Mar 31, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today:

1. David North’s Nuremberg video on US war against Iran evokes powerful response

A video of World Socialist Web Site International Editorial Board Chairman David North speaking outside the Nuremberg Palace of Justice on the criminality of the US war against Iran has been viewed nearly 200,000 times across social media platforms, generating an outpouring of support.

*****

North’s remarks were made shortly after he was barred from speaking at the “No Kings” rally in Nuremberg on Saturday by Democratic Party-aligned organizers, who blocked him from addressing the crowd because he intended to condemn the illegal war against Iran and the Democrats’ support for it, raising similar points to those he made in his video on the Nuremburg Trials. Video of the confrontation at the No Kings protest was also widely shared on X and other platforms.

2. As ground troops arrive in the Middle East, Trump threatens “obliteration” of Iran’s infrastructure

On Monday, the 30th day of the US-Israeli war against Iran, US President Donald Trump threatened to destroy all of Iran’s energy generation and water desalination plants unless it surrendered to his demands. “If for any reason a deal is not shortly reached,” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, “we will conclude our lovely ‘stay’ in Iran by blowing up and completely obliterating all of their Electric Generating Plants, Oil Wells and Kharg Island (and possibly all desalinization plants!).”

Destroying all of Iran’s power plants would uproot the basis of civilized life in the country—cutting off water treatment, hospitals and food refrigeration. And the destruction of its water desalination plants would deepen the already catastrophic water crisis in Iran, which is facing the worst drought in its modern history.

What Trump is threatening is a war crime — the latest in a war full of them. Article 54 of the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions states: “It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, agricultural areas for the production of foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations...” 

Trump’s threats constitute collective punishment—one of the oldest prohibitions in the laws of war. It is the Gaza model applied to a country of 90 million: the systematic destruction of the infrastructure necessary to sustain human life.

The criminality of the Trump regime is so naked that even the media has been compelled to take note. When NBC’s Garrett Haake asked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt why the president was “threatening what would amount to potentially a war crime,” she did not deny it. She replied that the US Armed Forces “has capabilities beyond their wildest imagination. And the president is not afraid to use them.”

The New York Times published an opinion piece Monday headlined “Is Trump Threatening to Commit a War Crime?” It admitted that Trump’s threat “would almost certainly amount to a war crime. One of the central tenets of the laws that govern modern conflict is that the targeting of civilians is off limits in military campaigns.”

This is true. But the entire war is criminal and illegal. The Nuremberg Tribunal defined the initiation of a war of aggression as “the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.” This is precisely what the US-Israeli war on Iran is.

*****

There is a logic to the increasingly genocidal rhetoric coming out of the White House. The Trump administration, having hoped to overthrow the Iranian government by assassinating its leaders, has failed to achieve its objectives and must either escalate US involvement in the war or face a catastrophic defeat. Trump called it an “excursion” and said it would be over in days. A month later, thousands are dead—but Iran’s government remains intact, the Strait of Hormuz remains closed and oil prices have surged 59 percent. 

The administration is turning to the Gaza model—the total destruction of a society as a method of war. In Gaza, Israel has killed more than 72,000 people, displaced the entire population of 2.3 million, destroyed every hospital and university and reduced the territory to rubble. Trump is threatening similar methods to a country 40 times the size of Gaza.

*****

The Trump administration operates outside of all legal and constitutional restraint. It is the criminal underworld in power, speaking the language of gangsterism on a global scale. Trump told the Financial Times on Sunday that his “preference” is to “take the oil in Iran,” resurrecting the colonial premise that a great power can invade, destroy, and then claim ownership over a nation’s resources. 

A ground invasion of Iran—a country of 90 million with a large military, rugged terrain and the capacity to inflict serious casualties—will not produce a swift victory. When the invasion bogs down, when casualties mount, when the political crisis deepens—what will be Trump’s next move?

As White House officials are so fond of saying, “Nothing is off the table.” Mohamad Safa, who served 12 years as the Permanent Representative of the Patriotic Vision Association to the United Nations, resigned this week, warning that the US “preparing for possible nuclear weapon use in Iran.”

The administration has staked the credibility of American imperialism on this war. A defeat would call into question the capacity of the United States to project power against Russia and China—the central strategic preoccupation of both parties. Trump’s threat to unleash “fire and fury” on Iran should, in fact, be taken as a threat to use nuclear weapons.

*****

The Democratic Party, which, before Trump’s election, had been waging war in the Middle East for over a year, is seeking to divert and neuter this mass popular opposition to the war.

At the “No Kings” rallies, Democratic politicians either ignored the war or reduced it to a passing phrase. In Boston, Senator Elizabeth Warren did not mention “Iran” at all. “No kings today and we vote in November,” as AFT President Randi Weingarten put it. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison told the crowd to “vote for people who don’t start wars.”

Ellison was telling attendees to vote for the Democrats. But the experience of the Biden administration, together with every other Democratic presidency before it, shows that this is a completely bankrupt perspective. Biden provoked the Russian invasion of Ukraine and then massively escalated the war. He armed Israel’s genocide in Gaza, which was intended from the beginning as a prelude to war against Iran.

The claim that the crisis will be resolved by electing Democrats in November is a fraud. And what will happen between now and then? The real significance of this focus is to buy time: to give Trump the months he needs to prosecute the war that the Democrats support in its fundamentals.

Trump does not speak and act simply as an individual madman. He is the political personification of a capitalist oligarchy—an American ruling class that has broken with democratic restraints and turns to war abroad and repression at home to defend its wealth and global interests.  

*****

The working class is the only social force capable of stopping this war. Eight million people took to the streets—but that opposition will be strangled if it remains under the control of the Democratic Party. The fight against war requires an independent movement of the working class, organized in rank-and-file committees in every workplace and linked across industries and borders, armed with a socialist program against the capitalist system that produces war, dictatorship and social inequality. 

3. Ukraine announces military deals with UAE, Saudi Arabia for war on Iran

The Ukrainian ruling class has quickly seized upon the criminal United States war against Iran to strengthen its own domestic defense industry and garner support from the Gulf states in its ongoing NATO-backed war against Russia.

On Saturday, just a day after announcing a defense agreement with Saudi Arabia, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky made an unannounced visit to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to meet with Emirati President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and discuss Ukraine’s military cooperation with the UAE, specifically its drone warfare capabilities, which the NATO-backed country has  employed extensively in its own war with Moscow.

A day earlier, Zelensky met with Amir of the State of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. Following the meeting, the Chiefs of the General Staff of Ukraine and the State of Qatar signed a 10-year intergovernmental agreement on cooperation in the defense sector. “Key areas of cooperation include the development of the defense industry and technologies, air defense, counter-drone capabilities, military training, exchange of experience, cybersecurity, AI, and command and control systems,” a statement from the Ukraine president’s office said.

In exchange, Ukraine will receive huge funds to develop its own arms industry and drone production for the war against Russia, and access to foreign technology. Ukraine has also secured a year-long diesel supply deal. It is reportedly also trying to gain access to high-grade air defense systems held by the Gulf states.

The military collaboration between Ukraine and the brutal authoritarian regimes in the Gulf to aid the imperialist war of aggression against Iran not only gives the lie, once again, to the NATO propaganda which portrayed the war against Russia in Ukraine as a war in defense of “democracy.” Above all, it makes clear that, essentially, both wars are part of a global conflict, in which the fronts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East are closely interlinked. 

Even as Zelensky has attacked the Trump administration for its temporary lifting of oil sanctions on Russia and “insufficient” pressure on Russia, the Ukrainian oligarchy is proving itself a willing enabler and beneficiary of the blatantly criminal war on Iran. 

*****

According to Russia’s Defense Ministry, Ukraine launched more than 345 drones overnight at Russian targets nationwide and 31 drones were downed over the Leningrad region as part of the attack. 

It remains unclear from where exactly Ukraine was firing the drones. However, military analysts estimate that Ukraine likely sent the drones from within Ukrainian territory over 935 kilometers away, underlining the increasingly vast distances from which drone technologies are being deployed. Last year, Ukrainian drones hit Russian airfields deep inside Siberia.

Apart from being used in military operations on the battlefield, drones are being used to attack and damage critical infrastructure such as energy plants, dams, oil refineries, electrical substations and more.

The individuals inevitably killed in such attacks while manning these facilities on 24/7 schedules are not soldiers, but workers with no stake in an expanding world war that threatens all of humanity. 

4. Storm clouds gather over global financial system

Storm clouds are gathering around global financial markets as the US war on Iran enters its fifth week and oil prices continue to rise along with a range of oil- and gas-dependent commodities such as fertilizers.

Even before the war began, there were growing concerns about the stability of the financial system. This focused on the financing of the massive investments in AI data centers and the role of private credit in financing software firms which could find their business models severely impacted or even wiped out by the develop of AI-based tools.

For the first couple of weeks of the war, financial markets, sustained by the claims of US President Trump that it would be over in a few weeks and the US had already achieved “victory,” did not experience major movements. There was certainly nothing like the shifts which took place in April last year when Trump unveiled his sweeping “reciprocal tariffs” against the rest of the world.

In an effort to calm the markets, Trump has claimed that negotiations are underway, that Iran is desperate for a deal and the war will soon be over. But with the preparations for an intensified onslaught involving the use of ground troops becoming ever more apparent, these efforts are wearing thin.

5. Palestinian activist Nerdeen Kiswani and her attorneys speak out on Zionist assassination plot [videos included]

Palestinian activist Nerdeen Kiswani addressed a news conference Monday morning in front of New York City Hall to denounce the Zionist-instigated assassination plot that was disrupted last week by the arrest of 26-year-old New Jersey resident Alexander Heifler in a joint FBI-New York Police Department operation.

Three of Kiswani’s civil rights attorneys and several other political activists joined her at the press conference, which was covered by a number of local media outlets and drew a supportive crowd.

Kiswani pointed to the activists supporting her and said, “I’d just like to point out that the largest demographic of supporters that we have today actually came from Muslim women and from Jewish communities who are standing unequivocally against this attack on me.”

She added, “Today I am standing here not just as an organizer, but as a mother, as a Palestinian, and as someone who was a target of a Zionist assassination plot that I have been warning has been inevitable for far too long. When I learned that someone was preparing to attack my home, building explosives with the intention of taking my life, I was not just processing that as a public figure. I was processing that as a mother, holding my infant, thinking what it means for someone to target my home—where my child sleeps, where my family is supposed to be safe.”

*****

In comments to the World Socialist Web Site after the press conference, Kiswani said “they are trying to suppress anti-genocide, anti-war, pro-Palestinian, pro-freedom advocates by whatever means they can” and are “resorting to violence.”  

The more “they try to silence us, the louder we will be,” Kiswani added. “I am not going to give them this win by going into hiding and not speaking out about Palestine anymore.”

Eric Lee and Christopher Godshall-Bennett, whose law firm represents Kiswani, both addressed the press conference. Lee drew the connection between the planned violence in New York City and the ongoing violence in the Middle East.

