Dec 8, 2025

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. This week in history: December 8-14

  • 25 years ago:

US Supreme Court stops ballot counting in Florida 

  • 50 years ago:

Ford approves austerity loans to New York City

  • 75 years ago:

    US military evacuation from Hungnam, North Korea

  • 100 years ago:

New York governor pardons communist leader

2. Socialism AI goes live on December 12, 2025

Technology does not lead automatically to the improvement of the human condition. Without politically conscious mass action, guided by scientific Marxist theory, technological advances under capitalism intensify the exploitation of the working class and threaten the destruction of the planet. 

Therefore, the problem of bringing into proper alignment the development of technology and the interests of the working class must be solved. The socialist movement must make use of the most advanced tools available for the education and unification of the working class.

3. Israel tightens its grip on West Bank

Under the cover of the ethnic cleansing of 2.3 million Palestinians from Gaza, Israel has tightened its grip on the West Bank aimed at incorporating the whole of Palestine into a “greater Israel” that now encompasses parts of Syria and Lebanon.

*****

Israel’s tightening grip on the West Bank has been accompanied by a wave of settler violence against the Palestinians. They have gone on the rampage, burning cars, desecrating mosques, wrecking industrial plants and destroying farmland. According to the UN’s humanitarian office, the number of attacks has surged, with settlers launching around eight attacks daily on the olive harvest during October, with attacks continuing last month.

Settlers have injured more than 1,000 Palestinians so far this year, double the rate of last year, and killed 21 people. This is in addition to at least 1,000 Palestinians killed by the military. According to the UN, settlers have forced at least 2,200 Palestinians from their homes, while the Israeli authorities have demolished the homes of more than 6,000 people.

4. The human catastrophe caused by massive flooding in Sri Lanka and Asia: How did it happen?

Sri Lanka has suffered massive destruction from Cyclone Ditwah, which made landfall on November 26 in the southeastern part of the island and moved northward along the eastern coastline. According to official statistics, 627 people have died due to the cyclone and the resulting floods and landslides, while 190 remain missing.

More than 4,500 houses were completely destroyed and over 76,000 partially damaged. A total of 247 kilometres of roads were impacted, and 40 bridges have been washed away. Several sections of the main railway line running through the central highlands were ruined, leaving transportation along this critical route indefinitely suspended.

The devastation caused by the cyclone is not an isolated phenomenon limited to Sri Lanka. In the final week of November, torrential rains swept across Southeast Asia, triggering massive floods and landslides in Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia. More than a thousand people were killed, and millions were displaced. Tens of thousands of homes were either completely or partially destroyed. The full scale of property damage has yet to be assessed.

In response to the disaster, Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake declared this week, “We are facing the largest and most challenging natural disaster in our history.” While the scale of destruction is indeed immense, to claim that the catastrophe is purely a “natural” event conceals the deeper social and scientific realities underlying it. 

Many people are asking a simple and urgent question: How did this catastrophe happen?

The answer lies not in fate or nature, but in the combined impact of climate change—driven primarily by global warming—and the systematic dismantling of scientific and disaster-prevention infrastructure by successive governments.

*****

This disaster is not the result of individual ignorance, but of the deliberate priorities of the global capitalist system, which places private profit and personal wealth above human life. Trillions of dollars are being invested in fossil fuels. Extreme inequality is maintained by billionaires. Military spending is soaring. The ruling class will not sacrifice its profits for climate safety. On the contrary, war and inter-imperialist conflict are intensifying emissions and plundering resources. Sustainable technologies exist, but they cannot be implemented under a global system rooted in private ownership of production and nation-state rivalry. 

*****

Various intellectuals have proposed isolated “national solutions,” as if climate change and disaster prevention can be addressed within a single country’s borders. This is a dangerous illusion. No nationalist program can stabilize the climate, construct modern forecasting systems or build the infrastructure needed to protect lives without being part of a globally coordinated effort.

The WSWS has repeatedly emphasized that climate change is a global crisis that demands a global solution. It requires the mobilization of the international working class on the basis of a socialist program, including:

·  Reorganizing global production to eliminate dependence on fossil fuels

·  Redirecting scientific resources toward climate modeling, forecasting and adaptation

·  Providing flood- and landslide-resistant housing as a social right

·  Placing energy, transportation and industry under workers’ democratic control

·  Coordinating international scientific planning, not competitive national policies

Only an international socialist reorganization of society can marshal the technological, scientific and material resources required to address global warming and protect human life. This cannot happen under capitalism, which subordinates every aspect of society to private profit and fuels national and communal division. Only the international working class, which has no allegiance to national borders, can lead the struggle for socialism on a global scale.

