Jul 22, 2026

 Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. Democrats to Trump on Iran: “Win the war!”

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testified alongside General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, before the Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday to demand $67 billion in emergency funding for the Iran war.

Held amid mounting casualties, the hearing revealed the deepening crisis of American imperialism in Iran, where it faces a military debacle to which the Trump administration has responded with renewed bombing and the active discussion of deploying ground troops and using nuclear weapons. 

Hegseth, admitting that the cost of the war had surged to $37.5 billion, conducted himself as a belligerent bully. “Shame on you and others who call this a quagmire and a failure!” he raged.

In the face of growing popular opposition, the Democrats made every effort to show that they are a loyal opposition, accusing the administration of incompetence in the prosecution of the interests of American imperialism.

The most significant statement came from Democratic Michigan Senator Gary Peters, who called Hegseth a “failure” and declared, “You don’t have a strategy. You don’t have a long-term plan to actually win this war. Win the war!”

*****

Under conditions of mass popular opposition to the war, which is being used by the Trump administration as a pretext to cut food stamps and other social services, the position of the Democratic Party is not “Stop the war,” but “Win the war!” 

*****

The Democrats’ other critique was that the “war of choice” against Iran is taking up funds from their central focus: the war against nuclear-armed Russia. “We’re in a moment in history where we can win the war in Ukraine,” Democratic Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois declared. “But instead of finding the money that they need now for air defenses, we’re putting more money into this exchange with Iran, a war of choice which we never should have entered.” 

*****

Not one senator, Democrat or Republican, proposed cutting off funds for the war.

In more than three hours of testimony, exactly one senator asked about the administration’s active discussion of a ground invasion of Iran. “The next step would be escalation by ground combat. Do you anticipate that escalation?” asked Democratic Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island. Caine refused to answer. 

*****

Despite the efforts of the Democrats to solidarize themselves with the efforts of the US military to dominate the world, they could not deny the criminal character of the war being waged by the Trump administration, whose defense secretary earlier vowed “no quarter, no mercy for our enemies.”

In her opening statement, Murray said that Trump “is threatening escalation and war crimes.” Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon asked Caine about US attacks on water infrastructure: “You are aware that infrastructure that civilians rely on to survive is not generally considered legitimate military targets?”

These insincere qualms, however, will not stop the Democrats from funding the war.

The supplemental contains $21 billion for fuel and the replacement of equipment used up in the war, and $46 billion to expand the production of weapons: rocket motors, guided bombs, hypersonic missiles and counter-drone systems. It also funds far more than the Iran war: nearly $1 billion to keep the National Guard deployed in Washington, over $1 billion for the Army on the Southern border, $900 million for the administration’s illegal boat strikes in the Caribbean and over $18 billion in bombs and missiles already requested through the regular budget.

The package is designed as a bridge to the administration’s $1.5 trillion military budget for next year, a roughly 50 percent increase over this year’s record $1 trillion. The weapons production lines it opens are to be kept running by the larger budget, which Hegseth and Caine presented as a generational investment in preparing for the wars of the future. 

*****

Tuesday’s hearing made clear that all factions of the US political establishment support the war and its aim of subjugating Iran to US domination. The fight against war can be taken forward only through the independent mobilization of the working class—in the United States, in Iran and internationally—against the capitalist system that is its source.

2. United States: LAUSD facing bankruptcy: Nearly 6,000 layoffs, healthcare cuts, furlough days

The way for these cuts was paved by a massive betrayal by the union bureaucracy in the district. On the morning of April 14, nearly 70,000 LAUSD workers, including administrators, were set to walk out together for the first time in the district’s history. Teachers authorized strike action by 94 percent; classified staff voted by 97 percent. Then UTLA and AALA (Associated Administrators of Los Angeles) settled and left SEIU members isolated.

But in the middle of the night before picket lines were to go up, SEIU99 President Max Arias, then‑UTLA President Cecily Myart‑Cruz (who is also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America), and other union officials met behind closed doors with Democratic Mayor Karen Bass. The City Council, which includes four DSA members, passed a unanimous resolution urging settlement. At 2:00 a.m., SEIU99 announced a tentative agreement, and the strike was canceled.

The very next day, April 15, the county demanded a new stabilization plan, the second in 12 months. The district had promised reductions under the first, and as of March, $231 million of them had been neither carried out nor even identified. It nonetheless eliminated 657 positions in May, mostly in the district office. In June the board adopted the present plan.

On July 2, the county arrived to collect, naming the contracts first among the causes: $1.13 billion this year, rising to $1.44 billion in 2027–28, a “severe fiscal event” reflecting what Duardo calls “mismanagement” of the collective bargaining process. She also finds the district never provided the certification that state law requires.

This is part of a national pattern in which contract ratifications have been followed immediately by cuts which the bureaucracy had worked to conceal. In Oakland, a 91 percent strike authorization ended in a tentative agreement as the district eliminated 421 positions. In San Francisco, the union shut down a four-day strike, and layoff notices followed within days under a multiyear fiscal recovery plan. In Chicago, the CTU concluded a contract in April 2025; three months later, more than 1,450 educators and staff received layoff notices. In Philadelphia, a 94 percent strike authorization was followed by a contract without a walkout in August 2025; the next April, the board voted to close 17 schools.

The assault on public education is bipartisan. While Trump and the Republicans move openly to liquidate the Department of Education, the Democrats administer austerity, expand charters and preside over district‑level collapses like that unfolding in Los Angeles. 

*****

The teachers unions are dominated by an unaccountable bureaucracy that enforces the demands of the state and corporations. They present false one-page “highlights” of contracts, rush votes, withhold information and collaborate in implementing layoffs and cuts while presenting themselves as defenders of “public education” and rewarding themselves with six‑figure salaries.

Gloria Martinez, who became UTLA president on July 1 and makes about $198,000, told the Los Angeles Times: “Labor contracts are not the issue.” School funding, she added, is set at the state level. SEIU Local 99 President Max Arias, whose total compensation is $242,000, dismissed the district’s dire warnings as its typical fear mongering every few years. But neither union is preparing any action, let alone joint strike action, to fight the coming assault.

The appeal to Sacramento is a diversion. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration is itself preparing cuts against a $21 billion state deficit. 

*****

The claim that there is “no money” for public education is a lie. The resources exist many times over to fully fund high‑quality public education, pay living wages, guarantee pensions and healthcare, and provide housing and cultural access for all. The issue is who controls the wealth of society and in whose interests it is used: for the enrichment of a tiny oligarchy and for war, or for the needs of the working class.

In the 12 months to March 2026, California’s 246 billionaires increased their wealth by $487.2 billion, to $2.061 trillion, nearly half the state’s annual economic output. Twenty‑three of the largest fortunes in America are held in Los Angeles County, where a cafeteria worker earns $35,500. The sum of $3.649 billion triggering the district’s crisis is a minuscule fraction of the wealth of this oligarchy. Trump’s 2027 budget meanwhile seeks $1.5 trillion for the military while cutting non‑defense spending by $73 billion and pushing the burden back onto states and districts, in other words, the working class.

3. How Trump uses Truth Social to manipulate markets and pocket millions

Following the release of President Donald Trump’s financial disclosure filing for 2025, showing that in the first year of his second term he pocketed $2.2 billion, including $1.4 billion in cryptocurrency deals, the World Socialist Web Site wrote, “The scale of Trump’s self-enrichment renders the great corruption scandals of American history almost quaint by comparison.”

Recent analyses of the disclosure report, which were filed with the Office of Government Ethics, have brought into sharper relief Trump’s use of the presidency to line his own pockets and those of family members.

On July 17, CNN published an investigative report documenting the fact that in 2025 Trump made at least 44 stock purchases of 21 different companies within a week of posting a complimentary Truth Social message about the firms, their executives or their products. Trump also made other stock purchases shortly before posting more general messages highlighting policy changes that could benefit those companies, but without naming them.

*****

By such criminal actions, the Trump White House has institutionalized at the height of state power the insider trading that pervades the wheeling and dealing of the financial oligarchy. Unlike every US president going back at least five decades, Trump has not placed his assets in a blind trust. He has refused to divest from his businesses and placed them instead in a trust he can still access. One of the trustees is his son Donald Trump Jr.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly responded to CNN’s report with the brazen lying and impudence that typifies the Trump administration:

President Trump only acts in the best interests of the American public—which is why they overwhelmingly re-elected him to his office, despite years of lies and false accusations against him and his businesses from the fake news media. There are no conflicts of interest. 

*****

The fact that none of the official institutions of American capitalism—least of all the Democratic Party—are willing or able to rein in Trump’s criminality testifies to the rule of a staggeringly wealthy and parasitic financial oligarchy, which has installed a fascistic product of the New York real estate and gambling mafia in the White House.

When asked by the New York Times in January why he’s so open about using politics for personal profit, Trump said, “I found out that nobody cared. I’m allowed to.”

4. United States: Federal judge bars strike action, orders SMART-TD union to police CSX railway workers “upon pain of fine, suspension or other sanction”

A federal judge in Florida issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) on July 15 barring thousands of CSX railway workers, represented by SMART-TD, from engaging in any strike, work stoppage, slowdown or sickout over the company’s new attendance policy—and ordered the union to discipline any member who defied the ban. The five-day TRO expired on July 20, after SMART-TD had complied with its orders.

The TRO, issued by Judge Wendy W. Berger of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, came in response to an emergency motion filed by CSX Transportation after SMART-TD indicated its opposition to System Notice 502, a June 30 policy update that dramatically narrows workers’ ability to take medically necessary absences without facing termination. CSX workers have written to the World Socialist Web Site confirming that their locals have been polled on strike action and approved it near-unanimously, indicating overwhelming rank-and-file support for a walkout.

No strike had been called, though the union’s general committees had formally objected that the Notice constituted “an unlawful unilateral modification of the parties’ Collective Bargaining Agreement in violation of the Railway Labor Act.” When CSX demanded assurances that operations would not be disrupted, SMART-TD union officials pledged to “use every lawful means available to preserve the negotiated status quo.”

Within days, CSX was in federal court, and Judge Berger classified the dispute as “minor” under the Railway Labor Act (RLA), meaning workers are prohibited from striking and must submit to compulsory arbitration. The legal standard, as the court itself noted, requires only that the carrier’s position be “arguably justified” by the contract. Any “reasonable doubt” defaults against the workers.

*****

The legal mechanism deployed against CSX workers is the same one used against 17,000 BNSF railway workers in January 2022, when Judge Mark Pittman issued a near-identical TRO blocking a strike over the “Hi-Viz” point-based attendance policy. In both cases, the court relied on the Railway Labor Act’s distinction between “major” and “minor” disputes—a framework that functions as a juridical trap. 

*****

The Railway Labor Act, enacted in 1926, is an anti-worker law which has served to all but ban strikes on American railroads for the past century. If a dispute is ruled “minor,” strikes are illegal and workers must submit to compulsory arbitration before the National Railroad Adjustment Board, a process that can drag on for years while the company’s policy remains in effect. 

As BNSF’s own lawyers boasted in 2022, the unions have “never prevailed” under this framework in 33 years. This record follows from a legal standard weighted heavily in the carriers’ favor.

*****

In fact, the union bureaucracy has accepted and defended this system for decades. SMART, the parent organization of SMART-TD, reported nearly $450 million in assets to the Department of Labor, while its leading officers received salaries of between $341,000 and $462,000 in 2025. The TRO makes this relationship explicit and legally enforceable.

The decisive confirmation came in the 2022 national contract struggle, which pitted 120,000 railroad workers not only against the carriers but against the Biden White House, Congress and the union apparatus. Members of several unions voted by margins above 99 percent to authorize strike action. Biden then appointed Presidential Emergency Board 250, whose recommendations failed to provide paid sick days or abolish the carriers’ punitive attendance regimes. A last-minute agreement brokered at the White House adopted this pro-company framework as the final RLA cooling-off period was expiring. Even after the RLA’s restrictions had been exhausted, the unions kept workers on the job. 