Referring to the would-be assassin, Lee said, “His aim of silencing a Palestinian activist and murdering her young child mimics the official policy of Israel, where he planned to escape for protection. His method, that of a firebombing in the dark of night, is the method of the Ku Klux Klan.”

*****

Lee argued that the broader political climate—marked by official indifference to, and even celebration of the assassination of Rene Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis—encouraged violent attacks by signaling that they would be tolerated.

“And so the attack on Ms. Kiswani is no accident,” Lee concluded. “It’s not the product of bad apples. It’s the deliberate and intended product of a political strategy by the Trump administration to cultivate extra-legal parliamentary militia forces to murder its opponents and suppress dissent in the aim of establishing a dictatorship in this country.

“We will do everything that we can in the courts to expose the right-wing conspiracy, but ultimately, the fight against dictatorship and right-wing terror is not going to be led from within the American state apparatus. It’s going to come from the population of this country, which is furious at what this government is doing, which is furious at what this terrorist network has done to our client. And here, as we prepare to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and the revolution that gave birth to this country, we encourage the people of this country to understand that the responsibility of defending our client and whatever remains of democracy falls on you, the people.”

*****

Kiswani and her attorneys took a series of questions from the press after the opening round of statements. She explained, “I have been going to bed every night worried about my child, worried about my family, my husband, my family, my siblings, my parents are always making sure that I don’t have to go anywhere alone. I share my location with all of them in case anything happens. And that was all before the assassination plot. So for this to happen, it just, you know, it confirms our fears. It validates them, especially because the threats haven’t stopped.”

The attorneys explained that the next action would be a hearing in the Southern District of New York on April 14 on the lawsuit against Betar brought under the anti-KKK Act.

6. US allows Russian oil tanker to dock in Cuba even as Trump threatens military action

Washington has allowed one Russian oil tanker to dock in Cuba as the Trump administration moves to impose starvation fuel rations on the island of about 8 million people.

The tanker Anatoly Kolodkin, carrying 730,000 barrels of crude from Primorsk, reached the Cuban port of Matanzas on Monday after being escorted through European waters by a Russian warship sanctioned by the US, the European Union, the UK, Australia and Ukraine.

Trump simultaneously boasted on Friday that “Cuba’s next” for US military intervention, underscoring that the regime-change operation against the island is accelerating, not easing.

The ship’s arrival may offer Cuba a brief breathing space but only that. Jorge Piñón, an expert at the University of Texas Energy Institute, says it could take up to 25 days for the crude to be processed in Cuba’s decrepit refineries, yielding only about 180,000 barrels of diesel—enough to meet roughly nine to ten days of demand.

*****

Even as he openly states his intent to expand his genocidal war on Iran to “take the oil,” Trump said in a forum during the weekend: “I built this great military. I said you’ll never have to use it. But sometimes you have to use it. And Cuba’s next by the way. But pretend I didn’t say that please.”

The entire political establishment has lined up behind this agenda. The New York Times, speaking for the Democratic Party, published a piece last week echoing the administration’s claim that mere suspicions of Russian and Chinese “spy outposts” justify denying Cubans access to the essentials of a modern society.

Republican Representative Carlos Gimenez's claims that Chinese sites in Cuba are “one of the most brazen intelligence operations ever attempted near the American mainland,” adding that supposed targets include a US military facility in Florida that is 'the only training range that actually can simulate battle in the Taiwan Straits.' 

*****

Since the blockade was launched in January, the US has allowed roughly 30,000 barrels of fuel into Cuba’s private sector through individual sales arranged through Miami and Texas, often via social media, according to Reuters.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has openly admitted that these exports are intended “to put the private sector and individual private Cubans—not affiliated with the government, not affiliated with the military—in a privileged position.” That is, Washington is consciously cultivating a capitalist layer on the island as a lever against the state and against the working class.

Cuba’s bourgeois nationalist regime has responded with major concessions. It has expanded the role of private business, opened the door wider to public-private partnerships, courted exile capital in Miami, invited FBI “experts” to the island, and entered into talks with the Trump administration over fuel and “security cooperation.” 

*****

The drive to recolonize Latin America and Cubans’ assault on the right to food, medicine, transport and energy on are inseparable from the broader war program of US imperialism. At the same time, the unanimous accommodation to Trump by the Cuban, Venezuelan and other “pink tide” governments confirms that imperialism cannot be opposed on a national basis under bourgeois leaderships.

The “No Kings” mobilization Saturday, the largest single-day protest in American history, testifies to mass opposition in the working class against war and dictatorship in the United States and internationally.

What is required is a conscious, political break with all nationalist and pro-capitalist parties and union bureaucracies and the construction of an international movement of the working class against imperialist war and capitalist rule. 

7. CNN news team assaulted and detained by Israeli soldiers in the West Bank

On Friday, a group of three Israeli soldiers assaulted and detained a CNN news team who were in the northern West Bank village of Tayasir to report on the aftermath of a settler attack and the establishment of a new illegal Zionist settler outpost.

The crew—reporter Jeremy Diamond, producer Abeer Salman, and photojournalist Cyril Theophilos—was set upon by armed soldiers who pointed rifles at them, ordered them to sit down, placed Theophilos in a chokehold, damaged camera equipment and detained the team for roughly two hours.

CNN reported that the journalists were speaking with Palestinian residents in Tayasir after settlers had attacked people in the village and erected an unauthorized outpost in the area, when Israeli soldiers intervened to stop the journalists from filming.

*****

The attack in Tayasir is part of the escalation that began with the Gaza genocide and has spread across the region. In the West Bank, the killing of Palestinians by Israeli forces and settlers has intensified dramatically throughout the assault on Gaza, with UN and rights groups documenting a rising death toll and repeated attacks by settlers acting under IDF protection. As of March 2026, reports cited by humanitarian and rights organizations placed the number of Palestinians killed in the occupied West Bank at 1,071 since October 7, 2023.

The Gaza genocide was also extended into Lebanon, where Israel has carried out repeated strikes that have killed civilians, journalists and other noncombatants, while occupying southern areas under the pretext of security and “buffer zones.” Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported at least 3,445 conflict-related deaths in Lebanon from October 7, 2023 to mid-November 2024.

The attack on the CNN team is part of Israel’s deadly war on journalists. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has reported that Israel was responsible for the most journalist deaths in 2025 and that it has killed more journalists than any government on record.

In Lebanon, Israeli strikes have repeatedly killed media workers, including the March 2026 attack that killed Ali Shoaib, Fatima Ftouni and Mohamad Ftouni. In Gaza, where foreign journalists are barred and Palestinian reporters have assumed the burden of bearing witness under bombardment, the toll has been catastrophic.

Meanwhile, according to a United Nations/OHCHR report cited in August 2025, at least 247 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Gaza since October 7, 2023. CPJ has reported that by late March 2026 the total number of press members killed in Lebanon since the war began had reached 11.

*****

For decades, Palestinians have been killed, beaten and displaced while Israeli authorities shield perpetrators and convert “security” into a cover for ethnic expansion. The ongoing campaign in the West Bank is not separate from Gaza; it is the same program of dispossession adapted to different terrain.

All these crimes have accelerated under the cover of the US-Israeli war with Iran which began on February 28.

CNN said the assault on its crew was an “unprovoked” attack and demanded “an explanation and accountability for this unprovoked assault.” The network also said that its journalists were clearly identifiable as press, that the crew was covering rising settler violence in the area, and that the attack occurred despite the team following wartime regulations.

A statement by the Foreign Press Association on Saturday said, “The use of force was excessive and dangerous. Pointing rifles at journalists and civilians, physically assaulting a cameraman and detaining a crew are actions that cross every line. Such behavior reflects a deeply alarming pattern of hostility toward the media and cannot be tolerated under any circumstances.”

The US government has not responded to the attack and this silence is sending a clear political message. Washington is the chief sponsor, financier and diplomatic protector of the Israeli state’s operations in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon. The lack of even a token defense of press rights by the Trump administration once again demonstrates that the US ruling class is dispensing with democratic rights in pursuit of global hegemony, and views Israel’s war crimes as a critical element of its strategic regional goals.

8. Australia:  Glencore threatens tiered wages at Mangoola coal mine

Workers at Glencore’s Mangoola open cut coal mine in New South Wales (NSW) are voting this week on a proposed enterprise agreement (EA) that would introduce a three-tier pay structure. The immediate effect would be to slash the wages of labor-hire workers at the Hunter Valley mine, who are not directly covered by the agreement and are not allowed to vote on it.

The financial press has noted that, if successful, Glencore’s tiered wage workaround could set a precedent for the slashing of labor-hire wages throughout the coal mining industry and more broadly. The Mangoola workers stand to lose as much as $36,000 a year, according to the Mining and Energy Union (MEU).

The existing direct workforce—whose vote is needed to approve the EA—have been assured by the company that they will be grandfathered into the top pay rate. Glencore is trying to turn one section of workers against the other, even as it further cuts the real wages of the entire workforce.

*****

Glencore has already introduced new pay tiers at other coal mines that froze labor-hire workers’ pay following SJSP orders. The Mangoola tiers represent an escalation, explicitly and immediately slashing wages for labour-hire and new employees. The company is simultaneously pushing similar clauses at other mines in the region.

Glencore has also axed 1,000 jobs globally as part of a cost-cutting drive announced in December 2025, targeting $1 billion in operating cost reductions. At the same time, Glencore reported adjusted EBITDA of $13.5 billion for 2025 and announced approximately $2 billion in shareholder returns for 2026.

9. United States autoworkers:  “A slap in the face”: Nexteer workers denounce sellout contract ahead of vote Wednesday

A new tentative agreement for Nexteer workers in Saginaw, Michigan, contains sweeping concessions, particularly on pay for new hires and out-of-pocket benefit costs. The sellout agreement is producing tremendous anger among workers at a key node in the global manufacturing network of the auto parts industry.

Details of the agreement have been explained in a leaflet being distributed by workers titled “Concessions our Leadership fails to tell you.” According to the leaflet, the deal creates a new layer of “third class employees” among new hires, who would be placed on a sharply reduced wage structure.

*****

Will Lehman

Will Lehman, a Mack Trucks worker running for UAW president, issued a statement calling on workers to reject the contract and organize to impose rank-and-file oversight over the vote. “There must be vigilance against any attempt by the Local 699 bureaucracy to ram through this deal. In 2021, they declared a deeply unpopular contract ratified by a narrow margin without even releasing a detailed vote breakdown.”

This is a reference to the 2021 vote in which the UAW claimed the contract was ratified by a 52–48 margin. The result drew widespread suspicion from workers, many of whom called for a recount. Meanwhile, Local 699 President Tom Hurst was quoted by local media at the time as calling the “ratification” “a big relief for the bargaining committee and all of the staff at the union.”

Lehman concluded, “Workers must organize rank-and-file oversight of the ballot to ensure its integrity and to enforce the democratic decision of the membership. If the contract is rejected in a free and fair vote, then a strike must immediately be called.

*****

For many years in the mid-20th century, parts workers had maintained wages close to parity with those in the assembly plants. However, in recent decades they have been driven down to near sweatshop levels. The spinning off of in-house parts operations into nominally “independent” contractors has been a central mechanism through which automakers have slashed wages and conditions.