The catastrophe now unfolding in Asia is a warning from a destabilized planet—a warning that the continued domination of capitalist profit over human life is incompatible with the survival of millions. The international working class must take up the fight to overthrow the capitalist system and build a socialist future.

5. Netflix takes over Warner Bros. Discovery in $82.7 billion deal

On December 5, Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) announced an agreement under which Netflix will acquire Warner Bros.’ film and television studios, along with its streaming operations, including HBO Max and HBO. The deal is valued at roughly $72 billion in equity, with a total enterprise value of $82.7 billion when accounting for debt. 

The proposed purchase has major cultural and social implications. It sharply increases the cartelization of the entertainment industry and places decisions about what tens of millions see and hear each day in even fewer hands. If “American democracy is in its death throes,” under the Trump administration as it pushes ahead with its plan for dictatorship, “freedom of expression” in the film and television world is in an equally perilous state. To speak of such freedom when a handful of gigantic conglomerates own nearly all the media and entertainment outlets is increasingly meaningless. 

For decades, American capitalism advertised itself as the alternative to “totalitarianism” and as the bastion of cultural openness. The mask has come off. Now, a few corporations with innumerable ties to the government and the military-intelligence apparatus by and large determine which film and television projects go forward. Many authoritarian regimes would be jealous. Artistic freedom in our day must increasingly take the form of a relentless struggle against this oligarchic stranglehold.

*****

The merger has provoked predictable, empty bipartisan criticism. Prominent Democrats such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (Washington) have wrung their hands and condemned the deal as an “antitrust nightmare,” warning it could suppress competition, raise costs and reduce creative and labor opportunities. Republican critics, including Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), have similarly flagged the centralization of media power.

The Writers Guild of America (WGA) expressed concern that consolidation would lead to worsening conditions for creative professionals: “The outcome would eliminate jobs, push down wages, worsen conditions for all entertainment workers, raise prices for consumers, and reduce the volume and diversity of content for all viewers.” It stressed: “Industry workers along with the public are already impacted by only a few powerful companies maintaining tight control over what consumers can watch on television, on streaming, and in theaters. This merger must be blocked.” However, the WGA offered no strategy whatsoever for writers or others to fight job elimination and wages lowering.

*****

he merger will restructure the industry with harmful consequences for workers. But the framing of these objections, whether from lawmakers or unions, assumes that capitalism is reformable, that regulatory intervention or corporate restraint could preserve competition and safeguard labor. In reality, the Netflix–WBD merger is the logical outcome of the monopolistic and imperialist dynamics that characterize the current era.

At this advanced stage of capitalist development, finance capital does not merely seek profit, it must expand and centralize, subordinating entire spheres of social life to the interests of a narrow ruling elite. Monopolization becomes a structural necessity.

*****

The merger, in a more profound sense, is part of a class offensive with deep consequences for the entertainment workforce and cultural life. Already, major media conglomerates operate as instruments of the corporate-financial oligarchy, shaping narratives to normalize US imperialism and play down or ignore mass social suffering.

War films routinely rely on intelligence consultants to ensure scripts do not challenge official agendas, while so-called social commentaries often reduce systemic issues to personal failures. Under a merged Netflix–WBD, these dynamics would intensify, amplified by AI systems capable of generating content at scale. Jobs for writers, actors, editors and technical crews would be further eroded, with entry-level opportunities diminished and wages reduced.

The technology itself is not inherently threatening. AI and digital production tools can be used for creative expansion, experimentation and democratization. It is the capitalist framework under which they are deployed that generates exploitation and cultural homogenization.

The denunciations of the merger by the entertainment union leadership are steeped in hypocrisy. These bureaucracies remain politically chained to the Democratic Party, the very instrument that has presided over and enabled the corporate consolidation they now claim to oppose.

In fact, the Writers Guild of America, SAG-AFTRA and the Directors Guild of America are preparing to enter yet another round of contract talks with the conglomerates they helped strengthen through their 2023 betrayals. Those sellout agreements cleared the way for an unprecedented expansion of AI, accepting the principle that studios could harvest performers’ voices and bodies and automate the scriptwriting process.

*****

Antitrust warnings and public statements of concern cannot reverse the structural imperatives driving consolidation. The working class and creative professionals must recognize that, at this advanced stage of capitalist crisis, the fight is about defending basic social rights and cultural production against the overarching logic of profit-driven monopolization. In a word, it is a struggle against capitalism.

6. Alliance of war criminals: German Chancellor Merz meets Netanyahu

There is hardly anything more repulsive than when the German ruling class justifies its support for Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians by referring to the “fight against antisemitism” and its own historical crimes. It was precisely this repugnant double standard that Chancellor Friedrich Merz (Christian Democrats, CDU) practiced on Thursday during his inaugural visit to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is the subject of an international arrest warrant for war crimes.