*****

Workers rebelled. The Railroad Workers Rank-and-File Committee (RWRFC) was founded in September 2022 in collaboration with the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC). It organized informational pickets, online meetings involving hundreds of railroaders and a nationwide campaign for strike action and rank-and-file control. The White House-backed agreement was rejected by SMART-TD conductors and yardmen and by workers in three other unions. The union bureaucracies staggered ballots and repeatedly extended strike deadlines, buying time for the state to intervene. At Biden’s request, Congress passed and Biden signed legislation imposing the rejected contract and blocking a national strike.

The near-unanimous strike votes at CSX show that rank-and-file railroad workers are still determined to fight. But that determination must be directed against the entire framework of “labor control” on the railroads, in which the union bureaucracy is acting as the company police. What is required is the development of rank-and-file committees, linked through the RWRFC across carriers and crafts, to transfer decision-making power to workers themselves, prepare collective action and mobilize the broadest support throughout the working class. 

5. Germany’s armed forces doubles size of homeland security division: War abroad, military state at home

The expansion to well over 10,000 soldiers serves the preparation of a comprehensive NATO war against Russia, whilst simultaneously creating an armed structure for the deployment of the Bundeswehr against domestic opposition.

6. Andy Burnham’s cabinet of austerity and war

Incoming UK Prime Minister Burnham’s declaration that his was a “cost-of-living government” amounted to a pledge to scrap VAT sales tax on domestic electricity, saving a typical household just £45 annually, or 86 pence a week. Even this provoked a right-wing media backlash.

7. Petro and De la Espriella use Colombia's Independence Day to promote military

Colombia's July 20 Independence Day, marking 216 years since the break from Spanish colonial rule, became the occasion this week for both outgoing President Gustavo Petro and President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella to place the armed forces at the center of the country's political life.

Beneath their apparently opposed postures—Petro's invocation of a “people's army” and de la Espriella's promise of restored “authority”—both pointed to the same institution as the ultimate guarantor of the existing social order: an armed force built, financed and trained by US imperialism since the 1960s and vastly expanded under Plan Colombia to suppress social opposition and defend the interests of capital.

 *****

The convergence around the military was reinforced by the rest of the political establishment. The Senate-appointed attorney general, Gregorio Eljach, confirmed De la Espriella could be sworn in at a military garrison if Congress approves, while Senate president Lidio García said conditions were favorable for such approval.

De la Espriella's transition team had already convened its own cabinet of designated ministers in Barranquilla, weeks before taking office. Petro responded to such an affront to his term by insisting his government retains full authority until the transfer of powers on August 7.

Petro, however, has confirmed that he will not attend the inauguration, tying his absence to allegations of an 848,000-vote fraud carried out through the Colombian consulate in Los Angeles, allegedly orchestrated with the Israeli private intelligence firm Black Cube. Colombia's own intelligence services and independent election monitors have found no evidence substantiating these claims.

*****

Petro has also alleged, also contradicted by the intelligence agencies, that a whistleblower was targeted through a hacked electric vehicle. Despite these still unclear claims of fraud, it is a matter of public knowledge that the Trump administration violated Colombian sovereignty by intervening openly and endorsing repeatedly De la Espriella over Petro’s candidate, Senator Iván Cepeda.

Facing what he calls attempts to jail him, Petro has called for a “permanent national strike” to defend labor gains, declaring: “I am not waiting for the next election; the opposition is exercised from the streets.” This is not a call to independent working-class action but a sign that Petro intends to use the threat of unrest as leverage within the existing bourgeois order, offering his services to contain and channel opposition into safe channels—a capitulation, in advance, to the reactionary administration set to succeed him.

8. Peru’s president-elect Keiko Fujimori calls for mega-prisons modeled on Bukele's CECOT

Far-right Popular Renewal (Renovación Popular) party leader and former presidential candidate Rafael López Aliaga has confirmed that president-elect Keiko Fujimori intends to apply El Salvador’s prison model in Peru through the construction of five mega-prisons. “She told me: ‘Rafael, I’m going to use the Bukele method. In El Salvador it took eight months. I’ll do it in seven,’” López Aliaga recounted to RPP on July 17. 

*****

The right-wing parties have celebrated Fujimori’s ascent as extending the Trump-Monroe Doctrine policy of asserting near-absolute US domination over South America. The aim: expel Chinese influence, deliver vast lithium and rare mineral reserves to US imperialism, and secure Pacific coast territory for attacks against Washington’s strategic rival [China]. This project is already underway: Ecuador plans to host two US bases; Washington will invest $1.5 billion to modernize the Callao naval base, 60 kilometers from the Chinese-owned Chancay mega-port; and Javier Milei has agreed to finance an Integrated Naval Base in Ushuaia.

Fujimori’s anti-crime credentials are nonexistent. Since 2016 she has run Peru from a corrupt Congress, forming pro-business alliances and toppling several presidents. She was at the center of an illegal fundraising operation channeling Odebrecht money through elite gatherings known as “the cocktail parties.” She was jailed twice during investigations and has promoted laws shielding extortion mafias and their accomplices in Congress, the police, and prosecutors’ offices.

The real question is what definition of “criminality” Fujimori will deploy to fill her prisons. She will not touch the corrupt networks tied to her own political machine. The target will be the militarization of working-class neighborhoods, not for the purpose of suppressing the extortionist mafias that have killed over 70 public transportation drivers in Lima and Callao this year, but rather to drown in blood any social opposition to the austerity and repression her government is preparing. Three out of four residents of Greater Lima—population 10.13 million—live in neighborhoods under mafia control. 

*****

Keiko Fujimori’s pledge to impose El Salvador’s prison model in Peru requires a clear-eyed understanding of what that model entails.

The CECOT (Terrorism Confinement Center), the world’s largest prison with a 40,000-inmate capacity, operates as a concentration camp. Prisoners are held in windowless cells under constant artificial light, deprived of sleep, water and basic necessities. Testimonies document systematic beatings, humiliations and sexual assaults. Hunger strikes are violently suppressed; some detainees resorted to “blood strikes” and were ignored. The government has threatened inmates with starvation.

Fully 1.9 percent of El Salvador’s population is imprisoned—equivalent to 650,000 Peruvians. The NGO Socorro Jurídico Humanitario documented 517 prisoner deaths during the state of exception: nine out of ten them were never convicted of any crime. One third died from violence or torture. Internal intelligence documents reveal that 36 percent of detainees had no prior criminal record.

The CECOT is directly intertwined with Washington’s immigration policy. The Trump administration deported hundreds of migrants to the CECOT without due process.

The regime rests on the annihilation of due process: mass hearings of up to 500 defendants, warrantless arrests including of children as young as 12, 45-year sentences, and suspension of press freedoms. Far from combating the causes of violence—extreme inequality and decades of imperialist intervention—the CECOT is the centerpiece of an authoritarian regime applauded by Washington, ultimately directed against the Salvadoran working class. 

*****

For years, the Peruvian press has stoked xenophobia against Venezuelans, plastering them on front pages whenever a crime is committed. The reality is that the vast majority are hardworking people who found a welcoming country, married and raised families. The Peruvian CECOT, in the hands of a president who is herself a criminal, will be an instrument for carrying out a witch hunt and pitting the working class against one another along national lines. There is no chance she will jail her cronies who accompanied her through a decade of congressional corruption. 

Since the 1993 Fujimorista Constitution, job security in Peru has been destroyed and trade unions decimated. Today, seventeen family clans hold a combined fortune of $35 billion—equal to the earnings of 9.5 million informal workers in Micro and Small Enterprises, which constitute 48 percent of the workforce.

*****

President Keiko Fujimori will use the Peruvian CECOT to imprison, torture and murder any opposition to her plans to satisfy national and foreign capital. The working class cannot place the slightest confidence in any faction of the Peruvian bourgeoisie. From Fujimori’s Fuerza Popular to the pseudo-left pretenders, all are united in subservience to US imperialism and the billionaire clans. The mega-prisons are not an aberration of Peruvian democracy—they are its logical culmination. The same ruling class that destroyed job security, starved public services and handed the country’s resources to foreign capital will now construct concentration camps to crush the inevitable resistance of the exploited masses.

The struggle against fascist prisons and imperialist war can only be waged under the banner of world socialist revolution. This requires the building of sections of the International Committee of the Fourth International in Peru and across Latin America. 

9. Deadly storms strike central Chile: A political and social indictment of capitalism

The social character of this disaster is unmistakable. The hills of Valparaíso are areas where drainage is inadequate, where informal and semi-formal housing predominates, where the terrain is steep and the risk of landslides endemic. The storm activated at least 12 sites identified as potential landslide zones in Valparaíso alone, involving 600 families. Meanwhile, the wealthy have never suffered flooding. This is not an accident of geography but a product of the capitalist organization of urban space. The same families evacuated from the Ribera del Río camp in Talagante, the same communities in Quilpué still recovering from the massive wildfire of 2024, are paying the highest price for a precariousness that did not begin with the rain. 

*****

The same institutional framework that allowed water rights to be privatized and hoarded during the drought is the framework that prevents the state from capturing and storing excess water now. The two phenomena, the drought crisis and the flood crisis, are products of the same failure to assert public control over an indispensable resource that was privatized under a dictatorship and never reclaimed. 

At the root of this failure lies the 1981 Water Code, one of the most radical experiments in water commodification ever attempted, imposed by the Pinochet dictatorship and enshrined in the 1980 Constitution. Under this code, water rights were transformed from state concessions into fully private property, separated from land title, granted in perpetuity, and subject to no beneficial use requirement.

Rights could be hoarded indefinitely by mining companies, agribusiness and hydroelectric firms. The result has been the creation of what are known in Chile as “Zones of Sacrifice.” Entire communities, such as Petorca in Valparaíso, where avocado plantations holding legally valid water rights accumulated over decades effectively dried out the population’s access to water.

Gabriel Boric’s 2022 reform, Law 21.435, was touted as a breakthrough: it declared access to drinking water a human right, established a hierarchy prioritizing human consumption, and introduced time-limited concessions for new rights.

But the Constitutional Court struck down the provision that would have imposed forfeiture on existing rights for non-use, declaring it a violation of constitutionally protected property rights. The vast accumulated stock of water rights (80 percent of which are controlled by corporate interests in agribusiness, mining and energy) remains untouched. The constitutional lock installed by the dictatorship held firm, as it was designed to do.

*****

No faith can be placed in the fascistic Kast government to address this crisis. Kast, the son of a Wehrmacht Nazi officer, came to power heading a “government of emergency” committed to deepening the very free-market policies that produced this catastrophe: corporate tax cuts, public sector austerity, deregulation and the defense of private property at all costs. His administration has already slashed health and education budgets, militarized schools and criminalized migrants. It is utterly indifferent to the suffering of the masses.

Nor can any faith be placed in the Chilean “left,” the Socialist Party, the Stalinist Communist Party, the Broad Front, which under Boric erected the most expansive police state since the return to civilian rule, defended capitalist property relations and normalized relations with the defenders of Pinochet. It was these very parties that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, used a State of Exception to regiment the country through curfews and military deployment, demonstrating that the “left” is as committed as the right to the defense of bourgeois order.

The working class and communities must establish their own rank-and-file committees to begin the reorganization of society to meet social needs. The resources and scientific know-how exist to carry out this work. What is lacking is not technical capacity but political power.

Chilean workers have the historic experience of the Cordones Industriales, the rank-and-file industrial and neighborhood organs established in 1972-73, in the midst of a putschist attempt by the ruling class to destabilize the country. Amid a profound crisis, these bodies set themselves the task of running production, distributing goods and services and defending the needs of their class.

That experience, written in blood by the heroic Chilean proletariat, points the way forward. The task of securing the conditions for the socialist planning of the world’s economic resources and the reorganization of society on a rational basis falls on the shoulders of the international working class, which must first wrest power from the bourgeoisie and overthrow its state, ending the subordination of economic life to private profit and the division of the world into rival nation-states.

10. Australia: Staff and students oppose sellout union deals at Western Sydney University

The resolution passed at yesterday’s lunchtime meeting was part of the campaign for a No Vote by all WSU staff members on the regressive enterprise agreements that management and the two campus trade unions are trying to rush through.