Nexteer itself emerged from this process. It originated as part of Delphi Corporation, which was spun off from General Motors in 1999. After Delphi declared bankruptcy, GM repurchased key operations in 2009. With the help of the UAW bureaucracy, management shed $6.2 billion in pension liabilities and imposed massive wage cuts, with hourly pay slashed from $26–30 to as low as $10–14. During the four-year bankruptcy process, the workforce collapsed from 50,000 to just 14,000. Nexteer was then spun off again and sold to a Chinese firm less than a year later.

The cost of the electric vehicle transition, combined with far lower than expected sales, is now being imposed on workers. At major automaker factories, thousands of jobs have been eliminated, beginning shortly after the UAW secured ratification of what it called a “historic” contract in 2023. Among parts workers, the impact is even more severe, as automakers shift losses onto the backs of suppliers.

“This resurgence of class struggle is colliding with the entrenched power of the union bureaucracy,” Lehman explained. “From the national headquarters—misnamed ‘Solidarity House’—down to the local unions, the apparatus operates as a dictatorship, beyond the control of the rank and file, while officials draw millions in income financed by workers’ dues.

“I am running for UAW president to abolish this bureaucracy, which has betrayed workers for decades. My campaign calls for workers to take back the union by replacing the existing hierarchy with a network of rank-and-file committees, democratically controlled from the shop floor. If elected, I will not take up a position in Solidarity House but will remain a worker on the shop floor.”

10. Berlin welcomes Syrian interim president and intensifies war and deportation campaign

Had any further proof been needed that Germany’s support for the US-Israeli war of aggression against Iran has nothing to do with a fight against terrorism or oppression, it was provided by the reception of Syria’s transitional President Ahmed al-Sharaa in Berlin.

The German state leadership quite literally rolled out the red carpet for the Islamist leader and de facto dictator. In the morning, al-Sharaa was received by Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier (SPD) at Bellevue Palace. He then took part in a German-Syrian economic forum at the Foreign Office before Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed him at the Chancellery with military honors and in a demonstratively cordial atmosphere.

If the label “Islamist terrorist” applies to any head of state in the Middle East, it applies to al-Sharaa. Under his former name, Mohammad al-Jolani, he was the emir of the al-Nusra Front, which was initially closely linked to the “Islamic State” and later directly to al-Qaeda. The United Nations designated the organization as terrorist as early as 2013.

That same year, al-Sharaa pledged allegiance in a video message to the then al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. Subsequently, al-Qaeda supported his militias in the Syrian civil war with fighters and weapons. The al-Nusra Front carried out numerous bloody attacks in which countless civilians were killed.

Since al-Sharaa and his militia—renamed Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)—rose to power in Damascus at the end of 2024 with the backing of the Western powers, violence against religious minorities and political opponents has continued unabated. The World Socialist Web Site has reported extensively on this. Thousands of Alawites, Druze and Christians have fallen victim to Islamist terror under al-Sharaa. His inaugural visit to Berlin, originally planned for January, was postponed because he was at that time overseeing a military offensive against Kurdish forces. Nevertheless, the regime’s violence is systematically downplayed or ignored in the Western media.

*****

The reception of al-Sharaa in Berlin makes clear what is really at stake: not democracy, human rights or the fight against terrorism, but power, influence and the barbaric enforcement of imperialist interests—abroad through war and at home through repression and deportation. 

11. Australian government’s “fuel plan” offers workers no real relief from Iran war impact

Following a second emergency meeting of the national cabinet of state and territory leaders yesterday, the Albanese Labor government announced a fuel security plan. Its purported aim is to ease the worsening cost-of-living crisis and supply shortages resulting from the criminal and increasingly catastrophic US-Israeli war on the people of Iran.

None of the measures outlined, however, will provide any meaningful relief for working-class households, which are being severely affected by sky-rocketing prices for petrol and diesel, as well as by the wider impact on the costs of food, gas, fertilizers, plastics and everything else derived from Middle East oil and gas. 

*****

At yesterday’s media conference following the national cabinet meeting, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese outlined a fuel security plan with four stages. The first phase—plan and prepare—supposedly has been completed already.

The second level, labelled “keeping Australia moving,” is said to consist of “current settingsfuel supply continues to flow, but there have been some disruptions.” In reality, shortages are mounting. Yesterday, for example, 75 petrol stations in New South Wales, the most populous state, had run out of at least one kind of petrol, while 242 had no diesel.

The third and fourth stages are described as “taking targeted action (ensuring fuel goes where needed most and adopting voluntary measures to limit fuel usage)” and “protecting critical services for all Australians (where action will be required to ensure critical users are protected and the economy is operating).”

These two phases have been kept deliberately so vague and variable as to be virtually meaningless. The plan states: Level 3 and 4 are under consideration and may change, depending on circumstances. Governments will continue to work with industry and community.”

This not only hides whatever plans the government has. It leaves supplies in the hands of the corporate energy giants, such as BP, that dominate the global markets and extract massive profits from them.

*****

Over the past month, since being one of the first governments in the world to support the illegal war on Iran, Labor has made almost daily announcements of new measures, none of which have lessened the fuel supply and cost-of-living crises. 

*****

As the devastating impact of the US and Israeli wars on Iran and Lebanon intensifies, both in the deaths of thousands of people and the destruction of civilian infrastructure and in working-class living conditions internationally, including in Australia, opinion polls indicate growing opposition. On Monday, even the Murdoch media’s Newspoll recorded 72 percent opposition to the US assault on Iran.

Under these conditions, the Labor government is desperately trying to distance itself somewhat from the carnage. Last night, Albanese appeared on national television, on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s “7.30” program, appealing to the Trump administration to clarify its war objectives and de-escalate, saying: “I think people want to see an endpoint.”

No amount of such posturing, or efforts to contain the severe domestic impact, can erase Labor’s complicity and involvement in this criminal war, to which it has committed a warplane, missiles and troops, as well as the facilities of the Pine Gap spy satellite base in central Australia.

12. War on Iran deepens social crisis in New Zealand

The average petrol price has risen about 40 percent in four weeks to $3.42 a liter yesterday, with Westpac bank predicting it will pass $3.70 by the end of the week. Diesel prices have nearly doubled to about $3.43 a liter, according to the website Gaspy.

The National Party-led coalition government has made clear that workers, already squeezed between high living costs and falling real wages, must endure a further cut to their living standards. It has responded to the fuel crisis by announcing a grossly inadequate $50-a-week temporary subsidy for a small number of families.

Nervous about the election approaching in November, the government is trying to distance itself from the assault on Iran. Finance Minister Nicola Willis told Radio NZ (RNZ) on March 20 that it was “not New Zealand’s war, it is not something that we support, but it is having a profound impact on our country.”

This contradicted Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Peters’ statement on March 1, which repeated US and Israeli propaganda that the war is “to prevent Iran from continuing to threaten international peace and security.” On March 21, Luxon signed a statement with leaders from 19 other countries including Britain, France and Germany, condemning Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz and expressing their “readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage through the Strait.”

*****

Last year the country’s economy grew by just 1.3 percent. Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr told RNZ on March 20 that disruption to fuel supply “will definitely increase the risk” of yet another recession, on top of recessions during 2023 and 2024, and a near-recession in 2025. 

With no oil refinery, New Zealand relies on shipments of fuel from Singapore and South Korea, both of which are impacted by the blocking of the Strait of Hormuz. NZ’s fertilizer imports, 22 percent of which come from the Persian Gulf region, are also disrupted.

On March 24 the government announced that 143,000 low-income families with children will receive a “relief” payment of just $50 a week. This will reach about 7 percent of households and excludes some of the poorest members of society: unemployed people, disabled people, pensioners, students, and everyone without children.

The payment—which equates to just $12.50 per person in a family of four—is temporary and will stop after either one year, or when fuel prices stay below $3 a litre for four weeks.

“Good government means looking after your people,” declared Luxon. This meant giving support “to help people when times are tough” while keeping government debt down. He said it was a “hard reality that we cannot alleviate the pressure of rising fuel costs for everyone.”

The people the government is “looking after” are rich investors and corporations. In last year’s budget it delivered a $1.7 billion annual tax cut package for businesses, and in 2024 it cut taxes for landlords by $725 million. By contrast, it is allocating a maximum of $373 million for the temporary $50 payments.

*****

The New Zealand Hunger Monitor, a survey of 3,000 people late last year, found that 18 percent of households were experiencing “severe food insecurity.”

Unemployment has reached 5.4 percent and will certainly go higher. Major food processing companies Watties and McCain recently announced factory closures with hundreds of job losses.

*****

While Labour and the Greens criticized the attack on Iran, they support NZ’s alliance with US imperialism, which has launched a third world war in a desperate bid to reverse its economic decline. Labour supports plans to double the NZ military budget and integrate the country into US war preparations against China, which is being paid for by starving public services.

13. India roiled by economic shocks from criminal US-Israeli war on Iran

India is being roiled by the economic fallout from the month-long, criminal war that US imperialism and Israel, its Mideast attack dog, are waging on Iran.

The war’s economic impact is already severe. In a speech to parliament last week, Prime Minister Narendra Modi compared it to the COVID-19 pandemic, which at its height caused a 24 percent contraction of India’s economy and ultimately killed more than 5 million people.

The war’s most immediate impact has been on India’s LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) supply. LPG cylinders, containing butane and propane are used for daily cooking both at home and by restaurants. Supply disruptions have led to sharp price increases, and forced street-vendors and restaurants to slash hours, limit menus, and in many cases close down entirely, slashing the incomes of tens of millions of households.

The war’s impact, however, threatens to quickly go far beyond LPG, and cascade across the economy, driving up inflation, especially the cost of food and transport.

India is massively dependent on oil imports, with half or more of those imports, approximately 2.5 million barrels per day, coming from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait. To date, the surge in world oil prices due to the war has not translated into large price jumps at the pumps for diesel and petrol, due to government intervention, including a rollback of excise taxes. But should the war continue in the weeks and months ahead—and everything suggests it will—the BJP government, which is in the midst of a years-long austerity drive, will move to impose the full burden of the price rises and any temporary debts it has incurred in cushioning their impact onto the backs of India’s workers and toilers.  

India is the largest importer of nitrogen fertilizers from the Persian Gulf region, which accounts for 45 percent or more of the world’s urea exports and 30 percent of global exports of ammonia, a vital component of urea and other nitrogen-based fertilizers. At least 75 percent of India’s urea imports and 80 percent of its ammonia imports typically come from the Gulf States.

Fertilizer shortages will raise farm input costs and reduce crop yields, both of which will squeeze farmers’ incomes and drive up food prices—this in a country where hundreds of millions already suffer from hunger and food insecurity. 

*****

While India’s workers and toilers are paying an ever mounting price for the illegal, unprovoked US-Israeli assault on Iran, India’s Hindu supremacist BJP government and the Indian ruling class as a whole have made clear that they stand with Washington and Tel Aviv.

