Jun 11, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. Trump signs $70 billion blank check for ICE and Border Patrol after Democrats enable passage

Speaking at the White House before signing the bill, Trump praised the “heroes of ICE and Border Patrol” and boasted that the legislation fully funds the Department of Homeland Security “through the end of my term, so we won’t have that to be talking about any longer.”

After months of mass protests, appeals to Congress and denunciations of ICE violence, the administration has secured a massive increase in funding for the same agencies responsible for the murders of Renee Good and Alex Pretti. The bill contains no restrictions on their operations. There is no requirement that ICE or CBP agents use judicial warrants; no prohibition on masked agents; no end to roving patrols; and no restriction on the deployment of immigration police in airports, workplaces, schools, neighborhoods and public spaces.

The passage of the bill exposes, once again, the fraud of the Democratic Party’s posture as an opponent of Trump’s mass deportation regime. While Democrats voted “no” on the final bill, they had ensured its passage beforehand, making possible the last act in a phony charade.

As the World Socialist Web Site explained last week, the Democrats’ opposition was a carefully staged maneuver. Earlier this year, they agreed to separate funding for ICE and Border Patrol from the broader Department of Homeland Security funding bill. This allowed them to vote for the rest of DHS funding, posture as opponents of the most openly fascistic elements of Trump’s immigration program, and then leave Republicans free to pass the ICE and CBP money through the budget reconciliation process without formal Democratic support.

In other words, the Democrats preserved their ability to posture before the public while guaranteeing that the immigration Gestapo would receive the funding demanded by Trump and the ruling class.

*****

Since Trump’s return to the White House, millions have taken part in “No Kings” demonstrations and the mass protests in Minnesota in response to the killing of Good and Pretti. There have been protests outside for-profit immigrant detention centers in New Jersey, Texas, Illinois and California, and walkouts by students across the country against the mass deportation operation. Yet this mass opposition finds no expression in Washington. The reason is that the Democrats are not an opposition party. They are collaborators in Trump’s and the ruling class’s drive to establish a presidential dictatorship.

The passage of the Secure America Act underscores that the fight to free immigrants, stop the construction of a nationwide network of concentration camps, and abolish the immigration Gestapo cannot be left in the hands of the Democratic Party. Workers need their own party and organizations, grounded in an internationalist and socialist program, which recognizes the right of all human beings to live, labor and love wherever they choose, regardless of immigration status.

2.  US consumer prices jump as workers pay for American imperialism’s war on Iran

The inflation report was issued only hours before Trump announced a new round of airstrikes on Iran, which will undoubtedly have a further catastrophic impact on world energy supplies and prices. Workers in the United States, and around the world, are paying the price for the US military slaughtering the people of Iran.

Trump himself underscored that connection at a press briefing at the White House, as he signed into law a bill providing $70 billion for the police-state operations of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) for the next three years. Asked about the increase in the Consumer Price Index, he responded with his characteristic mixture of indifference, lies and sheer incoherence.

*****

Trump’s remarks are the latest in a series of declarations in which he has expressed the indifference of the billionaire oligarchy toward the impact of the war on the broad mass of the population.

In April, he declared that the government should stop worrying about “Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things” and focus on “one thing, military protection.” By this he means, not protection for working people, but protection for the giant oil companies and the vast fortunes of the super-rich. Asked last month about the impact of the Iran war on the cost of living, he replied, “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation. Not even a little bit.” 

The same crisis of American and world capitalism that drives the ruling class to war abroad drives it to impoverish workers at home. The hundreds of billions spent bombing Iran, financing the proxy war against Russia in Ukraine and funding the ICE police-state machine must be extracted from the working class. Trump has said so openly, though the entire political establishment, Democrat and Republican, agrees. 

The same contradictions driving the ruling class to war are driving workers into struggle, and the past three months have seen a powerful growth of the class struggle. As in similar periods in the past, price inflation and the slashing of living standards are having a radicalizing effect on millions of working people and fueling an increasingly oppositional mood in factories, warehouses and workplaces of all kinds.

*****

The trade union apparatus is engaged in a systematic operation to suppress opposition among workers. The UAW Constitutional Convention opens Monday amid a series of betrayals of auto parts workers. On Wednesday, the UAW announced that it had reached a tentative agreement at American Axle in an attempt to shut down the strike before the convention begins and block the development of a united movement with Nexteer, Dana and other parts and auto workers.

The union apparatus as a whole is doing nothing to oppose the attack on wages and living standards. Workers are trapped in multi-year contracts that lock in real wage cuts while the bureaucracies function as arms of corporate management and labor police forces, controlled by privileged officials drawing six-figure salaries. 

The Socialist Equality Party encourages the formation of rank-and-file committees in every workplace, independent of the union apparatus and both corporate parties, to organize a struggle to defend living standards, oppose war and defend democratic rights.

These committees, organized through the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees should raise and fight for immediate demands, including: a large increase in wages to recover income stolen through decades of stagnation and inflation; the automatic indexing of all wages, pensions and benefits to the cost of living through a monthly escalator; a sharp increase in Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security, against all cuts; and an end to price-gouging by the energy and food monopolies.

But these demands raise the necessity for a direct assault on the wealth and power of the capitalist oligarchy. The giant energy corporations, food monopolies, banks and financial institutions must be transformed into publicly owned utilities, democratically controlled by the working class. The fortunes of the billionaires and corporate executives—amassed through war, speculation, exploitation and price-gouging—must be expropriated and used to meet urgent social needs.

The fight against inflation is inseparable from the struggle to end the war, and both require breaking the grip of the financial oligarchy over economic life. This is a political struggle: for the independent mobilization of the working class against both capitalist parties, for workers’ power and for the socialist reorganization of the world economy to serve human need, not private profit.

3. An opponent of the class struggle attacks Trotsky, writes a cautionary tale of the 1926 British General Strike

This review makes clear that Trotsky’s writings are the working class’s indispensable guide to this critical historical experience.

4. Far-right pogrom burns out immigrant families in Belfast

An organized pogrom by far-right forces against immigrants and asylum seekers began in Belfast, Northern Ireland, on Tuesday evening.

Seizing on a horrific stabbing attack by a Sudanese refugee, mob violence left families burned out of their homes and communities terrorized across the city.

Mobilizations were also organized in Glasgow and Liverpool, cities with an historic presence of the Ulster Unionist forces at the center of events in Belfast. Hundreds of masked men attacked migrants and a hotel housing asylum seekers was attacked in Liverpool.

Many schools and shops were closed and public transport shut down across Northern Ireland Wednesday, stranding some and leaving Belfast mostly deserted during the day. On Wednesday evening, a group of around 200 people—again clothed in black—gathered at roundabout about eight miles north of Belfast city center and confronted police, including by throwing projectiles. Riot police, who barricaded the road, responded by firing water cannon.

The pretext for the latest far-right provocation was the attack on Stephen Ogilvie, who was stabbed on Monday evening in a street in the north of the city with a kitchen knife by Hadi Alodid, aged 30. Ogilvie was stabbed repeatedly in the face, head, neck and back and Alodid also tried to cut his throat. Oglivie, aged 44, lost his left eye. Members of the public intervened to fend off the attacker until police arrived. The incident was partially filmed, and the footage widely circulated by far-right figures, including Tommy Robinson.

On Wednesday, Alodid appeared at Belfast magistrates court charged with attempting to murder Ogilvie, threatening to kill a National Health Service radiographer on the same day, and possessing a knife.

Ogilvie’s family issued a principled statement condemning the far-right attacks, which concluded, “We have many migrants who make a deeply valuable contribution to our country, including in our healthcare system and hospitality sector, and we depend on them to make our country work. We do not want this terrible tragedy to be used to divide people or fuel hostility.”

In a posting on X Tuesday afternoon Robinson described the stabbing as “another invader attack on our people” and listed specific times for protests being held that night in various cities. The posting was eventually viewed over 9 million times. Rupert Lowe, leader of the far-right Restore UK added his voice to calls for mobilizations with a video (viewed over 2 million times) and another posting stating, “We must stop harboring those who wish to decapitate children. A vast number of people need to be removed from our country-when I say vast, I mean it. Millions and millions need to leave or be made to leave.”