11. Autoworkers denounce threat by UAW official against rank-and-file presidential candidate Will Lehman

Will Lehman and a Stellantis Truck Worker

Autoworkers, retirees and other workers have issued statements demanding immediate action against the United Auto Workers official who issued a death threat against Will Lehman, the Mack Trucks worker and socialist candidate for UAW president.

Raymond Jensen Jr., an organizer for UAW Region 9 whose Facebook profile carries an “I Support Shawn Fain” campaign badge, posted an AI-generated image on Lehman’s public Facebook page last week showing the candidate bound and gagged, blood running from his mouth, with a masked gunman training an automatic rifle on his back. According to the UAW, Jensen was paid $202,000 in salary and other expenses last year. As of this writing, neither Fain nor any officer of the UAW International Executive Board has repudiated the threat, and Jensen remains on the union’s payroll.

Lehman has denounced the threat as an attempt to intimidate the growing rank-and-file opposition his campaign is giving voice to. In a letter to the legal counsel of the court-appointed monitor overseeing the UAW, Lehman’s attorney Eric Lee demanded: an immediate investigation, Jensen’s suspension without pay, a public repudiation by the union and referral of the matter to the Department of Labor and federal law enforcement.

*****

Thomas Adams, a retired GM worker and author of UAW, Inc., an investigation of the corporatist degeneration of the UAW, condemned the death threat and pointed to the significance of the region Jensen works for: “I find it interesting that Raymond Jensen Jr. is from Region 9. In my 2019 essay, ‘Tale of Corruption by the United Auto Workers and the Big Three American Automakers,’ I discuss a nonprofit corporation called the UAW Region 9 New York Training Initiative tasked with training Perry’s Ice Cream workers.

“The UAW leadership learned that they could establish these training centers funded by state training money—in this case, the New York State Department of Labor. New York State was funding the Perry’s Ice Cream training fund to the tune of $579,463. It speaks for itself. It had FBI agents laughing that ‘127 ice cream makers were the best trained ice cream makers in the history of making ice cream.’

“The Administration Caucus is like an overarching fatal disease that’s infected the labor movement, not just the UAW. I call for a full and open investigation of these threats and a public statement defending the right of Brother Lehman to campaign.”

Lyle Roussey, a retired Michigan autoworker, pointed to the responsibility of the UAW monitor, installed after the federal corruption prosecutions that sent more than a dozen union officials, including two former UAW presidents, to prison for embezzling union dues and taking corporate bribes. “Isn’t it the monitor’s duty during an election cycle to assure honesty and integrity of the union election? So if it is, it’s time for them to take action against this horrendous display from the UAW leaders.” 

Far from intimidating and isolating Lehman, the threat has provoked anger from rank-and-file workers and growing support for his campaign to abolish the corrupt UAW apparatus and transfer power to workers on the shop floor through the building of rank-and-file committees independent of the union bureaucracy. 

*****

A Warren Truck worker told the [WSWS reporting] team anyone responsible for the threat “should be in prison along with Shawn Fain too. Come on, you don’t go on and threaten people.”

Asked what he thought about Will’s call for power to be transferred from the UAW apparatus to the workers on the shop floor, he said, “That would be better. We have enough problems trying to get the union to fight for us or do anything.” As an example, he pointed to the smoke in the factories due to the Canadian wildfires. “The smoke days were real bad. They gave us masks, but they were only made for dust. They aren’t made for any kind of chemicals or fires. You need a respirator, and if you don’t have that forget about it, those dust masks do nothing. The factories should have shut down. Even the news said you need to stay in your house, don’t leave.”

A fuller account of the exchanges is available on Lehman’s campaign website willforuawpresident.org. Lehman’s campaign has urged workers to demand that the UAW publicly repudiate the threat by writing to feedback@uaw.org, with copies to info@willforuawpresident.org.

12. Mexican father killed by tractor-trailer while fleeing ICE operation in Florida

The man struck and killed by a tractor-trailer on July 14 while fleeing federal immigration officers in St. Augustine, Florida has been identified as Juan Jairo Coronilla Durán, a 28-year-old husband and father from Mexico.

Coronilla Durán, a native of San Luis de la Paz in the central Mexican state of Guanajuato, had legally entered the United States three weeks earlier on a valid tourist visa. Isaret Jeffers, a spokesperson for the farmworker advocacy group Colectivo Árbol, told the Miami Herald that Coronilla Durán had already made arrangements to return home. He had been in Florida for only two days and had already purchased a plane ticket to return to Mexico the following Saturday.

“He had already bought a flight,” Jeffers said. “Now, unfortunately, if he is returning, his return is different.”

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has refused to say whether Coronilla Durán was the target of its kidnapping operation. In repeated statements, the agency has said only that its agents “conducted an operation near St. Johns, Florida” and that the Florida Highway Patrol and Homeland Security Investigations were investigating “an incident resulting in the death of a Mexican national.”

Colectivo Árbol is assisting Coronilla Durán’s wife, Yésica Alamilla López, with returning her husband’s remains to Mexico. The couple had been married for 10 years and owned a small business together in San Luis de la Paz. They had two children, ages 7 years and 7 months.

According to Jeffers, Alamilla López learned that her husband had been killed while watching television. 

*****

Coronilla Durán’s death was the direct and entirely predictable product of the Trump administration’s mass deportation operation. More than a week later, the Department of Homeland Security has refused to identify the agents involved, explain why they were chasing someone who was legally present in the United States, or even disclose whether Coronilla Durán was the intended target.

He was at least the third immigrant father to die within eight days during violent operations conducted by the immigration Gestapo. 

*****

Appearing on television Monday, Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan declared that those killed during immigration operations had brought about their own deaths by refusing to submit unconditionally to armed and masked federal agents.

“You can attack the men and women of ICE all you want,” Homan said. “It comes down to one simple fact: These people failed to comply with law enforcement.”

Homan ignored the fact that Salgado Araujo, Durán Guerrero and Coronilla Durán were not identified as the targets of the operations in which they were killed. Nor were they given any opportunity to “comply” with law enforcement, who did not identify themselves and aggressively attacked the men. 

*****

Homan’s defense of police state executions means that any person confronted by masked agents in an unmarked vehicle must instantly submit or accept death as the legitimate punishment.

His cynical invocation of the courts came as the administration was using the same judicial system to intimidate and imprison workers and opponents of ICE. 

*****

Alongside the mass prosecution of anti-ICE protesters, the Trump administration is attempting to activate a secretive court created to deport alleged “alien terrorists.”

The Justice Department last week filed the first application in the 30-year history of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court. Established by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, the five-judge body had never previously received an application or heard a case.

The identity of the person targeted remains secret because the application was filed under seal. Chief Judge Joan Ericksen ordered the government to provide additional information after questioning whether it had established the required connection between the unnamed person’s conduct and the statutory provisions cited in its application.

Under the law, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump’s former personal lawyer and political hatchet man, can seek the removal of a noncitizen accused of involvement in “terrorist activity.” Proceedings may rely on secret evidence withheld from the targeted person and the public.

The activation of this court is an ominous development. The administration is systematically expanding the label “terrorist” to encompass socialist, anti-capitalist, antiwar and other left-wing opposition. 

*****

Alongside the mass prosecution of anti-ICE protesters, the Trump administration is attempting to activate a secretive court created to deport alleged “alien terrorists.”

The Justice Department last week filed the first application in the 30-year history of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court. Established by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, the five-judge body had never previously received an application or heard a case.

The identity of the person targeted remains secret because the application was filed under seal. Chief Judge Joan Ericksen ordered the government to provide additional information after questioning whether it had established the required connection between the unnamed person’s conduct and the statutory provisions cited in its application.

Under the law, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump’s former personal lawyer and political hatchet man, can seek the removal of a noncitizen accused of involvement in “terrorist activity.” Proceedings may rely on secret evidence withheld from the targeted person and the public.

The activation of this court is an ominous development. The administration is systematically expanding the label “terrorist” to encompass socialist, anti-capitalist, antiwar and other left-wing opposition.

At a State Department summit last Thursday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller delivered fascistic speeches portraying left-wing opposition as an enemy of civilization that must be destroyed. 

Days later, Rubio’s State Department issued a 100-page McCarthyite report portraying Cuba as the center of a worldwide “anti-American” conspiracy. The document seeks to attribute virtually every expression of anti-capitalist, antiwar and anti-police sentiment in the United States and internationally to foreign subversion.

The simultaneous activation of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, mass prosecution of anti-ICE protesters and execution of immigrant workers is not accidental. These measures are interconnected components of the Trump administration’s erection of a presidential dictatorship and criminalization of all opposition from the working class and the left.

13. US cyclosporiasis lettuce recall expands to 27 states as Taylor Farms dictates response

Over the weekend, the recall of iceberg lettuce linked to the worst cyclosporiasis outbreak in US history expanded to 27 states, reaching grocery shelves and the national foodservice chain. What Taylor Farms had described on Thursday as a limited “voluntary withdrawal” of lettuce from a single farm responsible for “less than 1%” of US iceberg lettuce supply had, by Sunday, become a formal, nationwide recall, and the corporation, not the government, was setting the terms of the response.

The outbreak has not slowed. Michigan, its epicenter, reported 6,571 cases as of Tuesday, up more than 1,500 since Friday and roughly four times the 1,645 laboratory-confirmed cases the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has processed nationally across 34 states. The federal count has barely moved in four days, even as more than 5,100 illnesses await analysis. The gap is a measure of the gutted federal surveillance that allowed the outbreak to spread undetected for seven weeks. So far, Michigan has reported 102 hospitalizations and no deaths.

On Thursday, Taylor Farms had described only a voluntary withdrawal of iceberg lettuce grown in central Mexico, a negligible share of supply by its own account. The recall it announced Friday and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) posted Saturday tells a different story. It covers lettuce distributed from June 29 to July 16 across 27 states, reaching Walmart shelves as Marketside-brand bagged and shredded lettuce, Jack in the Box restaurants, and institutions nationwide through foodservice distributors. The contaminated lettuce had not been confined to a handful of Taco Bell outlets. It had spread across the country.

Taylor Farms is one of the largest fresh-produce companies in the world. Founded in 1995 by Bruce Taylor, a third-generation grower in Salinas, California, it reports $7 billion in annual revenue and more than 25,000 employees, and by its own account makes two of every five ready-to-eat salads sold in the United States. It has been responsible for numerous prior outbreaks. In 2013, the FDA traced cyclosporiasis in Iowa and Nebraska to salad mix from its Mexican subsidiary, sickening 631 people across 25 states, and the company insisted then, as it does now, that grocery packages were not involved. In October 2024, onions it supplied to McDonald’s caused an E. coli outbreak that killed one person and sickened more than 100—no charges were brought.

The federal investigation into the outbreak, meanwhile, has produced a fiasco. On Saturday, July 18, the FDA announced that a sample of Taylor Farms de Mexico shredded iceberg lettuce, collected at the border, had tested positive for Cyclospora and that the lot had been detained. One day later the agency reversed itself, calling the result a false positive that “does not represent true amplification,” removing it from its record and, the company said, apologizing to Taylor Farms. As of July 19 there was no confirmed positive product test of any kind.

The reversal came while Taylor Farms was publicly disputing the finding, insisting the FDA had “made a mistake.” The company had direct access to the officials running the investigation. On July 16, two days before the positive result was even announced, its executives met with White House and FDA officials, by their own account to press concerns about the agencies’ handling of the outbreak.

The FDA attributed the correction to a laboratory re-review, and there is no direct evidence that the company influenced it. But a regulator that abandons its one incriminating result within a day, and then apologizes to the firm under investigation, has effectively granted that firm authority over the inquiry it should never have. Whether the reversal was sound or the product of corporate pressure, the government could not hold a single hard finding against the company for 24 hours.