On the war’s eve, when it was obvious to all that a US-Israeli attack was imminent, Modi made a two-day visit to Israel to solidarize himself with the far-right Netanyahu regime and its genocidal assault on the Gaza Palestinians and to announce an enhanced Indo-Israeli “Strategic Partnership for Peace, Innovation & Prosperity.”

New Delhi has remained conspicuously silent on all the war crimes committed by the US and Israel—beginning with the launching of an unprovoked war of aggression, the “supreme international war crime” according to the 1946 Nuremberg judgement, for which the Nazi leaders were hanged.

Although Tehran is ostensibly an Indian ally, Modi and the BJP government have failed to condemn the decapitation strikes with which the US and Israel launched their war, killing senior Iranian leaders, including Ayatollah Khamenei, who in addition to being Iran’s head of state was a religious leader revered by millions of Shia Muslims. Nor did India utter a word of protest against the torpedoing of the IRIS Dena, in which more than 150 Iranian sailors returning from an Indian-hosted naval exercise were killed. The defenseless vessel was sunk by a US nuclear attack-submarine, off the coast of Sri Lanka, more than 1,000 miles from Iran’s shores.

*****

In pursuit of its own predatory great power ambitions, the Indian bourgeoisie has aligned itself ever more closely with American imperialism over the past quarter century, while massively expanding military expenditures. Through the development of a vast network of bilateral, trilateral and quadrilateral military-security ties with the US and its principal Asia-Pacific allies, Japan and Australia, India has been transformed during Modi’s 12-year rule into a veritable frontline state in Washington’s military-strategic offensive with China. As a corollary to this, New Delhi has also developed extensive military-security and economic ties with Israel.

With the war on Iran, the utterly reactionary character of the Indo-US alliance and the costs it will impose on the people of India, the region and the world are being spelled out.

*****

Just ten days after the February 28 US-Israeli assault on Iran, the Modi government invoked the Essential Services Maintenance Act (ESMA). ESMA has usually been invoked by both national and state governments to suppress strikes by workers in what are termed as “essential services.” These include healthcare, sanitation, water supply, and defence, communication, transport, and government food distribution.

Under ESMA, the government has ordered petroleum refiners to increase LPG output, imposed controls on distribution, and prioritized domestic consumers over commercial users. In some areas, restrictions such as longer intervals between cylinder bookings have been introduced, effectively rationing supply.

At the same time, reports indicate that black markets are flourishing. Investigations have exposed illegal refilling operations and profiteering networks exploiting the shortage to sell cylinders at prices far above official rates. The burden of the crisis is falling overwhelmingly on poorer working-class families. These households, already struggling with rising living costs, are being forced to cut consumption or switch to inferior fuels.

This is not an aberration, but an inevitable outcome of a system in which essential goods are distributed according to profit rather than social need.

*****

India’s workers and toilers must be armed with a genuine socialist internationalist perspective to oppose the Iran war, the growing danger of world war, and the reactionary Indo-US strategic alliance. The fight against war must be rooted in the working class and aimed at its mobilization in India and globally as an independent political force, rallying all the oppressed behind it, in revolutionary opposition to capitalism, the root cause of war. 

14. Germany: Verdict in trial for death of railway apprentice Simon Hedemann

Our social life, our economic life, is organized in a way that continuously produces these disasters, and they will continue until a way is found of putting an end to the system which produces them. What is the system? What is this social organization? It is the capitalist system (David North at the IWA-RFC hearing in Detroit on the death of Stellantis worker Ronald Adams Sr.)

On Wednesday, March 25, the trial concerning the death of the young railway worker Simon Hedemann concluded in Hanover. The 19-year-old railway apprentice was killed by a fast-moving freight train at the busy Hanover-Linden freight yard on September 8, 2023.

The Hanover District Court sentenced a 37-year-old signal mechanic for national rail operator Deutsche Bahn (DB) to a fine of €6,300 for negligent manslaughter. This is just below the sentence at which he would be considered to have a criminal record.

The signal mechanic had led the construction crew of the former DB Netz AG (now DB InfraGo) and decided that Simon should attach new QR tags to a track under “self-protection” rules, i.e., without closing the tracks. His colleagues were supposed to warn the young man of approaching trains merely by shouting. But a freight train, traveling at approximately 90 km an hour, knocked Simon over and killed him on the spot.

The public prosecutor had demanded an eight-month suspended prison sentence, plus a fine. The defense lawyer pleaded for acquittal and claimed that at DB, every employee was personally responsible for their own safety. The accused had allegedly warned Simon of the approaching train in good time by shouting “Train coming,” but the latter had not reacted. In other words, Simon was, in principle, responsible for his own death.

The judge clearly rejected this. The accused had clearly made mistakes and taken a wrong decision in the position for which he bore responsibility when he sent Simon onto the track under the “self-protection” rules. However, the accused had not been alone in his misjudgement. Even during the police interrogation, neither his direct superior nor the dispatcher had expressed doubts about the accused’s decision.

15. United Kingdom:  Zack Polanski’s Greens block anti-Zionist motion at conference

A motion against Zionism and in support of the Palestinians was filibustered at the UK Green Party’s Spring Conference held this weekend. Fewer than 1,000 members, out of 220,000, took part in the online event.

The motion, “Zionism is racism”, identified Zionism as a “racist ideology”, called for a “single democratic Palestinian state in all of historic Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital”, and backed “the right of the Palestinian people to resistance and liberation from Israeli occupation, domination and subjugation”.

Opponents never even engaged in a debate on the issues. They began by trying to have the motion ruled out of order, with Eleanora Folan, who runs the X account Stats for Lefties, arguing that the call for a single Palestinian state could not be moved because it contradicted the party’s previous support for a “two-state solution”.

A vote was delayed by problems with the party’s online system, which the Canary suggested might have been the result of a deliberate denial of service attack. Participants were eventually able to block the effort to rule the “Zionism is racism” motion out of order by an overwhelming majority.

There were then six spurious votes of no confidence in the chair, which the presiding Standing Orders Committee advised had to be taken, each of which was defeated by roughly 600 votes to 40. But the tactic succeeded in running down the clock on the debate, preventing a vote either on the motion or on several proposed amendments.

This debacle followed weeks of antisemitism smears against Green Party members, from the usual quarters: the tabloid media and the Telegraph, GB News, UK Lawyers for Israel and so on.

All of this will be very familiar to those who lived through five years of Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership of the Labour Party. Beginning with high-profile figures close to Corbyn, like Ken Livingstone and Marc Wadsworth, scandals were manufactured by the right-wing press and the Blairites equating opposition to the Israeli state with antisemitism and declaring the latter to be rampant in the Labour Party. This was rolled out to the wider party in a campaign of slander, intimidation, suspensions and expulsions.

The Labour witch-hunt was able to gain traction because Corbyn and his allies capitulated, to the point of becoming active accomplices. First, they turned a blind eye to their allies being targeted, refusing to name the Blairite slander campaign for what it was, then they endorsed the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, then they began organizingand encouraging suspensions and expulsions themselves.

Zack Polanski’s leadership has shown this weekend they will act no differently. Polanski took the excuse provided by the Together Alliance march in London not to be present, consummating a series of evasions on the question of Zionism in the lead up to the conference.

*****

The political issues posed by the Corbyn phenomenon, which mobilized much larger numbers than Polanski, are not solved simply by switching efforts at a “left capture” from Labour to the Green Party. They have manifested again almost immediately and produced their first major betrayal.

These issues are: the impossibility of mounting a consistent opposition to imperialist war and genocide outside of a struggle against capitalism; the bankruptcy of all purported national solutions to social and democratic questions; the need for a revolutionary offensive against capitalist states impervious to reform; the need, therefore, for an independent party of the working class opposed to all collaboration with the ruling class and its representatives.

The Socialist Equality Party fought and fights illusions in Corbyn on this basis, and does the same today against Polanski and the Greens. Join our revolutionary socialist tendency today. 

16. Ethylene plant closing in Scotland with 400 jobs lost

ExxonMobil will start laying off workers from April 1 at its Mossmorran ethylene production plant near Cowdenbeath, Fife, Scotland. The plant’s closure was announced last November. In total some 400 jobs, half of whom are contractors, are to go. 

*****

The plant closure is being facilitated by Scotland’s main political parties. Fife Council is run by a Scottish Labour minority administration under leader David Ross. The Scottish National Party has the largest single group in the council, but do not have enough seats to govern alone. Labour has passed major legislation and budgets mainly through the informal backing of the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives.  

*****

The Mossmorran plant was set up in the late 1970s, with production starting in 1985, to process naturally occurring ethane from the North Sea into ethylene, a base component in the production of plastics. The plant’s closure reflects a worldwide trend as petrochemical companies move production to cheaper, less regulated labor markets and consolidate their capital into more profitable oil and gas extraction, refining and related operations.

By closing the Mossmorran plant, ExxonMobil aims to pass on the costs of market shifts to workers while continuing the bonanza to shareholders. UK chairman Paul Greenwood told the Scottish government that the plant was “inefficient” and “would need £1 billion in spending to make it profitable.” ExxonMobil is the third largest oil and gas company in the world and the £1 billion required to modernise Mossmorran is less than 3 percent of 2025’s profits. Its reported profits fell by 14 percent in 2025 to $28.8 billion, but the combined total of share buybacks and dividends increased from $36 billion in 2024 to $37.2 billion in 2025.

While vast sums were squandered, noise and pollutants from the Mossmorran operation have blighted neighboring areas for years. Residents in Cowdenbeath and Lochgelly have been subjected to repeated disturbances from the flaring of surplus gas. 

*****

The trade unions are wholly complicit in the plant’s closure. Such statements that have been made have appealed to the ruling class to retain Mossmorran alongside the huge Grangemouth complex, some 30 miles away, on the other side of the Firth of Forth.

The oil refinery at Grangemouth ceased production last year while an adjacent ethylene plant will now be Britain’s only producer. In December, Grangemouth’s owners INEOS, owned by billionaire Jim Ratcliffe, pocketed a £150 million package from the Labour government in exchange for a promise to keep ethylene production running for another five years. The British government views the process, underpinning production of a range of goods including war related industries, as, in the words of Business Secretary Peter Kyle as “of strategic national importance.”

As the Grangemouth refinery was being closed, Unite General Secretary Sharon Graham warned of an “avalanche of redundancies taking place across Scotland’s oil and gas industry.” She complained that the “UK and Scottish governments are failing to protect thousands of jobs. Government policy is also accelerating these huge losses without any credible jobs plan in place.” When Mossmorran’s closure was first announced last year, Graham merely called for “meaningful negotiations with all key players to ensure the future of the plant and jobs.”

Unite’s restriction of opposition to appeals to government and employers ensured that production at both sites was maintained to the last. No united offensive was organised in these key installations to defend jobs and living standards. 

*****

The closures at Mossmorran and Grangemouth underscore the fraudulent character of all claims from the authorities, the energy companies and the trade unions of a “just transition” to a “low carbon” economy. Communities affected by closures of sites such as Mossmorran cannot rely on governments, corporations, or the pacifying assurances of pro-company trade unions to effect a transition to a more just, ecological form of capitalism. The “just transition” to “net zero” much-promoted by unions and environmental groups suggests that there exists a national route to bypassing the profit motive.