Elon Musk, the billionaire oligarch who uses his control of X as a megaphone for the international far-right, reposted another of Lowe’s diatribes reading “Enough”, resulting in it being viewed over 62 million times. 

*****

In Belfast, gangs went door to door demanding the removal of anyone identifiably foreign. At least three homes were torched. Some families had to be evacuated by Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service (NIFRS) officers as their homes caught fire or flames approached. Among those rescued was a two-month-old baby.

The protest involved hundreds not thousands, with the fascist hardcore reported to have attacked one local youth—who involved himself in the attacks—for filming them with his phone.

*****

Tuesday’s attacks took place a year to the day of another anti-migrant pogrom in Northern Ireland. The far-right have also been heavily organising in the Republic of Ireland over the last few years.  

The attacks Tuesday were the second major occurrence of violence organized by the far-right within a week. It followed sustained protests in Southampton and beyond after Vickrum Digwa, a British Sikh, was jailed for the fatal stabbing of 18-year-old student Henry Nowak in December.

In that city Robinson told the crowd “As white people we are treated like second-rate citizens by our own government.” Former British National Party member and current Britain First leader Paul Golding urged the crowd to “take your anger and turn it into political action” against “the real criminals who are turning Britain into a foreign country”.

*****

None of this emerges in a vacuum. The far-right has been cultivated and animated by an unrelenting campaign of immigrant demonization that has characterized every government at Westminster for years. The Conservatives and now Labour have made the scapegoating of asylum seekers and migrants a central instrument of their political programs, competing to demonstrate toughness on borders in order to deflect working-class anger from the social catastrophe they are themselves imposing.

Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, positioning himself as a future Labour leader, moved to line up substantially behind Farage’s agenda, having already backed harsh anti-immigrant proposals of Labour Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood.

5. Platner wins Democratic Senate primary in Maine

The contest was over months before primary day. Mills—the candidate Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had personally recruited and endorsed in October as the establishment favorite—dropped out in April citing fundraising troubles, after polls showed her trailing Platner by as much as 38 points.

By late May, Platner led the entire field, Collins included, in fundraising, having raised $16.3 million for the cycle. Polls now show him leading Collins in the general election by between 5 and 9 points.

The vote for Platner expresses popular opposition to inequality, to which Platner’s rhetoric speaks. Platner’s promoters—large sections of the Democratic Party and the trade union apparatus, most avidly its so-called “progressive” wing—present him as a genuine representative of the working class. He is nothing of the sort.

*****

His politics are entirely compatible with the Democratic Party. He invokes the New Deal, praises Roosevelt and talks about billionaires, while accepting the framework of capitalism, private property, imperialism and the nation-state. On immigration, he criticizes Trump’s methods while accepting the need for border enforcement and a more “effective” system. On war, his military record and later mercenary work speak louder than any carefully scripted antiwar phrase.

This was underscored last Tuesday when Platner traveled to Washington D.C. to meet with Senate Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Schumer. Following the meeting, Schumer repeatedly ducked questions about Platner, saying only that Democrats were going to beat Susan Collins and take back the Senate. In the end, however, he said he endorsed Platner’s campaign.

Platner has tried to have it both ways, saying he “spoke with Senator Schumer” and is happy to find “common ground” to defeat Collins, while insisting he will not vote for Schumer to remain Senate minority leader and will not soften his “criticisms of the party.” But one cannot be a champion of the working class and simultaneously receive the blessing of the “senator from Wall Street,” one of the most fervent defenders of the Israeli genocide in Gaza.

The #MeToo-style campaign against Platner must be understood within this broader political framework. It is necessary to identify the political function of this scandal and the fraud of both camps.

The controversy began in earnest on May 30, when the Wall Street Journal reported that Platner’s wife, Amy Gertner, had told his campaign that she had found sexually explicit text messages to other women on his phone. Gertner and Platner have stated that they went through counseling and that the matter is private.

This was followed on June 4 by a New York Times article based on interviews with several women who had dated Platner. The article described what it called “unsettling” behavior, though nothing described in the piece amounts to a crime. The most significant allegations come from Lyndsey Fifield, a pro-Zionist Republican operative who worked on Nikki Haley’s presidential campaign and has been paid by the Independent Women’s Forum, a right-wing organization that backed the elevation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court when he himself was the target of sexual assault allegations.

Platner has issued varying responses. He has categorically denied allegations of physical abuse and claimed that when he put the Totenkopf tattoo on his chest he did not know it was a Nazi symbol. At the same time, he has acknowledged that after several military deployments on behalf of US imperialism he went through a “dark period” in which he abused alcohol and acted in ways he now says he regrets.

The hypocrisy of the Republican attacks is staggering. Republicans have seized on Platner’s alleged infidelity and womanizing, presenting themselves as guardians of moral decency. These are the same forces that worship at the altar of Donald Trump, who has faced numerous allegations of sexual misconduct and was found civilly liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll.

At the same time, the response of Platner’s pseudo-left supporters is no less revealing. Many of the same forces who previously insisted that “believe all women” was a sacrosanct political principle have discarded it overnight, recasting his alcoholism, womanizing and evasions as marks of his working class bona fides.

This is a contemptible caricature of the working class, which is not composed of drunken liars and men who “accidentally” tattoo Nazi insignia on their chests. The #MeToo campaign was always, as the World Socialist Web Site explained from its 2017 origins, a reactionary movement of privileged upper-middle class layers, hostile to due process and the presumption of innocence and indifferent to class. It was deployed in 2020 to drown class anger in the politics of gender and race. The pseudo-left embraced it then and discards it now. Platner is their candidate, their project, their chosen instrument for corralling opposition to capitalism back into the Democratic Party.

*****

Platner is not a threat to the financial oligarchy. His campaign is an operation of the Democratic Party, prepared by operatives, consultants and the trade union bureaucracy. As Politico reported in December, Platner was not some spontaneous expression of working class anger. He was recruited by operatives Daniel Moraff and Leanne Fan, veterans of the Sanders milieu, who had previously sought a “blue collar” candidate in Maine before turning to Platner. They were directed to him by union officials, community organizers and “progressive” networks.

*****

Workers and youth must draw the necessary conclusion. The fight against capitalism will not be waged through the Democratic Party or its pseudo-left apologists. The fight to expropriate the billionaires, end imperialist war and hold the fascists accountable requires the independent political mobilization of the working class, in the United States and internationally, on the basis of a socialist program. 

6. In attack on WSWS, Counterpunch extols “socialism with Mexican characteristics”

In a recent piece published by CounterPunch, American novelist Eve Ottenberg mounts a defense of Mexico’s former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) and his hand-picked successor, President Claudia Sheinbaum, as the government faces growing opposition from below amid spending cuts and a deepening social crisis.

***** 

The poverty statistics Ottenberg cites do not survive contact with Mexico’s own official data. According to the National Institute of Statistics (INEGI), the share of the population living in poverty did fall from 41.9 percent in 2018 to 36.3 percent in 2022, the period Ottenberg celebrates. But extreme poverty remained virtually unchanged, and in absolute terms nearly 400,000 more people joined the ranks of the extremely poor. More damning still: the number of Mexicans unable to access health services more than doubled, from 16 percent to 39 percent—approximately 30 million people stripped of healthcare during the years of what Ottenberg describes as a “social welfare revolution.”

A study by the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) found that cash transfers played a minimal role even in the modest poverty reductions recorded; the improvements were largely attributable to the post-COVID income recovery.

Yet Ottenberg does not merely praise these programs. She borrows a term coined by Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping to justify the restoration of capitalism in China to describe AMLO’s project as the construction of “socialism with Mexican characteristics.”

The phrase “socialism with Chinese characteristics” sought to provide an ideological cover for the de-collectivization of agriculture, the opening of China to foreign capital, the privatization of state enterprises, and the transformation of the Chinese Communist Party bureaucracy into a property-owning bourgeois ruling class engaged in corruption, theft of state assets, and joint ventures with overseas capital.