*****

Examining the more basic question of how human excrement reached the food of thousands in the first place leads to an indictment of the whole system of food production under capitalism. Cyclospora completes its life cycle only in the human gut; decades of research have found no other reservoir. It can only reach a bag of salad through human feces, either carried on the inadequately washed hands of the workers who pick and pack produce, or in the water used to irrigate and wash it. That so many fell ill at once means human waste entered the food supply on a “surprising scale,” Matthew Moore, a food safety microbiologist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, told the New York Times, and points to contaminated water as the most likely route. 

***** 

The source of that contamination lies in the conditions imposed on agricultural workers in Mexico and Central America, as well as largely immigrant workers in California, Arizona and Florida alike. Farmworkers are routinely denied clean water, working toilets, handwashing and any paid leave that would let them stay home sick. Their housing is often served by failing septic systems, and irrigation water runs past latrines and sewage. Under such conditions one sick worker becomes many, and their waste reaches the produce and the water at scale. The parasite in the lettuce is a biological measure of how the workers who grow the world’s food are forced to live.

None of this is new. Cyclosporiasis has returned nearly every summer for three decades, from the raspberries grown in Guatemala that caused the outbreaks of the 1990s to the bagged salads that cause them now, because the conditions that produce it have never been improved. What has changed is the pace of the decline in working conditions and the collapse of public health surveillance.

*****

The Trump administration has gutted the agencies that once tracked the parasite, dissolving the CDC division responsible for it and cutting foodborne-disease surveillance to a skeleton, while extracting not a single penalty from the corporations. This is the acceleration of a decades-long, bipartisan assault on public health, which only deepened after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

14.  Australia: Educators form rank-and-file committee in Victoria amid rejection of sellout deal, mass strike tomorrow

Public school educators across Victoria will hold their second full-day strike of the year tomorrow, after rejecting the latest sellout enterprise agreement pushed by the Victorian Labor government and the Australian Education Union (AEU) bureaucracy. 

Despite the attempts of the AEU leadership to stampede teachers into endorsing a deal that would lock in stagnant pay and do nothing to address soaring workloads, educators voted by 51.18 percent, in a ballot that concluded yesterday, to reject the agreement and proceed with strike action. This is the second mass repudiation of the sellout in several months.  

Teachers have made clear their determination to fight, but are continually coming up against an AEU bureaucracy that works as an arm of the big business Labor government, against the interests of educators.

It was in this context that a meeting of Victorian teachers and staff was convened by the Committee for Public Education (CFPE) on Saturday. The gathering resolved to form a statewide Educators Rank-and-File Committee, completely independent of and opposed to the AEU bureaucracy. 

15. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.

Jul 21, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. Oppose the death threat against UAW presidential candidate Will Lehman!

Target of a corrupt UAW bureaucracy: Will Lehman, autoworker, socialist, and candidate for the presidency of the UAW

On July 16, Raymond L. Jensen Jr., a high-ranking official of the United Auto Workers, posted a death threat against Will Lehman, the socialist Mack Trucks worker and candidate for UAW president. The threat was an AI-generated image posted on Lehman’s public Facebook campaign page depicting Lehman bound with rope and gagged, blood running from his mouth, with a masked man aiming an automatic rifle at his back.

The International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC) calls on workers and all defenders of democratic rights to denounce this incitement to violence against Will Lehman and demand its unequivocal public repudiation by the UAW.

Jensen’s threatening post cannot be brushed aside as the act of a deranged individual acting on his own. Jensen is an organizer on the staff of the UAW. Until recently he was the assistant director of UAW Region 9, the region to which Lehman belongs. He was paid approximately $202,000 in total compensation in 2025, according to the union’s LM-2 filings with the US Labor Department. He is a prominent supporter of UAW President Shawn Fain, and his Facebook profile displays an “I Support Shawn Fain” campaign badge.  

Lehman is an officially certified candidate for UAW president, nominated on June 18 at the union’s 39th Constitutional Convention in Detroit. He is campaigning on a platform calling for the abolition of the union bureaucracy, the building of rank-and-file committees in every plant and the transfer of power to workers on the shop floor. In the last election, in 2022, Lehman received nearly 5,000 votes, despite the fact that turnout was systematically suppressed by the apparatus and barely 10 percent of the UAW membership voted. 

On Friday, Lehman’s attorney Eric Lee sent a letter to the court-appointed UAW Monitor’s office demanding a full investigation. It states:

When a highly paid functionary of the incumbent administration, publicly identified with the president’s re-election campaign, posts an image of the opposition candidate gagged, bleeding, and under the gun, the message transmitted to the UAW membership is unmistakable: extreme violence against Will Lehman is encouraged and enjoys the sanction of the union leadership.

Under federal law, such a posting is a crime. Transmitting a threat to injure another person over the internet is a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), punishable by up to five years in prison, and threats of violence are likewise criminal offenses under state law. In addition, 29 U.S.C. § 530 makes it a federal crime to use or threaten force or violence to restrain, coerce or intimidate a union member for the purpose of interfering with their rights.

On Sunday, Lehman responded with a statement warning that if a threat of this character can be made openly against a candidate for the union’s highest office, “then no worker who challenges the bureaucracy in their own local is safe.”

The threat is part of a pattern. Less than one month ago, the federal Monitor, Neil Barofsky, found that Fain “inappropriately used the powers of his office” in an “abuse of his authority,” documenting a “recurring pattern of retaliation,” including the removal of Vice President Rich Boyer on charges Fain “knew were false when he made them.” A federal grand jury is now investigating Fain.

The Monitor has also found that the leadership perpetrated a “toxic climate of retribution” and that Fain personally threatened to “slit” the “throats” of anyone who “messed” with his inner circle.

The long history of violence directed by union bureaucracies against rank-and-file opposition is well known. As for the UAW, the Monitor’s office itself exists only because of the apparatus’s record of criminality. It was installed under a consent decree with the federal government in 2021, following a corruption investigation that sent more than a dozen union officials to prison—including two former UAW international presidents—for embezzlement, kickbacks and the taking of bribes from the auto companies.

The IWA-RFC endorses the demands advanced in Lehman’s statement:

  1. A full investigation of the posting, encompassing not only Jensen’s conduct but the knowledge, encouragement or acquiescence of the UAW leadership.
  2. A public repudiation of the threat by the UAW in the strongest possible terms, a formal apology to Lehman, and an unequivocal public declaration—circulated to the entire membership—that the union recognizes and fully supports Lehman’s right to conduct his campaign.
  3. An immediate public statement by the Monitor’s office warning that such threats will not be tolerated and announcing that an investigation has been initiated.
  4. The immediate suspension of Jensen from his position without pay, pending completion of the investigation, with all appropriate legal and disciplinary sanctions to follow.
  5. Referral of the matter to the Department of Labor and, as warranted, to federal law enforcement.
  6. Affirmative measures to guarantee that the remainder of the 2026 election is conducted free of intimidation.

The IWA-RFC calls on UAW members and workers in every industry, in the US and internationally, to take up the defense of Lehman as their own cause. As Lehman stated: “This threat is not aimed at me alone. It is an act of intimidation directed against the entire rank-and-file opposition.”

The IWA-RFC also calls on all left-wing and progressive organizations to categorically denounce this threat.

Register your opposition to this incitement to violence! Email the UAW at feedback@uaw.org to demand that it publicly repudiate the threat against Lehman, with a copy to the Will Lehman campaign at info@willforuawpresident.org.

2. Former Trump envoy calls for ground invasion of Iran as US losses mount

The rapid escalation of the Iran war, and the mounting death toll for US troops, have triggered a crisis for the administration, which faces the failure of its goals of overthrowing the Iranian government, breaking the power of its military and securing American domination of the Strait of Hormuz.

 In the face of this deepening crisis, the administration is moving more openly toward the deployment of ground troops, and retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, who served as Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine until the end of last year, publicly called for a ground invasion.

***** 

Only on Monday, after days of refusal, did the Pentagon acknowledge the scale of its losses: nearly 100 soldiers wounded since July 7. Sean Parnell, the chief Pentagon spokesman, said the “vast majority” of the injuries were “mild concussions” and that 96 percent of the wounded have returned to duty. The New York Times reported Monday that in the week before the fatal attack, Iran struck US forces in Jordan three more times, wounding dozens of soldiers and damaging helicopters—strikes the Pentagon never disclosed.

The Pentagon’s public casualty database, static for days at 14 dead and 427 wounded, was quietly updated Monday evening to 18 dead and 447 wounded, the Washington Post reported. The Pentagon has not held a press briefing on the war since early May. “Claims of concealment are fabrications meant to further distress the American people,” Parnell said.

*****

A Journal investigation published in late June documented the damage at one base. Iranian missiles and drones, striking repeatedly between late February and June, devastated Naval Support Activity Bahrain, the base from which the U.S. Navy has run its Middle East operations for over 30 years.

The Fifth Fleet’s headquarters building, whose construction cost the Journal put at $200 million, can no longer be used, according to a US official. A dozen or more other buildings were struck, two satellite communications terminals were knocked out, and the Navy evacuated most of the base’s staff. The Pentagon has never publicly acknowledged the damage.

*****

At least 20 American military and diplomatic sites had been hit by late June, the Journal reported, in the course of the war that began February 28. Iranian attacks smashed structures at Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, damaged Al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates and destroyed E-3 Sentry radar planes at Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia.

The Journal reported in June that US officials said the military was weighing a retreat from its exposed positions: pulling back from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, shifting bases and command functions westward out of missile range, burying command posts underground and stationing American forces in Israel.

The Pentagon has refused to tell Congress what the damage costs. Asked at a May hearing for an estimate, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth replied: “What is the cost of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon?” Jay Hurst, the Pentagon comptroller, said in congressional testimony in May that the department’s war-cost estimate—then $29 billion—left out the damage to American bases. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), in a June report, put the war’s total cost at about $40 billion, including $2.2 billion to $5.1 billion in damage to bases.

3. United States: Kaiser Permanente implementing invasive AI surveillance of advice hotline nurses

An investigation published July 9 by CalMatters documented call monitoring, predictive productivity software and monthly performance scores used on Kaiser Permanente advice nurses in California. Interviews with seven current and former nurses found that staff are questioned about calls lasting more than 15 minutes and receive monthly scores tracking their speed and activity. Software also records active and inactive time and attempts to predict whether nurses are unproductive or answering too slowly. 

*****

Nurses said the time allowed after calls has fallen from about 10 minutes to 30 seconds or less when lines are busy; extra time requires a manager’s permission. In 2024, Kaiser also piloted software that graded tone and apparent empathy in the voices of nurses and patients. One nurse said the program repeatedly scored calls incorrectly. Nurses petitioned against it, and Kaiser suspended the pilot in November, but they were told it could return. Kaiser declined to say whether patients knew their voices were being assessed. Charlotte Capulong, a 22-year call center veteran, told CalMatters: “You aren’t calling Comcast. We’re dealing with life here.” 

Kaiser denied using average handling time to evaluate nurses or enforce call-time targets. It said its contact-center tools support quality assurance and are subject to human review. But the company did not explain why nurses are questioned about calls exceeding 15 minutes or why call time appears in the scores they described.

Management’s ability to impose these technologies depends on the trade union bureaucracy suppressing resistance and accepting contracts that preserve management’s authority. The nurses interviewed by CalMatters belong to the California Nurses Association (CNA), which represents 25,000 Kaiser nurses, including about 1,000 in call centers, and has historically remained outside Kaiser’s infamous Labor Management Partnership (LMP). But CNA begins contract talks this month, and its existing contract contains few limits on new technology outside of requiring notice, which even the union says Kaiser has not always provided.

***** 

Workers’ control would require enforceable provisions: Call-time and activity metrics could not be used for discipline; nurses would determine adequate documentation and recovery time; workers would have access to system data and validation results; deployments would require approval by those affected; and clinical staff could override software recommendations without penalty. Staffing minimums would be based on patient need and could not be reduced on the promise of technological savings.

Technology can reduce repetitive documentation, but Kaiser has shown why this cannot substitute for staffing. It cut post-call time to as little as 30 seconds and filled the interval with another patient. Without control of workload, time saved in one task becomes the basis for imposing another. Automation cannot be presented as an alternative to hiring enough nurses.