But companies exist to maximize private profit and capitalist institutions are incapable of producing the rational, democratic, and globally organized changes necessary to plan a sustainable future. Today, the struggle over control of oil and gas extraction rights is a major factor in driving US and European imperialism to war against Iran.

Workers in the oil industry and those dependent on it can only defend jobs, living conditions, and democratic rights by organizing rank-and-file committees independent of the trade union and company apparatus, seeking to unify with workers across industries and national borders. Contact the SEP today to discuss these questions further.

17. Workers Struggles: The Americas

Argentina:

Protests against anti-labor legislation continue in the wake of a 24-hour general strike

Brazil:

Dockworkers strike
 
Students and workers mark 1964 anniversary of military coup, demand justice

Canada:

Quebec post-secondary students take strike action over education cuts 

Chile:

Students protest in Santiago over right wing policies of Kast administration

United States:

First Student school bus drivers vote to authorize national strike
Omaha beverage drivers enter ninth week on strike against company’s concession demands
 

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.

Mar 30, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today:

 1. This week in history: March 30-April 5

  • 25 years ago:
Slobodan Milošević arrested at the behest of US imperialism
  • 50 years ago:

Palestinian general strike and the First “Land Day”

  • 75 years ago:

    Julius and Ethel Rosenberg sentenced to death for espionage

  • 100 years ago:

Kolkata gripped by communalist riots   
 
2. More than 8 million join mass anti-Trump “No Kings” protests3. Perspective:  The March 28 “No Kings” demonstrations: The political lessons

The scale of the March 28 protests reflected the depth of popular anger at the advance of dictatorship at home and the escalation of imperialist war abroad. A collision is unfolding between a capitalist oligarchy that is breaking with democratic forms of rule and the broad mass of the population.

The war against Iran, now one month old, was a decisive animating force for those participating. While it was downplayed by the organizations that called the protests, opposition was expressed in signs and chants in city after city. As the demonstrations were taking place, Trump was preparing a further escalation with potentially catastrophic consequences for the planet. The day after the protests, the Washington Post reported that the Pentagon is preparing for “weeks or months” of ground operations in Iran and that planning for such operations “has been in development for weeks,” under the cover of fraudulent “negotiations.”

4. Actors, performers oppose Trump at No Kings protests and elsewhere–the question of the Democratic Party looms large

Speaking at the No Kings rally in New York, veteran actor Robert De Niro told the crowd that he supported the anti-Trump movement “150 percent.” No other president has been such an “existential threat” to constitutional rights as Trump, he continued. “The president “must be stopped, he must be stopped now.” De Niro went on:

It’s time to say no to kings. It’s time to say no to Donald Trump. We’ve had enough. No King Trump, no unnecessary wars that rob our resources, sacrifice our brave servicemen and women and slaughter innocents. No corrupt leader enriching himself and the Epstein class buddies. No taking away healthcare from our most vulnerable neighbors, no unaffordable groceries, no unaffordable energy, no unaffordable housing and no inflation at its highest level since COVID. No government masked thugs shooting down our neighbors in the streets. Trump has to be stopped.

The actor added that Trump “can’t do all the f—-ed up things he’s been doing without the collusion of Congress and the goons in his administration…It’s diabolical…They should be afraid of us.”

*****

Every honest criticism of the Trump administration and the American ruling elite’s assault on democracy, drive to dictatorship and homicidal war on Iran is welcome. Every exposure of the government’s lies, every puncturing of its public posturing helps undermine confidence in an utterly rotten political and economic system.

However, that hardly resolves all the political issues and contradictions embedded in the present situation. The leading performers mentioned—Fonda, De Niro, Springsteen and Baez—all have histories of supporting the Democratic Party or one or another of its candidates, including various “mavericks.” Springsteen and Fonda appeared on a platform in St. Paul Saturday groaning with Democratic Party politicians, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, Rep. Ilhan Omar, Gov. Tim Walz, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan and Attorney General Keith Ellison. Walz introduced Springsteen.

In their comments, the prominent actors and musicians hewed closely to the Democratic Party line. Aside from De Niro’s reference to “the collusion of Congress,” there was no mention of the Democrats’ complicity with Trump all down the line, including on the massive aggression against Iran. In regard to the latter, in keeping with the official No Kings strictures, there was again almost no mention this past weekend of this brutal conflict by any of the artists. The general implication, left hanging in the air, was that the answer to the fascist Trump was voting for the Democrats in the mid-term elections (De Niro referred limply, for example, to the solution lying in the “ballot box.”)

The Democrats, however, are not an opposition party, they are a party of imperialism, soaked in blood from head to foot. They agree in fundamentals with Trump’s reactionary and sinister measures, objectively driven by the crisis of American and world capitalism, only differing on tactical and entirely secondary questions.
*****

Again, the vocal opposition to Trump’s wars, at home and abroad, is timely, but the basis for a movement to drive out this administration will have to be anti-capitalist and socialist, because there is no fight against war and authoritarianism without a fight against capitalism today. This also means that a genuine anti-war, anti-fascist movement must be independent of and implacably hostile to all the political parties and organizations of the capitalist ruling class, including every wing and faction of the Democratic Party.

The growth of profound radicalism among the artists is inevitable, given the present intolerable conditions created by capitalism. The force and influence of such a movement will not depend on a sudden turnaround in the orientation of an older generation, but above all in the upsurge of the working class in struggle and the consequent emergence of genuine, fierce opposition to the entire status quo by primarily younger and more determined artists. 

As Russia is being drawn into an escalating global conflict, class tensions in the country have been rising significantly. Over the last year mass layoffs have hit several key industries, including IT and various services industries, but also major state-owned companies such as the Russian Railways (RZD) and the metals producer Rusal. As of November 2025, at least 10 companies in mining, transport and machinery had shifted to shorter working weeks to cut costs, according to a report by the Moscow Times.

While media coverage of strikes and protests in Russia is slim, several strikes and protests have apparently taken place over the past year. According to a report by Solyanka Media, this year has seen strikes over the withholding of wages at several workplaces, including construction sites by Novoleks and facilities of Orgenergostroi. Since March 20, railway workers of the company SeverPut’Stroi have gone on strike in the Republic of Komi. One of the striking workers told the Moscow Times that they have received no full paycheck since December 2025. In February they were not paid at all. Alexandra told the outlet, “People need something to live on. I have three children, I have to pay for utilities, for school, and everyone of course also wants to eat.” According to a report dated March 25, workers from other companies that are supplied by SeverPut’Stroi also face months-long withholding of wages and are planning to join the strike.

Official figures by the agency Rosstat indicate that overdue wage arrears rose 2.3 fold and have now reached the highest level since 2016 (2.077 billion rubles or 25.169 million USD.) 14,700 workers did not receive their wages, an almost two-fold increase of 6,500 relative to 2024. In most cases, companies claim that they are unable to pay wages due to high interest rates of the Central Bank and a slowdown in the economy. Domestic demand has declined significantly, with many commentators pointing to the indebtedness of the population as a major factor.

More layoffs and wage cuts are already underway. The Russian Railways have announced plans to cut 15 percent of their staff in 2026, or around 6,000 people. Several auto plants have also announced layoffs and reduced working hours. Thus, one media report indicated that AvtoVAZ and GAZ, the two largest Russian car companies, officially transitioned to a four-day work week in September. Real incomes of auto workers have declined by some 20 percent.

The metal giant Rusal has been shutting down some of its key facilities. Thus, on January 1, Rusal’s Kremniy plant in the Irkutsk region stopped production. It was the largest silicon facility in the country. Several other factories of Rusal have shifted to reduced working weeks. Rusal is one of the country’s largest companies and one of the biggest metal producers in the world. Its workforce in Russia is estimated at between 40,000 and 50,000, the vast majority of them are factory workers. The company’s annual revenue frequently ranges around $12 billion to $15 billion.

 
*****

The case of Boksitogorsk’s Rusal plant has provoked considerable nervousness in the ruling class with the governor of the region calling upon the Kremlin to intervene. Rusal is owned by the billionaire Oleg Deripaska who has an estimated net worth of around $7.6 billion. Perhaps even more than other oligarchs, who have amassed their wealth through the plundering of state assets during the restoration of capitalism in the former Soviet Union, Deripaska is widely hated in the working class.

In 2009, a mass protest by workers of Rusal in another monotown, Pikaliovo, led to one of the most tense class confrontations in Russia under Putin. In the wake of the 2008 crash, Rusal stopped paying its workers for months while also ceasing to pay its water and electricity bills. As a result, local authorities shut down water and electricity for the residents, prompting an angry protest by workers who stormed the local city hall and blocked the highway to demand their wages and jobs. The situation became so tense that the Kremlin considered it necessary for President Vladimir Putin to intervene. At the time, Putin chided Deripaska on public television, forcing him to get the factory back running and presenting himself as a defender of the interests of workers against the oligarch. 

*****
The Ukraine war, now in its fifth year, has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives with no end in sight. Ukraine also still regularly strikes targets on Russian territory, with dozens, sometimes hundreds of drones, intercepted each day. While some strikes hit residential areas, most target industrial and energy facilities and the casualties are often workers. In recent weeks, Russian forces have also been pushed back by the Ukrainian army, reportedly suffering significant casualties. 

Meanwhile, what is essentially already a global war has entered a new stage with the US-Israeli attack on Iran. Even while Russia might benefit in the short term from higher oil prices and the lifting of some sanctions, fundamentally the new imperialist carve-up of the entire continent targets Russia as well as China. The Russian press and pundits close to the Kremlin have also been alarmed by the prospect of the war spreading directly to the border of Russia, in both the Caucasus and Central Asia. Already, the conflict has dragged in Azerbaijan, a key country in the Caucasus which has long been built up by both the US and Israel as an important ally in a war against Iran.

In an indication of how desperate the Kremlin is in trying to reach a deal with US imperialism, the Kremlin not only abstained from a vote on a resolution condemning Iran for striking US allies in retaliation for the attack. According to a report in the Financial Times, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has also offered to stop sharing targeting intelligence with Iran, in exchange for an end to Washington’s intelligence partnership with Ukraine. Washington reportedly rejected the offer.

While haggling to reach a settlement with the imperialist powers, the Kremlin is simultaneously ratcheting up its campaign of internet censorship. Earlier this year, the Russian state blocked WhatsApp, which had been used by over two-thirds of the population. The Kremlin is also expected to shut down Telegram, the only nominally encrypted messenger still available to Russian users. Meanwhile, the rolling mobile internet shutdowns which have centered on the provinces have begun to significantly disrupt life in the country’s largest and economically most important cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. In a recent poll, 83 percent of teenagers indicated that they opposed these shutdowns.

The decision by Donald Trump to have his signature placed on the US dollar bill will no doubt be greeted by anger and hostility as another expression of his drive to establish a personalized dictatorship in the United States, implement a fascist agenda of imperial conquest abroad and a war against the democratic and social rights of the working class at home. 

As critics of the decision have pointed out, the placing of a sitting president’s signature on the currency or his image on a gold coin violates the anti-monarchical principles on which the revolution was based.