At Yad Vashem, Merz wrote in the guest book that Germany’s commitment to Israel’s security is “an unalterable core element” of bilateral relations. “That applies today, it applies tomorrow, and it applies forever.”

It is the height of cynicism and criminality when the German government, under the mantra of a “reason of state,” whitewashes Israel’s campaign of destruction and legitimizes it with responsibility for the Holocaust, of all things. In reality, it is not continuing the tradition of “Never again!” but rather the criminal traditions that led to Auschwitz—and is continuing them in a new form.

*****

With his visit, Merz made it unmistakably clear that the German government not only stands by this regime, but is further deepening its cooperation with Israel. The Social Democrat (SPD)/Green/Free Democrat coalition government under Chancellor Scholz (SPD) and Foreign Minister Baerbock (Greens) already provided political cover and military support for the genocide—and defamed and criminalized anyone who denounced the crimes as “antisemites.”

Merz is seamlessly continuing this course. At a joint press conference with Netanyahu, he rejected the immediate recognition of a Palestinian state. Such recognition could come “at the end and not at the beginning” of a process—in other words, never. At the same time, he justified the criminal policies of the right-wing extremist Netanyahu regime with the platitude that Israel has “the right and indeed the duty” to defend its existence. Criticism is “possible,” he said, but “must not be misused as a pretext for antisemitism, especially not in Germany.”

*****

The basis for this supposedly “eternal” alliance is obvious. Germany’s ruling class uses Israel as a geopolitical outpost to enforce its imperialist interests in the resource-rich and strategically central Middle East region. Merz himself admitted this in a moment of unusual candour after Israel’s attack on Iran in June, when he declared that Israel was doing “the dirty work for all of us.” 

*****

People in Germany, Israel, Europe, the Middle East and around the world who want to stop the fascist barbarism of their ruling class must oppose it with the international unity of the working class and a socialist perspective. Only such a movement can break the cycle of imperialism, oppression and mass murder.

7. Immigration thugs deploy to Minnesota as 19 people kidnapped and a US citizen sexually assaulted

Less than a week after President Donald Trump disparaged all people from Somalia as “garbage” Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have deployed in force to Minneapolis-St.Paul, Minnesota, targeting the largest Somali community outside Africa. As of this writing, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has confirmed 19 arrests. 

Many more people, including at least one US citizen, have been detained in the ongoing raids. This past Wednesday, an Edina-born Somali-American woman was kidnapped by ICE agents while shopping in downtown Minneapolis. Despite being a US citizen, ICE agents kidnapped and ziptied her before taking her to a local jail.

Even though she repeatedly insisted she was a US citizen, ICE held her for over 24 hours. She was only released from jail after her husband, a paralegal, provided federal agents her passport.

In an interview with the local Fox affiliate, the woman’s cousin, who is a legal Somali immigrant, said that while she was in federal custody she pleaded with agents to let her go, “but they ended up sexually assaulting her.” According to the victim’s cousin, the agents mocked the woman, questioning her over what “she could be hiding in her hijab.”

The cousin continued, saying that agents joked that she was wearing the wrong attire “to try and run away from us.” The woman, still suffering trauma from the incident, did not wish to be identified or interviewed. On Friday DHS told Fox it “could not comment on the incident without additional information.”

*****

The vast majority of the 80,000 people of Somali descent living in Minnesota are US citizens or legal residents. Yet, in an appearance on CNN’s State of the Union, Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan claimed without evidence, “there’s a large illegal Somali community there. There’s an illegal alien community, a large illegal alien community there.”

The detainment of the Edina woman is one of hundreds, if not thousands of cases this year where immigration police have assaulted and handcuffed US citizens under the guise of immigration enforcement. A report published by Pro Publica in October found more than “170 cases this year where citizens were detained at raids and protests” while more than 20 were held for over a day “without being able to call their loved ones or lawyers.”

In a disturbing incident last week in Key Largo, Florida, a woman in medical scrubs was stopped by immigration agents while driving and forcibly removed from her vehicle. In a video that has been seen millions of times, the woman can be heard screaming that she is a US citizen as immigration thugs handcuff her.

*****

Refuting claims that kidnapping operations are specifically targeting violent criminals, videos from Minneapolis and southern Louisiana show immigration thugs harassing and accosting workers as they go to gas stations to fill up. Underscoring the deep unpopularity of the raids among the working class, in one video a man records Border Patrol agents as they accost workers in Minneapolis. In the video a woman can be heard saying “You’re not welcome here,” while the man is heard saying, “Get the f*ck out of here.” 