Rank and file committees independent of the union bureaucracy are needed to investigate systems already in use and unite workers across Kaiser’s bargaining units around these demands. Decisions over staffing, budgets and technology ultimately require public ownership and democratic control of the healthcare system.

4. Hundreds protest ICE murder of Lorenzo Salgado as Trump escalates conspiracy against democratic rights

Hundreds of workers, young people and immigrant families rallied Sunday at Ervan Chew Park in Houston to demand justice for Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, the 52-year-old construction worker and father of three killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent on July 7. Salgado’s sons addressed the crowd, which later marched onto the Hazard Street bridge.

On Monday, an attorney for Salgado’s brother, Victor, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking his release from ICE custody. Victor was inside the work van when his brother was shot. He and two other witnesses, Daniel Tirado Pantoja and José Trinidad Rojas, remain imprisoned at the Montgomery ICE Processing Center in Conroe and could be deported, the evident purpose being to prevent them from contradicting the government’s account of Salgado’s murder. The agent who killed Salgado has not been publicly identified, arrested or charged.

The witnesses say the agents did not identify themselves and none was standing in front of the van when the officer fired. DHS initially claimed Salgado used the van as a weapon and struck a government vehicle. That claim was absent from a statement Thursday by US Attorney Aaron Reitz. Reitz said the officer was beside or partly inside the van, no agent was injured and Salgado was not the target of the operation.

In a transparent attempt at smearing him after the fact, the FBI later filed an affidavit as part of a search warrant of Salgado’s van referring to a “white crystalline substance” in the vehicle, although there was no laboratory result or drug charge. The family’s attorney said it was granulated salt commonly used by construction workers to replace electrolytes.

Six days after Salgado’s death, ICE officer David Brouillette killed Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a young father and worker in Biddeford, Maine, although Guerrero was not the intended target. Subsequent reports revealed that Brouillette had a documented history of domestic abuse allegations, violent threats, erratic behavior and suicidal crises. ICE’s decision to arm him exposes the violent and authoritarian forces being recruited and empowered by the agency.

*****

In a nationally televised address on Thursday, July 16, Trump revived false claims that the 2020 election was stolen, demanded the punishment of officials who rejected them, and called for federal restrictions on voter registration, voting and mail ballots. The following day, Mullin threatened to withhold federal funding and impose fines, penalties and even prison terms on state officials who refuse to submit their voter rolls to Department of Homeland Security scrutiny. His threats made clear that the administration is preparing to seize control of the midterm elections and reject any result that does not go Trump’s way.

At a State Department summit that same day, attended by representatives of 66 governments, Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that the counterterrorism apparatus would target socialist, anti-capitalist, anti-war and other left-wing opposition. He called such opposition “enemies of civilization” and vowed to dismantle its networks “brick by brick.” Stephen Miller denounced “leftists” as “deformed,” and said that their appeals to civil liberties to defend themselves against state prosecution must “fall on deaf ears.”

Miller did not name Salgado or Guerrero, but his statement answers demands for independent investigations into their deaths. The administration rejects constitutional rights and restraints on state violence whenever they obstruct its attack on domestic opposition.

Opposition to the ICE murders must therefore be taken up by the working class as part of a broader political movement against dictatorship, uniting immigrant and US-born workers, independently of the Democratic Party, against the raids, state violence and the attack on democratic rights.

5. Australia: Musicals cancelled as inflation and austerity impact ticket sales

A wave of cancellations and shortened tours across Australia’s commercial musical theater sector has exposed a deepening crisis as rising inflation is making large-scale touring productions increasingly unviable. The sector in Australia is not a niche industry: last year it generated $4 billion in economic activity and 30,000 associated jobs. Actors, dancers, musicians and technical crew—numbering in the hundreds across the industry—are now being thrown out of work with little notice and no recourse, and, in some cases, without being paid.  

*****

The immediate trigger of the musical theater cancellations is a drastic fall in ticket sales. Advance bookings, on which commercial producers depend to secure financing and commit to venue contracts, have fallen sharply, impacted by the surging cost of living and government austerity measures.

Industry groups have noted that a family of four attending a musical can easily spend between $500 and $1,000, including tickets and other associated costs. For middle-income earners and especially low-paid workers, hit by years of real wage cuts, rising interest rates, surging rents and escalating prices for electricity, groceries and fuel, these costs are prohibitive.

The present crisis, however, is more than just a fall in ticket sales. It exposes the fundamental instability of the for-profit commercial theatre model. Commercial producers are competing in an exceptionally crowded marketplace. Never before have there been so many large-scale musicals, international tours, concerts, festivals and immersive experiences, all vying for the same pool of ticket buyers. 

*****

Even Broadway is struggling these days. According to a report in the New York Times, none of the 18 commercial musicals that opened last season have made a profit yet and only three of 46 new musicals have received the green light. 

Large-scale musical productions are financed on the expectation of high-ticket prices and extended runs but when ticket sales fall, producers respond not by lowering prices and reaching out to broader audiences but by cancelling altogether, throwing performers and crew members onto the street.

*****

The current downturn in live performance is not limited to the private commercial sector but extends into the state-funded sector. The Melbourne Theatre Company (MTC), Victoria’s state theater company for more than 70 years and a department of the University of Melbourne, recently announced a $3.9 million net deficit for 2025, following a drop in ticket revenue and donations, and a sharp rise in costs.

The reality is that state theaters and training institutions—which provide the commercial theater with the performance skills, technical expertise and, in many cases, venues needed to mount musicals and theatrical blockbusters—are being starved of funds. 

*****

The Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), which covers workers in the industry, has declared that the musical theater cancellations are “completely devastating for everyone involved,” but it has done nothing to defend jobs in the sector. It supports calls for tax reform, while advocating a “cultural pass” that would provide young people with government-funded vouchers to spend on theater tickets—a scheme that would funnel public money into the pockets of commercial producers while leaving the underlying fundamentals untouched.

As the WSWS has documented, the MEAA has functioned for decades as a corporatist instrument of employers and the state, not a defender of its members. Under legislation introduced in the 1990s, the union is directly involved in approving visas for foreign productions—which cannot proceed without MEAA sign-off and payment of consultancy fees—making it a de facto labor hire agency and one that guarantees industrial peace. 

*****

While arts funding is being slashed, the Albanese government is funneling hundreds of billions of dollars into the military as part of the AUKUS pact and the US-led war drive against China. The same imperatives that drive producers to cancel tours and cut jobs compel governments to slash public arts funding: the subordination of every aspect of social life to the dictates of profit and the financial markets.

Musical theater performers and crews must fight to defend every job. This means reaching out to other creative artists and the entire working class through the development of rank-and-file workplace committees. Such organizations must be independent of the MEAA and other trade union bureaucracies and be based on a socialist perspective that rejects the domination of private ownership and profit over the needs of ordinary working people.

6. Refugees expelled from Australia face hunger and violence in Nauru

Two reports have shed further rare light on the inhuman conditions being suffered on the remote impoverished Pacific island of Nauru by asylum seekers and immigration deportees consigned there for indefinite detention by the Australian government.

Under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who once postured cynically as a defender of refugee rights to head off widespread disgust with offshore detention, the Labor government is enforcing one of the most barbaric regimes in the world.

The first report, published yesterday by the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre (ASRC), is based on interviews conducted with 78 refugees whose boats were intercepted militarily before they were forcibly transported to Nauru.

The results provide a glimpse of their plight, which has been largely hidden from public view because most journalists are banned from entering the tiny island state, a former British, Australian and New Zealand colony.

Among the interviewees, 99 percent could not buy enough food with their meager allowances and described routinely exhausting their fortnightly payments, leading to missed meals and periods of hunger. Two-thirds, or 68 percent, rarely or never had access to fresh fruit, vegetables and meat, and 82 percent had no easy access to free, clean drinking water.

*****

One asylum seeker commented: “I’m not even eating a quarter of what I ate before coming to Nauru. I cannot afford fruit or vegetables. I just eat pulses and rice. I skip meals frequently in the second week of my pay cycle. I’ve lost 15kg since arriving on Nauru. People tell me that I have lost weight. My clothes are much looser now than they were on arrival. I feel weak and tired from the lack of food.” 

*****

In another report, based on whistleblower claims that were tabled in the Australian parliament in June, violent threats also come from community monitoring officers (CMOs), tasked with policing the people dumped in Nauru.

Under laws introduced by Nauru’s government in March, CMOs were given powers to restrain, search, and monitor Australian transferees, including the use of “reasonable force.” Failure to comply with instructions by the CMOs risks an imprisonment term of up to two years.

Last month, these laws were amended to extend those powers to be used against all residents of Nauru. That seems to be a bid, instigated by the Australian government, to stymie court challenges by ex-immigration detainees who face being deported to Nauru. Legal arguments have been mounted that the detainees’ selective exposure to CMO powers amounted to unconstitutional punishment.

In addition to consigning refugees to Nauru, the Labor government is trying to remove to Nauru about 350 people whom it had been forced to release from immigration detention facilities in November 2023 as the result of a High Court case known as NZYQ, which ruled indefinite detention to be unconstitutional punishment. 

To help Labor evade the NZYQ ruling, Nauru’s government agreed to place them on 30-year visas in return for an upfront payment exceeding $400 million, plus $70 million a year. The exact terms of this Memorandum of Understanding remain secret.

Holders of these visas have no right to family reunification. More than a third of the NZYQ ex-detainees, 131 individuals, have Australian children, and 63 have an Australian spouse or partner, according to data obtained under freedom of information laws. They face being separated for life.

As of June 4, 12 people had been issued Nauruan visas and deported there, including an individual reliant on a wheelchair. A further 37 people reportedly have been re-detained for deportation to Nauru, with another nine issued visas but not yet detained.

Offshore detention is policed by private contractors such as Management and Training Corporation (MTC), a US prison operator. In 2025, the Albanese government expanded MTC’s Nauru detention contract to approximately $790 million. 

*****

On every continent, the media and political establishments are seeking to whip up anti-immigrant sentiment and nationalism to divide the working class and divert discontent away from the staggering accumulation of wealth by the billionaires and the underlying capitalist profit system itself.

Amid an ongoing cost-of-living and housing crisis, and facing growing working-class disaffection, Labor is trying to scapegoat refugees, immigrants and international students for the deteriorating social conditions, echoing the far-right anti-immigrant One Nation.

To answer this toxic offensive, workers and young people must defend the basic democratic right of people to live and work anywhere, with full social and citizenship rights. This is part of the fight for a global movement of the working class to reorganize society on a socialist basis, for human and social need, not corporate profit.

7. Former Greek Prime Minister and Syriza leader Alexis Tsipras launches new party ELAS

Alexis Tsipras, notorious for his ruthless austerity policy in Greece, is back on the political stage. One year before the next parliamentary elections in 2027, the former Prime Minister and Syriza leader has founded a new party called ELAS (Greek Left Alliance).

Following the announcement on 26 May, Tsipras’ party overtook the previously strongest opposition party, the social-democratic PASOK, in the polls and moved overnight into second place, directly behind the right-wing governing party Nea Dimokratia (ND).

Tsipras’ comeback inevitably calls to mind Karl Marx’s observation that all great world-historical facts and figures occur twice: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce. That the man whose name is linked, like almost no other in Europe, with the deceit and betrayal of the working class is once again standing for election must be understood as a warning.

In his founding declaration, Tsipras calls for a “new patriotism” and “a sovereign, democratic, strong and secure Greece.” He combines this crude nationalist rhetoric with a handful of social phrases about justice and democracy, designed above all to pull the wool over the eyes of young people and workers who are searching for a political alternative to the ND government.

In 2015, more than ten years ago, Tsipras won the elections on a wave of mass protests by promising to end the austerity measures of his predecessors. It took only a few weeks for this pseudo-left standard-bearer to jettison all his social promises and turn them into their opposite. The attacks on social and democratic rights under Tsipras’ stewardship far eclipsed the austerity that had come before. 

*****

Now Tsipras is returning to the scene of his crimes, once again offering himself as capitalism’s savior in a period of deep political and economic crisis. As across Europe, social conditions in Greece are stretched to breaking point. The ND government is engaged in a massive military build-up, while workers, families, pensioners and students can barely make ends meet. Public discontent is above all fueled by the high cost of living, which has risen sharply again with the Iran war. 