But at the same time, it could well be that Trump’s decision to affix his signature to the dollar comes to be regarded as entirely appropriate, a fitting symbol of the economic, cultural and political decline of US capitalism, of which Trump, who resembles nothing so much as a Mafia gangster, is the personification.

Economically this decline and the deepening crisis to which it is giving rise is expressed nowhere more sharply than in the position of the dollar.

*****
In the past four decades, starting with the stock market collapse of 1987, the largest one-day fall in history, the US financial system has been rocked by a series of financial crises, each one more serious than the last. Major turmoil in the 1990s, of which the collapse of Long Term Capital Management in 1998 was the most serious, was followed by the bursting of the dot.com bubble at the turn of the century.

In the first years of the new century, it appeared, at least to short-sighted observers, principally those at the highest levels of the financial administration of the US state, that financial crises had been overcome and a veritable new epoch had dawned dubbed the “Great Moderation.”

That fiction was ripped apart by the financial crash of 2008, sparked by the outright criminal activities of banks and financial institutions and speculators, the very milieu from which Trump emerged and who he now represents at the top of the US state.

And the contradictions of the financial system erupted again in March 2020 when the US Treasury market, where US government debt is bought and sold and which forms the basis of the global financial system, froze. No buyers could be found for the supposedly safest financial asset in the world, a US government dollar-denominated bond. The Federal Reserve had to intervene with an injection of trillions of dollars to prevent a total collapse of the financial system.

Today the central question in the financial markets is not whether there is going to be another financial disaster, but what will trigger it. Will it be sparked by a withdrawal of the crucial supplies of international finance from the $30 trillion US Treasury market, leading to a liquidity crisis? Will there be a collapse of the bond market when the insatiable demands of the US state—driven by ever-increasing military spending—become too large to be met?

*****
 And outside the world of finance, in the real economy, there are deepening concerns. Key sections of industry have already taken a hit from the Trump tariffs and now there is the impact of the price increases flowing from the war against Iran, starting with gas and diesel but extending across a vast range of industrial commodities.

The much-touted revival of American industry pledged by Trump has not materialised and mass layoffs are taking place in key areas. The “golden age” for the US economy and American workers has turned into a cruel joke as they are hit first from one side and then another.

*****

The media release from the Treasury Department on the decision to put Trump’s signature on the dollar bill and to mint a gold coin with his image read as if they were written by Jonathan Swift or some other master satirist.

A statement issued in the name of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent read: “Under President Trump’s leadership, we are on a path toward unprecedented economic growth, lasting dollar dominance, and fiscal strength and stability. There is no more powerful way to recognise the historic achievement of our great country and President Donald J. Trump than US dollar bills bearing his name, and it is only appropriate that this historic currency be issued at the Semiquincentennial.” 

These statements have been issued to give the impression of strength. They indicate the exact opposite. Tinpot dictatorships, racked by internal crises, conflicts and divisions, have their officials give such paeans of praise to their “great leader.” Stable regimes have no such need.

President Herbert Hoover has gone down in history because of his intimate association with the Great Depression, giving his name to the “Hoovervilles,” shanty towns of unemployed workers and displaced farmers.

But on this occasion, as American capitalism lurches into crisis, there is no Franklin Roosevelt waiting in the wings with a New Deal to avert social revolution. Roosevelt had at his disposal the enormous resources of a still rising American capitalism. Those resources have now gone. They have been replaced by a mountain of debt and paper dollars which will now have Trump’s name on them.

The crisis of American and global capitalism cannot be resolved through reforms from within the system. There are none. The only resolution is the socialist revolution by the American and international working class, unified objectively by the global character of production and now the onslaught against workers in every country emanating from the war Iran, to reconstruct society on new foundations. Trump, together with his signed dollars, and the system he represents must be cast into the rubbish bin of history. 

On Saturday, as 8 million people marched across the United States and internationally in the “No Kings” protests against the Donald Trump administration, fascist operatives behind the US regime gathered in Dallas, Texas, for the CPAC 2026 (Conservative Political Action Conference). The event was addressed by Flávio Bolsonaro, who is running as the far-right’s candidate in the Brazilian presidential elections in October. Flávio is standing as the political representative of his father, the former president Jair Bolsonaro, now serving a 27-year sentence for the coup attempt that culminated in the January 8, 2023 fascist insurrection in Brasília.

In his speech before CPAC, Flávio Bolsonaro eloquently presented the fascist strategy driving his campaign. Demanding direct US imperialist intervention in the Brazilian elections, he pledged to continue the coup conspiracy for which his father was convicted.

“They called him the Trump of the Tropics,” Flávio said referring to his father. Addressing Bolsonaro’s imprisonment, the Brazilian junior fascist continued: “The formal charge is similar to what President Donald Trump faced: insurrection. Sound familiar? But the real reason is the same. … My father fought against COVID tyranny. He fought against drug cartels. He fought against global elite interests.”

Promising to follow the example of the frenzied dictatorial drive taken by the US fascist president upon returning to office, he added: “Trump 2.0 is being much better than Trump 1.0. Right? Well, Bolsonaro 2.0 will also be much better.”

Flávio also laid bare the deep connection between the Brazilian fascists’ domestic agenda and collaboration with US imperialism’s ruthless neocolonial and military aims in Latin America, particularly in the escalation of war against China. He declared:

Here’s what should really get your attention. Brazil is going to be the battleground where the future of the hemisphere will be fought, because Brazil is America’s solution to break dependence on China for critical minerals, especially rare earth elements. …

[Brazilian President Luiz Inácio] Lula [da Silva] and his party are openly anti-American. He speaks publicly about undermining the dollar as the global currency. He has aligned Brazil with China on a massive scale. He has opposed America’s interests on every single issue of foreign policy, publicly criticizing President Trump’s actions on Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, and the fight against drug trafficking. …

Opinion polls published in recent weeks have shown a rise in the number of Brazilians indicating their intention to vote for Flávio Bolsonaro, whose standing has risen continuously since his jailed father named him in December as his proxy presidential candidate. 

*****
Flávio Bolsonaro’s rise in the polls has provoked despair within the Workers Party (PT) which is seeking Lula’s reelection through a rerun of the “broad front” with right-wing parties with which he was elected in 2022. The catastrophic outcome of this political perspective is revealed by the fact that, six months before the elections, Flávio already appears in a technical tie with Lula. 
*****
Lula’s collapse in the polls represents a historic indictment, not only of this current term, but of the entire experience of PT governance. Selling itself as a better manager of capitalism in Brazil, with the idea that all social classes would benefit from the growth of national capital, PT administrations have proven incapable of significantly altering the economic and social reality of the country, which remains one of the most unequal societies in the world. 
*****
This pattern is repeated on a regional scale: the demagogic and pro-capitalist policies of the Pink Tide paved the way for the recent rise of Milei in Argentina, Kast in Chile, Paz in Bolivia and a host of other fascist-type figures across Latin America. As the World Socialist Web Site noted regarding the analogous phenomenon in Europe, “the fact that the right is strengthening has less to do with its intrinsic power than with the complete bankruptcy of what passes for the left.” The necessary political response to the rise of fascism, war, and the capitalist offensive is the construction of a revolutionary political alternative in the working class. 

In an interview published Sunday in the Financial Times, US President Donald Trump announced his “preference” to “take the oil” from Iran—a massive expansion of the US war of aggression that would only be possible through a ground invasion of the country.

Trump’s statement of his intent to massively expand the war was announced one day after what organizers said were as many as 8 million people took to the streets across all 50 states in the third round of “No Kings” demonstrations—which would make them the largest single-day protests in American history. Despite efforts by the organizers to downplay opposition to the war in Iran, the demonstrations expressed the overwhelming popular opposition to it.

The Financial Times interview, conducted by Edward Luce, was published as the Pentagon ordered thousands of additional troops to the region. Trump compared the planned seizure of Iran’s oil to Venezuela, where the US intends to control the oil industry “indefinitely” following its capture of President Nicolás Maduro. “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran,” Trump said, “but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people.”

Such a move would involve seizing Kharg Island, through which most of Iran’s oil is exported. Trump told the Financial Times: “Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options.” He added: “It would also mean we had to be there for a while.” 
The Wall Street Journal reported separately Sunday that Trump is actively making plans for a military operation to extract nearly 1,000 pounds of uranium from Iran—“a complex and risky mission that would likely put American forces inside the country for days or longer.”
*****
Trump claimed he could take Kharg Island “very easily,” saying Iran has “no defense” on the island. The military’s own assessments contradict this. CNN reported that Iran has fortified the island with an estimated 30,000-40,000 personnel, air defense systems, underground trenches, land mines along the coastline and swarms of first-person-view kamikaze drones. Harrison Mann, a former Army major and Defense Intelligence Agency analyst, told

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham compared the planned operation to Iwo Jima, one of the bloodiest battles of World War II, and said: “We did Iwo Jima, we can do this. My money’s always on the Marines.” Iran’s parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said Sunday that the US was “secretly planning a ground invasion” while publicly talking about negotiations, according to Reuters.

More than 50,000 US troops are now deployed across the Middle East, according to the New York Times. The 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU)—2,500 Marines and 2,500 sailors—arrived in the region on Friday. Another 2,200 Marines from the 11th MEU are en route aboard the USS Boxer. Roughly 2,000 paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division have been ordered to the region. The Wall Street Journal and Axios reported that the Pentagon is drawing up plans to send another 10,000 troops to the region. 

In Lebanon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered Sunday the expansion of what he called the “security zone” in southern Lebanon. More than 1,238 people have been killed and 3,500 wounded since Israel launched its assault on March 2, according to Lebanon’s Health Ministry, including 124 children. More than 1.2 million people have been displaced. Israeli forces have reached a tributary of the Litani River. PBS NewsHour reported that three journalists were killed Saturday in a targeted Israeli airstrike on a marked press vehicle in Jezzine.

After 30 days of war, the civilian death toll in Iran continues to climb. The human rights group Hengaw, using field documentation, reported at least 6,530 killed through Day 25, including 640 confirmed civilians. The Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) documented at least 1,551 civilian deaths, including 236 children. Iran’s Red Crescent reported more than 81,000 civilian sites damaged, including 61,000 homes and nearly 500 schools. Between 3.2 and 4 million Iranians have been internally displaced. A near-total internet blackout has sealed off 90 million people from the outside world for 30 days.

*****

On the Sunday talk shows, no Democrat on any of the four major programs used the words “war crime” or “international law” in connection with the Iran war. Last weekend, former Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Donna Brazile declared on ABC’s Sunday news program: “Democrats understand that Iran has posed a threat, not just to the region, the Gulf, but to the world itself.”

The entire Democratic leadership—Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Minority Whip Katherine Clark and Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar—voted for the $839 billion military budget that funds the war. 

9. Stalemate following parliamentary elections in Slovenia

The outgoing government, comprising the liberal Freedom Movement (GS), the Social Democrats (SD) and the Left Party (Levica), no longer has a majority of its own. GS, led by incumbent Prime Minister Robert Golob, came out on top with 28.6 percent, but only by the narrowest of margins ahead of Janez Janša’s right-wing conservative Democratic Party (SDS), which secured 28 percent. Even with the votes of the Social Democrats (6.7 percent) and the “left-wing” electoral alliance Levica-Vesna (5.5 percent), Golob does not have a majority in parliament.