It attempted to conceal the fact that China was being integrated into the world market on imperialist terms, reviving the pre-revolutionary “concessions” through special economic zones and enabling the exploitation of Chinese workers at globally competitive wages. The consequences included runaway inflation, mass unemployment, official gangsterism, and the reemergence of prostitution on a scale not seen since the worst days of Chiang Kai-shek—while the regime maintained its dictatorial suppression of the working class, demonstrated most brutally at Tiananmen Square in 1989.

The 1949 Chinese Revolution, nonetheless, represented a monumental world historic event, ending a century of imperialist subjugation and unifying the most populous country in the world. It dealt a major blow to imperialism, smashed the domination of the landlord class and, ultimately, nationalized much of Chinese industry. At the same time it created a Stalinist-style bureaucratic police state that ruthlessly repressed opposition, particularly from the left.

To compare such a history to the meager reforms offered by the bourgeois governments headed by Morena (Movimiento Regeneración Nacional/National Regeneration Movement) is preposterous, while adopting Beijing’s rhetorical fig leaf for capitalist restoration—“socialism with Chinese characteristics”—as the template for a positive depiction of the rule of AMLO and Sheinbaum recalls nothing so much as Lenin’s famous metaphor of “wishing mourners at a funeral many happy returns of the day.”

Neither AMLO nor Sheinbaum, of course, has even claimed to be building socialism. Morena’s ideological content consists of vague promises to put “the poor first” and expand “the people’s access to rights.” The slogan of the “Fourth Transformation” grandiosely compares these limited policies to Mexico’s three prior historic transformations: the Wars of Independence (1810–1821), the liberal Reform War and expulsion of the French Empire’s invasion under Benito Juárez (1858–1867), and the Revolution of 1910-20.

*****

Oxfam Mexico’s 2026 report, “Oligarchy or Democracy,” demonstrates how preposterous it is to speak of “socialism with Mexican characteristics” under Morena. The wealthiest 1 percent of Mexicans receive 35 percent of the country’s total income and hold 40 percent of its private wealth. Carlos Slim—whom Ottenberg quotes praising AMLO’s social peace—increased his fortune by 66 percent since 2020, accumulating $107.1 billion. As Oxfam notes, the Mexican state devotes less than 4 out of every 100 pesos of national wealth to public investment, while the private sector invests less than 8. “When wealth is concentrated,” the report states, “power remains in the same hands, causing the erosion of democracy and the establishment of an oligarchy.”  

AMLO himself, in 2018, created a Business Advisory Council composed of Mexico’s richest men and headed by millionaire Alfonso Romo, who served as chief of the Presidential Office. This is the institutional architecture of Ottenberg’s socialist paradise.

*****

Ottenberg states her framework openly: “AMLO’s accomplishment comes within the context of regulated capitalism,” and she finds it “difficult to get upset about leaders who obviate this awful system, modify it or use it to advance social welfare.” What this really means is that capitalism is acceptable so long as it maintains a polite face that helps suppress the class struggle.

But the Mexican working class does not experience capitalism as a spectrum from “regulated” to “unregulated.” It experiences it as super-exploitation. A minimum wage of $15 per day, modestly raised, remains a poverty wage—and in a country where three out of five workers labor in the informal sector, minimum wage laws are largely symbolic.

*****

Ottenberg’s article has a concrete political purpose: to dissuade workers in the United States and Mexico from drawing the conclusion that social reformism has exhausted its historical possibilities and that their joint revolutionary struggle to overthrow capitalism is necessary. Her celebration of Sheinbaum and AMLO as “socialism with Mexican characteristics” replaces class analysis in favor of feel-good storytelling about benevolent rulers—and in doing so, provides a service to Trump and US imperialism in blocking the joint struggle of workers across North America against capitalist exploitation, imperialist war and fascism.

The degree of Mexico’s economic subordination to US imperialism means the Mexican bourgeoisie possesses no independent basis from which to resist being reduced to the status of a protectorate. What gives it any room to maneuver at all is the fear, in Washington, of provoking the Mexican working class—and the service Morena provides in containing that class from igniting a continental explosion. Mexican workers need to throw the Mexican bourgeoisie and its representatives in Morena into the trash bin of history and unite with their class brothers and sisters in the United States and the rest of the Americas to destroy imperialism.

7. Washington meddles in Peruvian election with runoff too close to call

A paper-thin margin separates the two candidates as the Trump administration openly maneuvers to shape the outcome in Washington's favor. 

8. Mr. Nobody Against Putin: A portrait of Russian working class life, but in the service of NATO

Under the cover of a generally humane portrayal of the impact of the Ukraine war on a beat-up working class Russian town, the film, at its core, promotes typical US-NATO anti-Putin politics. 

9. Students across Chile protest criminalization of youth and education cuts

The protests were directed against Kast’s newly installed fascistic government and its across-the-board spending cuts in the public sector in service of Chilean and international capital. 

10. ICE abducts mother at Ann Arbor middle school

The Trump administration’s targeting of the Detroit metro area, the historic heart of the American auto industry and home to nearly a quarter million manufacturing workers, makes it clear that ICE is not engaging in narrow immigration enforcement but a terror campaign aimed at the working class as a whole. 

11. Collapse of Franco-German fighter jet project exposes sharp tensions

The Future Combat Air System (FCAS), considered a lighthouse project of Franco-German plans to arm Europe into an independent imperialist great power capable of standing up to both the US and China, has failed spectacularly. 

12. “I would be willing to strike”: New York transit workers prepared to fight for their needs

Almost a month since their last contract expired, New York City transit workers are determined to fight for their needs against the administration of the Metropolitan Transit Authority. The MTA is demanding huge concessions in a new contract for 40,000 subway and bus workers, including 2 percent annual pay increases, restrictions on overtime and sick leave and a doubling of out-of-pocket costs for healthcare.

The MTA claims there is “no money,” in the richest city in the world, for pay that keeps pace with inflation. Meanwhile, around 15 percent of the MTA’s overall budget is spent servicing debt to Wall Street firms like BlackRock and Vanguard.

The fight is against the city’s financial elite, as well as the Democratic Party, including Governor Kathy Hochul and city mayor Zohran Mamdani. Brought to power because of widespread opposition to inequality, Zohran Mamdani quickly aligned himself with the pro-business governor, held two fawning meetings with Trump, and is now establishing a municipal agency, COGE, patterned after DOGE, which slashed 300,000 federal jobs.

*****

The World Socialist Web Site also received the following letter from a working CSX railroad worker, addressed to Long Island Rail Road workers. Workers on LIRR and the Class I freight carriers share many of the same unions.

To My Brothers and Sisters at the Long Island Rail Road and the MTA:

I’m writing as a fellow rail worker — a conductor, a SMART member, working CSX in the northeast. First: what you did on May 16th took guts. The first LIRR strike in 32 years. The MTA couldn’t break you — their scab operation was a humiliation, and the strike was working at the very moment it was shut down.

But solidarity means being honest. Your officials ordered you back without showing you a single term of the contract — and when asked why, the answer was plain: they were afraid you’d vote it down if you saw it. That’s not representation. Now they’ll tell you this is the best deal you could have gotten. They always do.

They did the same thing to us on the freight railroads this contract cycle, also weakening our bargaining power by isolating each craft during contract talks. This tactic of negotiating each craft separately, is not an accident — it is a pattern, and its purpose is to weaken your hand before you even sit down at the table. When you hear “this is the best we can get,” what it really means is: this is the best they were willing to fight for.

This moment demands more than waiting for the next contract cycle or the next hot shot union rep. The power that shut down New York’s commuter rail for three days belongs to the workers who walked that picket line — not to the bureaucrats who ended it without your consent.

Take that power back! The time is now to form your own workplace committees — democratic, rank-and-file bodies that answer only to you, that you run, that represent what you actually need. We should do this nationally, and right now.