*****

The choice of name is no coincidence. ELAS is not only a nationalist allusion to Greece (“Hellas”), but above all a reference to the Greek resistance army ELAS, which, under the leadership of the Stalinist Communist Party, fought Hitler’s Wehrmacht (military) during the Second World War.

Under this new banner, Tsipras is attempting to politically reorganize the same social layers that already formed the base of Syriza—the affluent urban petty bourgeoisie, academics, cultural workers and the self-employed.

*****

Tsipras’ new party is a calculated maneuver to bring the social discontent that has erupted over recent years in large strike and protest movements under control and channel it into nationalist directions. Its program, moreover, does not differ fundamentally from Syriza’s. 

*****

As he did ten years ago, Tsipras presents himself to the world as a shrewder statesman and foreign policy operator. He promises to restore Greece’s “international standing,” weakened by “corruption and lack of credibility,” and to pursue national interests more effectively: “In a period of intense geopolitical upheaval, the country urgently needs a new national compass and an active, multi-layered foreign policy.”

What stands out particularly is the gushing nationalism of ELAS, only perfunctorily disguised by a pro forma critique of right-wing tendencies. The declaration claims that “oligarchies” manipulate social discontent, pit workers and peoples against one another, and foment racism and nationalism. “Neoliberalism,” it adds, embraces “neo-fascism.”

But what is Tsipras’ answer to this fascist danger? Not the mobilization of the working class to overthrow capitalism, which gives rise to war and fascism, but... “the dedication of all to the fatherland”! 

*****

The list of Syriza’s crimes could be extended at length. The experience with Syriza is a strategic lesson for the working class of world-historical significance. It has proved what the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) tirelessly explained from the beginning of Syriza’s rise in 2012: it is impossible to resolve the deep social and political problems confronting society by voting for pseudo-left parties that promise reforms within capitalism.

The WSWS warned even before Syriza took office: “Despite its left-wing façade, Syriza is a bourgeois party that rests on affluent layers of the middle class.” This analysis was completely confirmed and applies equally to Tsipras’ new party ELAS. It stands ready to impose capitalist interests in the coming confrontation with the working class with the same brutality as Syriza.

8. Pentagon draws up plans to attack Cuba amid anti-communist propaganda campaign

The Pentagon is drawing up a range of detailed plans for a potential military assault on Cuba. The continued threats against Cuba, even as the White House actively discusses sending ground troops into Iran, points to the increasing desperation of the Trump administration as it expands its campaign of imperialist plunder abroad and attacks on democratic rights at home.

The report on the Pentagon’s preparations, which first aired July 16 on CBS News, highlighted a plan involving an assault by thousands of US Army troops from the 101st Airborne Division. The 101st Airborne Division is capable of landing thousands of soldiers into a territory within a matter of hours through the use of helicopters. While the operation undertaken by US special forces to kidnap Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, killed over 100 people just to accomplish that objective, an operation to invade Cuba as a first step to take over the country would involve bloodshed and destruction on a much larger scale. 

*****

In recent weeks, the Trump administration has ramped up its efforts to construct a casus belli by claiming the presence of Iranian drones in Cuba. During a visit to the US naval base at Guantánamo Bay on June 10, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth suggested that Cuba had acquired drones that could pose a threat to the base or even the US mainland. The US government under Trump and Biden has previously alleged that Cuba hosts Chinese and Russian intelligence facilities. Countering Chinese influence in Latin America has been a top strategic priority for the White House.

The drone claim was renewed on Monday, when President Donald Trump said the US was “looking into” the possibility that Cuba was stockpiling Iranian drones, saying, “If they do have that, and they might very well have that … we’ll take care of it in short order. We’re not going to allow that to happen. So, it could be that they’re storing some. We’re looking into it now. It could be so, and it maybe isn’t.”

A report in Foreign Policy on July 17 interviewed several experts, all of whom denied Cuba posed any threat to the United States, even if it did possess some small number of drones. Fulton Armstrong, a former American intelligence officer and subject matter expert for Latin America, stated “there has never been, in 63 years since the Cuban missile crisis, any evidence of Cuba [having] offensive intentions against the United States or southern Florida or Guantanamo.”

At the same time that the Pentagon draws up invasion plans, the Trump administration has continued its fuel blockade. Cuba’s latest reported major shipment came in April, when the Russian tanker Anatoly delivered crude oil, but the energy crunch has since deepened. Residents in Santiago de Cuba said they have endured 26 straight days without electricity, while other areas have faced repeated blackouts lasting many hours and, in some municipalities, more than 87 consecutive hours. Growing anger over the crisis has spilled into the streets, with cacerolazos (pot-beating) and fire-lit protests in downtown Havana and other cities. 

*****

US aggression and threats have already resulted in deep concessions as the Cuban government uses the crossroads to carry out pro-market policies to attract investors and appease Trump. On June 18, Cuba’s National Assembly unanimously approved a package of more than 170 measures that amount to a form of shock therapy and would dismantle most of what little remains of the radical reforms the government put in place following the 1959 Revolution.

*****

The official Cuban newspaper Granma noted that during the National Assembly session, Prime Minister Manuel Marrero Cruz “recalled the premises of Army General Raúl Castro Ruz in leading the update of the economic and social model: not to be dogmatic or immobile, to banish the mechanical association between socialism and egalitarianism, and to recognize that socialist planning does not exclude, but must incorporate and regulate the rules of the market.” One can hardly imagine a clearer statement of the Cuban government’s distance from Marxism and genuine socialism and its social constituency in a capitalist ruling elite intent on intensifying the exploitation of Cuban workers.

This layer is exemplified by figures such as Raúl Guillermo Rodríguez Castro, also known as El Cangrejo, or The Crab. Rodríguez Castro is Raúl Castro’s grandson, as well as the son of Luis Alberto Rodríguez López-Calleja, a general who worked closely with the elder Raúl to create the GAESA business conglomerate which is operated by the Cuban military, and which comprises a large part of the Cuban economy, including much of its tourist sector. According to reports, the 42-year-old Rodríguez Castro has enjoyed a life of luxury, including trips on yachts, private jets and designer clothes.

Nominally a colonel in the Interior Ministry without much of a public profile, Rodríguez Castro has emerged from the shadows in recent months as an interlocutor with the US government during talks which have been going on since the beginning of the year. In this role he has effectively served as an indirect line of communication to the 95-year-old Raúl Castro, who maintains substantial control and influence over the government despite his official retirement.  

The Castros and their close supporters are no doubt prepared to throw open the gates to American capitalism in exchange for a continued political role and a guarantee of their privileges along the lines enjoyed by the Venezuelan Chavistas. A New York Times article recently revealed that American Secretary of State Marco Rubio is effectively “running Venezuela,” controlling its finances and government, approving all major decision of the country’s acting president, Delcy Rodríguez.

Whether or not the Trump administration deploys the American military to Cuba in the near term, its goal is the complete overturn of the Cuban Revolution and the extirpation of any even verbal or symbolic link to the Russian Revolution, which it hopes to use as a cudgel to bring Latin America into line as it prepares for war against China.

9. Mass protests roil Pakistan-controlled Azad Kashmir and the Islamabad-based political and military establishment

Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK)the Pakistan-held portion of disputed Kashmir—has been convulsed by mass protests since early June, including sit-ins, demonstrations, and “wheel-jam” and “shutter-down” strikes of public transport, shops and other businesses.

The protests have continued despite mounting state violence. More than 30 people, among them a small number of security forces, have died in clashes between protesters and police and paramilitaries. On Tuesday, July 14, at least nine people were killed, including half a dozen anti-government protesters who were shot down when they tried to block a security convoy in Tararkhal, in AJK’s Sudhnoti District.

The immediate trigger for the current mass agitation was the state’s banning of the AJK Joint Awami (Common People’s) Action Committee or JAAC under a draconian anti-terrorism law, and the arrest of more than a hundred of its leaders and activists.

Although it was the government of the ostensibly self-administered AJK that formally criminalized the JAAC on June 5, it was clearly done at the behest of the central government. From the outset, Pakistan Rangers and Frontier Constabulary police were deployed en masse to make arrests and quell opposition. All of the territory was also immediately subject to a cell phone and internet service blackout that lasted well beyond its initially announced duration of a week. Since then, the authorities have continued to suspend telecommunications intermittently, especially in Rawalakot and the Poonch District of which it is the capital.

In an attempt to break the protest movement, which is centered in Rawalakot, security forces have effectively besieged Azad Pakistan’s third-largest city. The government has prevented food, fuel and medical supplies from reaching Rawalakot, where tens of thousands have joined an ongoing sit-in launched in defiance of the authorities on June 7.

*****

A mountainous region, Pakistan-administered Kashmir is home to some 4 million people. Like Indian-held Kashmir, which lies to its south and east, it is highly strategic given its centrality to the reactionary conflict between India and Pakistan and its proximity to China.

Relations between South Asia’s nuclear-armed rivals have remained on a knife-edge since they fought a four-day border war in May 2025, with New Delhi and Islamabad regularly exchanging bellicose threats.

Objectively, the protest movement in Azad Kashmir undercuts the official narrative of the Pakistani state, which counterposes a supposedly “free” (in Urdu and Kashmiri “Azad”) Pakistan-held Kashmir to the larger part of the former princely state Jammu and Kashmir now controlled by India. In reality, both India and Pakistan have systematically run roughshod over the democratic rights of the Kashmiri people, while seeking to manipulate them to serve their rival predatory agendas.

The Kashmir region and people were partitioned as part of the broader 1947-48 communal carve-up of South Asia. Implemented by the subcontinent’s departing British colonial overlords and the rival representatives of the colonial bourgeoisie in the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, it divided the subcontinent into an expressly Muslim Pakistan and a predominantly Hindu India.

*****

Given the myriad of intersecting crises, the situation in AJK could spiral out of control, potentially leading to a major military operation aimed at brutally upholding the authority of the Pakistani state over Azad Kashmir and/or a rapid spike in tensions with India.

New Delhi, it need be noted, has hypocritically denounced the Pakistani state repression in Azad Kashmir. This under conditions where it maintains a half-million-strong security force in Indian-held Jammu and Kashmir, and routinely suppresses protests and imposes internet and cell-phone blackouts. In 2019, the Hindu supremacist Narendra Modi-led BJP government illegally stripped the region of its status as a “semi-autonomous” state within the Indian Union and reduced it to a Union-administered territory so as to place it more directly under central government control.

*****

The agitation in Azad Kashmir raises fundamental strategic questions for the working class across all South Asia, above all the necessity of it making the strategy of permanent revolution the axis of its struggle. First formulated by Leon Trotsky, it served as the strategic compass for the 1917 October Revolution in Russia and the subsequent struggle against its Stalinist degeneration, under conditions where the revolution remained isolated in a war-ravaged, predominantly backward country.

What Trotsky established—and this was subsequently demonstrated in the positive in the October Revolution and in the negative in the independence and partition of South Asia—is that in the imperialist epoch the tasks historically associated with the democratic revolution, such as the eradication of landlordism and caste-ism, separation of Church (mosque/temple) and state and real freedom from imperialism, can only be realized through a working-class led socialist revolution. 

Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK)the Pakistan-held portion of disputed Kashmir—has been convulsed by mass protests since early June, including sit-ins, demonstrations, and “wheel-jam” and “shutter-down” strikes of public transport, shops and other businesses.

The protests have continued despite mounting state violence. More than 30 people, among them a small number of security forces, have died in clashes between protesters and police and paramilitaries. On Tuesday, July 14, at least nine people were killed, including half a dozen anti-government protesters who were shot down when they tried to block a security convoy in Tararkhal, in AJK’s Sudhnoti District.

The immediate trigger for the current mass agitation was the state’s banning of the AJK Joint Awami (Common People’s) Action Committee or JAAC under a draconian anti-terrorism law, and the arrest of more than a hundred of its leaders and activists.