*****

In Kenner, Louisiana, a suburb of New Orleans, workers at a local gas station locked their shop and refused entry to Bovino and other CBP thugs loitering outside the station. Another video shows community members blowing whistles and keeping watch outside a school after ICE agents were spotted in the community. 

On Sunday, anti-ICE protesters continued to demonstrate and track federal agents throughout Kenner. Protesters carried signs reading “no human is illegal” and “No trespassing, we don’t open the door for ICE.”

*****

AP reported Sunday that in response to growing anger of Trump’s mass deportation operation state and federal police are tracking “online criticism and protests” and compiling “regular updates” to be shared between agencies. According to one report viewed by AP and circulated among police on Sunday, opinions on the raids, “remain mixed, with some supporting the operations while others are against them.”

According to the report, FBI and CBP agents are currently tracking “discussions on the online forum Reddit that local residents have used to exchange information about the immigration raids.” In response to a question from AP, Louisiana State Police spokesperson Danny Berrincha, confirmed that cops are “monitoring social media activity related to protests, activism and other forms of public response.”

The AP’s report follows a November report by the Brennan Center which found that ICE is spending upwards of $25 million on spy technology including “social media monitoring systems, cellphone location tracking, facial recognition, remote hacking tools, and more” to track and intimidate those who opposed federal kidnapping operations.

The monitoring of social media accounts by the government underscores that the attacks on immigrants are an attack on the democratic rights of the entire working class. The same techniques, technologies and legal warfare used by the federal government and police against anti-ICE protesters will be turned against all sections of the working class regardless of immigration status.

8. NBC confirms Hegseth ordered murder of all boat passengers and crew in September 2 strike

On Saturday, NBC reported that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth “ordered the US military on September 2 to kill all 11 people” on a motorboat traveling between Venezuela and Trinidad, contradicting the administration’s denials that no such order was given.

*****

Following an initial attack on a civilian speedboat in the Caribbean on September 2, the US military, at the direction of Admiral Frank Bradley, launched a second strike, targeting two survivors who had climbed on top of the capsized boat and were reportedly waving at US military aircraft in a request for rescue. The US military launched two more strikes, sinking what was left of the boat in a likely effort to conceal their crimes.

The Pentagon’s law of war manual declares that soldiers have a duty to refuse to carry out “clearly illegal” orders, such as killing shipwrecked sailors. “Orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal,” the manual declares.

The Trump administration’s claims that the boat was transporting drugs headed toward the United States are contradicted by available evidence. Small drug boats do not typically have such large crews, meaning the boat was likely transporting people.

*****

Rebecca Ingber, a professor at the Cardozo School of Law, told the New York Times, “There is a risk that the focus on the second strike and specifically the talk of ‘war crimes’ feeds into the administration’s false wartime framing and veils the fact that the entire boat-strikes campaign is murder, full stop. … The administration’s evolving justification for the second strike only lays bare the absurdity of their legal claims for the campaign as a whole—that transporting drugs is somehow the equivalent of wartime hostilities.” 

*****

In remarks on Saturday, Hegseth threatened to continue the killings, saying, “If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you. Let there be no doubt about it. President Trump can and will take decisive military action as he sees fit to defend our nation’s interests. Let no country on Earth doubt that for a moment.” 

9. Palestine Action prisoners on hunger strike in UK at “a very, very high risk of death” warns doctor

The health of pro-Palestine activist prisoners who began an open-ended hunger strike last month is deteriorating rapidly.

The hunger strikers are demanding an end to censorship of their communications, with letters and phone calls blocked; immediate bail, with most held on remand well over the usual six-month limit; the right to a fair trial; an end to their demonization by the Labour government, including dropping the “terrorist connection” claim made of their case; and the shutting down of Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit Systems’ UK sites.

Six of the seven involved began their protest between 27 and 36 days ago. A seventh joined the ­hunger strike last week.

The seven are Qesser Zuhrah (His Majesty’s Prison (HMP) Bronzefield); Amu Gib (HMP Bronzefield); Jon Cink (HMP Bronzefield); Heba Muraisi (HMP New Hall); Teuta “T” Hoxha (HMP Peterborough); Kamran Ahmed (HMP Pentonville) and Muhammad Umer Khalid (HMP Wormwood Scrubs).

Five of the seven have only recently returned to prison from hospital, where they said they were handcuffed to officers throughout their stays.

*****

Following the PA protests against Elbit and at RAF Brize Norton, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper moved to proscribe the organization. These actions were used as a pretext for long-planned police state measures, implemented in collaboration with the dictatorial agenda of the US Trump administration.

The proscription came into operation July 5, rubber stamped by both houses of parliament in a right-wing stampede. Membership of PA, or support for it, is now a crime under the Terrorism Act (2000).