In solidarity — A CSX Conductor, Northeast Region, SMART-TD Member

13. Hersheypark workers in Pennsylvania reject 4th tentative agreement, vote to strike

On Wednesday, June 3, over 200 skilled trades workers at the Hersheypark theme park and luxury resort in Hershey, Pennsylvania, voted down a fourth tentative agreement offered by management and the Chocolate Workers Local 464 bargaining committee. Following the rejection, over 500 Local 464 members across Hersheypark, the Giant Center and Hotel Hershey voted to authorize a strike. A walkout could shut down operations amid the busy opening weeks of summer.

Originally, the skilled trades workers had been scheduled to authorize a strike in mid-May, following rejection of one of the $1 billion corporation’s “final offers.” No sooner was that offer defeated than management and the union—affiliated with the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers (BCTGM)—returned with another proposal, keeping workers on the job while attempting to ram through yet another sellout agreement. It was only after the fourth rejection that Local 464 officials felt compelled to call a strike authorization vote at all and only then to save face.

The consecutive rejections and strike authorization reflect a deepening mood of resistance and militancy among workers in the United States and internationally. They come as 1,700 Nexteer auto parts workers in Saginaw, Michigan, have launched a rebellion against both management and the United Auto Workers union, rejecting three tentative agreements and authorizing strike action by 86 percent. That militancy, however, is being strangled by the UAW leaders, who have instructed workers to remain on the job indefinitely.

Nearby, American Axle workers in Three Rivers, Michigan, have launched strike action against low pay, the absence of sick days and years of concessions extracted by the UAW, even as the company has posted massive profits. In addition, Dana workers in Michigan, Ohio and Indiana have rejected union-backed contracts by more than 90 percent over the last week.

In a June 3 statement, the same day Hersheypark workers voted to strike, the Nexteer Workers Rank-and-File Committee—composed of workers from the shop floor determined to advance their struggle—declared: “We have rejected three contracts. We have voted to strike. We have made our position clear. From this point forward, the workers will become the authority.” 

*****

Workers should build a rank-and-file committee of militant members to prepare for strike action, elect a new bargaining committee directly accountable to the membership, and organize solidarity with non-union workers at the park, as well as rank-and-file members across other unions.

What has unfolded since the contract’s expiration in mid-March makes this clear.

On March 15, the contract expired. Rather than strike, a 60-day extension was agreed to—a move that enabled management and the union leadership to divide the workforce, pushing a separate revised agreement through at the Hershey Lodge and Hershey Country Club.

On May 7, they voted down what management called its “last, best and final” offer. With Hershey preparing to operate seven days a week through the Memorial Day holiday weekend, a strike at that moment would have significantly disrupted operations and increased pressure on the company by directly hitting its bottom line. The union ensured that did not happen.

The most recent vote was conducted over three days, June 1 through 3, with different sections of the workforce voting in separate time blocks. This staggered process was plainly designed to dilute unified opposition and improve management’s chances of securing ratification. Despite it, workers rejected the offer a fourth time and authorized a strike.

Hersheypark workers are not alone in confronting the brickwall of the apparatus. The BCTGM brings to this struggle a long train of betrayals. In mid-2021, 600 Frito-Lay workers in Topeka, Kansas, struck and rejected four sellout agreements, but the BCTGM pushed through a contract while paying just $105 a week in strike benefits. “The union,” a striking worker told the World Socialist Web Site at the time, “literally starved us into accepting the latest offer.”

In August–September 2021, Nabisco workers struck across five states. The BCTGM colluded with management to isolate the walkouts, rushing through a sellout vote that gave workers less than an hour to read the contract before balloting.

The relationship between the BCTGM bureaucracy—with President Anthony Shelton drawing $364,966 per year to deliver sellout agreements to his members—and the two major political parties is what separates these institutions from the rank and file. Their material interests make them instruments of management and capitalism, not of workers’ power or solidarity.

A strike would win mass support. A former coworker posted on social media following the latest rejection: “The Hershey Trust is sitting on how many billions? I worked with those guys for two seasons. They deserve every penny.”

14. Georgia, United States: Four workers dead at Palmetto: The safety crisis, the privatization drive, and how postal workers can fight back

These were not simply tragic accidents but the lethal results of austerity. Preventing them requires an organized movement from below, not beholden to management, toothless regulatory agencies or corrupt union officials. 

15. FBI raids pro-Palestinian activists at University of Michigan, indicting eighy and arresting seven

The Trump administration escalated its political persecution of anti-war protesters on Wednesday, as the FBI and federal law enforcement agencies raided homes across southeast Michigan and unsealed a 63-page indictment charging eight individuals associated with pro-Palestinian activism at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

16. Sri Lankan President pledges separate courts for Buddhist monks, placing them above the normal law

The Dissanayake government’s move is a further step in strengthening the Sinhala-Buddhist chauvinist state and towards autocratic rule.

17. Earthquake off southern Philippines leaves at least 46 dead

The flouting of safety standards in order to cut costs in the Philippines and in countries around the world regularly turns so-called "natural disasters" into man-made ones. 

18. One-day nationwide strike in Portugal opposes right-wing labour reform

The June 3 strike was the second nationwide strike against Trabalho XXI in six months, after the December 11, 2025 strike--the first in 12 years--which paralysed the country.

19. Trump orders second day of new strikes on Iran, vowing to attack “very hard”

The United States bombed Iran for a second consecutive day Wednesday, with the US military announcing that it had begun striking “multiple targets” in Iran at 5:15 p.m. Eastern time. CBS News reported Wednesday that two US officials said the targets included ammunition depots, command-and-control nodes and warehouses.

20. Preface to the book: “The Ukraine War and the Fight for Socialism: The Case of Bogdan Syrotiuk”

This book appears at a decisive moment. More than two years after Bogdan’s arrest, the legal frame-up constructed by the SBU has largely collapsed. Bogdan’s lawyers have systematically refuted the claim that he is a supporter of the Kremlin on the basis of his own writings. Late last year, they submitted an independent linguistic expert report by Yuri Borisovich Irkhin, one of Ukraine’s most renowned criminologists. His analysis shows that the accusations against Bogdan are entirely baseless.

21. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

Bogdan Syrotiuk holds a copy of John Reed's Ten Days That Shook the World 

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.

Jun 10, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. A tribute to Gordon S. Wood (1933-2026), historian of the American Revolution

A tragic accident has brought to an end the life and career of one of the United States’ major historians. Gordon S. Wood died Sunday at the age of 92, hours after being struck by a car while walking through a grocery store parking lot in East Providence, Rhode Island. He died later that day at Rhode Island Hospital—less than one month before the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the commemoration of the revolution whose history he had spent a lifetime studying.

It speaks to the degradation of democratic consciousness, intellectual life and culture in the United States that Wood’s death, apart from scattered and superficial obituaries placed on the inside pages of newspapers, has gone largely unnoticed. The country’s foremost historian of its own founding has passed from the scene, on the very eve of the semiquincentennial, with hardly a ripple in official public life.

Within the historical profession, however, Wood’s death is deeply felt as a tragic loss....

*****

In a career spanning six decades and numerous books, articles and lectures, Wood established himself as the foremost historian of the American Revolution and the Early Republic. His Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787, published in 1968, won the Bancroft Prize, and his The Radicalism of the American Revolution, arguably the most important book yet written on the period of the American founding, won the Pulitzer Prize in 1993. Wood’s Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815, published in 2009, was a landmark contribution to the Oxford History of the United States series initiated by C. Vann Woodward and Richard Hofstadter. 

 *****

Wood later recalled finding high school history unbearable, suffering through classes in which the teacher simply read from a textbook. A Latin instructor encouraged him to attend nearby Tufts University, which he attended on ROTC funding while commuting from home. He graduated summa cum laude in 1955. His subsequent Air Force service in Japan caused Wood to abandon earlier ambitions for a career in the Foreign Service. He instead enrolled as a graduate student at Harvard University.

