive context that Sawant—long promoted by pseudo-left circles as a “revolutionary socialist”—has stepped forward to channel working class opposition back into the safe confines of the Democratic Party and prop up the trade union bureaucracy.

Sawant says her campaign rests on her “record of victories” in Seattle and that these reforms can be “scaled up” nationally. This premise is false. Her decade on the Seattle City Council did not secure significant improvements for the working class and offers no strategy for confronting the oligarchy that dominates American society. Rather, it exposes the political function of Sawant’s entire career: to contain social anger within the dead end of municipal reform, electoral maneuvering, and alliances with the Democrats and the union bureaucracy, while blocking the emergence of an independent revolutionary movement of the working class.

*****

Sawant’s political rise was facilitated by the trade union bureaucracy. In her 2013 campaign, she secured endorsements from several Seattle-area union locals, including American Federation of Teachers (AFT) Local 1789, Communications Workers of America (CWA) Local 37083, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 46, and the Greater Seattle American Postal Workers Union (APWU).

These endorsements provided organizational resources and access to union staff who carried out phone-banking, canvassing, and voter mobilization. While not every major union backed her—in fact, key Service Employees International Union (SEIU) locals endorsed her opponent—Sawant’s victory depended heavily on sections of the AFL-CIO apparatus that were in conflict with sections of the Democratic establishment but remained fully committed to capitalist politics. She did not rise in rebellion against the unions apparatus, she entered office as one of its sanctioned political projects. Her “victories” were the product of these same forces—and were designed to stabilize, not challenge, the existing order.

*****

Sawant presents her political evolution as principled, but it is defined by opportunistic shifts between organizations without explanation or accountability.

She began as a leader of Socialist Alternative, then joined the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) in 2021—calling it “the most significant left organization in the United States in many decades.” In 2023, she launched Workers Strike Back as a new “independent movement.” In 2024 she endorsed Jill Stein’s Green Party campaign. In 2016 and 2020 she campaigned aggressively for Bernie Sanders bid to win the Democratic presidential nomination.

These shifts were not made on the basis of a socialist program or perspective. They reflected Sawant’s continual adaptation to shifting layers of the middle class and to the changing tactical needs of the Democratic Party.

*****

Sawant calls herself a revolutionary while insisting that every social issue can be resolved through electoral victories and policy tinkering. This is not Marxism—it is liberal reformism dressed in socialist language.

Her national program—$25 minimum wage, rent control, Medicare for all—is presented without any strategy to confront or overthrow the financial oligarchy. She never addresses how these reforms can be enacted under conditions of bipartisan austerity, the domination of Congress by corporate interests, and the escalating drive to world war. She never raises the need to expropriate the corporations and banks. She never explains how workers are to defeat the political and economic power of the ruling class.

*****

Sawant’s worldview is fundamentally American nationalist. Her appeals to “fight the billionaires” are disconnected from an internationalist understanding of capitalism, war, and class struggle.

Her posture on Gaza consists of moral outrage and calls for a ceasefire, not a socialist strategy linking Israeli and Palestinian workers in a struggle against imperialism, Zionism and the Arab bourgeoisie. She offers no analysis of imperialism, the historical role of the US in the Middle East, or the capitalist roots of the conflict.

Significantly, she is silent on the US–NATO war against Russia. Silence denotes consent. She does not expose NATO expansion or the role of US and European imperialism in instigating the reactionary invasion of Ukraine by the Russian bourgeoisie. This is not an oversight, but a political choice: exposing the Ukraine war would require confronting the Democratic Party and the trade union bureaucracy—institutions on which she depends.

Sawant never warns of the danger of fascism or dictatorship. She does not analyze or expose the Trump administration as fascist, and her campaign website makes no reference to the real and growing threat of authoritarian rule. The attacks on immigrants, the assault on democratic rights, and Trump’s open moves to extra-Constitutional power are treated as policy disputes, not as components of the collapse of American democracy and the turn by the ruling oligarchy to dictatorship and fascism. This silence is political: acknowledging the danger would require exposing and breaking from the Democratic Party and the trade union apparatus. As with her silence on the US–NATO war against Russia, Sawant leaves workers unprepared for the mounting threat of dictatorship.

Her politics, in form and content, remain within the national framework of US liberalism in its death agony. She speaks for a privileged middle-class layer seeking limited reforms to bolster their own privileges within capitalism—not for the international working class.

*****

The working class confronts unprecedented dangers—war, dictatorship and social collapse. None of these can be confronted through municipal reforms, pressure campaigns, or appeals to “progressive” Democrats. The decisive task is to break from all forms of middle-class pseudo-left politics and build a revolutionary leadership rooted in the international working class.

6. Zelensky’s chief of staff and closest ally forced to resign amid massive corruption scandal

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s chief of staff Andriy Yermak was forced to resign on Friday just hours after investigators from Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) raided Yermak’s apartment as part of a $100 million scheme case known as “Operation Midas” that has shaken the crisis-ridden Zelensky government.

Yermak, Ukraine’s most powerful political figure next to Zelensky, served as both Zelensky’s top aide and lead negotiator in the ongoing United States-backed plan to end the ongoing NATO-backed proxy war against Russia.

In a joint statement, the NABU and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office stated the raids were officially “authorised” and linked to an unspecified investigation, which was unspecified but it certainly related to the $100 million embezzlement scandal first exposed by NABU earlier in November.

According to the allegations, several leading members of the Ukrainian government and a close business associate of both Zelensky and Yermak were involved in an embezzlement scheme around Energoatom, the state nuclear company.

Energy Minister Svitlana Hrynchuk and Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko were already forced to resign after it was revealed they had allegedly received kickback payments worth 10 to 15 percent of contract values from contractors building fortifications on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure.

Other alleged accomplices in the scheme included former Deputy Prime Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov and Timur Mindich—a close Zelensky and Yermak associate who is a co-owner of Zelensky’s own former TV studio Kvartal95. Mindich was reportedly tipped off about the raid and had already fled for Israel by the time investigators raided his apartment.

In the following weeks rumors circulated that Yermak and even Zelensky may be next, as their well-known close association with Mindich rendered their claims of innocence in the kickback scheme both logically and politically untenable. Yermak’s voice also allegedly appears on recorded conversations with Mindich released by NABU.

Mindich and his other close business associate Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoysky were instrumental in bringing the former comedian Zelensky to power in the 2019 presidential elections and Zelensky even traveled in Mindich’s personal armored car during the campaign. Zelensky also owned a high end apartment in the same building as Mindich, where NABU investigators discovered a gold plated bathroom that Mindich had built for himself. That Yermak and Zelensky himself were completely unaware of Mindich’s massive embezzlement scheme involving ministers in their own government is highly improbable.

*****

The resignation of Yermak is the temporary culmination of a ferocious battle within the Ukrainian state and ruling class. On the surface, this struggle has been centered on a war between the Zelensky regime and NABU, which has in the past been strongly backed by both the EU and the United States as means to intervene directly in Ukraine’s turbulent and clannish oligarchical politics.

Earlier in July, Zelensky—likely aware of the massive embezzlement and robbery endemic to his government—had moved to limit the power of NABU and SAPO, leading to the largest protests across the country since the beginning of the NATO-backed proxy war in February 2022.

According to Zelensky, stripping the agency of its independence was necessary to combat “Russian influence.” At the same time, Ukraine’s security services (SBU), which is closely aligned with Zelensky, had carried out raids of NABU to supposedly arrest Russian spies.

As a result of both domestic outrage and intervention from the EU and the US, Zelensky ultimately was forced to backtrack and withdraw his attempt to take over NABU.

NABU was set up in the wake of the US and EU-backed coup of elected President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014, which triggered an eight-year-long civil war in East Ukraine, leading up to Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. Founded in 2015 by the right-wing nationalist government of Petro Poroshenko, NABU is almost entirely created and directed by the US. Its staff is trained directly by the FBI and European Union.

*****

It has been no secret that Washington and EU officials have long been extremely skeptical, if not hostile, to Yermak and his immense influence in Ukrainian politics. In July, the Financial Times ran an extensive essay about Yermak as the “grey cardinal” of Ukrainian politics, citing numerous officials complaining about his influence on Zelensky.

In recent months, the Trump administration, in particular, has viewed Yermak as an obstacle to a negotiated deal—strongly opposed by its EU rivals—with Russia that would maximize US profit from the end of the proxy war that has already killed hundreds of thousands while at the same time striking a long term agreement with the oligarchic Putin regime. In an interview with the Atlantic just days ago, Yermak as the chief negotiator outright refused to even consider conceding Ukrainian territory—one of the main stipulations of the Trump peace plan—in order to end the war.

With Yermak gone, the position of Zelensky has been dramatically weakened.

In the population, there is immense anger and disgust over the corruption scandal, which reveals the shameless theft of money by the same oligarchs and government officials who have been sending hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians into their death, falsely promising them “democracy” and “freedom”. Zelensky’s approval has plunged nearly 40 percentage points and is now below 20 percent—the lowest mark since his election in 2019. For the first time since the beginning of the war, more Ukrainians now distrust than trust him.

At the same time, the growing popular dissatisfaction with Zelensky is exploited by sections of the ruling class and the imperialist powers in an embittered struggle over the country’s foreign policy and division of the spoils of the war. Shortly after the announcement of Yermak’s resignation, Zelensky’s arch-rival, ex-commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny, issued a de facto endorsement of Trump’s efforts to broker a deal. Now the ambassador to the UK, Zaluzhny stated that “the overwhelming majority of wars end either with mutual defeat or with both sides convinced, that they won, or in other variants [of these scenarios].” Zaluzhny, who maintains extensive ties to the country’s far-right, was ousted by Zelensky in 2024 but still enjoys substantial support within sections of the Ukrainian state and the imperialist powers, and has been widely discussed as Zelensky’s possible successor.

7. Death of 15-year-old in Turkey underscores widespread child labor exploitation

Muhammed Kendirci, a 15-year-old student who was working at a carpentry workshop in the Bozova district of Şanlıurfa within the scope of Vocational Training Centers (MESEM), was seriously injured on November 14 when the 20-year-old foreman, Habip A., inflated his rectum with compressed air.

The young apprentice, who reportedly sustained serious internal organ damage as a result of this torture, lost his life after five days in intensive care. This raised the number of children who have become victims of work-related homicides to at least 16 since the establishment of MESEM.

Information obtained from the family revealed that the investigation was handled carelessly from the very beginning. The perpetrator was first released and then apprehended in another city while trying to flee abroad. Muhammed’s trousers, one of the most critical pieces of evidence, were thrown away by hospital staff.

Hundreds of people, including Muhammed’s friends from the neighborhood, staged a protest march on November 24 in the district of Bozova where he lived.

Muhammed’s death has brought to sharp relief the fact that children are subjected to uncontrolled exploitation, with the cooperation of the government and companies, and the complicity of the trade union apparatus.