A right-wing alliance comprising the SDS, a three-party right-wing conservative electoral alliance and the SDS splinter group Democrats also lacks a majority of its own. The far-right party Resni.ca (Truth) with 5.5 percent could now become the kingmaker. The party was formed at the height of the coronavirus pandemic by anti-vaxxers and coronavirus deniers, and combines social backwardness with hate speech against migrants. Like the SDS, it also maintains close ties to openly fascist circles.

Yet this has not deterred Golob from a possible coalition with the far right. On Friday, he invited the leaders of all parties and alliances represented in the new parliament—with the exception of the SDS—to explore the possibility of a “government of national unity.”

The right-wing conservative alliance (New Slovenia (NSi), People’s Party (SLS) and Fokus) declined the invitation. It stated that the Golob government had been voted out and that it would only join a government led by the SDS. The remaining parties, on the other hand, offered to work with Golob’s GS on an emergency law that would allow them to bypass parliament and pass legislation in the event of protracted coalition negotiations.

Numerous political commentators consider cooperation between the previous coalition partners and Resni.ca or the Democrats to be likely. This would result in a further, significant shift to the right. 

The strike by 3,800 JBS meatpackers in Greeley, Colorado has now been extended into its third week, a significant development in the growing confrontation between workers and one of the largest meatpacking corporations in the world.

Previously, officials from the United Food Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7 had indicated that it would limit the strike to two weeks. That workers remain out shows both their determination and the depth of the anger over poverty wages, dangerous working conditions and soaring healthcare costs and the company’s refusal to meet their demands.

Eduardo and Ezekiel, two workers at the Greeley plant, told the World Socialist Web Site the company, “treats the animals better than us. They don’t care about us. We are not going back until we get something good. Without us they don’t make any money.”

Mac, another meatpacker said he supports “equal conditions for workers everywhere.” Jose noted the exorbitant costs imposed on workers’ for their personal protective equipment: “It’s $800. We shouldn’t have to pay for that out of pocket.” 
 
*****

Under these conditions, the company is gambling that it can outlast the strike, utilizing grinding poverty and government threats against immigrants—who are a large majority of the workforce at the plant—to soften workers up.

The proposed wage offer only underscores the contempt with which the corporation views workers. The 60 cent initial raise does not even keep pace with inflation and amounts to a real pay cut, before proposed increases to workers’ health insurance plans. Workers are being told to sacrifice while JBS reports enormous revenues and profits.

The UFCW itself says it remains “ready to meet with JBS at any time.” But talks could only lead to gains for workers if they are the ones taking the initiative, not the company. Instead, the bureaucracy’s perspective remains one of resuming normal production as soon as possible, not broadening the struggle into an industry-wide and international fight. 

*****
JBS is a multinational corporation with enormous resources. The UFCW’s own press release notes that JBS recorded $86 billion in revenue in 2025 and $2 billion in profits, while its stock rose on the basis of improved margins in the beef industry. 

JBS workers across the country should organize with the Greeley workers to shut down scab cattle processing at Cactus and other plants. Lines of communication must be established immediately between meatpackers in Greeley and workers at Cactus and other JBS facilities to accomplish this.

Workers must appeal for support across the industry and internationally. Meatpacking workers in every plant confront the same corporations, the same attacks on wages and benefits, and the same union apparatuses that seek to suppress a common fight.

This is a struggle with world dimensions because it is an international workforce fighting a multinational with operations in over two dozen countries. Recent statements of support for strike from JBS workers in Brazil shows enormous sympathy for the strike, which must be activated through global collaboration.

*****
Now is the time to draw the necessary conclusions. Workers have shown they are ready to fight. What is needed is an independent, socialist perspective, that can lead to victory. Workers in Greeley interested in forming a rank-and-file committee should contact the World Socialist Web Site. 

On March 25, the 210-day statutory deadline, which was imposed by the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, for the Trump administration to nominate a new director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) expired. Consequently, the premier US public health agency remains officially headless but under the de facto control of Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who simultaneously serves as director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). 

Bhattacharya, an economist and co-author of the anti-science Great Barrington Declaration, shares Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s hostility to established public health measures. He will continue executing the duties of the office despite legally losing the title of acting director. 

The expiration of the deadline comes just days after U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy issued a March 16 preliminary injunction blocking Kennedy’s overhaul of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and his sweeping rollbacks to the childhood immunization schedule. This administrative lapse also coincides with the government’s escalating efforts to validate right-wing anti-vaccine narratives, highlighted by a recently leaked federal report from an ACIP workgroup urging the formal medical codification of “COVID-19 vaccine injuries.”

It also follows the apparent stalemate in the Senate over the nomination of anti-vaxxer Dr. Casey Means as Surgeon General. Some Republican senators have balked over the nomination of an individual without a current medical license to the post, which is seen as America’s top doctor. This applies as well to Dr. Jerome Adams, Trump’s Surgeon General during his first term.

Under these conditions, pushing through a Senate-confirmed director risked a bruising confirmation battle, or the selection of a nominee who would assert the CDC’s traditional scientific independence. Keeping Bhattacharya in informal control instead ensures the agency remains paralyzed and subservient to Kennedy’s agenda at precisely the moment the federal courts are pushing back. Murphy’s ruling has sharpened the administration’s dilemma, because it must find a nominee ideologically aligned with Kennedy’s anti-vaccine crusade who can nonetheless survive Senate confirmation. Former CDC officials and public health experts are unequivocal—This is not bureaucratic neglect but a deliberate strategy to keep the agency leaderless, legally diminished and incapable of resisting HHS directives.

*****
The vacancy is not an isolated failure but the predictable outcome of the administration’s war on CDC. Dr. Susan Monarez was confirmed by the Senate on July 29, 2025—the first CDC director ever to require Senate confirmation, a change made as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Twenty-nine days later, Kennedy fired her for refusing to pre-approve his ACIP recommendations and purge career vaccine officials. Clearly any CDC director who resists the anti-vaccine agenda will be removed. 

The ACIP purge in June 2025 was the starkest expression of this strategy. Kennedy dismissed all 17 independent voting members and replaced them with ideological loyalists, provoking a federal lawsuit. On March 16, Judge Murphy issued a preliminary injunction that stayed the appointments of the 13 newly installed ACIP members, nullified all their 2025 votes and froze the January 5, 2026 decision memorandum that slashed the childhood immunization schedule.

The leadership vacuum mirrors a devastating internal collapse. Over the past year, mass layoffs, forced attrition and prolonged administrative leaves have cost the CDC roughly a quarter of its workforce. Frozen grants and contracts have devastated morale. Core disease surveillance is severely disrupted, and the agency’s flagship journal, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, is publishing far fewer scientific articles. While federal grants still reach state partners, severe staffing shortages mean this funding is distributed without vital technical assistance or accountability.

*****

Dismantling vaccine liability shields has been a central objective of Kennedy and the anti-vaccine movement for decades. The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005 currently insulates COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers from direct lawsuits, routing claims through the federal Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). Anti-vaccine law firms, such as Siri & Glimstad, are challenging this framework in court, seeking to open the floodgates for conventional civil litigation. Embedding an ICD-10 diagnosis for COVID-19 vaccine injuries into federal policy—even absent any scientific consensus on causation—would hand those litigants a powerful tool, one that risks bankrupting the compensation system and driving life-saving vaccines off the US market entirely.
On Wednesday, the Albanese Labor government made more explicit and blatant its move to block Iranians trying to flee the criminal US-led bombardment that has already killed and maimed thousands of civilians and destroyed basic infrastructure, including schools and hospitals. 
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke used his new powers, handed to him by legislation rushed through parliament with Liberal-National Coalition support two weeks ago, to issue a “control determination order” barring access to Australia for all Iranians—currently about 7,000—holding valid tourist visas. 

According to Science Alert on March 20, the Runit Dome nuclear waste dump on the Marshall Islands in the northwest Pacific is continuing to deteriorate with deepening cracks in the site’s concrete capping and the casing vulnerable to rising seas due to global warming.

The 115-metre (377 feet)-wide dome was built between 1977 and 1980 as part of a supposed military cleanup. The 18-inch thick structure holds more than 3.1 million cubic feet of radioactive soil and debris, more than 120,000 tons of material contaminated by US nuclear waste including lethal quantities of plutonium. The dome was intended as a temporary fix and, to save money, the actual bomb crater on which it was constructed was never lined.

Accelerating climate change now threatens to turn the potential catastrophe into an irreversible regional disaster. Recent reports of new cracking, the daily in‑and‑out movement of radioactive groundwater driven by the tides, and rising seas around the structure show that it may have serious consequences for the wider Pacific and its impoverished populations.

Situated mid-way between Hawaii and Australia, the Marshall Islands has a population of 53,000 people. The island chain was occupied by Allied forces in 1944 and placed under US administration in 1947. It achieved nominal independence in 1986 under a neo-colonial Compact of Free Association (CoFA) which effectively still binds it to Washington.

Between 1946 and 1958, the US carried out 67 atmospheric and underwater nuclear explosions and a series of biological weapons tests in the islands. The largest, the Castle Bravo bomb detonated in March 1954, was 1,000 times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The blast vaporised part of Runit Island and sent a mushroom cloud six kilometres into the sky. Irradiated soil from the Enewetak and Bikini atolls, used as “ground zero” for the tests, was poured into a crater left from the detonations, mixed with concrete and covered with the shallow concrete dome.

Since the construction, groundwater has penetrated the crater, beneath which lies a bed of porous coral sediment. This is the main source of leaks, but experts are concerned that parts of the dome designed to sit above sea level will not stay above water much longer. US government data already shows sea level rise at Runit and project increases that will push waves higher over the dome, exacerbating cracking and infiltration.

With rising sea levels, the Marshall Islands is forecast to see many of its 29 atolls under water within 10 to 20 years. In 2019, the WSWS reported a Los Angeles Times investigation that showed climate change is breaking open the aging and weathered dome as it “bobs up and down with the tide,” threatening to spill nuclear waste into the ocean.  
 
*****
Of the 4,000 troops posted to Enewetak during the 1970s and 80s, only a few hundred are alive today, according to records from the National Association of Atomic Veterans. It was not until 2023 that the US government officially recognised the survivors as “atomic veterans” who could access disability claims. “We couldn’t go to the VA [Veterans Affairs] before that so a lot of guys couldn’t get treatment,” Celestial said. 

He described the clean-up effort as careless. “We didn’t do a good job,” he said. “We didn’t know what the plan was so a lot of the equipment and hot stuff we just dumped into the lagoon.”

Hundreds of Marshall Islanders were exiled across the Pacific—impoverished, their homes devastated and health imperiled. An international tribunal concluded in 1988 the US should pay $2.3 billion in claims, but Congress and US courts refused. Documents cited by the LA Times showed the US paid just $4 million.