There Wood studied under the brilliant scholar of the colonial era, Bernard Bailyn, who was himself early on in a remarkable career. Precisely in those years Bailyn was at work on a close study of the massive body of pamphlets that had, he surmised, created the political climate of the American Revolution, a study that resulted in his most important book, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Published in 1967, it won both the Bancroft and Pulitzer Prizes and remains worthy of careful reading today.

Wood’s own Creation of the American Republic, produced out of the dissertation he had completed under Bailyn, came just one year later. It announced the start of an extraordinary career that clearly owed much to the work of his mentor, but that went, in key respects, beyond it. The “Bailyn school,” which nurtured the careers of a constellation of significant historians—among them Pauline Maier, Mary Beth Norton, Michael Kammen, Jack Rakove and Fred Anderson—produced three Pulitzer Prize winners in addition to Wood.

Wood’s writing, unlike much of academic history, was accessible to a general readership. He achieved this without sacrificing complexity and while still conveying his encyclopedic grasp of the archive. Like Bailyn, Wood possessed a rare literary gift, one rooted in a sensitivity to the voices that survive in the historical record and in a respect for his readership. Much like the present, the past was a living world inhabited by actors confronting circumstances whose resolution they themselves could not foresee. In Wood’s hands, the Revolutionary era ceased to be a familiar sequence of settled events, moving toward an outcome predetermined by the historian, and became instead a drama unfolding in real time, animated by uncertainty, conflict, possibility and tragedy. “The past cannot see the future,” Wood liked to remind students and colleagues.

From this conviction followed Wood’s emphatic rejection of historical anachronism—the ripping of historical figures out of their own time in order to impose upon them the assumptions and standards of the contemporary world. Such an approach, Wood insisted, was inherently moralistic and hypocritical. It flattered the present at the expense of the past, converting history into an exercise in self-congratulation and it rendered genuine historical understanding impossible. The men and women of the eighteenth century could not be indicted for failing to think and act as people of the twenty-first; the historian’s task was to comprehend them within the world they actually inhabited, with its given limits and possibilities.

*****

Wood never went to great lengths to identify precisely what those interests were or how they related to social classes in the emerging capitalist world—a limitation dictated, in great measure, by his fidelity to the archive and his sensitivity to the nature of the society itself. There was no modern bourgeoisie or significant wage-labor working class in the late colonial period, though both were emerging by the early republican era. Instead, Wood insisted, and demonstrated richly in The Radicalism of the American Revolution, that what was at stake was the erosion and eventual collapse of a monarchical society.

Monarchy and its social and property forms were weak in America, Wood acknowledged, but nonetheless they existed. The American Revolution was waged against this Ancien régime no less than the French Revolution was a decade later, a comparison from which Wood never shrank. It was an Old World challenged and undone by what Jefferson called a new “natural aristocracy” of republican leaders. But, in tragic irony, these Founders’ vision of a republic governed by disinterested statesmen gave way, in Wood’s telling, to a bustling, vulgar democracy commanded by career politicians representing a new “middling type.”

Wood was at his literary height when he conveyed the sense of tragedy over the outcome of their revolution felt by founding fathers who lived into the 1820s, figures such as Jefferson, Adams and Madison. One senses that, to a certain extent, the author shared their view, which he captured memorably at the conclusion of his Empire of Liberty:

No American had spoken more eloquently or more fully for the radical impulse of the Enlightenment than Jefferson. No one had expressed the radical meaning of the Revolution—the deposing of tyrannical kings and the raising up of common people to an unprecedented degree of equality—than Jefferson. Yet he always sensed that his “empire of liberty” had a cancer at its core that was eating away at the message of liberty and equality and threatening the very existence of the nation and its democratic self-government…

Although Jefferson in his final years tried to retain his sunny hopes for the future, he had twinges of an impending disaster whose sources he never fully understood. He and his colleagues had created a Union devoted to liberty that contained an inner flaw that would nearly prove to be its undoing. The Virginians who had done so much to bring about the United States knew in their souls, as Madison intimated in his advice to his country from beyond the grave, that there was a “Serpent creeping with his deadly wiles” in their Arcadian “Paradise.” Like Madison, many of the older generation came to realize that “slavery and farming are incompatible.” The Civil War was the climax of a tragedy that was preordained from the time of the Revolution. Only with the elimination of slavery could this nation that Jefferson had called “the world’s best hope” for democracy even begin to fulfill its great promise.

 These and other passages give the lie to some critics’ claims that Wood was indifferent to the issue of slavery, or to other forms of oppression. But while the historian did not shrink from the tragedy of unintended consequences, which, as Trotsky observed, always “lay inherent in the contradiction between the awakened world of the mind, and the stagnant limitation of means,” Wood emphatically insisted on the revolutionary, transformative character of the American Revolution, on its world-historic significance. He never budged from this stance.

*****

At the close of his life, as the United States approached the 250th anniversary of independence amid deep political and social crisis, Wood stood as one of the last major representatives of a historical tradition that is now embattled and endangered. He belonged to a generation of historians who believed that the past could be understood objectively, that ideas mattered and that great revolutions altered the course of human history. He rejected cynicism, superficial and ahistorical present-mindedness and the reduction of history to race, identity or power for its own sake. For him, the American Revolution remained one of the decisive events in the democratic development of humanity, however incomplete and contradictory its results.

That conviction animated his scholarship across more than half a century and gave his work its enduring vitality. It will be read long after the racialist falsifications and postmodernist evasions that he combatted in his last years have been discredited, not only in scholarly works but also, and most important, by the practice of a radicalized working class that draws encouragement and inspiration from the ideals of the first American revolution.

2. Wall Street anxiously awaits speculative SpaceX launch

The SpaceX launch is aimed at raising around $80 billion with the market valuation of the company set to reach $1.75 trillion. If it goes ahead as planned it will make Musk, already the world’s wealthiest individual, the first trillionaire. The SpaceX IPO is the largest in history, three times more than Saudi oil firm Aramco’s $25.6 billion in 2019.

Wall Street has always functioned as a means for siphoning the wealth of society, created by the labor of billions of workers in the US and around the world, into the hands of finance capital. But with the development of the AI boom this process has assumed historic dimensions.

There is no question that AI has the potential to bring an enormous increase in the productivity of human labor, opening up vast possibilities for the advancement of society.

But under capitalist ownership it is the vehicle for massive speculation, with the potential to cause a financial crash of major proportions, while at the same time its success, as measured by profitability, depends on its capacity to wipe out the jobs and livelihood of millions of workers as a cost-cutting measure. 

*****

All told, the four major hyperscalers—Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Meta (the owner of Facebook) and Microsoft—are expected to spend $725 billion on AI this year. Initially this money was drawn from their cash reserves but now they are seeking finance through debt or via the share market.

And the market is showing signs of increased volatility. Last Friday its nine-week rise, which saw the S&P 500 index reach 11 record highs in May, came to a jarring halt set off by the tech sector with the NASDAQ index falling 4.2 percent, its largest one-day fall since the start of the pandemic in 2020.

The fall was largely ascribed to official figures which showed an increase in employment of 172,000, higher than the market expectation of 85,000. This led to the conclusion that interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve—two had been expected at the start of the year—were off the table for the foreseeable future.

That was no doubt a factor. But the instability of the tech boom, and its speculative character had been revealed the previous day. In a major selloff the chipmaker and technology firm, Broadcom, lost $285 billion in what was the fourth largest single-day loss by a company on record.

It was not that Broadcom had made a loss or suffered a significant downturn in revenue. In fact, its projected revenue for the second quarter was $29.4 billion, above consensus estimates of $28.2 billion. But because this was short of the insatiable demands in the market, its shares opened the day 15.9 percent lower and finished the day 12.6 percent down. 

*****

The reason SpaceX and others are so anxious to secure a listing, and NASDAQ is doing everything to make that possible, is to ensure that money from Exchange Traded Funds, which base themselves on indexes rather than individual stocks, can flow into their shares. 

*****

But even as there is knowledge of the speculative character of the boom, the rush to cash in continues, with a WSJ article noting that Wall Street was “rushing to fund the AI bonanza in every conceivable way.”