Vocational Training Centers were included in formal and compulsory education in 2016. Through MESEM, high school-aged students between 14 and 18, who are separated from academic education, are made to work four days a week in a workplace for four years and receive theoretical training at school for only one day. Children officially receive a salary equal to just 30 percent of the minimum wage (6,631 TL/160 USD) for the first three years and 50 percent of the minimum wage (11,052 TL/260 USD) as a foreman in the fourth year.

In Turkey, which has accepted international conventions on children’s rights, the employment of children under 16 years of age is officially prohibited. Children over 15 years old who have completed compulsory primary education may be employed in “light work” that does not interfere with their physical, mental, social, and moral development or their continued schooling. But child labor, which the state denies on paper, has gained legal status through MESEM.

The approximately 500,000 child workers within the scope of MESEM in Turkey mainly come from poor families. Educator Nurcan Korkmaz, speaking to soL Haber, stated that in their field studies, 58 percent of the children directly cited “economic difficulties” as the reason for attending MESEM.

In conditions where inspection mechanisms are systematically eliminated and occupational safety measures are non-existent, child workers are employed in “heavy work” despite the prohibition, and are exposed to insults, pressure, and violence. In its current form, MESEM is an application aimed at providing cheap labor to capital rather than an educational model. Moreover, this is the tip of the iceberg.

*****

The Education and Science Workers’ Union (Eğitim-Sen), in its statement on November 20—World Children’s Day—explains that there are approximately 2.3 million child workers in Turkey. A significant portion of these children, coming from families who are refugees mainly due to imperialist wars in the Middle East, particularly Syria, are employed very cheaply in high-risk sectors.

According to the recent Education Monitoring Report by the Education Reform Initiative, approximately 804,000 children of compulsory education age are not attending school. Including foreign nationals, open education students, and those who have dropped out of formal education in MESEM, the total number exceeds 1,470,000. Most poor children in this situation are forced to become child laborers.

The working hours of child workers, which can be up to 12 hours a day, not only keep them from education but also exhaust them physically and mentally. This situation, combined with a lack of supervision and inadequate occupational safety measures, leads to fatal “work accidents”. According to the data of the Worker Health and Work Safety Council (İSİG), at least 82 child workers have lost their lives this year. This represents an increase of about 10 percent compared to the previous year’s data. Since 2013, at least 770 child workers have died at their workplaces.

*****

The proliferation of child labor exploitation is part of the attack by the ruling class internationally on the conditions and living standards of the working class. According to last estimates published by the International Labour Organization and UNICEF on June 11, 2025, there were approximately 138 million child laborers worldwide in 2024. About 54 million of them are engaged in hazardous work that could endanger their health, safety, or development.

Child labor plays a significant role in pushing wages down. In recent years, the government of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey has accelerated its policy of reducing workers’ real wages under the pretext of curbing high inflation and closing the budget deficit. The minimum wage for 2025 was increased below the official inflation rate. A similar scenario is planned for 2026, in line with the demands of foreign and domestic financial capital.

*****

Karl Marx

Karl Marx, who put socialism on scientific foundations, explains that child labor is not an individual or moral issue but an inevitable product of the development of capitalist production relations. As capitalist industry develops, labor becomes deskilled, and capital tends to constantly cheapen the price of labor. This deskilling facilitates the proliferation of child labor; the child is now suitable for “running errands” and undertaking dangerous jobs for low wages. At the same time, the labor market expands, and average wages are pushed down.

In the twentieth century, due to the impact of the 1917 October Revolution and major industrial and political struggles, significant progress was made in the conditions of the international working class and in children’s rights. These are now being sacrificed worldwide for the profit and wealth accumulation of capitalist oligarchy.

The way forward lies in combining the demands for the immediate implementation of measures aimed at protecting children, and improving the social conditions of workers, with the struggle for the revolutionary mobilization of the working class against the capitalist profit system, for socialism.

8. Peter Oborne’s Complicit: Britain’s role in the destruction of Gaza A passionate critique bereft of explanation or remedy

That Complicit has become a Sunday Times Bestseller testifies to the widespread opposition within Britain to the support for Israel’s ongoing genocidal war against the Palestinians in Gaza by both the former Conservative government of Rishi Sunak and now Keir Starmer’s Labour government.

Its success is all the more noteworthy because the mainstream press, including the Guardian, has not reviewed it. Yet the book’s author is a journalist who used to write for the right-wing press, including the Daily Telegraph, where he was the paper’s chief political commentator until he resigned in 2015, as well as the Daily Mail, Daily Express and Spectator. He now writes for the Byline Times, Declassified UK, Double Down News, Middle East Eye and openDemocracy.

His previous books include The Rise of Political Lying (2005), The Triumph of the Political Class (2007), and The Assault on Truth: Boris Johnson, Donald Trump and the Emergence of a New Moral Barbarism (2021).

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) made a preliminary ruling on January 26, 2024, that Israel may “plausibly” be committing genocide in Gaza in the case brought by South Africa against Israel under the Genocide Convention.

Oborne explains that the ruling had serious legal, political, and moral implications for the UK government. It heightened the UK’s obligations under the Genocide Convention, which Britain had incorporated into domestic law under the 2001 International Criminal Court Act.

*****

That Complicit has become a Sunday Times Bestseller testifies to the widespread opposition within Britain to the support for Israel’s ongoing genocidal war against the Palestinians in Gaza by both the former Conservative government of Rishi Sunak and now Keir Starmer’s Labour government.

Its success is all the more noteworthy because the mainstream press, including the Guardian, has not reviewed it. Yet the book’s author is a journalist who used to write for the right-wing press, including the Daily Telegraph, where he was the paper’s chief political commentator until he resigned in 2015, as well as the Daily Mail, Daily Express and Spectator. He now writes for the Byline Times, Declassified UK, Double Down News, Middle East Eye and openDemocracy.

His previous books include The Rise of Political Lying (2005), The Triumph of the Political Class (2007), and The Assault on Truth: Boris Johnson, Donald Trump and the Emergence of a New Moral Barbarism (2021).

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) made a preliminary ruling on January 26, 2024, that Israel may “plausibly” be committing genocide in Gaza in the case brought by South Africa against Israel under the Genocide Convention.

Oborne explains that the ruling had serious legal, political, and moral implications for the UK government. It heightened the UK’s obligations under the Genocide Convention, which Britain had incorporated into domestic law under the 2001 International Criminal Court Act.

*****

Oborne outlines how first the Tory and then the Labour government gave their unconditional backing to the crushing of Palestinian resistance to Israel—following decades of support for Israel against the Palestinians—using the October 7 attack to justify the genocide. Speaking in October 2023, Starmer, a former human rights lawyer, even agreed with Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant that Israel had the right to cut off power and water, only retracting his statement a week later after it sparked an outcry and the resignations of several councillors.

The UK provided constant political and diplomatic support for Israel, opposing ceasefire resolutions at the UN Security Council. The Tory government sent warships to the Middle East as Israel began its onslaught. Since then, both governments have nodded through the export of arms to Israel in the full knowledge they would be used against the Palestinians. They supplied Israel with the necessary components for the F-35 fighter jets that it used to kill civilians, while the Royal Air Force flew near daily reconnaissance flights from its base in Cyprus to supply Israel with intelligence. The Conservative government never put Britain’s support for Israel to a vote in parliament, and Labour in opposition did not call for such a vote.

The day after the ICJ ruling, the UK government withdrew funding for UNRWA, the agency that has for decades provided essential services for the Palestinians who were forced to flee their homes due to ethnic cleansing during the 1948 and 1967 Arab Israeli wars, and Israel had long detested. Israel had alleged, with negligible evidence, that a handful of UNRWA’s 13,000 employees had taken part in the October 7 assault. In so doing, the government was aiding Israel in its mission to annihilate the Palestinians.

Instead of challenging this cartel, the mainstream media backed it to the hilt. It repeated without query or criticism the assertions and statements put out by Israel about the October 7 attack, including its allegations of butchered and beheaded babies. Dissident voices were suppressed or sidelined. The truth about the war was suppressed, the facts misrepresented.

*****

While Oborne offers a biting and passionate critique of the UK’s support for Israel and complicity in its genocidal war against the Palestinians in Gaza, his disgust and moral outrage is no substitute for explaining its causes. He says that Britain’s foreign policy in the Middle East—Conservative or Labour—flows from its support for “Atlanticism” but does not explain either the policy or the reasons for it.  

*****

Britain has long tied itself to US imperialism’s coattails as a means of punching above its very reduced weight on the international arena and obtaining a share in the spoils that flowed from US control over markets and resources. It joined NATO and participated in Washington-directed wars in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, as well as backing Ukraine against Russia.

In June 2023, the US and UK announced the “Atlantic Declaration for a Twenty-First Century U.S.-UK Economic Partnership”. This makes clear that cooperation between the US and Britain is based on confronting Russia and China. It states, “We face new challenges to international stability from authoritarian states such as Russia and the People’s Republic of China (PRC).”

*****

Washington and London’s backing for Israel in its wars, not just against the Palestinians, but against Iran and its allies in Lebanon and Yemen, as well as its efforts to weaken Syria and sever Damascus’ relations with Moscow and Tehran, is bound up with reordering the energy-rich Middle East under the domination of US imperialism. This includes isolating Iran—or securing regime change in Tehran that would pledge allegiance to Washington—in preparation for war against China. Israel’s wars in Gaza and the Middle East—ongoing despite supposed ceasefires—form another front in an emerging World War.  

*****

Oborne accuses Britain of conducting its foreign policy in “a closed world” by a small elite and “on behalf of opaque interests”. He continues plaintively that what is needed is “legal accountability” that in turn requires “bringing democracy to Britain’s state and society”. He does not explain how such a change is to be achieved because he is an unalloyed defender of British imperialism and of capitalism.

9. Nuremberg: Where does fascist barbarism come from?

The new film is based largely on Jack El-Hai’s 2013 book, The Nazi and the Psychiatrist, a nonfiction work that traces the investigation by US army doctor Douglas Kelley into the psychological state and fitness for trial of the defendants, particularly Herman Göring, the number two figure in the Nazi regime after Adolf Hitler.

A film that attempts to depict the Nuremberg Trials is certainly welcome at this moment, when genocide and fascist dictatorship have once more begun to threaten humanity. Nuremberg is very uneven as a depiction of a vital part of the history of the 20th century. While it suffers from very serious weaknesses, it is also necessary to recognize several important strengths.

Chief among these are the scenes of the actual trial, including its concluding days. Staged courtroom scenes are effectively and rapidly intercut with 80-year-old black-and-white film footage. These sequences include the screening of imagery from the recently liberated concentration camps. As the names Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald and others flash across the screen, we see the huge piles of corpses as well as a few survivors near death. The film audience is stunned, as the spectators were during the original trial. Humanity had never seen anything like this. The depths of Nazi barbarism began, in 1946, to seep into mass consciousness. The Nuremberg Trials were instrumental in telling the world about the crimes of German imperialism.

It is one thing to graphically expose this history, however, and quite another to make sense of it. The principal problem with Nuremberg is that it looks for the motive force of the Nazi Holocaust largely in the psychology of the individual leaders, and not in the acute social contradictions that roiled Europe, and especially Germany, in the wake of World War One.