Since the ban on Palestine Action, thousands of people have been arrested—the vast majority simply for holding a placard reading: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action”—at peaceful protests organized by civil liberties group, Defend Our Juries. As of the start of December, more than 2,700 people had been arrested under sections 12 or 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Those convicted under Section 12, for inviting support or arranging meetings to encourage support for a proscribed organization, can face up to 14 years’ imprisonment, a fine, or both. A summary conviction—tried by a magistrate without a jury in the Magistrates’ Court—can result in six months’ imprisonment.

Those convicted under Section 13, for wearing clothing or displaying articles in public in support of a proscribed organization, face up to six months’ imprisonment, a fine of up to £5,000, or both.

So far, more than 300 individuals have been charged under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

10. Starbucks workers’ strike approaches 4th week

A nationwide strike by Starbucks workers is approaching the start of its fourth week on Wednesday. The strike, which began on November 13 with walkouts at 65 stores across more than 20 cities, expanded to 120 stores on Black Friday. Workers are demanding higher wages, stable schedules, an end to understaffing and action on hundreds of unfair labor practice charges stemming from years of union busting.

Contract talks, which began in February, collapsed in April after delegates of Starbucks Workers United (SWU)—organized under Workers United (WU), an affiliate of the SEIU—rejected a contract offering a below-inflation 2 percent raise for baristas.

This is the second strike in a year called by SWU. Around 5,000 workers struck for five days last Christmas before being sent back to work without any concessions from management.

*****

Four years after the first Starbucks union election in Buffalo, no contract has been signed. Wages remain low, hours remain unstable, understaffing remains chronic and retaliation continues. These conditions are the product of a deliberate strategy by Starbucks management to stall, demoralize and wear workers down.

For Starbucks—which posted $3.76 billion in net income in 2024—the fines in New York are simply absorbed as a cost of doing business. They do not alter the basic issues for workers.

*****

Starbucks baristas have demonstrated initiative, courage and determination in launching the strike. But to win, the struggle must be expanded, unified and taken out of the narrow channels imposed from above.

The strike must not remain confined to isolated store walkouts. All 10,000 members of SWU must walk out at all at 650 unionized locations nationwide. Workers should organize flying pickets to nearby stores, regardless of union status to encourage participation and shut down whole areas.

They should begin holding meetings on the picket lines to formulate broad, fighting demands—real wage increases tied to inflation, guaranteed hours, adequate staffing, protection from retaliation—to build a united struggle with workers across the country, beginning with the service industry and the 2 million members of the SEIU. The struggle at Starbucks is inseparable from the broader conditions facing workers nationwide.

To bring the full weight of the working class to bear, workers need organization and coordination that the official structures will not provide. This requires the building of rank-and-file committees—democratically controlled by workers themselves—and linking these committees into the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC), which provides a framework for uniting workers across industries and across borders.

*****

SWU is one of many unions established over the last few years which younger workers have joined because they see them as more militant, democratic alternatives to the established corrupt, bureaucratically-controlled trade unions. They receive considerable support from the Democratic Party and the union hierarchy, who see them as a means of providing themselves with a semblance of credibility. In 2022, [Vermont Senator Bernie] Sanders spoke alongside SEIU officials and other Democrats at “Unity Fest” in Richmond, Virginia.

This is the kiss of death. It has proven impossible to combine ties with these pro-capitalist forces with the demands of the workers. One example is the fate of the Amazon Labor Union (ALU), which won a major union election at one of the company’s warehouses in Staten Island, New York, in 2022. More than three years later it still does not have a contract. An internal factional crisis led to it being absorbed by the Teamsters union, whose bureaucrats have helped Amazon’s competitor UPS slash tens of thousands of jobs, and whose top official Sean O’Brien is an open fascist and Trump supporter.

*****

The decisive question, both in this strike and in the situation as a whole, is the emergence of the working class as an independent force. Starbucks workers are fighting a giant corporation supported by both capitalist parties and backed by a global system of exploitation. This struggle unfolds under a Trump administration preparing sweeping attacks on democratic rights, migrant workers and labor protections.

The issues confronting Starbucks workers are shared by workers around the world facing layoffs, inflation, war, austerity and state repression. The urgent need is the building of a new movement of the working class, uniting across borders in defense of their common universal interests.

11. Australian Labor government gives $95 million to Ukraine for war with Russia

The Labor government announced on Thursday that it is providing the Ukrainian government with $95 million to help it prosecute the war with Russia that has already claimed hundreds of thousands of lives in the worst European conflict since World War II.

The package is the first by the Labor government since it was reelected in May, and is among the biggest provided by an Australian government to Kiev since the US and NATO deliberately provoked Russia’s reactionary invasion in March, 2022 and the war that followed.