In a comment published on X, Jurrien Timmer, head of global macro at Fidelity, a global fund manager, said bull markets ended either because they were not supported by fundamentals or because of inflation.

Timmer’s post then recalled the words of Chuck Price, the one-time CEO of Citigroup who famously said in July 2007, little more than year before the 2008 crisis broke, that “ as long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance.” 

*****

It remains to be seen what the outcome of the SpaceX IPO on Friday will be. But one thing is clear.

The gyrations on Wall Street, the escalation of the valuations of loss-making firms into the stratosphere on the basis of expectations, the support for this process by the major banks—they expect to collect at least $500 million in fees from the SpaceX launch—the “buy the dip” mentality, the bending of the rules by major indexes, and the feverish drive by the Wall Street oligarchs to acquire ever more wealth are all indications of the decay and rot of the entire financial system.

3. Record One Nation polling underscores crisis of Australia’s two-party system

The far-right party is a temporary beneficiary of explosive social discontent that will increasingly find expression in the struggles of the working class. 

4. May 8: How the Soviet Union’s victory over the Nazis is being erased from memory

Katja Rippert

While visitors to the Soviet memorials in Berlin laid wreaths for the soldiers of the Red Army and commemorated the victims of Nazi terror, the German government is rearming at a pace not seen since 1945. A new world war is already unfolding on several fronts. The war in Ukraine has entered its fourth year, and the war of aggression by the US and Israel against Iran threatens to set the entire region ablaze.

Germany is, in effect, once again at war with Russia and is risking a nuclear escalation. In the weeks leading up to the anniversary, the German government introduced the new Conscription Act, published a German military strategy for the first time since the end of the war and agreed on a “strategic partnership” with Ukraine that provides for joint arms production and the economic exploitation of Ukraine. The German armoured brigade in Lithuania, which is permanently stationed in the immediate vicinity of Russian territory, is being reinforced.

The more aggressively the German imperialists stoke the war against Russia, the less they can tolerate people recalling the Nazi crimes of the last world war—and who was instrumental in defeating the fascists. The Red Army’s victory over Nazi Germany, the struggle of millions of Soviet workers of all nationalities who gave their lives to defend the achievements of the October Revolution, is being erased from the collective memory. For it is this memory that stands in the way of the new war policy.  

*****

The attacks on the Soviet Union are most clearly evident in the reignited campaign against Soviet memorials, which commemorate the approximately 13 million Soviet soldiers who fell in battle. Today, they are a thorn in the side of the ruling class because they remind the whole world of what war produces.

Following the demolition of hundreds of Soviet monuments in Ukraine and the Baltic states in recent years, alongside the erection of new monuments to fascist collaborators such as Stepan Bandera, efforts are now underway in Germany to put an end to the commemoration of the Red Army’s victory. The campaign is advancing step by step.

In the treaties of 1990 with the USSR and subsequently with Russia, the Federal Republic of Germany undertook to preserve and maintain Soviet monuments and war graves in Germany. Therefore, demolition, as has occurred in Ukraine, is not legally possible without further ado. Instead, a “redesign” and “contextualization” of the memorials is being demanded.

The focus is on the three Berlin memorials in the Tiergarten, where some 2,500 soldiers are buried; in Treptower Park, the largest memorial of its kind in Germany, where 7,200 soldiers are buried; and in the Schönholzer Heide in the district of Pankow, the largest Soviet military cemetery with some 13,200 fallen Red Army soldiers. The monument in Dresden is also being called into question—the oldest memorial to the Red Army in Germany, which was inaugurated immediately after the war in 1945.

Calls for the removal or alteration of the memorials are not new. As early as 2014, at the start of the Ukraine crisis, the right-wing Springer press had called for the dismantling of the monument in the Tiergarten. Following Russia’s reactionary invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the Soviet tank there was draped in a Ukrainian flag and the monument in Treptower Park was sprayed with swastikas and anti-Russian slogans.

Now the offensive is entering a new phase. The Social Democrats (SPD) and the Greens tabled motions in the Berlin State House of Representatives calling for a “contextualization” of the Stalin quotations at the Treptow monument and for the inclusion of the other successor states of the Soviet Union in the handling of the monuments—several of which are pursuing a policy of rigorously removing Soviet monuments. The Berlin Left Party agreed to such a motion in the committees. 

*****

These nationalist attacks on the Soviet Union are based on a distortion of history. As Jochen Hellbeck demonstrates in detail in his latest book, “World Enemy Number 1,” Hitler’s war in the East was directed primarily against the Soviet Union. In that war, the drive of German imperialism towards the East converged with the anti-communism of the Nazis, who propagated the fight against “Jewish Bolshevism” and sought to reverse the October Revolution. This is the only way to explain the Nazis’ massive extermination campaigns, to which 27 million Soviet citizens fell victim.

The Nazis treated all Soviet prisoners of war as representatives of despised Bolshevism and subjected them to barbaric “special treatment,” in violation of the 1929 Geneva Convention. In consultation with the Nazi leadership, the Wehrmacht command deliberately had over 3 million of the 5.7 million Soviet prisoners of war murdered through mass shootings, starvation, epidemics and forced labor.

Conversely, millions of workers and peasants from all the Soviet republics joined the Red Army to defend the achievements of the October Revolution—and not for their respective nations. They fought side by side for the Soviet Union and were victorious despite Stalin’s devastating policies and the terror and the brutal persecution of national minorities and groups by the NKVD.

If Stalin’s crimes are now being used to belittle the heroic struggle of the Red Army soldiers and to bolster the nationalism of the former Soviet republics, this is a falsification of history in two respects.

Firstly, Stalin was not Lenin’s legitimate heir, but the gravedigger of the Russian Revolution. After Lenin’s death in 1924, the Soviet bureaucracy under Stalin seized power and transformed the USSR into a dictatorship that oppressed the working class and murdered the flower of the revolution in the Great Terror of the 1930s.

Secondly, it was Stalin himself who brought back nationalism, which ultimately culminated in the dissolution of the Soviet Union by the Stalinist bureaucracy. When the heads of state of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus—Boris Yeltsin, Leonid Kravchuk and Stanislav Shushkevich—decided to dissolve the USSR on December 8, 1991, without any democratic legitimacy, they opened up the territory of the Soviet Union to imperialist ambitions and created the multitude of post-Soviet mini-states that are now being pitted against one another, which forms the basis for the war in Ukraine.

The erasure of the Soviet Union and the rehabilitation of the national movements in the Soviet republics that collaborated with the Nazis serve the transparent aim of rehabilitating the Nazis’ old anti-communist narratives, which were used to justify the war against the Soviet Union. By rehabilitating the collaborators, the Nazis are ultimately rehabilitated, and today’s war policy is legitimized 

*****

Furthermore, the distortion of history against the Soviet Union is aimed at removing the world’s first workers’ state—and thus the October Revolution—from history books and collective memory. The Russian Revolution of 1917 was the greatest transformation in history and proves that an alternative to capitalism is possible. It dealt a severe blow to the ruling class and inspired workers and oppressed peoples across the world to mass uprisings and revolutions. The national independence of the former colonies would have been just as unthinkable without the October Revolution as the social gains in the industrialized nations.

Today, all these achievements are under attack across the board. “All that had occurred in the aftermath of the revolution—the upsurge of the international working class, the monumental global movement of the oppressed masses against imperialism, and the social advances that were won in the aftermath of the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945 and the victory of the Chinese Revolution in 1949—was to be reversed,” explained David North in his May Day speech this year, referring to the US wars and the social counter-revolution.

What the imperialist powers actually seek to impose with their bombs and missiles, as well as by smashing workers’ social rights, is ideologically underpinned by the erasure of the October Revolution. Politicians and the media seriously believe they can simply wipe out the most important event of the past century.

Yet in reality, both the horrors of world war and fascism and the struggles of the working class are deeply rooted in mass consciousness. That is why the vast majority reject the politics of war. But to transform this rejection into a conscious movement, it is essential to counter the falsification of history and to keep alive the memory of fascism and war on the one hand, and the October Revolution on the other.