Consequently, Nuremberg cannot explain why the Nazi leaders were capable of such monstrous crimes. The most that director Vanderbilt (of the prominent Vanderbilt family) can say, in an interview, referring to the main plot of the movie, is that “Kelley had the highest-ranking living Nazi dropped in his lap. It was an opportunity to dissect the nature of evil.”

*****

The Tribunal broke with earlier legal practice by allowing for the first time those convicted of planning and waging aggressive war to be punished in a court of law. As Robert H. Jackson (Michael Shannon), the US Supreme Court Justice and lead prosecutor at Nuremberg, declares in his opening statement: “We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow.”

The trials were, nevertheless, inseparable from the postwar settlement shaped by the victorious Allies. The political and strategic aims of these powers, especially the US, determined which crimes (and criminals) would be prosecuted and which would not. As the World Socialist Web Site explained some years ago, the trials

remained silent not only about the root cause of the war, the historic crisis of capitalism, but also the many war crimes committed by US and British imperialism. In particular, the dropping of atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was never condemned, nor was the issue even raised.

Nuremberg served several immediate political purposes: to legitimize the postwar settlement, and to establish conditions for the rehabilitation of German imperialism, including the rehabilitation of former Nazis, as part of what was almost immediately to become the Cold War against the Soviet Union and the imperialist drive against the threat of socialist revolution.

10. Elisabeth Zimmermann-Modler: November 10, 1956 – November 28, 2025

Elisabeth Zimmerman-Modler

Internationalism was the most important question for Elli. She participated in numerous ICFI schools and conferences, forming friendships with many international comrades. When the British Workers Revolutionary Party, led by Gerry Healy, broke with the ICFI in 1985/86 and adopted a nationalist course, Elli unhesitatingly supported the ICFI, even though she had great respect for Healy.

In the years that followed, she played an important role in educating new members in the lessons of the split. Tamil comrades who fled the civil war in Sri Lanka and had a nationalist background still remember today the perseverance with which Elli convinced them of international socialism at that time.

Her encyclopedic knowledge of the history and documents of the ICFI also played an important role in the party’s national committee, of which Elli was a member for many years. When fundamental questions arose, one could always count on Elli to contribute a historically informed perspective.

Elli also campaigned as the public face of the SGP. She ran several times in European, federal and North Rhine-Westphalia state elections and wrote nearly 330 articles for the World Socialist Web Site. Her core topics were poverty and social inequality, the coronavirus pandemic, trials of Nazi criminals, the flood disaster in the Ahr Valley, and reports on industry, especially on the crisis in the steel industry, which she experienced firsthand in Duisburg, where she lived. 

*****

We will remember Elisabeth Zimmermann-Modler as a tireless fighter for socialism who dedicated her entire life to serving the working class and building a better society. Her death is a bitter loss and fills us with deep sorrow, but her confidence in a better, socialist future is also an inspiration.

We will publish a detailed tribute to Elli’s political life soon....

11. German unions silent over their state visit to Israel

The German unions secretly sent a forty-person delegation to Israel to demonstrate solidarity with the Zionist Histadrut amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza. This revealing silence exposes the alignment of the German trade unions with Berlin’s war agenda.

*****

While the German elites are reorganizing society for war, rearmament and a war economy, the trade unions have also been transformed. Whereas in the past they negotiated social compromises within the framework of a so-called “social partnership”, today they are actively involved in implementing social cuts and mass layoffs. No plant closure, no redundancy plan, no agreement on wage cutting takes place without the signature of a works council, of IG Metall, Verdi or another DGB union.

However, two years of genocide in Gaza have changed the working class. More and more workers understand the broader dimension: a ruling class that supports such a brutal genocide will trample over the “own” working class in pursuit of profit. To drive an unwilling population into war, it is also prepared to revive fascism.

The struggle against social devastation is inseparable from the struggle against war. The first step for workers in Germany must be a break with the DGB and its member unions.

The World Socialist Web Site and the Fourth International, which have fought for decades, since the founding of Israel in 1948, for the unity of Palestinian and Israeli workers, have called for the mobilization of the international working class to stop the genocide in Gaza. We call on workers in all workplaces to form rank-and-file action committees independent of the DGB. Only in this way can they defend their own interests, their workplaces and their lives.

12. Kennedy installs anti-vaccine loyalist, Ralph Abraham, to finish purge of CDC

Dr. Ralph Lee Abraham, the former Louisiana surgeon general and a long-standing opponent of established vaccine science, has been named principal deputy director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the agency’s second-highest leadership post.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made the decision three months after firing CDC Director Susan Monarez and replacing her by making HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill, who has no medical experience, acting CDC chief. The firing of Monarez was quickly followed by the resignation of four top CDC officials who opposed the anti-science, anti-vaccine agenda pushed by Kennedy.

Abraham will now become the highest-ranking figure in the CDC with a medical degree, with outsized influence over its policies, although he has no background in epidemiology, infectious diseases, outbreak response or the management of scientific institutions—core qualifications for leading the nation’s premier public health agency. 

During the COVID-19 pandemic, he heavily promoted quack treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, while fiercely attacking the lifesaving COVID-19 vaccines. After leaving Congress in 2020, he became Louisiana Surgeon General, where he opposed mandatory mass vaccination for childhood diseases.

Abraham’s elevation, which directly aligns with Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) agenda, has drawn alarm throughout the public health community. “My jaw hit the ground,” said Dr. Nirav Shah, former principal deputy director of the CDC under the Biden administration, calling the decision “unqualified” and “atrocious.” Dr. Richard Besser, acting CDC director in 2009, said he is “greatly concerned” that Abraham will function as an extension of Kennedy’s longstanding hostility toward vaccines. “Rather than being someone who will push back on that, I think he will further the secretary’s agenda,” Besser warned.

13. Rolling strikes continue in New Zealand

Despite intense efforts by New Zealand’s trade union bureaucracy to demobilize and break up the strike movement that erupted in a nationwide “mega-strike” on October 23, thousands of workers are continuing industrial action against the far-right government’s austerity agenda.

The mass strike, the country’s largest since 1979, saw more than 100,000 public sector workers—teachers, nurses, doctors and healthcare workers—mount a militant and unified one-day stoppage. The strike was a demonstration of the potential power of the working class, and an expression of enormous opposition to the attacks on wages and conditions by the National Party-led coalition government. 

The unions were forced to call the strike due to mass anger over moves, begun under the 2017-2023 Labour government, to further cut wages across the public sector, while starving hospitals and schools of staffing and resources. It was part of an upsurge of workers internationally—including millions-strong protests against US President Trump’s fascist dictatorship, strike waves in France, Italy and elsewhere and global mobilisations against the Gaza genocide.

The NZ union bureaucrats promptly moved to contain the developing movement and divert it into safe parliamentary channels. They did not schedule any further joint strikes and, while keeping each section of workers isolated, returned to negotiations seeking deals that would freeze wages and intensify the crisis of living costs. 

The strategy has met with fierce resistance among workers. Last Friday nearly 17,000 health workers covered by the Public Service Association (PSA) struck over pay and unsafe staffing levels. On the same day 2,000 firefighters walked out in the latest of a series of one-hour stoppages in a contract dispute that flared up in August. The unions limited both strikes to a paltry one hour while deliberately isolating them from each other.

14. Australian governments invoke Nazi actions to crackdown on democratic rights

The repressive laws, providing the state with powers to prosecute Nazi “ideology,” are a precedent for further attacks on the working class and the socialist movement. 

15. To stop the ICE raids in Chicago: Mobilize the working class through rank-and-file committees

In Chicago and across the United States, the most flagrant violations of constitutional rights are being carried out by armed teams under Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). More than 3,000 people have been abducted from Chicago this year, overwhelmingly with no criminal background. Chicago Public Schools has reported a sharp drop in attendance since federal agents surged into the city in September, as families pull children from class out of fear of kidnappings at school entrances.

*****

In Chicago, spontaneous resistance has developed rapidly. In working class and middle class neighborhoods, residents have formed rapid-response teams to warn families of approaching ICE or CBP vehicles. Teachers, school staff and parents have organized informal patrols during drop-off and pick-up hours, intervening when agents appear. On the Southwest Side, small businesses have prepared thousands of meals for families too afraid to leave home. Volunteers deliver groceries, medicine and other necessities and aid street vendors most likely to be targeted.

This active resistance stands in stark contrast to the posturing of local Democratic officials—Governor JB Pritzker, Mayor Brandon Johnson and Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle—who rush before cameras to associate themselves with popular anger while insisting that the only remedies lie in court challenges or electing more Democrats in 2026. This performance of helplessness is not confusion or timidity. It expresses their fear—and hostility—toward any movement of workers and youth that might slip out of their control, unify broad layers of the working class and challenge the corporate and financial interests they defend. Their appeals to the courts, which Trump openly disregards, and to an electoral cycle that could occur under martial law are aimed at diverting and demobilizing real opposition.

A growing section of the population refuses to recognize ICE or CBP as legitimate authorities, chanting “There is no law” during a protest in the Chicago neighborhood of Little Village. Their sentiment recalls an earlier turning point in American history: In the years before the Civil War, millions in the North concluded that the Supreme Court, Congress and the principal institutions of government had fallen under the control of the Slave Power and that moral appeals or legal arguments would do nothing to halt its expansion.

Today, millions are drawing a similar conclusion about Trump—that the United States government is headed by a lawless gangster, who treats lawsuits, court rulings and constitutional restraints with open contempt. What is emerging is an initial break from the political framework that enabled these conditions in the first place and a recognition that genuine rights can only be defended through mass, organized struggle.

*****

Chicago’s entire history of class struggle demonstrates that the working class has never achieved anything without a politically conscious struggle against the ruling class’s use of race, nationality and anti-immigrant hysteria to divide them. The Haymarket affair, the Pullman strike, the meatpacking struggles depicted in The Jungle and the Memorial Day Massacre of 1937 were all battles in which the ruling class accused workers of being foreigners, agitators, anarchists or communists, weaponizing nativism to weaken resistance. Workers prevailed only when they overcame these divisions and united across ethnic, racial and linguistic lines.

Today’s witch-hunt against immigrants is a continuation of the strategy of divide-and-conquer. It must be countered consciously, through the unification of US-born and immigrant workers in a common struggle against exploitation, repression and war.

16. Sri Lanka: Over 330 dead from Cyclone Ditwah, hundreds of thousands impacted

Cyclone Ditwah, one of the worst natural disasters to hit Sri Lanka in decades, has killed more than 334 people and affected nearly one million across the island as of Sunday evening. With over 370 people still missing, and search operations ongoing, the death toll is expected to rise further in the coming days.

Cyclone Ditwah tore through the country, unleashing devastating floods and massive landslides that swept away entire villages and buried families alive, particularly in the hardest-hit Central Province.

*****

The lack of timely evacuation has contributed to the high death toll. In many cases, landslides struck without warning because authorities either failed to issue alerts or sent them at the last minute, leaving residents no time to flee.  