The latest spend is striking for its militarist thrust. When the war began, Australian governments, first the Liberal-National Coalition and then Labor, downplayed their involvement, presenting assistance as humanitarian or as indirect military support.

That pretext has been dispensed with. Of the $95 million, it appears that not a cent is earmarked for humanitarian relief. The vast majority of the money is going to offensive weaponry, including advanced US and NATO supplied munitions, which could provoke a war throughout Europe. 

*****

The depiction of the war as being a defense of Ukrainian “democracy” and of “human rights” was always a fraud. In reality, the US and NATO transformed Ukraine into a garrison state over the course of more than a decade, deliberately provoked the Russian invasion and have used it to further longstanding plans for regime-change in Moscow and the breakup of the Russian Federation. 

*****

[Defense Minister Richard ] Marles and the Labor government, intoning against Russia’s “illegal and immoral invasion,” and its “aggression,” have been steadfast supporters of Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza. As the Zionist regime has massacred up to 100,000 people, dropping bombs on schools, hospitals and all buildings, Labor has proclaimed Israel’s “right to defend itself.”

That has included ongoing military exports from Australia to Israel, in defiance of findings by the International Court of Justice that Israel had a “plausible” case to answer for genocide and an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court for its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other leaders on charges of crimes against humanity.

The very same forces that have funded the Israeli genocide, above all American imperialism and its NATO partners, are also financing and directing the Ukrainian war effort, bluntly rejecting international law in the first case, and cynically invoking it in the second.

Ukrainian democracy, too, has been exposed as non-existent. The term of its President Volodymyr Zelensky expired in May, 2024 and he has ruled as a dictator since.

The government, roiled by corruption scandals over the siphoning off of state funds, is rounding up ordinary people in the streets to force them to fight. It is also persecuting opponents, including the young Ukrainian socialist Bogdan Syrotiuk, who has been imprisoned for more than a year on trumped-up charges for opposing the war from a socialist and internationalist standpoint. 

The phony professions of humanitarian concern for the Ukrainian people have increasingly been dropped, with the Trump administration deporting Ukrainians so that they can serve as cannon fodder.

The Labor government announcement boasted that its latest spend takes the Australian contribution to the Ukrainian war effort to $1.7 billion. Some $1.5 billion of that has been in military aid, which Labor claims is the highest of any non-NATO country.

*****

Labor’s involvement in the Ukraine war is part of its participation in an eruption of imperialist militarism globally. The Labor government is ironclad in its commitment to the US alliance, which in the Indo-Pacific centers on a massive military build-up in preparation for war against China, which is viewed as the chief threat to the hegemony of American capitalism.

The Trump administration has gyrated wildly on the question of Ukraine, suggesting at times that it would withdraw from the conflict and at others threatening a more direct war against Russia. The shifts reflect divisions within the US national-security establishment, including the view of some that American imperialism should cut its losses in Ukraine and focus all of its resources on conflict with China.

The oscillations have also been tied to demands for far greater military spending by the European NATO states, a demand contained in Trump’s National Security Strategy released this month.

In the Indo-Pacific, too, Trump has demanded that allies divert ever greater resources to preparations for war. That has included this year public calls by Trump administration officials for Australia to boost its military spending from the current level of little over 2 percent of gross domestic product, to 3.5 and then 5 percent of GDP.

Labor’s announcement on Ukraine was made just days before Marles and Wong departed Australia for Australia–United States Ministerial Consultations (AUSMIN) in Washington. Those meetings will be followed by a summit of AUKUS, the anti-China pact involving the US, the UK and Australia.

12. Australian government prepares social media ban amid opposition to privacy and free speech violation

The Australian Labor government’s ban on social media use by those under the age of 16 is set to be rolled out on December 10. The ban is not a child welfare measure but a direct intervention by the state to dictate how ordinary people will be allowed to use the internet.

While the immediate effect is to bar under‑16s, the ban’s enforcement mechanisms will have consequences for the entire population. Implementing an age‑verification regime necessarily requires that every user be identified through biometric checks, face scans, or government and bank databases.

The nominal purpose of the world-first policy according to the government is supposedly to “protect” children’s mental health. But the primary causes of distress, particularly among young people, are the government’s own policies of austerity, housing unaffordability, militarism and the climate catastrophe. 

Some mental health advocates, moreover, have warned that the ban will have a deleterious impact on that front, limiting the ability of children to communicate.

The real concern is that young people are being radicalised by what they are seeing and learning on social media platforms, including but not limited to the escalating environmental crisis, genocide in Gaza and return of fascism most sharply expressed in the second administration of US president Donald Trump. The ban’s purpose, therefore, is to censor social media platforms where youth in particular are searching for information about and answers to these major issues.