Although it was the government of the ostensibly self-administered AJK that formally criminalized the JAAC on June 5, it was clearly done at the behest of the central government. From the outset, Pakistan Rangers and Frontier Constabulary police were deployed en masse to make arrests and quell opposition. All of the territory was also immediately subject to a cell phone and internet service blackout that lasted well beyond its initially announced duration of a week. Since then, the authorities have continued to suspend telecommunications intermittently, especially in Rawalakot and the Poonch District of which it is the capital.

In an attempt to break the protest movement, which is centered in Rawalakot, security forces have effectively besieged Azad Pakistan’s third-largest city. The government has prevented food, fuel and medical supplies from reaching Rawalakot, where tens of thousands have joined an ongoing sit-in launched in defiance of the authorities on June 7.

*****

A mountainous region, Pakistan-administered Kashmir is home to some 4 million people. Like Indian-held Kashmir, which lies to its south and east, it is highly strategic given its centrality to the reactionary conflict between India and Pakistan and its proximity to China.

Relations between South Asia’s nuclear-armed rivals have remained on a knife-edge since they fought a four-day border war in May 2025, with New Delhi and Islamabad regularly exchanging bellicose threats.

Objectively, the protest movement in Azad Kashmir undercuts the official narrative of the Pakistani state, which counterposes a supposedly “free” (in Urdu and Kashmiri “Azad”) Pakistan-held Kashmir to the larger part of the former princely state Jammu and Kashmir now controlled by India. In reality, both India and Pakistan have systematically run roughshod over the democratic rights of the Kashmiri people, while seeking to manipulate them to serve their rival predatory agendas.

The Kashmir region and people were partitioned as part of the broader 1947-48 communal carve-up of South Asia. Implemented by the subcontinent’s departing British colonial overlords and the rival representatives of the colonial bourgeoisie in the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, it divided the subcontinent into an expressly Muslim Pakistan and a predominantly Hindu India.

*****

Given the myriad of intersecting crises, the situation in AJK could spiral out of control, potentially leading to a major military operation aimed at brutally upholding the authority of the Pakistani state over Azad Kashmir and/or a rapid spike in tensions with India.

New Delhi, it need be noted, has hypocritically denounced the Pakistani state repression in Azad Kashmir. This under conditions where it maintains a half-million-strong security force in Indian-held Jammu and Kashmir, and routinely suppresses protests and imposes internet and cell-phone blackouts. In 2019, the Hindu supremacist Narendra Modi-led BJP government illegally stripped the region of its status as a “semi-autonomous” state within the Indian Union and reduced it to a Union-administered territory so as to place it more directly under central government control.

*****

The agitation in Azad Kashmir raises fundamental strategic questions for the working class across all South Asia, above all the necessity of it making the strategy of permanent revolution the axis of its struggle. First formulated by Leon Trotsky, it served as the strategic compass for the 1917 October Revolution in Russia and the subsequent struggle against its Stalinist degeneration, under conditions where the revolution remained isolated in a war-ravaged, predominantly backward country.

What Trotsky established—and this was subsequently demonstrated in the positive in the October Revolution and in the negative in the independence and partition of South Asia—is that in the imperialist epoch the tasks historically associated with the democratic revolution, such as the eradication of landlordism and caste-ism, separation of Church (mosque/temple) and state and real freedom from imperialism, can only be realized through a working-class led socialist revolution. 

*****

The class struggle is intensifying in South Asia as around the world. The crucial question is the fight to establish the political independence and hegemony of the working class, so it can lead all the oppressed in struggle against the national bourgeoisie and imperialism. This will only be realized through the development of a class-conscious vanguard that has assimilated the lessons of the great revolutionary struggles of the last 150 years—that is through the building of sections of the International Committee of the Fourth International in Pakistan and across the subcontinent. 

10. Questions raised over continuation of AI boom

Amid the frenzy on Wall Street, the big questions being raised in financial circles are whether the AI-based bubble is about to burst, what factors may trigger its collapse and what will be the consequences if that happens.

The past weeks have been marked by increasing volatility: a surge one day followed by a significant fall, and then another surge. 

*****

The memory chip industry is notoriously volatile, going through boom-bust cycles. But the rollout of the AI data centers is a new factor. Samsung shares have fallen by a third since their June high, SK Hynix has dropped 40 percent and shares of the US-based chipmaking firm Micron have dropped more than 30 percent.

Reporting on the fall in semiconductor stocks yesterday, the FT cited remarks by Kwon Seok-joon, a professor at a Seoul university who warned of a significant oversupply problem if AI demand faltered.

“Chipmakers are making these plans on the assumption that demand from AI centers will remain strong for the next two to three years. But memory demand will fall if returns on AI investments fail to meet expectations.”

It is not just chipmakers that are dependent on the continuation of the AI boom, but Wall Street and major global equity markets.

It is estimated that about 60 percent of the gains in the S&P 500 index have been driven by a handful of AI-related tech giants, including companies such as Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta and Broadcom. The 10 top companies in the index account for 41 percent of the S&P’s market capitalization.

This high degree of concentration and its role in driving the market higher is the cause of increasing concern in sections of the financial press.

*****

It is by no means guaranteed that the US firms presently leading the development of AI, such as Anthropic and OpenAI, will emerge as the winners in the ruthless fight for markets and profit. Their business model assumes that they will be able to stay at the head of AI development and thereby accrue the lion’s share of the profits.

However, this assumption is already under challenge with the development of AI firms in China which can produce results comparable with their powerful US rivals at a much lower cost. AI users may turn to Chinese models as being adequate for their purposes, even though they are not top of the range, because they are cheaper to run. 

*****

Drawing out the wider implications of this development, the New York Times noted: “The release of a free, open-source Chinese AI model that could rival the performance of costly computing-intensive systems from Silicon Valley’s best-funded companies has reignited concerns over whether the industry’s enormous spending spree on data centres is justified.” 

11. Protests shake Zelensky government after dismissal of Ukrainian defense minister  

The Ukrainian ruling class and military are in an immense crisis following the firing of Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov and the reshuffling of President Volodymyr Zelensky’s cabinet last week.

On Saturday, around 10,000 protesters gathered in Kiev near the Ivan Franko National Academic Drama Theatre demanding the dismissal of current Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi and the reinstatement of Fedorov. Smaller protests were also held in Odessa, Lviv, Lutsk, Dnipro, Cherkasy, Zhytomyr, Vinnytsia, Chernivtsi, Rivne, and Ivano-Frankivsk, and elsewhere.  

The protests have shaken the Zelensky government, which has been embroiled in a number of corruption scandals, involving several of Zelensky’s closest allies. However, these protests cannot be characterized as “anti-war.” Rather, they have been dominated by frustrated pro-war veterans and upper middle class elements from Ukraine’s so-called “civil society,” who support the war in principle but are critical of Zelensky’s conduct of it. Protesters in Kiev were photographed carrying placards with Fedorov’s name, explicitly backing the continuation of the disastrous war with Russia that has claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of workers and youth, both Ukrainian and Russian.

*****

In the days following Fedorov’s dismissal, Ukrainian forces have dramatically ramped up long-range drone and maritime attacks, successfully hitting Russian oil depots, shadow fleet tankers in the Black Sea, and major logistics centers deep inside Russian territory, including facilities near Moscow. Such strikes are part of a strategy specifically championed by Fedorov.

The expanding drone strikes of the past weeks and months have created a serious fuel crisis in Russia, one of the largest oil producers in the world. They are also claiming a growing death toll. On Sunday, a Ukrainian strike on a warehouse of the Russian online retailer Wildberries in Kotovsk, in the Tambov region, killed at least seven workers, injuring 25 more. The town is located approximately 360 kilometers  (220 miles) from the Ukrainian border. 

*****

While Western media have celebrated these strikes as a sign that Ukraine could “win” the war, the increased reliance on drones is not least of all a response to the massive desertion crisis facing the Ukrainian army. According to an April report from public broadcasting (PBS) in the US, an estimated 150,000 service members were missing from their units as the war entered its fifth year. 

12. Second in a Four-Part Series: Kast's fiscal austerity: ruling Chile by Executive Decrees

Almost from the moment that Chile’s ultra-right President José Antonio Kast assumed power he began issuing executive decrees. Finance Minister Jorge Quiroz’s Circular 12, Decree 333, Decree 330, Decree 337, and Circular 16 are not an emergency response to a temporary fiscal imbalance. They are the logical culmination of a social architecture erected over half a century. To understand what Kast is cutting, one must first understand what was created.

The Chilean state that emerged from the Pinochet dictatorship was organized around a single principle: the state does not provide. The 1980 Constitution enshrined the “subsidiary state,” under which public functions like health, education, pensions, were transferred to private operators or devolved downward to municipalities, while the central state retreated to a regulatory and financing role. This was a reorganization of class rule.

In health, the dictatorship created a two-tier system. The National Health Fund (FONASA), the public insurer, was left with the poor, the chronically ill, and the elderly, which the market refused to cover. The Private Health Insurance Institutions (ISAPREs) skimmed the young, healthy, and wealthy and were permitted to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. Public hospitals were starved of resources while private clinics proliferated. By the time the dictatorship ended, Chile had one of the most privatized health systems in the world.

In education, the dictatorship municipalized the school system in the 1980s, transferring administration to communes with wildly unequal tax bases while introducing a per-pupil voucher subsidy. The result was that a school in the leafy Vitacura commune and a school in working class La Pintana commune received the same voucher, but the Vitacura school had parents who could supplement it, better infrastructure, and a municipality with resources. The Constitutional Organic Law on Education, imposed in 1990 as Pinochet’s parting gift, constitutionalized this arrangement. In higher education, the 1981 reforms dismantled public universities and opened the sector to for-profit operators. The State-Guaranteed Loan System (CAE), introduced under Socialist Party President Ricardo Lagos in 2005, completed the architecture: private banks issued loans, the state guaranteed repayment, and students shouldered decades of debt.

The civilian center-left coalition of Christian Democrats, and the Socialist and Communist parties that governed for 24 of the 28 years after 1990, did not dismantle this structure but deepened it. Ports, electricity, oil refineries and banks were privatized. The education voucher was expanded. The health split was maintained. The pension system, built around the private Pension Fund Administrators (AFPs), was left untouched. The “Chilean miracle” celebrated by the IMF and the World Bank was, really, a mechanism for transferring public wealth into private hands while condemning the working class to chronic underfunding, interminable waiting lists and debt servitude.

The municipalization of social services proved particularly destructive. Municipalities, constitutionally prohibited from borrowing except by special congressional authorization, were made responsible for primary healthcare and public education but given revenues (property taxes, vehicle permits, commercial licenses, and their share of the Common Municipal Fund) that were structurally inadequate and acutely sensitive to economic downturns. The poorest communes, with the weakest tax bases, were left to fund the most vulnerable populations.

The consequences of this architecture are now visible in every social indicator. 

*****

The Kast government’s cuts were prepared by four years of pseudo-left austerity under Gabriel Boric. By the time Boric handed power to Kast in an “orderly and exemplary transfer,” the structural deficit stood at 3.6 percent of GDP, the per capita public spending was frozen, the hospital network was in debt, the municipalities were insolvent, and the police state was operational. The pseudo-left had done the preparatory work for the fascistic right. 

*****

The fiscal adjustment operates on two simultaneous tracks: executive decrees that modify current-year appropriations with immediate legal effect, and instructional circulars that set the framework for future budget formulation. 

*****

The financing mechanism for this austerity is a US$6.2 billion increase in public debt, approved by the Chamber of Deputies with 94 votes in favor and sent to the Senate. The government is borrowing to finance tax cuts for large corporations (the corporate rate drops from 27 to 23 percent under Kast’s National Reconstruction Plan) while cutting the programs that sustain working class life. 

13. Trump loudly booed at World Cup final in New Jersey

There were two noteworthy events at Sunday’s World Cup final match in New Jersey. Spain defeated Argentina 1-0, on the strength of a defense so suffocating that Argentina did not record a shot on goal until the 116th minute of the contest. And US President Donald Trump was heavily booed by the crowd as he walked onto the field to award the trophy to Spain’s captain Rodri. 