*****

While the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna/National People’s Power (JVP/NPP) government has deployed 25,000 troops, and many civilians are volunteering to assist, the magnitude of the catastrophe demands coordinated efforts both nationally and internationally. So far, the government has failed to mobilize anything close to the level of aid required.

As public outrage over the government’s disastrous response continues to grow, President Dissanayake invoked a sweeping state of emergency on Saturday, granting himself vast powers—not to address the humanitarian crisis, but to clamp down on growing social unrest. Opposition parties, including the Samagi Jana Balawegaya and the United National Party, had already been calling for such measures, fearing the eruption of mass anger.

*****

In an interview with the Sunday Island, Dr. Thasun Amarasinghe, a scientist at the Climate Research Centre in Indonesia, stated: “There are no natural disasters. These are governance disasters. Sri Lanka destroyed the very systems that protected it. What’s happening now is the predictable result of political mismanagement.” While accurate as far as they go, his remarks overlook the inadequate measures being taken by governments internationally to stem global warming, which directly contributed to Cyclone Ditwah’s intensity.

17. After nationwide strike, Belgian unions block further action against austerity budget

Last week, a powerful three-day nationwide strike movement against austerity halted public services, logistics, and industrial activity across Belgium.

18. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

 

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.

Nov 29, 2025

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today:

1. Summary execution in the West Bank: Trump’s “peace” deal in practice

On Thursday, Israeli forces carried out a summary execution of two unarmed Palestinians in the West Bank after they had surrendered, in an event recorded live on video.

The victims, Yusef ‘Asa’sah, 39, and al-Muntaser bel-lah ‘Abdallah, 26, were shown in the video lifting their shirts to prove they had no weapons and lying on the ground in surrender. Israeli forces directed them to enter a building, had them lie on the ground then shot them multiple times in a hail of automatic rifle fire.

*****

The shooting occurred as part of an ongoing assault on the Jenin refugee camp in the West Bank. “Everyone saw that they were posing no threat to the Israeli forces,” said Shai Parnes of Israeli human rights group B’Tselem, “yet the soldiers decided to shoot them and kill them on the spot.”

The summary execution, a war crime under international law, was openly defended by Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who declared, “The [Israeli] fighters acted exactly as expected of them – terrorists should die.”

The incident is the first time since the beginning of the genocide in Palestine on October 7, 2023 that footage has been released showing Israeli forces carrying out a summary execution using small arms. But eyewitness accounts and direct physical evidence point to the existence of dozens or hundreds of such murders.

In April 2024, nearly 300 bodies were discovered in a series of mass graves near Nazer Hospital in Southern Gaza. Many of the dead were handcuffed and showed signs of being shot at close range.

The victims of these executions are just part of the more than 60,000 Palestinians killed by Israeli bullets and bombs since the start of the Gaza genocide nearly two years ago, and the tens of thousands more who have died from hunger, disease and deprivation.

The fact that Israeli forces are not only executing unarmed Palestinians with TV cameras rolling, but that the cabinet of the Israeli government is defending these actions, exposes the fact that the “peace” deal signed by Israel and Hamas is nothing more than an enabling act for genocide throughout all of Palestine. Israel is in fact accelerating its plan to annex Gaza and the West Bank. 

*****

Earlier this month, Trump’s “peace” deal was given the imprimatur of the UN Security Council, which voted on November 17 to pass a resolution “welcoming the historic Trump Declaration for Enduring Peace and Prosperity” and praising the “constructive role played by the United States of America.”

This shameful resolution was passed with the vote not only of the imperialist powers—France, the UK, the United States—but with the votes of the Arab bourgeois regimes of Algeria and Pakistan, and with the endorsement of the Palestinian Authority.

As Craig Mokhiber, former director of the New York Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, declared “Not a single member of the Council had the courage, principle, or respect for international law to vote against this US-Israel colonial outrage.”

*****

Since the declaration of the “ceasefire” on October 10, Israel has violated its terms over 500 times, killing 350 Palestinians and wounding about 900 others. It has carried out near-daily attacks throughout Lebanon, and this week carried out an airstrike in Syria that killed 13 people.

The “peace” plan has, moreover, enabled Israel to turn its attention to the West Bank as part of a systematic project to annex the whole of Palestine into “greater Israel.” The attacks on Lebanon and Syria are, moreover, preparatory to a war against Iran.

In September, Netanyahu announced a plan to expand Israeli settlements in the West Bank, effectively cutting the Palestinian territory in half. The settlement plan, in the words of Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, aims to “bury the idea of a Palestinian state.”

*****

The events since the announcement of the so-called Gaza “ceasefire” have thoroughly exposed those who have promoted Trump’s “peace” plan—including the corporate media, the Democratic and Republican parties, the imperialist powers of Europe, and the bourgeois regimes of the Arab world.

In the United States, it was launched by the Biden administration and the Democratic Party, and it is now being “completed” under Trump and the Republicans. This bipartisan unity was embodied in the grotesque display last week by Mamdani. A not insignificant factor in Mamdani’s election was popular opposition to the genocide. Now, he pledges a “partnership” with its chief architect.

The genocide in Palestine is part of a far broader imperialist war, stretching from the Middle East to Ukraine to the Asia-Pacific. Stopping it requires the mobilization of the international working class, the only force capable of halting the war machine.

2. Trump threatens to denaturalize and deport US citizens after D.C. National Guard shooting

Following the shooting of two West Virginia National Guard soldiers on Wednesday, on Thursday night, US President Donald Trump published a staggering statement announcing that his government would “remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States, or is incapable of loving our Country,” “end all Federal benefits and subsidies to noncitizens of our Country,” “denaturalize migrants who undermine domestic tranquility,” and “deport any Foreign National who is a public charge, security risk, or non-compatible with Western Civilization.”

Trump further pledged to “permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries” and declared that “only REVERSE MIGRATION can fully cure this situation.” Trump’s call for “reverse migration” comes just over a month after the Department of Homeland Security posted “Remigrate” on X.

“Remigration” — interchangeable with “reverse migration” in fascist discourse — is a central demand of Great Replacement theorists, white nationalist movements in Europe and the United States, and racists advocating the forced removal of ethnic, religious, and immigrant populations deemed undesirable. Once the Nazis came to power in the 1930s, and especially after the Kristallnacht pogrom of November 1938, the Schutzstaffel (SS) began aggressively pressuring German Jews to emigrate.

Drawing directly from the same ideological architecture that animated ethnic purges in the 20th century and also underpins contemporary fascist movements, only hours before Trump announced that “only REVERSE MIGRATION can fully cure this situation,” U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services director Joseph Edlow declared that the agency would begin intensified screening of migrants from 19 countries classified as “high-risk.”

The list includes Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela.

The directive took effect immediately, covering all pending and future immigration requests filed on or after November 27, and was issued without public legislative approval. Nearly every country named is either presently under U.S. sanction, military occupation, or targeted in active war planning.

*****

Trump and the billionaires he represents know that refugees and immigrants are not responsible for collapsing infrastructure, overcrowded hospitals, or homelessness, American capitalism is. As David North, citing Oxfam, outlined in his recent London lecture inequality in America has been skyrocketing for decades.

  • The wealthiest 0.1% own 12.6% of U.S. assets.

  • From 1989–2022, the top percentile gained 101 times more wealth than the median household

  • 40% of the U.S. population, including nearly half of all children, is poor or low-income

The US is one of the richest societies in history, yet for the working class life expectancy falls as COVID-19 runs rampant, tens of millions cannot afford housing or medical care, and workers labor longer for less. As millions struggle to survive, Trump’s cabinet and top appointees exceed $60 billion in net worth. Sixteen rank among the 813 billionaires in a nation of 341 million people.

 Trump’s attacks on immigrants are aimed at obscuring this reality and dividing the working class from their brothers and sisters in the US and internationally. They serve not only as a spearhead for attacks on the democratic rights of the entire working class, but also serve to shield his, and the Democrats, responsibility for decades of imperialist war which created the so-called “migrant crisis.” During America’s multi-decade “global war on terror,” over 37 million people have been forced to leave their homes due to imperialist violence.

Among those that were forced to migrate to the United States appears to have the suspected shooter, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29. Lakanwal is currently facing multiple charges, including murder, after he shot Sarah Beckstrom, 20, of Summersville, West Virginia and Andrew Wolfe, 24 on Wednesday. Beckstrom died on Thursday from her injuries while Wolf remains hospitalized and in critical condition as of this writing.

Lakanwal came to the United States in September 2021 after the US military withdrew from Afghanistan. Multiple reports have confirmed that he was recruited by the Central Intelligence Agency in 2011, that is while he was still a 15-year-old child, and participated in Zero Unit, paramilitary death squads run by the CIA during the 20-year occupation of the country. In 2018, Rolling Stone described Zero Units as the “CIA’s secret army” trained by “American special-operations soldiers.”

*****

There is no question that Trump is using Wednesday’s shooting to create conditions for him to invoke the Insurrection Act and rule as a president-dictator. Following the shooting, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced that 500 additional troops would be deployed to D.C. on the orders of Trump. A federal judge ruled the deployment illegal just last week, but this did not prevent Democratic D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser from agreeing to joint patrols between Guard units and the Metropolitan Police.

Leon Trotsky warned that capitalism in degeneration transforms the Earth into “a foul prison.” Trump’s anti-immigrant pogrom and military occupations makes that prison visible. Stopping this trajectory will not come through the Democrats who are already cooperating and collaborating with the aspiring dictator. It will come only through the united action of the working class—immigrant and native-born—against the ruling class that fears them both.

3. “Things like this happen everywhere”: Residents of Hermosillo, Mexico speak on Waldo’s explosion

Memorial outside of the Hermosillo Waldo's 

The World Socialist Web Site recently spoke to Hermosillo residents about the November 1 explosion at a Waldo’s convenience store, which killed 24 people and injured at least a dozen more.

Reports indicate that a fire began at an electrical transformer improperly installed inside the store before causing an explosion. The store lacked basic safety measures, such as emergency exits, and had been operating without a civil protection plan since 2021.

The death toll rose to 24 after 81-year-old Marco Segundo Reyes, a Waldo’s worker, succumbed to his injuries on November 7.

The tragedy is still a raw nerve in Hermosillo, the capital of the state of Sonora in northwestern Mexico. At the corner of the block where the explosion happened, residents have set up a memorial to the victims, including signs demanding, “No more tragedies … no more victims.”

*****

The Waldo’s explosion illustrates to the need to develop a network of rank-and-file committees in Mexico, linking their struggles up with the struggles of workers in the US fighting against industrial slaughterhouses and the fascist, anti-immigrant policies of the Trump administration. Central to this will be the development of socialist consciousness throughout the hemisphere, as part of the fight of the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) for the United Socialist States of the Americas.

4. Death toll reaches 128 in horrific Hong Kong apartment fire

At least 128 residents are confirmed dead in the fire at Wang Fuk Court, a public housing estate in the Tai Po district of Hong Kong. Approximately 200 people remain missing and unaccounted for as firefighters and recovery teams comb the charred towers.

Local and international reports indicate that the victims range from young children to elderly pensioners, including at least one firefighter, and that the estate—home to roughly 4,600 people—housed predominantly low‑income families and older residents in cramped apartments.