*****

The immediate effect is intimidatory and chilling. Requiring ID or a facial snapshot to access platforms creates a barrier to anonymous political discussion and exposes users—especially young activists, migrants and dissidents—to targeting, undercutting the use of social media as an online space for political organizing and cultural expression. 

*****

Indeed, Albanese affirmed in an interview with radio commentator Neil Mitchell in 2023 that, were he granted dictatorial powers, Albanese’s first business would be to “Ban social media,” due to the presence of “keyboard warriors who can anonymously say anything at all without any fear.”

Initially, the list of platforms included in the ban was Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and X. Since then, the government has accepted the eSafety Commissioner’s recommendation, based on flimsy arguments, that YouTube be added to the list. Reddit and streaming platform Kick were added earlier last month while Twitch, another popular streaming platform, was added less than three weeks out from the ban’s start date.

*****

No credence can be given to any government or corporate claim that collected identification or biometric data will remain beyond the state’s reach. Once age-verification systems are implemented, access by state agencies—police, intelligence services, or national security bodies—becomes routine, especially as Australia deepens its role in the imperialist redivision of the world including using data to attack political opponents. 

The government this year announced new Australian Federal Police units which will, among other methods, use “electronic surveillance” to enforce “social cohesion.” The AFP will work with the Australian domestic intelligence agency ASIO and the global imperialist surveillance network the Five Eyes which also uses massive amounts of data to target dissidents and in strategic planning.

*****

The Albanese government understands that it sits atop a social powder keg most sharply expressed in younger generations who are confronted by a system which presents them a future of joblessness, homelessness, financial stress and war.

Amid a broader collapse of the two-party system in Australia, the social media ban is a desperate attempt to prevent the further politicization of an entire generation increasingly opposed to the major parties and the corporate, militarist agendas they represent.

The ban is part of a broader assault on democratic rights in Australia and internationally including laws suppressing protest and attacks on anti-genocide demonstrators. The ruling elite is increasingly resorting to authoritarian measures to stifle political opposition as the environmental crisis, war and social inequality radicalize youth and the working class.

13. New Zealand police embroiled in major corruption scandal

Fallout from a scandal involving a group of senior New Zealand police officers is continuing despite the political establishment seeking to limit damage after a damning report found “significant failings” in the handling of sexual complaints against a former high-ranking officer. 

The National Party-led government is to establish a new position of Inspector General of Police, with powers to investigate police conduct, following the release of the 135-page report by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) on November 11. The report detailed serious allegations against former Deputy Police Commissioner Jevon McSkimming and a years-long cover-up by senior staff.

McSkimming earlier pleaded guilty in a Wellington court to accessing child sexual exploitation and bestiality material on his work computer and had resigned. Police Commissioner Richard Chambers claimed the outcome “showed all police, no matter their rank, are accountable to the laws that apply to us all.” McSkimming’s behavior, Chambers said, “goes against the core values of police” and he would not allow the episode to “tarnish” his staff.

But the IPCA report exposed a systematic cover-up by multiple senior officers of other serious complaints. The allegations arose from a sexual relationship that began in 2016 between McSkimming, then aged 40 and a superintendent, and a “Ms Z,” a 21-year-old unsworn police staffer. In 2018, McSkimming informed his seniors of the affair, which he claimed had ended, but accused the complainant of threatening and blackmailing him.

Ms Z allegedly sent hundreds of emails to McSkimming and the police, posted on social media and lodged complaints with the police hotline. Her allegations included sexual interaction without consent and threats by McSkimming to use intimate video recordings against her. The IPCA found that instead of investigating the woman’s allegations, police charged her with sending harmful digital communications.

Chief among those who subverted any investigation was then Police Commissioner Andrew Coster. Coster not only failed to take the allegations seriously, he covered up for McSkimming during the selection process for the latter’s appointment as Deputy Commissioner. Coster then sought to limit the scope and accelerate the IPCA investigation to ensure it did not interfere with McSkimming’s job application.

*****

In the wake of the IPCA report, Coster finally resigned last week as chief executive of the Social Investment Agency, which he took up after quitting the police in late 2024. Others identified as culpable were two former Assistant Commissioners of Investigations, a Deputy Commissioner responsible for Police Integrity and Conduct and a female Deputy Commissioner.

Over six years, police brass who knew of Ms Z’s allegations “seriously” failed, the IPCA declared, to make “sufficiently robust enquiries” and relied too heavily on accounts given by McSkimming and other officers. Instead, an investigation into Ms Z was launched and in May 2024 she was prosecuted under the Harmful Digital Communications Act. The charges have only recently been withdrawn.