*****

The response to Trump Sunday was significant because there were so many football fans from around the world in attendance, particularly from Spain and Argentina, obviously, but from many other countries, including the United States. Trump is even less popular around the world than he is at home. 

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, whose countries co-hosted the World Cup along with the United States, also congratulated the victorious Spanish team and shook hands with the players. Neither, however, tried to hog the stage, as Trump did, and neither was treated with any hostility by the crowd.

While the booing of Trump was quite audible on the television broadcast, according to on-the-spot press accounts the boos and whistles were far louder within the stadium itself, drowning out the music piped in as part of the award ceremony.

Trump and FIFA President Gianni Infantino jointly carried the trophy to present it to the Spanish team, but Trump resisted Infantino’s effort to usher him out of the picture-taking session which followed, and he stayed on the podium during the initial celebration, in a transparent and pathetic effort to claim the spotlight.

*****

Trump’s own conduct during the World Cup added insult to injury. He blatantly interfered with disciplinary process, calling up Infantino to demand that FIFA suspend the red card issued to US striker Folarin Balogun for a foul, which would have prevented him from playing in the knockout second round match against Belgium.

Infantino did as he was told, and Balogun, who had accepted the consequences of his foul with grace, was allowed to play. The Belgian team was outraged, and they outplayed the US team by a wide margin, beating them 4-1.

One group of protesters outside the World Cup final distributed specially made red cards to fans going into the stadium, asking them to raise the cards against Trump and Infantino as they presented the trophy after the match.

More ominous was the Trump administration’s use of its powers as host country to exclude the Iranian team, which was not allowed to stay overnight on US soil. After each match, the Iranians were forced to go back across the border into Mexico, where they were welcomed with appropriate hospitality.

US immigration officials also expelled a FIFA-certified referee, Omer Artan, for the “crime” of bearing a Somali passport. Fans from several African and Asian countries were subjected to racial harassment and exclusion when they attempted to enter the US to cheer on their countries’ teams.

An article in Foreign Policy magazine Friday gave details of a little-reported aspect of the Trump “welcome” to the World Cup. It was headlined: “The Soccer Surveillance State: How the United States used the World Cup as a testing ground for policing technologies.”

The article described how security cameras and sophisticated software were used to spy on fans attending a June 13 match between Qatar and Switzerland at Levi’s Stadium in the San Francisco Bay Area:

Long before fans watched Qatar and Switzerland take the field that day, the stadium watched the fans: tracking faces at the gates, flagging suspicious sounds in the crowd, and feeding a constant stream of data to an on-site control center, where it then became accessible to a network of local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies coordinating security for the event.

The article noted that this surveillance regime was not limited to San Francisco or to the World Cup: “This system will not shut down when the World Cup ends: DHS budget documents reveal that the tournament is a testing ground for new surveillance technologies.”

14. New UK prime minister Andy Burnham will step up Labour’s agenda of austerity and war

Andy Burnham became Britain’s seventh prime minister in just 10 years as his predecessor Keir Starmer scuttled off stage after his final meeting with King Charles. Starmer was followed later that day by his two closest allies, former chancellor Rachel Reeves and deputy prime minister David Lammy, along with numerous other loyalists who will be missed by no one. 

Burnham did make sure to retain arch-Blairite Jonathan Powell as national security adviser to underscore the continuity of British imperialism’s foreign policy. But this was dwarfed in significance by Burnham’s most important appointment to his new cabinet, John Healey as chancellor.

Healey’s resignation as defense secretary precipitated Starmer’s downfall and paved the way for Burnham’s rise. He denounced Starmer and Reeves for being “unable and unwilling” to commit the resources required to wage war effectively, identifying a £28 billion “black hole” in existing defense spending and insisting that the real shortfall was closer to £78 billion.

Healey is an advocate of military aggression against Russia and China, up to and including nuclear weapons. He has now been placed in a position to determine the savage cuts required to bring about his dream of “full spectrum society resilience”—a blueprint for the militarization of all aspects of social life.

*****

The world situation is characterized by an escalating global conflict to carve up essential territories, resources and markets between the imperialist powers. This eruption of militarism and its devastating impact demand ever deeper austerity, not a reversal.

Social spending must be slashed to free up resources for war and push more young people into the armed forces. Aggression against Russia and China, two of the world’s largest military powers, will drive the greatest offensive on the working class, its social and democratic rights, since the 1930s.

The claim that Burnham can change the course of the government is a pale imitation of the claims made earlier about Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership of the Labour Party.

Corbyn entered the 2015 leadership contest with an explicit, stated objective: to prevent the type of implosion that had almost destroyed other social-democratic parties across Europe. His aim was to channel anti-austerity, anti-war sentiment that had welled up after the 2008 financial crash back into the Labour Party, where it could be managed, contained and defused.

The widespread illusions that Corbyn would lead a left renaissance were dashed as he worked to betray opposition to the Blairite right and preserve the grip over the working class of the bureaucracy—of which he is a loyal representative.

The pseudo-left groups—such as the Socialist Workers Party—who gave their fulsome backing to Corbyn at that time now claim that pressure exerted “from below” on Burnham will force an albeit more limited shift to the left. In this way they continue to oppose the necessary political break with the Labour Party, and with the trade union bureaucracy on which it depends to police and suppress the class struggle.

It must be recalled that Starmer replaced Corbyn while promising to implement a 10-point plan more left-sounding than Burnham’s miserable offering. It included higher taxes on the top earners; additional welfare measures; the scraping of university fees; a Prevention of Military Intervention Act to stop illegal wars; ending outsourcing in the National Health Service and local government; defending migrant rights and freedom of movement; strengthening workers’ rights; and bringing rail, mail, energy and water into public ownership.

They all evaporated like mist.

Whatever temporary and tactical shifts workers’ social and political opposition may produce, the fundamental direction of capitalist politics today is shaped by pressure “from above”, exerted by the oligarchy. This financial and corporate elite is set on a common global agenda, destroying democratic rights and eliminating social gains to prepare for trade war and military violence.

America is the prime example, where Donald Trump’s presidency is the direct instrument of multi-billionaires. But the Elon Musks and Jeff Bezoses of this world exert the same influence everywhere. The financial oligarchy buys control of political parties by pushing millions into their coffers, and not just the far-right. Moreover, the demands of the oligarchy are passed on through the bond and stock markets that can threaten national economies with collapse, and by the media and business groups—none of which Burnham has either the ability or the desire to oppose.

All talk of alleviating the social distress faced by millions of workers without challenging the power of the oligarchy, without mobilizing the working class on an anti-capitalist and anti-war program, is a dangerous political fraud.

Burnham has been installed to do what Starmer failed to do. He will continue and intensify Britain’s participation in the US-led NATO war against Russia in Ukraine, as well as the broader global preparations for direct military conflict with Russia and China, at whatever cost to the working class.

It is time to break with the illusion that Labour can be reformed or “saved”. The bitter price the working class paid for this lie began with the Starmer government and its agenda of austerity and war. It must not be allowed to continue under Burnham, to more devastating impact.

15. Legal services workers strike in New York City

On Thursday morning, roughly 500 lawyers, paralegals, social workers and administrative workers walked out at Brooklyn Defender Services, launching a strike over pay and working conditions.

The organization provides free legal representation to people in Brooklyn and Queens facing criminal, family, immigration and other civil legal matters. Its workers are members of the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys (ALAA)-UAW Local 2325. The strike pits legal-service workers against an employer whose operations depend heavily on public funding overseen by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, injecting a directly political character into the strike.

The walkout is part of an eruption of struggles across New York City’s fragmented legal-services sector. Fellow Local 2325 members are currently on strike at Justice in Motion, while workers at the Bronx Defenders and the Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem have authorized walkouts. Bronx Defenders struck last year, as did workers at the Goddard Riverside Law Project, CAMBA Legal Services, and the Urban Justice Center.

At the Legal Aid Society, historically the dominant provider of public defense services in New York City, UAW officials prevented a strike last year by pushing through a grossly inadequate contract while formally leaving the door open for revisiting wage provisions this year.

The strike at Brooklyn Defender Services is a concentrated expression of something objectively significant unfolding across the American working class. The attorneys and support staff who walk picket lines are not the high-earning professionals popularly portrayed; they are workers who have been squeezed by stagnating wages, crushing caseloads and institutional indifference into conditions that differ in degree, not in kind, from those of any other section of the workforce.

What gives the legal services sector strikes added political and social significance is the terrain on which these workers labor. Every day, public defenders confront the wreckage of a social order that criminalizes poverty. Their clients are the same workers and families hammered by evictions, wage theft, police violence, deportations and mass incarceration. When public defenders are compelled to strike over wages that leave them unable to cope with the rising cost of living, it reveals the broad character of exploitation. The eruption of class struggle in the legal sector, alongside strikes by nurses and Long Island Rail Road workers in New York City alone just this year, is an indication of a far broader social radicalization taking place well beyond the city limits. 

*****

Meanwhile, the political orientation of the union apparatus is to appeal to Mayor Zohran Mamdani “to personally visit our picket lines and use the city’s funding of these organizations as leverage to directly pressure management to concede to our reasonable demands,” according to a statement adopted by the ALAA-UAW Local 2325 Joint Council. The statement also acknowledges the draconian sweeps of homeless encampments, the overcrowded and inhumane conditions in arraignment courts and the brutal police methods continuing under Mamdani. The statement appeals to the mayor to fire NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch and to “fully re-commit to his values as a democratic socialist and supporter of labor.”

The insistence by the UAW on directing workers’ energies toward pressuring the Mamdani administration is a dangerous diversion. Mamdani governs a city whose fiscal framework is dictated by Wall Street and whose housing stock is controlled by big landlords and real-estate developers. He is presiding over explosive tensions under conditions of growing social inequality, expanding war, and the dismantling of democratic rights. When workers’ demands come into direct conflict with the interests that dominate New York City and the country as a whole—as they inevitably must—a mayor operating within these constraints does not choose the side of workers. He seeks to contain and neutralize their opposition.

Will Lehman, the socialist candidate for UAW president and Mack Trucks worker who has campaigned to transfer power from the union bureaucracy to the rank and file, issued the following statement in support of the striking pubic defenders:

As a UAW member and Mack Trucks worker, I stand in full solidarity with the striking workers at Brooklyn Defender Services and every legal service worker fighting for a contract across New York City. I am calling on UAW members everywhere to mobilize active, concrete support for this strike. The issues these workers are fighting for are our issues. Wages that cannot keep pace with soaring costs, workloads designed to grind workers down, employers who track your movements and treat you as a resource to be managed rather than a human being. This is the common experience of the working class. And the clients these workers defend, people facing deportation, criminalized for being poor, trapped in a system of mass incarceration that functions as a weapon against the entire working class, these are our brothers and sisters too. The deportation machine and the prison system exist to divide, intimidate, and exploit workers. They must be dismantled.

The power to win this fight lies with the workers themselves, not with union officials negotiating behind closed doors or with politicians. I urge legal service workers to fight to expand the strike to every Local 2325 shop and beyond, including appealing to the tens of thousands of transit workers, healthcare workers, and municipal employees who are now or will soon be staring down expired contracts. A unified walkout across the entire sector is the only way to break the isolation that management and the UAW apparatus depend on to wear workers down. To seize the initiative, what is required is to build rank-and-file committees—democratically elected, accountable only to the membership, with full transparency over negotiations and the power to reject any deal that doesn’t meet workers’ needs. That is how we win.

16. Workers Struggles: The Americas

Argentina:

Sadowa Meat workers protests over wages and layoffs

Canada:

Strike mandate by WestJet cabin crews

Cuba:

Street protests continue amid blockade, shortage of basic necessities

Mexico:

Teachers renew protests, claim government reneged on agreements

Puerto Rico:

Independence demonstration hits Wall Street financial control

United States:

800 pharmacists in Southern California vote to strike
Ohio library workers authorize strike action
 
Nurses at Cleveland Clinic authorize strike as demands go unaddressed
 

17. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

Bogdan Syrotiuk in 2015

"Peace for the world! Down with war!"