A BBC report said, “Some 2,311 firefighters worked to bring the fire under control after it spread across seven of Wang Fuk Court’s eight apartment blocks.” The Fire Services Department reported that the blaze was fully extinguished at 10:18 a.m. on Friday, after roughly 43 hours of firefighting.

Rescue crews have shifted from active firefighting to systematic search, recovery and support operations. They are moving through the towers flat by flat, forcing open doors to look for victims, recovering bodies and checking any remaining “unresolved” emergency calls from residents, who phoned for help during the blaze.

*****

Many of the dead and missing lived in the mid‑ to upper floors of the blocks that were most heavily wrapped in scaffolding and polystyrene‑sealed windows, where smoke and flames cut off stairwells and trapped entire households.

The Wang Fuk Court inferno in Hong Kong is the territory’s deadliest residential fire in more than 70 years, a man‑made social crime caused by the capitalist system. A profit‑driven renovation, official negligence and systematic degradation of public housing have exposed the reality facing Hong Kong’s working class.

*****

Although an official investigation is underway, what is already clear is that this was not a natural disaster but the predictable outcome of a dangerous renovation regime and a gutted safety infrastructure.

*****

Residents and former security staff have said that the fire alarm system in at least one block had been intentionally disabled months earlier to facilitate contractor access, while multiple survivors report that no alarms sounded, and emergency lighting failed as smoke poured into corridors.

Footage and eyewitness accounts describe flames and burning debris cascading from the exterior works, smashing windows and driving super‑heated gases into the flats, while escape routes were choked by black smoke.

The dense mesh and boarded‑up windows not only accelerated the blaze but also obstructed residents’ attempts to signal for help or reach fresh air, forcing some to crowd onto tiny balconies or attempt desperate climbs along the scaffolding.

*****

The Labour Department and relevant building authorities have admitted that they conducted at least 16 safety inspections at Wang Fuk Court between July 2024 and November 2025, issuing six improvement notices and initiating three legal actions against the contractor.

Residents had repeatedly complained from 2024 onward about the flammable green mesh and the accumulation of cigarette butts and debris on the construction platforms, but officials insisted that the netting was certified as “flame-retardant” and allowed work to continue with only minor corrective orders.

Even as late as November 20—days before the inferno—the authorities carried out another inspection and issued written warnings but did not halt the works, revoke permits or compel removal of the combustible cladding and foam that turned the estate into a tinderbox.

In their public statements, senior Hong Kong officials have combined rote expressions of sympathy with platitudes about “lessons learned,” while treating the disaster as a regrettable aberration rather than the product of systemic capitalist neglect.

*****

Survivors and residents have responded with anger and grief, denouncing the catastrophe as preventable and condemning both the contractors and the government. Many of those who escaped report being awakened or alerted not by alarms but by the smell of smoke, the shouts of neighbors or the sight of flames racing up the building outside their windows.

One elderly resident told local media that he would “be dead” except for already being awake. Others trapped in upper floors described pitch‑black corridors, the collapse of power and emergency lighting, and the terror of feeling their doors and metal gates grow hot as the exterior foam boards ignited.

*****

Rescue and recovery workers, confronting a scene of mass death, have spoken of the extraordinary difficulty of their task. Firefighters have detailed how the combination of exterior scaffolding, burning debris and high internal temperatures forced them to proceed slowly, floor by floor, even as they knew large numbers of people were trapped above.

Emergency service briefings describe apartments gutted down to bare concrete, with entire families found huddled together in bathrooms and corners far from windows, having been unable to reach stairwells in time.

*****

Non‑governmental groups and local charities have deployed volunteers to Wang Fuk Court’s displaced residents, distributing blankets, heat packs, masks, clothing and portable chargers at shelters and ad hoc collection points.

Spokespeople for these organizations are emphasizing the psychological trauma facing the survivors, particularly children and the elderly, and are calling for increased funding and coordination to provide counseling, legal support and longer‑term housing solutions.

5. United States: As Henry Ford Genesys nurses complete third month on strike, management steps up strikebreaking

Henry Ford Health acquired the operations of what was Grand Blanc Genesys Hospital in the fall of 2024 through a joint venture with Ascension Michigan. Since that time, conditions at Genesys have deteriorated as management has sought to recoup the costs of the acquisition off the backs of staff and at the expense of patient care.

The great danger is that the strike continues to remain isolated under conditions where Henry Ford Health is continuing normal operations at scores of hospitals, medical centers and clinics across Southeast Michigan. Henry Ford Genesys is one of the few unionized hospitals in the Henry Ford Health system, which reported $9.6 billion in revenues in 2024.

Some 370 hospital support staff, members of American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 3518 have continued to work under a separate contract all during the strike.

About 375 nurses at Henry Ford Rochester Hospital were locked out five days in June of 2025 after they returned an 87 percent vote to strike for three days. The nurses at Henry Ford Rochester are also fighting for safe staffing and have been without a contract since 2022.

While healthcare workers all across the United States have launched strikes and protests against the ruthless cost-cutting by the healthcare conglomerates, their struggles have been rendered ineffective by the trade union apparatuses. In most cases, walkouts have been limited to a few days. In the few instances where open-ended strikes have been launched, such as at Genesys, healthcare workers have been left isolated so that the billion-dollar hospital chains can wear them down and impose defeats. This was the case at St. Vincent Hospital in Worcester, Massachusetts, where workers struck for 301 days in 2021 over staffing before finally being forced to ratify a concessionary contract.

Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien and General Secretary-Treasurer Fred Zuckerman visited the picket line last month. Despite tough sounding talk, O’Brien proposed no concrete action to aid or expand the strike outside.

O’Brien notoriously was invited to speak at the Republican National Convention in 2024, receiving applause from the collective assembly of extreme right-wing and anti-working class politicians.

While elected as a supposed reformer, he showed his true colors with the betrayal the 2023 UPS contract struggle covering 340,000 workers. The Teamsters used a bogus “strike-ready” campaign to strike a militant posture but then blocked a strike and pushed through a contract that met none of drivers’ key demands, especially those regarding casual workers. Since then, tens of thousands of UPS workers have lost their jobs due to automation and other measures.

*****

Despite threats from Teamsters toadies, several Genesys workers stopped to discuss the issues in their strike with the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS).

One veteran nurse told the WSWS, “A lot of people will never cross. They will go find work elsewhere with employers who are ethical and don’t lie to people.”

*****

She explained, “We are a profession. We have our own licensure. There is a national and worldwide nurse shortage. You need programs to finance and get people into nursing because it is a very difficult profession. We love what we do. It’s not the money or the hours—they suck. It’s not the holidays, weekends and night shifts. Who wants to go in there to hold dead people’s hands? I want to work somewhere I am valued.

“To say it is not a profession, you are not getting an equal amount for loans, is going to make bigger problems. It is going to make it more difficult to get people into the profession. We are one of the few professions AI can’t replace. Someone has to actually be there.”

*****

On the strikebreaking operation being carried out by Henry Ford, another nurse said, “They paid more for temporary workers the first week than what they offered in their whole contract over three years.” Another nurse said Henry Ford paid $6 million the first week of the strike alone on strikebreakers.

She added, “They don’t have unions at their other hospitals, and they don’t want us to get a good contract.”

The WSWS explained the call for the building of rank-and-file committees to take up the fight to mobilize workers independent of the trade union bureaucracy. We explained that our opposition to the Teamsters leadership was not “anti-union,” pointing to the fact that O’Brien and other bureaucrats like United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain carried out policies detrimental to the interests of workers they claim to represent, by imposing company-friendly contracts to suppressing strike action.

6. Disastrous “Ditwah” cyclone creates immense catastrophe, killing potentially hundreds across Sri Lanka

More than 200 millimeters [almost 8 inches] of rainfall have accompanied the terrifying “Ditwah” cyclone currently battering Sri Lanka, unleashing floods, landslides and other calamities. By the evening of November 28, the Disaster Management Centre (DMC) reported at least 69 deaths, with several others missing. Tens of thousands—possibly hundreds of thousands—have been displaced by the ensuing devastation. The disaster is widespread and the worst in living memory.

According to the Department of Meteorology, the storm originated as a low-pressure system over the southwestern Bay of Bengal and Sri Lanka on the 26th. It developed into a deep depression and intensified into Cyclone Ditwah by the 28th, making landfall in Sri Lanka. Similar storms across Southeast Asia in recent days—affecting Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand—have killed hundreds and displaced millions, creating a regional catastrophe.

Since Thursday, Kandy, the capital of the hill country, has been completely cut off, with still no access as of Saturday morning. On Friday, the cyclone hit the war-ravaged northern province.

*****

Numerous rivers and reservoirs are either already overflowing or dangerously close to doing so, displacing thousands in surrounding low-lying regions.

The highest number of deaths—over 35—has been reported in Badulla district in the Central Province, which is experiencing landslides, hillside collapses and flooding. Fatalities have occurred in the divisional secretariat areas of Badulla, Welimada, Lunugala, Passara, Kandaketiya, Uva Paranagama, Soranathota and Ella.

Many residents in these areas are tea estate workers living in dilapidated line rooms that offer no protection against even moderate rain. On the 27th, a major landslide in Badulla killed 11 people, with several still missing.

The Mahaweli River overflow has devastated Mahiyanganaya Hospital, submerging its lower floor under six feet of water. Expensive equipment and millions of rupees’ worth of medicine have been destroyed. Similar reports are emerging from other areas.

*****

Electricity is disrupted all over the country. Officially, there have been over 65,000 power outages, only 26,000 of which have been restored. Hundreds of thousands of people are still without electricity. Adverse weather has made repairs extremely difficult. According to the general manager of the Ceylon Electricity Board, the island’s power supply has been disrupted by 25 to 30 percent.

Flooding, landslides and power outage have also severely impacted telecommunications. Phone services have been cut for more than 24 hours in flood-affected areas such as Gampola, Nuwara Eliya, Passara, Kadugannawa and Welimada, as well as much of the Kandy district, where a emergency situation has been declared.

The chairman of the National Water Supply and Drainage Board warned that disruptions at several major pumping stations could lead to a severe shortfall in the distribution of clean drinking water.

*****

There have been calls for the immediate declaration of a draconian state of emergency by opposition parliamentarians. On the 28th, the main opposition party Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) MP for Kurunegala, J.C. Alawathuwala, made the call in parliament, while MP Ravi Karunanayake of the United National Party voiced support. Former President Chandrika Kumaratunge also joined the call.

These calls are not made out of genuine concern for disaster victims, but out of fear of social upheaval. The government ministers have said that in the immediate aftermath of the disaster, prices for all essential food items may skyrocket.

Though Dissanayake has not yet declared a state of emergency, he has reportedly decided to place camps for displaced people under military control, according to a report in Lankadeepa.

*****

Like their counterparts around the world, Sri Lanka’s capitalist rulers have refused to invest in the infrastructure necessary to protect lives. The current Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna/National Peoples Power (JVP/NPP) government’s election pledges to “balance economic growth and environmental conservation” have been exposed as lies. There is no such national solutions under a capitalist framework for the economic and social crisis.