5. Germany: IG Metall union accepts closure of Mahle auto components plant in Neustadt an der Donau

The union is celebrating the plant closure and loss of 400 jobs as a great success, as it has achieved "a significantly improved financial safeguard." Previously, the workforce had proved that it wants to fight to preserve jobs. 

6. “Workers at Flint Assembly and Nexteer should stop production”: Anger mounts against UAW collusion with American Axle strikebreaking

UAW officials at GM's Flint Assembly plant are allowing the company to truck in axles from the strikebound American Axle plant (Dauch Corp.) in Three Rivers, Michigan. 

7. Will Lehman issues open letter to UAW members and delegates on eve of Constitutional Convention

Autoworker, socialist, and UAW presidential candidate Will Lehman

Will Lehman, the Mack Trucks worker waging a rank-and-file campaign for the presidency of the United Auto Workers, distributed an open letter Tuesday to a list of 300,000 UAW members maintained by the federal monitor, calling on delegates to nominate him from the floor of the union’s Constitutional Convention, which opens in Detroit on June 15.

“The aim of my campaign is not to swap one official for another,” Lehman writes in the letter, which was also posted on his website. “It is to organize a rebellion against the dictatorship of the UAW apparatus and restore power where it belongs: the rank and file on the shop floor.”

To every delegate, the letter states: “Nominate me on the convention floor on a program of rank-and-file power.” To every UAW member: “Press the delegates from your local to do exactly that, and join this movement.”

Lehman says UAW members are facing an “absolutely desperate situation,” pointing to inflation accelerating under the impact of “the criminal war against Iran”; multi-year contracts that “erode living standards”; the auto companies “using AI and other advanced technologies to carry out a jobs bloodbath.”

He then declares:

There are two forces in the UAW: the rank-and-file workers who work every day and pay dues, and a bloated bureaucracy of highly paid officials who work against our interests at every turn. This has not changed under the Fain administration. It has only gotten worse.

The letter was issued under conditions of growing militancy and an incipient revolt against the UAW bureaucracy. In Three Rivers, Michigan, 1,000 workers at the American Axle (Dauch Corp.) plant walked off the job on June 1 for the first time since 2008, when the UAW accepted a 50 percent cut in their wages. At the GM Flint Assembly plant, rank-and-file workers have objected to the use of axles from the strikebound plant.

At Nexteer Automotive in Saginaw, Michigan, 1,700 workers have rejected three UAW-backed tentative agreements and voted by 86 percent to authorize a strike. A rank-and-file committee has emerged, which is campaigning to defeat a fourth contract and join the American Axle workers in a common strike. Workers at Bridgewater Interiors in Warren, Michigan, and at Dana in Ft. Wayne, Indiana, overwhelmingly rejected UAW deals.

Among academic workers—who make up a quarter of all UAW members—there is growing anger against the bureaucracy, including at Harvard where the UAW International shut down a 41-day strike without a contract or any meaningful concession. 

In every struggle, Lehman explained, workers are confronting an apparatus that works not to mobilize the membership against the employers but to contain and disorganize the workers it claims to represent.

This pattern is grounded in the very structure of the institution. The UAW International holds $1.1 billion in assets. Of its roughly 1,000 employees, nearly 470 take home more than $100,000 a year. Fain himself earns $270,000; Secretary-Treasurer Margaret Mock, $247,000; the three vice presidents average $235,000; the nine regional directors, $220,000. Beneath them sit 500 to 600 International Representatives—who are paid $140,000 to $160,000, what Lehman characterizes as “industrial police”—whose function is to enforce leadership decisions and ensure that strikes do not take place.

Lehman states that the apparatus intends to hold the convention as a coronation of Fain’s “Stand Up” slate—described in Lehman’s letter as “a rogues’ gallery of Fain and former Curry supporters”—with no accounting for the past four years and no opening for an independent rank-and-file candidate. 

*****

Lehman calls on delegates to “take the side of the rank and file” and nominate him from the convention floor, and on every UAW member to press their delegates to do the same, talk to their coworkers and build rank-and-file committees independent of the bureaucracy. 

8. Trump booed at Madison Square Garden during NBA playoffs

Millions of people across the United States and internationally watched on various media platforms Monday night as basketball fans loudly booed President Donald Trump when his image appeared on the Jumbotron inside New York City’s Madison Square Garden. The eruption of hatred for Trump occurred during a National Basketball Association (NBA) playoff game between the New York Knicks, the favored home team, and the San Antonio Spurs.

Trump was attending the event in a bullet-proof glass VIP room with members of his family and cabinet, including Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, along with the widely despised Knicks owner (and owner of Madison Square Garden) James Dolan, a billionaire and longtime Trump supporter.

The audience booed Trump for many reasons—his assault on immigrants, his attack on Medicaid and other social programs, the war with Iran, his erection of a personalist dictatorship—but certainly on their minds was the fact that Trump’s presence had turned the area around the venue, near a central transit hub and the center of many business and corporate headquarters, into an armed camp.

The New York Police Department (NYPD) fenced in 10 blocks around Madison Square Garden and deployed thousands of cops alongside hundreds of federal agents. Every single ticket holder had to pass through heavy-duty, airport-grade metal detectors set up at street checkpoints blocks away from the Garden’s actual doors. Secret service agents and members of NYPD tactical units had a long list of items to confiscate, such as metal water bottles, aerosols, glass, selfie sticks, and laser pointers.

Bags and backpacks had been banned in advance. Because of how long it took security personnel to clear thousands of people through long lines, the stadium was half-empty just before tip-off, causing massive entry delays for the fans. 

*****

Millions of working class Knicks fans in New York could not afford the cheapest seats at the game, priced at between $3,100 and $4,600, since the Knicks had the possibility of winning an NBA championship for the first time since 1973. Prices for better seats started at $8,150.

It is worth noting that standard ticket prices for the 1973 playoffs ranged from $5.00 to $15.00. A $15.00 ticket would put a fan in some of the best lower-level seats in the arena. In 2026 dollars, accounting for inflation, those tickets would now cost between $37 and $259.

These differences in prices are not simply the product of inflation, but of the vast social chasm that has opened up in the last half-century between the top 5 or 10 percent of income earners and the rest of the population. Basketball, football and baseball games were affordable and regularly attended by working class families. But now the working class is far poorer than it was in 1973, and attendance at one of these games is at best an annual treat. 

*****

One only has to look at the grotesque publicity for the game to get a sense of the unreal world the rich inhabit. Coverage in the media featured the anticipated attendance of super-rich Hollywood and sports celebrities such as former Yankees shortstop Derek Jeter (net worth $200 million); filmmaker Spike Lee (net worth $60 million); actor Timothée Chalamet (net worth $30 million); comedian Chris Rock (net worth $60 million) and singer Jay-Z, whose net worth is estimated to be $2.6 billion. The aristocrats of today’s degraded culture sat at the courtside seats. Sources in the media wasted no time in pointing out that Spike Lee could have sold his three tickets for over $500,000.

The most deceptive and mendacious coverage of the event, however, was reserved for the New York Times, which glorified it for supposedly uniting New Yorkers. Its lead article after the game told readers, “Mr. Trump’s attendance was a footnote on a night when New Yorkers banded together to support a team that had united them like few things can.” It quoted the Democratic Party political operative and charlatan Al Sharpton as saying in an interview before the game, “I don’t care about Trump… This is one of the few things I’ve seen New Yorkers across gender and race united around. You walk around, everyone has Knicks’ gear. It’s healthy.”

The entire social context of the game, including the Times’ reporting, are, in fact, deeply diseased. Trump was sandwiching his appearance at the game, during which he visibly fell asleep, between war crimes and social devastation. His administration had just made cuts to SNAP benefits (food stamps) for the working poor, and ICE and Border Patrol agents had attacked protesters at Delaney Hall, an ICE-run immigrant concentration camp in Newark, New Jersey, some 13 miles from Madison Square Garden, where 300 inmates are on a hunger strike against inhumane conditions.