Washington has falsely asserted that locals now face little risk from radioactivity. At Bikini and Rongelap, residents initially returned to their islands after the US told them it was safe. The resettlement was a disaster. Cancer cases, miscarriages and deformities multiplied. By 1967, 17 of the 19 children who were younger than 10 and on the island during the Bravo detonation had developed thyroid disorders and growths. One child died of leukaemia.

Under the Compact with Washington, in exchange for limited funding and continued US military access, “all claims, past, present and future” related to nuclear testing were declared resolved. US officials now exploit this arrangement to shield Washington from any responsibility, with the legal burden for any remediation of Runit Dome resting primarily with the impoverished Marshall Islands government.

*****
Today, the Marshall Islands are again assuming geo-strategic importance as part of Washington’s intensifying confrontation with Beijing. Once poisoned for nuclear weapons development, the tiny Pacific Island state is now, along with other parts of the Pacific, being secured and upgraded as a forward platform in the US-led drive to militarily encircle China. 

Democratic Party candidate for US Senate in Michigan Abdul El-Sayed is appearing at back-to-back events at Michigan State University (MSU) and the University of Michigan (UM) on April 7, along with US Representative from Pennsylvania Summer Lee and podcaster Hasan Piker.

El-Sayed is one of three candidates seeking the party’s nomination for US Senate in the November midterm election. His campus tour is a calculated intervention by a faction of the Democratic Party—along with its pseudo-left satellites—to corral the growing leftward movement of students behind capitalist politics.

With Democrat Gary Peters retiring, the seat is open in a state that Trump carried in 2016, lost in 2020, and narrowly recaptured in 2024, making Michigan a key state from the standpoint of bourgeois electoral politics. Former Representative Mike Rogers has emerged as the leading candidate for the Republican Party, advancing a law‑and‑order, national security platform aligned closely with the White House. 

*****
The essential political function of the campus tour—which pairs the Democrat El-Sayed with a “progressive” member of Congress and a media personality branded as a leftist—is to direct opposition behind the false hope that electing Democrats in 2026 will stop the threat of fascism and the descent into a Third World War. 
*****

Abdul El‑Sayed is a physician and former Detroit health director who first came to national prominence in 2018, when he ran in the Democratic primary for Michigan governor with the backing of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez (AOC), ultimately losing to Gretchen Whitmer, who went on to win the gubernatorial election and is currently serving a second term.

Born in Detroit in 1984 to Egyptian immigrant parents, El-Sayed has become a significant figure in Michigan Democratic Party politics, with media and Democratic Party-aligned groups referring to him as the “Mamdani of Michigan.” This is an attempt to connect him to the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member Zohran Mamdani, who won the New York City mayoral election as a Democrat in 2025.

El‑Sayed’s posture on the US‑Israeli war against Iran illustrates clearly the alignment of his politics with that of the Democratic Party. On social media he has issued posts under slogans like “NO WAR WITH IRAN,” presenting himself as an opponent of the conflict. But his actual criticism centers not on the criminal character of the war itself, but on procedural objections and Trump’s betrayal of his “America First” rhetoric. 
*****

El‑Sayed’s criticisms are a repackaged version of this fundamental agreement between both parties, while carefully phrased to appear to align with widespread public anti-war sentiment. El-Sayed does not condemn the criminal murder by the US and Israel of the Iranian leadership, including the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, in a series of “decapitation” strikes beginning on the first day of the war.

Branding himself as a “single‑payer champion,” El‑Sayed’s program is entirely reformist and pro‑capitalist. He has presented himself as one of the most prominent advocates of Medicare for All. He proudly declares that he has “never touched corporate money” and that he is the only candidate openly running on Medicare for All, which supposedly distinguishes him from the Democratic Party establishment.

Yet El‑Sayed speaks of building a “broad-based movement” that comes together around policies that address affordability and expand public goods—not to expropriate the capitalist class and place major industries under workers’ control—but to “prove out” a policy through the Democrats.

*****

Jacobin [Magazine] has praised El‑Sayed for never taking corporate money and for being the only Medicare for All candidate, presenting him as anti-establishment. The publication frames Michigan as a laboratory for demonstrating the viability of “movement” politics that can push the Democratic Party to the left on social issues, notably healthcare and affordability.

In an interview with Jacobin, El-Sayed emphasized that winning in Michigan would “suggest a way forward in the rest of the country,” meaning he had a strategy for rebranding the Democratic Party. While insisting he could “speak truth to power,” El-Sayed promised the ruling class that his proposals—single‑payer, limited debt relief, modest taxation of the wealthy—would not fundamentally threaten their wealth, property or control of the state.

This narrative is designed to obscure the lessons of Mamdani’s election-- that such figures—including Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—do not represent the working class and are not independent in any way of American imperialism. The El‑Sayed candidacy represents the same perspective in Michigan. 

*****

Globally, strikes and protests by workers, from autoworkers to logistics and public sector workers, indicate that a new period of class struggle is underway. As the wars and attacks on democratic rights are pushing masses of people to the left, the El‑Sayed campaign and its April 7 campus tour serve a specific political purpose: to create a dead‑end trap for the emerging mass movement and divert it back into the Democratic Party.

The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) advances a fundamentally different perspective. The SEP insists that the fight against war, fascism and social inequality requires a break from the Democrats and the independent political mobilization of the working class based on a socialist program. War is not an aberration, but the inevitable outcome of the capitalist system. Ending war means abolishing capitalism.

The SEP fights for the construction of rank‑and‑file committees in workplaces and schools, independent of the trade union bureaucracy and the Democratic and Republican parties, to organize strikes and mass action, including a general strike against austerity, layoffs and war. It calls for the expropriation of the banks and major corporations, placing them under democratic control as public utilities; the cancellation of student and medical debt; the guarantee of free, high‑quality healthcare and education; and the defense of democratic rights.

n the first days of March 2026, the Philippine National Security Council (NSC) announced it had uncovered and dismantled a Chinese espionage network operating inside government agencies. The online news outlet Rappler simultaneously published a three-part investigative series claiming Filipino civil servants had been recruited to pass military secrets to Chinese handlers. The Philippine military amplified the claims. Senator Risa Hontiveros of the Akbayan party demanded new surveillance powers and the suspension of visa-free entry for Chinese nationals.

The announcement and escalating allegations against and attacks on China for “spying” come as the Ferdinand Marcos Jr administration confronts an immense economic and social crisis caused by the spike in prices and curtailed supply of oil as a result of Washington’s war on Iran. There are strong indications that Marcos is looking to distance the Philippines from the United States and improve relations with China.

Theresa Lazaro, head of the Department of Foreign Affairs, announced that the Philippines was planning on conducting joint patrols of the South China Sea with China. A leading Marcos ally, Senator Erwin Tulfo, head of the Foreign Relations committee, called for the re-examination and possible scrapping of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) that allows the basing of US forces in the country and the deployment of US missile systems targeting China. On March 24, Marcos told Bloomberg that there would be a “reset” of relations between Manila and Beijing, and called for joint oil and gas exploration in the South China Sea.

Opposing this reset are many of the top brass of the Philippine military and the pseudo-left party Akbayan, which out of its merger with the elite Liberal Party, has become the most vocal proponent of Washington’s war drive against China in the Philippines.

It is in this context that the espionage campaign—whose immediate origins lie in a March 4 NSC press release and a Rappler series sourced entirely from military officials—must be understood. 
 
*****

The identification of this alleged operation as a Chinese government intelligence program rests on the NSC’s assertion that anonymous informants transmitted documents to un-named Chinese nationals. This is not merely flimsy: it is unsubstantiated allegations piled upon baseless claims.

The March 2026 allegations are the latest in a sustained cycle that has been running since 2024, each episode following the same template: an announcement by security officials, media amplification, and charges that fail to materialize. 

*****

There is a long history of espionage conducted against the Philippines, including the rigging of elections, the subversion of democracy, and sabotaging of popular sovereignty—but it was waged not by China but by the United States.

CIA officer Edward Lansdale arrived in the Philippines in 1950, ran psychological warfare against the Hukbalahap peasant insurgency, managed the 1953 presidential election—writing Ramon Magsaysay’s campaign speeches, funding his campaign through CIA channels, and running a smear operation against Magsaysay’s rival. Philippine presidents were funded by the CIA; cabinet ministers and members of Congress were paid CIA assets. The Philippines served as the training laboratory for counterinsurgency methods exported across Asia and Latin America; the techniques developed there were carried to South Vietnam and to the Bay of Pigs in Cuba. Clark Air Base and Subic Bay were the platforms from which the United States bombed Cambodia and Vietnam.

The operations have never stopped. US Marine Corps MQ-9A Reaper drones now fly continuous surveillance missions over the South China Sea from Basa Air Base in Pampanga—an EDCA site—providing real-time intelligence on Chinese vessels to US Indo-Pacific Command. A permanent US special forces task force, Task Force Ayungin, is embedded in Philippine maritime operations. The intermediate-range Typhon missile system, capable of striking the Chinese mainland, has been deployed to Philippine soil.

Washington, in a secret psychological warfare campaign documented by Reuters in 2024, operated hundreds of fake social media accounts in Tagalog and other Philippine languages to sabotage the Chinese-manufactured Sinovac vaccine—distributing fabricated claims that it was “rat poison”—during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

There are no Chinese drones flying from Philippine bases. There are no Chinese special forces embedded in Philippine commands. There are no Chinese missiles aimed at Washington on Philippine territory. China has never rigged a Philippine election, bought off a candidate, or flown bombing missions from its shores.

The scurrilous campaign against Chinese nationals and Chinese Filipinos waged by Akbayan and the Philippine military serve to buttress the violently tottering framework of the US empire in the Philippines, but it does more than this. In the context of explosive social unrest, Akbayan is bringing back into circulation the age-old racist scapegoating of the Chinese. They are employing the language of the pogrom.

16. Germany’s SPD leader launches attack on working conditions and pensions

Social Democratic Party leader Lars Klingbeil has reacted to the SPD’s recent election defeats with a frontal attack on pensions, working conditions, health insurance and other social achievements. 

17. DSA declines to endorse its own members in Los Angeles mayoral race

The DSA's role in the Los Angeles mayoral race exposes its function as an appendage of the Democratic Party in blocking the independent political mobilization of the working class. 

18. How humans’ capacity for cultural adaptation allowed them to spread across the planet

A comparison with the environmental settings and biological adaptations of nearly 6,000 terrestrial mammalian species demonstrates the profound advantages of human cultural adaptations.

19. Uganda military chief says would join Iran war if Israel faced defeat

General Muhoozi Kainerugaba is grovelling, to signal the loyalty of the Ugandan regime to US imperialism.

20. Hundreds of thousands march against far right in London to be told to vote for Labour

The growth of Reform UK was used by the Together Alliance, to mount a “get the vote out” drive for the Labour Party, backed as necessary by the Green Party. 

21. United Kingdom:  Doncaster bus drivers at First South Yorkshire strike for pay parity

The 230 Unite union members are determined to overcome a deal failing to give them parity with their First South Yorkshire colleagues in Sheffield, just 18 miles away.

22. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

 

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.