Obsessed with meeting the IMF’s austerity demands, the JVP/NPP spends not a cent of the tax money wrung from the people to protect human lives—let alone the environment.

That is why even moderate rainfall leads, year after year, to mass deaths and devastation from landslides and floods. The government has ravaged the environment for unregulated development, abandoned people to their fate during disasters, and made no effort to build infrastructure capable of withstanding natural calamities. There are no serious programs to relocate those living in danger zones to safe areas or to allocate the necessary funds for long-term disaster preparedness.

Global warming, driven overwhelmingly by human activity—specifically the unrestrained burning of fossil fuels by giant industries in the advanced capitalist countries—is fueling the rise of extreme weather events. Large-scale deforestation, industrial agriculture, and urbanization intensify the problem, releasing greenhouse gases that trap heat in the atmosphere.

These are not “natural” disasters in the traditional sense, but the predictable and preventable byproducts of a capitalist system driven by profit, not human need. The only solution lies in replacing this social order with a rational, socialist society committed to safeguarding life and the planet.

7. Australia: Labor-Greens deal to fast-track mining and military project

Yet again the Greens have proven how far they will go, even at the expense of their pretensions to be fighting to avert the climate change catastrophe, in order to shore up the Australian Labor government and deliver the requirements of the corporate ruling class. 

 After talks on Wednesday night between Greens leaders and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, the Greens helped the government ram through both houses of parliament by Friday morning seven “environmental” bills—about 1,500 pages of legislation—that particularly fast-track critical minerals and other war-related projects.

*****

In all the media coverage, no explanation has been provided as to why the government was so desperate to rush the legislation through parliament before the end of the year. There has been no mention of the most pressing factor—Labor’s critical minerals agreement with Trump.

The Greens tried to justify their role by claiming to have obtained an amendment to prevent the “national interest” power being used to approve new coal and gas projects. But they had no objection to the power being strengthened for war-related purposes. 

*****

The Australian Financial Review, a mouthpiece for the financial elite, voiced appreciation for the part played by the Greens. The newspaper’s political editor Phillip Coorey said their “smart politics” had given the Greens a “significant policy win” that played them “back into relevance.”

What is the record of the government that the Greens are so anxious to prop up? Since taking office in 2022, the Albanese government has approved at least 31 new coal, oil and gas developments, which add up to a cumulative carbon emissions total of 6.5 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent over their lifetimes. Most recently, Labor approved an extension until 2070 of the giant North West Shelf (NWS) gas project, operated by Woodside Energy Group Ltd.

This makes a mockery of Labor’s claims to be seeking “net zero” emissions by 2050. In September, the government released its totally inadequate 2035 target of a 62-70 percent reduction in domestic greenhouse gas emissions relative to 2005 levels. That does not even count the much larger impact of Australian capitalism’s coal and gas exports, which by some measures make it the second-largest climate polluter by total carbon emissions per capita, second only to Russia.

This month’s COP30 climate summit in Brazil, like the previous international gatherings of government representatives, confirmed the failure of global capitalism to even approach the measures necessary to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial average. UN reports show the planet is on course to heat by 2.6 degrees Celsius by the end of the century.

According to scientific studies, this would expose billions of people to one or more of extreme heat and regular life-threatening heatwaves, regular droughts and wildfires, coastal and riverine flooding, far more frequent extreme storms, newly prevalent diseases, food shortages and price shocks, with the damage overwhelming affecting the poorest people of the planet.

8. Australia: Residents highlight big-business neglect of worker safety after Port Kembla steelworks death

On November 17, 24-year-old worker Jack McGrath was killed at BlueScope’s Port Kembla steelworks after he was hit by a steel beam that fell while being lifted by a crane. McGrath, who was employed as a rigger by contractor Ventia, was apparently working on a major $1.15 billion project to reline the steelworks’ No.6 blast furnace. 

Work was temporarily halted in the area where McGrath had been working, to allow SafeWork New South Wales (NSW) inspectors to investigate the scene. However, BlueScope kept the rest of the large industrial complex operating. Employees and contractors, while forced to continue working, were told by the company not to speak to anyone about the incident.

At a moving funeral service yesterday in Kembla Grange, more than 700 people gathered to mourn McGrath’s passing. Family and friends, still clearly shocked and traumatized by his sudden death, remembered the young man as generous, loving and fiercely loyal.

*****

McGrath’s death is part of a broader trend of workplace tragedy. An average of 191 workers are killed on the job each year in Australia, more that one every two days, according to Safe Work Australia. Last year, 37 construction workers were killed at work, 20 percent of all workplace fatalities in the country. Only two industries, “transport, postal and warehousing” and “agriculture, forestry and fishing,” claimed more lives.

This is by no means an Australian phenomenon. The scourge of workplace deaths and serious injuries is on the rise globally, as corporations impose productivity increases and speed-ups to sate the demands of their financial backers. These are not accidents, but examples of social murder perpetrated by an economic system, capitalism, under which everything, including workers’ health and lives, is subordinated to profit.

The very organizations that purport to defend workers’ safety in fact serve to cover over the threats. Investigations by SafeWork NSW and equivalent bodies in other states are invariably dragged out over several years, allowing anger to subside before a ruling is made that is invariably a whitewash. Recommendations may be handed down, but are rarely implemented or enforced, and the company escapes with a token fine, amounting to a tiny fraction of the profits made in the intervening period.

These cover-ups would not be possible without the complicity of the trade union bureaucracies.

*****

World Socialist Web Site reporters spoke to local residents about McGrath’s death and the broader issue of workplace safety.

*****

Lorraine, a young customer service worker, said McGrath’s death was “very tragic to society as a whole, and especially to his parents, family and friends.” At just 24 years old, “he had his whole life ahead of him, but lost his life to work.”

The big corporations should put more money into ensuring that the workers are healthy and safe, because we all know they get lots of money. Companies just see people as numbers and don’t really take into account what the employees are saying.”

9. Cook Islands PM condemns New Zealand’s “coercion”

Earlier in November, it was revealed that New Zealand’s National Party-led government had suspended two aid payments amounting to $NZ29.8 million since February to the Cook Islands. The aid boosts the Cook Islands budget for core sectors including education, tourism and health. Following the withdrawal of the first aid payment in June, Brown said the punitive decision would “harm the country’s most vulnerable citizens.”

New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters, leader of the right-wing populist NZ First party in the ruling coalition, blocked the payments after Brown signed strategic deals with China in February without “consulting” Wellington. Peters claimed prior approval was required under the terms of the Cook Islands’ constitutional position as one of New Zealand’s semi-dependent “Realm” countries.

*****

Peters’ diplomatic bullying is part of increasingly belligerent attempts by Wellington to maintain its neo-colonial domination over the impoverished Cook Islands. New Zealand’s ruling establishment responded with outrage over the agreement with Beijing which covered economic development, including fisheries, infrastructure and undersea minerals, as well as strengthening diplomatic relations. The documents contained no military clauses.

In his television interview Brown declared: “The withholding and the pausing of financial assistance, development assistance, we don’t feel that that is a useful tool to try and coerce, if you like, a country into changing its policies—it certainly is not going to work with us.” By using its cash reserves the government had, Brown said, ensured the funding cut would not affect the delivery of public services, while GDP growth rate meant it was “well placed” for the coming years.

The dispute is an expression of the sharp geopolitical tensions created by the advanced US-led preparations for war against China. New Zealand and Australia—both imperialist allies of the US—are seeking to block China’s growing economic and diplomatic influence in the Pacific and are presenting Beijing in increasingly hysterical terms as a military threat. While using aid to pressure Pacific states, they are militarizing the region and forcing them to cut economic and diplomatic ties with Beijing.

*****

The Cooks—a tiny state with fewer than 20,000 people—is heavily dependent on outside aid. It has been diplomatic partners with China for almost 30 years, signing agreements to develop local infrastructure, and has diplomatic relationships with 70 different countries.

According to Brown, the Cook Islands government fulfilled its obligations to consult with New Zealand regarding the content of any diplomatic and economic deals and has followed “established protocol” in its talks with China. “I would not expect any of the countries that we discuss our bilateral relations with… to have them share those documents with a third country, and the reciprocal arrangement would also exist,” he said.

Brown assured the Cook Islands parliament his government is taking steps to mend the rift. Officials and ministers had “engaged consistently with New Zealand across every formal channel that is available to us,” he declared.

*****

New Zealand, along with Australia, regards the southwest Pacific as its “backyard.” Prime Minister Christopher Luxon declared recently that New Zealand’s funding would remain “paused” until the Cook Islands government took unspecified steps to restore “trust.” The opposition Labour Party has joined in the denunciations of the Brown government, expressing only mild concern that Peters’ hard-nosed approach could be counter-productive.

New Zealand’s universally anti-China media plays a grimy role demonizing the Cook Islands over its purported “treachery.” On November 24, the New Zealand Herald published an inflammatory “special investigation” alleging that the Cook Islands flag has been flown by over 100 oil tankers “accused of illicitly trading Russian and Iranian oil.” It claims the operation is run by a private shipping registry owned by Maritime Cook Islands (MCI) which was set up in 2000 by “government insiders” and delivers “modest fees” to the Cooks’ government.

According to the Herald, the flagged “shadow fleet” enables “pariah countries” Russia and Iran to generate “huge revenues.” It also gives end users, notably China and India, a secure flow of energy at cheap rates while evading unilateral sanctions imposed by the US and Europe. Allegedly, nearly half of the flagged tanker fleet of 150 vessels has been formally sanctioned by the US, United Kingdom or the European Union.

Brown has refused to comment on the Herald story. Peters declared that New Zealand’s support for Ukraine in the war with Russia was being deliberately undercut by the Cook Islands: “This is a completely unacceptable and untenable foreign policy divergence,” he fumed. The flag registry is just one of “a range of actions and statements” by the Cook Islands, Peters said, that have “damaged its free association relationship with New Zealand and the trust that underpins it.”

*****

Whatever truth is in the Herald article, the flag operation is likely similar to those run, among others, by Vanuatu and the Marshall Islands, the sale of “passports of convenience” by Tonga, Nauru and Vanuatu, or the tax havens and offshore financial centers in Fiji, Niue and Samoa, all desperate attempts to attract foreign capital.

Ultimate responsibility for the proliferation of such ventures—many blacklisted by capitalist overseers and financial institutions such as the EU and OECD—lies with the imperialist powers. For the past century they have kept the fragile Pacific micro-states in conditions of poverty, economic backwardness and oppression, while exploiting them for cheap labour and now, for geo-strategic ends in the escalating US-led confrontation with China.

10. Rebellion begins against IG Metall union at Bosch in Germany

In the face of sharp attacks on jobs and wages in the automotive and supplier industries, a rebellion is developing against the IG Metall union and its works council apparatus who are busy enforcing those attacks. This process is already well under way at Bosch Automotive Steering GmbH in Schwäbisch Gmünd, in the state of Baden-Württemberg. The founding of a new trade union organization there, in opposition to IG Metall, is imminent.