In a pre-game Sunday interview with NBC, he said of the Iranians, “Now, if we don’t make a deal, then we’re going to take them out militarily, very harshly.”

Zohran Mamdani, the pseudo-socialist DSA mayor of New York City, was also present at the game, although he was standing in a cheaper area farther away from the court. At a press briefing last Thursday, he said that he would be “In a very different section of the stadium… I won’t be courtside or in a suite.”

He told the media, nevertheless, that his ticket cost $1,000, a price out of reach for at least 80 percent of New Yorkers, including the 50 percent of working-age city households that do not earn enough to cover basic necessities (housing, food, healthcare, childcare) without assistance or extreme budgeting.

Mamdani was taking a break from promoting his new “Block by Block” housing plan, a project that provides major sops for the same criminal layer of building developers from which Trump emerged. He is also in the midst of imposing government “efficiencies” through his new COGE city government restructuring plan, having reneged on his campaign promises, including free bus service. Last month he encouraged commuters to scab on striking Long Island Rail Road workers.

Mamdani played a central role in encouraging the bogus “unity” of New Yorkers proclaimed by the Times in social media posts that took jibes at the Spurs. While Mamdani did not, at least publicly, meet with the fascist in the White House for a third time, he did welcome Trump. He told the Atlantic: “I think we look forward to welcoming any New Yorker who is excited for the Knicks to have that chance to win that championship.” 

Always ready to offer up a political diversion in the service of their ruling class masters, the supposed “progressives” in the Democratic Party such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez spent the days preceding the game tweeting in support of the home-town Knicks and ignoring the multiple crimes of Trump and American imperialism.

The grotesque episode of Game 3 of the NBA playoffs underscored the mammoth social divide between the financial oligarchy and the broad mass of working people that will, perhaps sooner rather than later, produce political convulsions that will shake the entire rotten economic and political system to its foundations.

9. US railroad CSX plans to reduce human track inspections following government waiver

Automated Track Inspection, used in conjunction with human visual inspections, can be used to greatly increase railway safety. Instead, they are being used to cut jobs on behalf of profit.

10. DSA candidate Raman advances to Los Angeles mayoral runoff as Democrats seek new “progressive” face

The Los Angeles race lays bare the Democratic Party’s increasing reliance on the DSA to contain working class opposition to inequality, war and austerity. 

11. The “Big Shrink”: Over half of 50 largest school districts in US facing deep cuts as war on education escalates

More than half of the country’s 50 largest school districts are either making budget cuts, have already implemented them, or are confronting reported deficits, according to a Chalkbeat analysis published at the end of May.

Describing the mass layoffs as a long-anticipated “Big Shrink,” Georgetown University’s Edunomics Lab details cuts in Boston, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, San Diego, Toledo, Broward, San Francisco, Anchorage, Cedar Rapids, Tulsa, Brevard, Richmond, Fresno, Clark County, Cleveland, Bellingham “and countless small and mid-sized districts.”

They conclude, “What’s becoming clear: This isn’t temporary—it’s a reset.”

The capitalist-controlled media universally describe the cuts as the inevitable result of declining student enrollment. In reality, they are part of a decades-long bipartisan strategy by the ruling class to cripple public education services, drive students out and privatize it.  

12.  An opera and an art exhibition in New York focus on Mexican artists Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera

Kahlo and Rivera were not merely remarkable artists whose marriage was unusually turbulent. They were, at critical moments of their lives, participants in the great political struggles of their era. Rivera was expelled by the Mexican Communist Party in 1929, initially opposing the dictates from Moscow on art, and soon exhibiting growing sympathy for the struggle of Leon Trotsky and the International Left Opposition. For most of the 1930s he and Frida Kahlo, whom he married in 1929, supported Trotsky’s fight against the Stalinist bureaucracy. Rivera played a key role in convincing the government of Lazaro Cardenas to offer Trotsky refuge in Mexico in 1937. In 1938 he co-authored, with Trotsky and Andre Breton, the “Manifesto for an Independent Revolutionary Art.” This document, written almost 90 years ago, rejecting the Stalinist lie of “socialist realism” and upholding both revolutionary commitment as well as freedom for artistic creation, retains its full significance today.

Rivera broke with Trotsky in 1939. Both he and Kahlo made their way back to Stalinism, a reflection of the defeats of the revolutionary struggles of the 1930s, but also the failure of either artist to ever fully assimilate the difference between revolutionary Marxism and the radical nationalism of the Mexican Revolution. As the WSWS noted back in 2002 in its analysis of the film Frida, “it seems safe to suggest that neither Rivera nor Kahlo—remarkable artists and not first and foremost political thinkers—ever understand the essence of Trotsky’s struggle with the Stalinist bureaucracy … and remained to one extent or another under the influence of Mexican nationalism.”

Not all of this perhaps can be treated exhaustively, but the fact that all references to political struggle are missing in the new opera, including the collaboration of both Rivera and Kahlo with Trotsky, is indeed revealing. The problems of this new opera are bound up with the baleful influence of identity politics. Frida Kahlo in particular has been turned into a feminist and gay icon, above all the victim of mistreatment by Rivera. She has become a “brand,” with her image adorning tote bags and coffee mugs. Rivera himself has been to some extent dismissed, as if an appreciation of Kahlo required the shrinking of Rivera’s reputation. Àlvarez himself, in a brief intermission interview during a performance, referred to his character as “the bad boy” of the opera. The great Mexican muralist is depicted as a depressed and despairing figure. This is the image of one of the greatest artistic figures of the 20th century that audiences are asked to take away from El Ùltimo Sueño de Frida y Diego

While the MoMA exhibition suffers from some of the same problems as the opera, and at times feels more like a co-branded marketing opportunity than a serious approach to these artists’ work, it nevertheless offers the opportunity to see six of Kahlo’s most significant paintings along with several of Rivera’s murals and other sketches, and allows one to appreciate what resonated in their work, as well as their differences.  

*****

Often valorized for its intensely intimate depiction of pain, be it physical or emotional, Kahlo’s work is also strikingly objective, as much as it appears fanciful and dream-like. Although grouped with surrealists, particularly through Rivera’s association with Andre Breton, Kahlo did not see herself as part of any “School,” and was often quite critical of many avant-garde circles.

For all their differences, and their often-tumultuous personal relationship, Kahlo and Rivera remained committed politically as well as fiercely loyal to one another as artists. Even though they returned to the camp of Stalinism, both conceived of their art as part of humanity’s struggle for liberation. Their political trajectory amounted to a tragic repudiation of the revolutionary courage they displayed in the 1930s, but it did not of course negate their earlier contributions.

The political commitment of both Rivera and Kahlo is lost on the creators of El Ùltimo Sueño de Frida y Diego, as well as on the curators of the art exhibition at MoMA. But Rivera and Kahlo as simply a tormented husband and wife is hardly the lesson to be drawn by a more inquisitive viewer who examines the complex legacy of their lives and work more deeply. A serious and all-sided examination of the intertwined artistic and political careers of these two great artists has yet to be presented. 

13. Pseudo-left parties support new Danish government committed to massive war budget and tax cuts for the rich

That the decision was ultimately taken to integrate the Socialist People’s Party and Red-Green Alliance into government, or at least some form of support for it, speaks to the recognition within the ruling class that they require a political cover to proceed with their agenda. 

14. Homeless Congolese man Yves Sakila killed at hands of security guards outside Dublin department store

A homeless Congolese man, Yves Sakila, resident in Ireland since childhood, was killed last month in Henry Street, Dublin. He had been chased and forced to the pavement by private security guards of Arnotts department store. 

15. United Kingdom: The way forward for resident doctors: Unite all NHS workers against Starmer government

The BMA and other health unions—Unite, Unison, the GMB and the Royal College of Nursing—are suffocating a unified fightback by National Health Service workers. 

16. Educators strike in Australian capital as public education crisis deepens

Teachers and school assistants in Canberra will join a 24-hour strike this Thursday over essentially the same issues of poor pay and deteriorating conditions that confront educators everywhere. 

17. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

A video reminder describes Syrotiuk's ongoing plight 

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.