In a works meeting on November 22 last year, Bosch management in Schwäbisch Gmünd informed the 3,450 employees that by 2030 a total of 1,900 jobs would go, mainly in the production of steering systems.

*****

Bosch declares that the company aims to become competitive again through the job cuts. In order to reduce costs, production of steering systems for commercial vehicles is being relocated to Hungary–with the support of IG Metall.

Resistance to this policy and to the role of IG Metall, which millions of workers are currently experiencing first hand, has already erupted at Bosch in Schwäbisch Gmünd. The then deputy chair of the works council, Hüseyin Ekinci, refused to sign a confidentiality agreement and informed the workforce at a works meeting about the secret talks and plans of IG Metall, the works council and management. He was then voted out at the instigation of the works council, chaired by Claudio Bellomo.

Bosch works council rep Mustafa Simsek also opposed this. He accused some works council members of having learned of the downsizing plans from management months beforehand and having kept them secret. He reports that management had already met with works council members on November 5 and 12, 2024, and thus days before the downsizing plans were announced on November 22, including to discuss “the closure of plant II.” His questions at a works meeting as to the reasons for the secrecy were not answered by the official keepers of secrets.

Simsek said he was preparing the founding of a new trade union organization in order to be able once again represent the interests of the workforce. The new organization was already in the process of being founded and was to be active nationwide, he said. “We are thinking big and we intend to act big.” Around 200 employees were already involved; he expected many more: “We are going to see a rush. The movement has become an ‘avalanche’ that can no longer be stopped.”

Confidently, Simsek declared: “Many people’s patience has run out. Now the employees are organizing themselves.” IG Metall had distanced itself from people’s concerns, “When a trade union loses its voice, the workers must raise their own.” The new “employees’ association” was “a warning call to the entire republic.” “What is happening here is a wake-up call for all employees in Germany: we must once again take our interests into our own hands,” he stressed. The association was to be open to everyone: “Origin, religion, political stance—that does not matter.”

Simsek has stood up to the apparatus and has therefore won support among workers. The response to his initiative shows the enormous anger over IG Metall’s role as a company police. This self-organization of workers and rebellion against the apparatus are to be welcomed. But what is decisive is that it is really carried out by rank-and-file and does not become a new bureaucratic apparatus. It must be democratic, accountable and international in orientation.

It must be uncompromising. Jobs and wages, the livelihood of the working masses, must not become bargaining chips in order to secure the competitiveness, that is, the profits, of the company. 

*****

Simsek and his associates want to defend jobs “without compromise.” “We will not allow jobs here to be cut or relocated abroad quietly and secretly. We stand for the people here on the ground—and we do so resolutely,” says Simsek. But for “the people on the ground,” unity with people all over the world is absolutely essential. Jobs in commercial vehicle production, for example, cannot be defended without fellow workers in Hungary.

Workers—not only at Bosch—face challenges that go far beyond the previous forms of so-called representation within the framework of “social partnership.” Globalization and the ability to relocate production to another corner of the earth at short notice have pulled the rug from under the unions’ feet. Under these conditions, their nationalist perspective—that of strengthening the competitiveness of their “own” company, because, according to trade union logic, only then can jobs be preserved—turns into the justification of boundless attacks. In global competition, the workforce in Germany is competing with that in Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, China, Vietnam and so on. Thus, wages and working conditions in the poorest country become the worldwide benchmark.

On this basis, the unions agree to job cuts, wage reductions and worse working conditions. They play one site off against another, divide workers from their colleagues in other countries and boycott every serious resistance. And not only that. In the escalating international trade war, the unions also stand at the side of “their own” government.

*****

The attempt to replace IG Metall while leaving the social framework untouched is therefore doomed to fail. Simsek says: “The works council was not elected to act as a puppet of the employer. Its task is to represent the interests of the workforce.”

That is not entirely correct. Even though works councils are not obliged to approve every dirty trick of the companies, their class collaboration is enshrined in law. Works councils were legally anchored by the Social Democratic Party (SPD) government under Friedrich Ebert after the November Revolution of 1918 as a response to the formation of workers’ and soldiers’ councils, modeled on the revolutionary soviets. The Works Constitution Act, which came into force in November 1952 and was fundamentally revised in January 1972, further anchored the class collaboration of the works councils.

The law obliges management and works council to “work together in a spirit of mutual trust” and to maintain confidentiality. It forbids the works council from calling for industrial action. Instead, it is required, once a month, “to negotiate contentious issues with a serious will to reach agreement and to make proposals for the settlement of differences of opinion.” (§ 74 para. 2 Works Constitution Act)

This legally regulated class collaboration is directed against the workers and against the defense of their interests through “measures of industrial struggle.”

The newly developing liberation of the workforce from the straitjacket of the unions is therefore a tremendous step forward. What is now necessary is a further bold step: firstly, the building of independent action committees that connect and unite the working masses across all sites, companies, sectors and national borders, so that they can successfully confront shareholders, banks and corporate owners.

Secondly, the defense of workers’ interests requires a perspective that goes beyond capitalism, that is, beyond private ownership of the means of production and the nation state system: workers’ interests before profit interests, international unity rather than national division.

11. UK Labour government’s war on migrant workers threatens health and social care

The Labour government has opened a new front in its assault on the working class, with dire consequences for many of the people who hold Britain’s overstretched health and social care services together.

On November 20, Labour Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood unveiled a proposed brutal restructuring of immigration rules under the Orwellian title “A fairer pathway to settlement.” The measures are in fact designed to trap migrant workers in a state of prolonged insecurity.

The message could not be clearer: work, pay taxes, fill the gaps left by a collapsing system, but do not expect permanent rights, stability or family life in return. It marks a decisive escalation of Labour’s nationalist, anti-immigrant agenda which mirrors that of right-wing and far-right governments across Europe and the United States.

*****

The aim is to establish a permanently insecure workforce using citizenship, salary and passport exceptions to divide workers whose employment in the UK reflects the international character of the working class itself. The class bias on migration could not be starker with the wealthy able to glide through comparatively easily: high-earners and “entrepreneurs” earning over £125,140 can obtain ILR in just three years.

The infamous “hostile environment” pioneered by the Tories pales in comparison. So vicious is Labour’s policy that the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) warned ahead of the announcement that up to 50,000 migrant nurses could leave the UK under the restrictions.

*****

This assault comes when the social care system is on the brink. Britain has 130,000 care vacancies and two million elderly people are living with unmet care needs.

Hospitals discharges of many medically fit patients—who require a carer—are routinely delayed because not enough carers exist to support them at home, adding to the NHS gridlock. Patients routinely wait on trolleys in corridors, ambulances queue at A&E bays, and wards overflow.

There is no serious opposition in Westminster to the anti-migrant crusade and its consequences, only competition over which party who can penalize them more efficiently.

*****

As for the trade union leaders in the sector, they have responded only with statements of concern, moral indignation and sternly worded press releases. Unison called the proposals “devastating”, the RCN a “betrayal”. But the union bureaucracy proposes nothing practically beyond appeals to the very government carrying out the assault.

Their role is not to lead resistance but to contain and divert it into the safe, harmless channels of “consultation” and parliamentary debate. The bureaucracy performed the same function during the NHS strike wave in 2022-3, dispersing the movement into fragmented, limited stoppages before helping shut them down and foist de facto pay cuts on their members.

The defense of migrant health and care workers cannot be entrusted to the union partners of the Labour Party. It must be led from below by rank-and-file health and care workers organizing independently of the union bureaucracy, linking migrant and non-migrant staff, uniting NHS and private-sector carers, demanding rights not as privileges but as inalienable.

*****

This is the perspective advanced by NHS FightBack in opposition to the Starmer government’s hostile environment and its complicit allies in the trade union bureaucracy.

12. United Kingdom: Reject CWU’s Royal Mail letter writing stunt

The Communication Workers Union’s (CWU) letter-writing campaign urging postal workers to contact their Member of Parliament (MP) for urgent action to “Protect Postal Services” is a political fraud from top to bottom. It claims Royal Mail workers can “Have your Say”, when in fact it is based on adding a signature to a pre-written email tightly scripted by CWU general secretary Dave Ward and deputy Martin Walsh.

The 870-word message is a tissue of distortions designed to bury their responsibility for destroying the postal service and the jobs and conditions of Royal Mail workers, who are presented as humble petitioners. Eleven months after hailing its “groundbreaking agreement” with Royal Mail’s new owner, billionaire Daniel Kretinsky’s EP Group, the CWU now claims the issue is persuading EP Group to “honor the agreement” and adopt “a more realistic approach to USO reform”.

The CWU-EP Group Framework Agreement—tied to Labour’s Deed of Undertakings in December which rubber stamped Kretinsky’s £3.6 billion takeover—has from the outset been a restructuring agenda for downgrading the mail service and its Universal Service Obligation (USO) to deliver letters six days a week to addresses across the UK at a fixed price. Its purpose is to facilitate mass job cuts, further automation and gig-economy practices, converting the postal service into a low-wage parcel courier network.

*****

The CWU now portrays its stage-managed letter-writing campaign as “mobilizing members”—the same workers they delivered bound and gagged to EP Group. It is another PR stunt aimed at shielding Ward and Walsh from rank-and-file anger as they deepen collaboration with the Starmer government, block workplace resistance, and limit the fallout from handing the postal service to a billionaire oligarch. 

*****

The CWU’s letter-writing PR stunt must be rejected. To stop ODM, defend the postal service and win immediate levelling-up for new entrants, the fight must once and for all be taken out of the hands of the unaccountable pro-company union apparatus led by Ward. Power must be transferred through workplace committees to the shop floor where it belongs, and a campaign waged to defend the 130,000-strong workforce and the public service it provides, not to appease EP Group.

This is the fight being taken up by the Postal Workers Rank-and-File Committee (PWRFC), which also seeks to help Royal Mail workers reach out to resident doctors, refuse and transport workers opposing austerity cuts and profit gouging; and logistics workers such as DPD employees who have taken action against what they describe as a “corporate dictatorship”.

Through the International Worker Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees, the PWRFC can coordinate the fight of Royal Mail workers with postal and logistics workers internationally coming under attack by the same hedge funds and equity firms, with postal services being restructured to prioritize profits in preparation for outright privatization in America, Canada and Australia—ripe for plucking by oligarchs like Kretinsky. 

13. Tanzania: The December 9 Protest, Nyerere’s “African Socialism” and the Struggle for Permanent Revolution—Part Four

[Julius] Nyerere presented the transition to independence in Tanganyika in 1961 as the opening of a new era of “Uhuru na Umoja” (Freedom and Unity). He promised a break with colonial domination and the construction of a society based on self-reliance and equality. Yet the capitalist class foundations of the new state were already clear. TANU embodied the interests of a rising petty-bourgeois elite whose aspiration was the Africanization of state and commercial positions previously monopolized by British colonial officials and expatriate capitalists.

The working class, which had played a central role in the anti-colonial struggle, continued to mobilize after independence. In its first year, workers organized 152 strikes involving approximately 48,000 participants. However, this renewed labor militancy was quickly repressed. Nyerere’s government introduced a battery of laws effectively abolishing the right to strike and extending preventive detention to curb “subversive activities”. The Tanganyika Federation of Labour (TFL) was dissolved and replaced by the National Union of Tanganyika Workers (NUTA), a single, government-controlled union structure.

As for Nyerere’s claim of seeking self-reliance, it too was rapidly exposed. Between 1961 and 1972 an average of 34 percent of its total development budget came from foreign aid. In the 1975 budget, the government expected 55 percent to be raised by foreign aid.

In early 1964, Nyerere faced a new challenge when the Tanganyika Rifles mutinied against their British officers, demanding Africanization and better pay. The uprising rapidly spread from Dar es Salaam to other barracks. Nyerere, caught unprepared, fled the capital and appealed to British imperialism for assistance. British troops were flown in from Kenya and Aden to suppress the mutiny and restore his government, exposing Nyerere’s anti-imperialist rhetoric.

The wave of strikes and the 1964 army mutiny that followed independence convinced Nyerere of the need to consolidate power. In 1965, Tanganyika became a one-party state under TANU, following the model of Nyerere’s mentor Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana. This turn reflected a broader pattern across Africa, as postcolonial elites sought to suppress the social forces that had brought them to power through police-state measures. Having secured the state apparatus, the emerging bourgeois leadership turned against the working class and peasantry.

Nyerere’s justification was that the class struggle was alien to Africa. This was codified in his Ujamaa: The Basis of African Socialism, where he insisted, “In our traditional African society we were individuals within a community. We took care of the community, and the community took care of us. We neither needed nor wished to exploit our fellow men. We neither had capitalists nor feudalists.”

This conception underpinned the Arusha Declaration of 1967, often hailed as the high point of Nyerere’s “socialist” project. It declared, “The objective of TANU is to build a socialist state. The people must own the means of production. We reject capitalism, which seeks to build a society of division, and we equally reject feudalism.” The Declaration added that: “In a socialist society it is the government which must control the principal means of production.”

State ownership under a petty-bourgeois bureaucracy left the underlying relations of exploitation intact. The nationalisations that followed merely transferred control of banks, industries, and major farms to the state. Workers did not manage factories, elect planning committees, or determine investment priorities through organs of workers’ power. Instead, a bureaucratic-managerial elite took over the commanding heights of the economy and consolidated its authority through technocratic management, foreign aid, and control of the cooperative and marketing systems that dominated agriculture.

The centerpiece of Nyerere’s economic strategy were village cooperatives, or Ujamaa villages. This was influenced by Maoist ideas of rural collectivization, which the new Tanzanian state looked to for guidance, particularly Mao’s “Great Leap Forward” (1958-1960). Between the late 1960s and late 1970s, around nine million rural people, over ninety percent of the population, were forcibly relocated into these villages. Entire communities were uprooted under threat or force, houses were burned, and food stores destroyed. 

Officially, these villages were to promote communal cooperation, modern agricultural techniques, and shared social services. The real aim was to tighten state control over agricultural labor and boost the production of export crops needed for foreign exchange. Capitalist accumulation had to come from the heavy sacrifices of workers and peasants. Lacking large scale industry, the capacity to produce agricultural machinery and inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides, as well as sufficient infrastructure and technical skills, the Ujamaa ultimately failed. Production of cash crops actually fell. Between 1967 and 1975, Tanzania achieved an average rate of growth of just 1.4 percent while its population grew by 2.8 percent.

*****

Nyerere faced even sharper contradictions in foreign policy. While he rejected the Marxist analysis of imperialism, events in the region repeatedly confirmed it. The same powers that could tolerate a poor, aid-dependent Tanzania were determined to hold on to the mineral wealth and strategic levers of the continent.

In neighboring Congo, the CIA and Brussels orchestrated the overthrow and murder of Patrice Lumumba to secure control over copper, cobalt, and uranium. In Southern Africa, Britain and the US armed and diplomatically protected the white-supremacist regimes in South Africa and Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), turning them into regional gendarmes. In Mozambique and Angola, London and Washington backed Portugal, NATO’s oldest dictatorship, providing military support that enabled Lisbon to wage protracted colonial wars against the newly formed liberation movements.

Nyerere made Tanzania a rear base for these struggles, hosting exiled movements and training camps and opening the country’s limited resources to their support. This further strained an already weak economy and deepened dependence on external financing and military aid.  Into this vacuum stepped in the Stalinist regimes in the Soviet Union and China. Though both claimed to stand for socialism, neither the Soviet Union nor China based themselves on the internationalist strategy of October 1917. Each pursued its own nationalist course. Their divergent national interests erupted into open conflict in 1961.

Their rivalry spilled across Africa. For the Soviet bureaucracy, whose industrial base was shielded behind Eastern Europe, the priority was “peaceful coexistence” with Washington. Moscow cultivated conservative African governments, military strongmen, and sections of the nationalist elites as bargaining chips in its diplomatic maneuvers.

China, by contrast, encircled by hostile powers and threatened by the US war in Vietnam, turned to exporting guerrilla warfare as a strategic buffer in Africa, Asia, and Latin America to secure influence with dissident wings of the local bourgeoisie who might soon come to power. The Maoist line openly glorified “progressive” monarchs, tribal chiefs, and nationalist officers. Maoism in Africa, as elsewhere, was not an alternative to Stalinism but a mutation of it.

These global contradictions converged in Zanzibar. British imperialism had long manipulated the islands’ stratified social structure, elevating an Arab landlord class over the overwhelmingly African plantation workers who labored under conditions of extreme exploitation. Independence did not resolve these contradictions. The 1964 revolution, a volcanic uprising of the oppressed, toppled the Arab landowning elite. But while the revolt expressed deep class antagonisms, the absence of a revolutionary proletarian leadership meant that its political direction fell to petty-bourgeois formations, the Afro-Shirazi Party (ASP) and the radical Umma Party, and paved the way to communal massacres of thousands.

For Nyerere and the Tanzanian elite, the Zanzibar Revolution was an existential threat. The radicalization on the islands risked igniting similar upheavals on the mainland, where workers had already carried out mass strikes before and after independence. The hurried union between Tanganyika and Zanzibar was a pre-emptive act designed to contain a potentially revolutionary situation. This was backed by the US and Britain, who opposed the new Zanzibar regime’s closeness to the Soviet Union and China. They both welcomed the merger, which confirmed Nyerere’s reliability as a bulwark against Moscow and Beijing.

*****

The global recession of the mid-1970s exposed the fragility of Tanzania’s economic foundations. Falling prices for coffee, cotton, and sisal; soaring oil costs; and the country’s dependence on imported machinery and fuel produced chronic shortages, inflation, and declining living standards. The limited welfare gains associated with Ujamaa could not be sustained. Forced to appeal to the IMF and World Bank, Tanzania entered the tightening grip of global finance capital, which demanded austerity, wage suppression, agricultural commercialization, and deep cuts to social services.

The crisis intensified in 1978 when Uganda’s Idi Amin, facing economic collapse, invaded Tanzania’s Kagera region. Amin, who originally come to power with the tacit backing of London, Tel Aviv, and later Washington, was by the late 1970s heavily armed by the Soviet bureaucracy. Tanzania’s counter invasion, carried out with Chinese-supplied weaponry and the support of Ugandan exile militias, culminated in Amin’s overthrow in April 1979. The war revealed how rival Stalinist bureaucracies in Moscow and Beijing armed competing nationalist factions, deepening political confusion by presenting their geopolitical competition as socialist struggles.

Although Nyerere was able to secure more aid from the West during the 1970s (US$2.7 billion between 1971 and 1981), Tanzania was effectively bankrupt when he stepped down as president in 1985.

*****

The trajectory of Tanzania under Nyerere stands as a decisive refutation of the petty-bourgeois illusion that national independence, state ownership, or Pan-African sentiment could substitute for proletarian revolution. Confined within the framework of the capitalist state and the world imperialist system, “African Socialism” could only replace colonial administrators with a new African bourgeoisie managing exploitation on behalf of international capital. By suppressing the independent organization of workers and peasants, the TANU/CCM leadership blocked the only social force capable of unifying East Africa on socialist foundations: the working class. 

*****

Since independence, Tanzania’s working class has grown in size and strategic importance. Hundreds of thousands work in mining, manufacturing, commercial agriculture, transport, logistics and tourism—sectors tied directly to global commodity chains. Gold mining alone employs tens of thousands. Manufacturing employs roughly 700,000 workers, much of it linked to processing export crops. Transport and logistics—rail, trucking and port work—bind these export circuits together. Tourism, hospitality and conservation generate foreign exchange and rely on a large, insecure labor force.

Beneath this sits a vast informal economy, representing more than 90 percent of all employment, including millions of smallholder farmers and around 175,000 artisanal miners. Moreover, the port of Dar es Salaam functions as a regional artery, moving goods for Zambia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Burundi, Malawi and Uganda.

This immense social and economic power, concentrated in the hands of the working class and the rural poor, must be consciously mobilized into a political force capable of confronting the capitalist state and leading the struggle for socialism.

*****

The working class must advance its own revolutionary answer. A movement rooted in miners, port workers, teachers, nurses, students and the rural poor must form democratically elected committees in workplaces, neighborhoods, schools and universities to coordinate protests, strikes and self-defense against state violence. It must raise the demand for a general strike to bring down the CCM government and reject all appeals to the African Union or imperialist governments, instead calling for solidarity from workers across East Africa and internationally. 

A socialist program in Tanzania would place the mines, banks, ports, logistics networks and major industries under workers’ democratic control; abolish repressive laws; cancel foreign debt; and reorganize agriculture on cooperative, mechanized lines under workers’ and peasants’ committees. It would guarantee employment, housing, healthcare and education by directing resources away from foreign corporations and domestic elites toward human need.

The only viable path forward is the fight for the United Socialist States of Africa—a voluntary federation of workers’ states built through the common struggle of workers, youth and rural poor across the continent. This would abolish the colonial borders, pool the continent’s immense resources, plan development rationally and democratically, and finally end the nightmare of poverty, repression, ethnic division and imperialist domination.

This requires constructing a revolutionary party based on Trotsky’s Permanent Revolution, a Tanzanian section of the International Committee of the Fourth International. Only such a leadership can transform the present uprising into a conscious struggle for power and socialism.

14. Workers Struggles: Asia and Australia

Bangladesh:

Garment workers fight sudden closure of factory

India:

5,000 sanitation workers strike indefinitely in Jaipur
 
Anganwadi (childcare) workers demand pay rise in Bhubaneshwar
 
Midday meal workers in Telangana fight for higher wages

Australia:

Bus drivers strike in Newcastle
 
Mount Gambier nurses and midwives protest low wages and staff shortages
 
Coca Cola locks out Richland maintenance workers
 
Queensland’s Urban Utilities workers strike for better agreement
 
Tasmania’s public hospital scientists walk out for better enterprise deal

15. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

Bogdan Syrotiuk holds a copy of John Reed's Ten Days That Shook the World 

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.