The IPCA’s findings were deliberately circumscribed. While the report found “significant misconduct” and a “massive failure of leadership” at the top of the police, no officers had “set out to undermine the integrity” of the organization. Their response, the IPCA deemed, was simply one of “inaction and an unquestioning acceptance” of McSkimming’s narrative. 

*****

Ms Z emphasized that senior police ignored or dismissed her allegations for years while McSkimming continued to rise through the ranks. “I’ve been bullied into silence,” with no interest in whether there was substance to her concerns, she said. After being charged she was placed under restrictive bail conditions and subjected to suppression orders for nearly 18 months, costing her a job and legal bills. “My life has been so damaged by this … it’s an ongoing nightmare,” Ms Z declared.

*****

The scandal is the most recent in a litany of investigations and inquiries spanning decades. Similar systemic issues were identified by the Bazley Commission 18 years ago. That inquiry, into allegations that officers had undermined or mishandled investigations into complaints of sexual assault against other officers, delivered 60 recommendations to the police, IPCA and government—all now exposed as entirely ineffectual.

The ruling establishment has rushed to restore the plummeting reputation of the police. No criminal charges are being pursued against officers involved. Public Service Commissioner Brian Roche insisted there is “no evidence of corruption or cover up,” praising Coster for “unreservedly apologizing and accepting accountability.” Chambers assured parliament that he had now set specific goals to restore “trust and confidence up to 80 percent” in the police.

*****

Any conception of reforming “police culture,” given the central oppressive role the police play in capitalist society, is doomed. Amid a brutal austerity drive and escalating social tensions, police are the means of suppressing opposition particularly in the working class. The National Party-led government and the opposition Labour Party, competed on right-wing “law and order” policies.

The drum-beat includes a vicious political campaign witch-hunting Palestine protesters and, as in other countries including Britain and Australia, preparing escalating police-state measures against oppositional activities including workers’ struggles and strikes.

*****

The police are an essential component in the escalating state-wide offensive on the social position of the working class. The prison population has reached an all-time high, despite official figures showing a fall in the number of crimes. New Zealand’s incarceration rate is high compared to other OECD countries, with 199 prisoners per 100,000 people. Māori, among the most oppressed layers of the working class, are significantly overrepresented, making up 52 percent of inmates despite being only around 15 percent of the population.

New Zealand police are also involved in high rates of killings. Officers do not routinely carry firearms but can access them from police vehicles and stations. According to a 2022 Radio NZ report, police had killed 40 people since 1990, putting NZ ahead of England and Wales in fatal shootings per capita. The country of 5 million people had nearly eight police shootings per 10 million, compared to 0.3 in England and Wales, and 2.4 in Australia. Those killed are disproportionately Māori.

Meanwhile, corporate leaders investigated by police routinely avoid prosecution. Fifteen years after the Pike River coal mine disaster, which killed 29 workers, no one has been held accountable for violations of health and safety laws that turned the mine into a death trap. In 2017, police also decided not to charge individuals responsible for violating multiple building regulations in the construction of the CTV building, which collapsed in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake killing 115 people.

14. For a socialist perspective against the reintroduction of conscription in Germany

This is a statement that was distributed at demonstrations and protests held throughout Germany on December 5 against the reintroduction of conscription: "No cannon fodder for the profits of the rich!"

*****

We say no to conscription, in whatever form and at whatever time it is planned. We refuse to serve as cannon fodder for the profits of the rich!

The return of conscription is part of the militarization of society as a whole. Eighty years after the end of the Second World War, the German government is once again preparing to march an entire generation into the barracks and the trenches to sacrifice young lives for the economic interests of the ruling class. The CDU/SPD coalition is driving the rearmament of the Bundeswehr forward at breakneck speed.

The Bundeswehr is to be expanded into the largest conventional land army in Europe. The government plans to increase troop strength by some 80,000 soldiers and to build a reserve pool of several hundred thousand more. The new military service law creates the legal framework for this massive build-up, through compulsory mustering and subsequent call-ups. German military expenditure has already reached record levels and will be driven still higher through the “New Military Service” in order to finance the planned expansion in personnel and weaponry.

This has nothing to do with “self-defense.” Russia’s reactionary invasion of Ukraine does not alter the fact that the imperialist powers systematically prepared this war for years. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, NATO has, in defiance of all assurances made to Moscow, pushed its borders steadily eastwards and encircled Russia militarily. Berlin has played a central role in this offensive.

With its current rearmament program, the German government is returning to its historic war aims from the First and Second World Wars. Its declared goal is that Germany, 80 years after the catastrophic defeat of Hitler’s Wehrmacht (army), should once again be capable of winning a war against nuclear-armed Russia. For us, this would mean the same fate that young people suffered then, and that young people in Ukraine and Russia suffer today: forced recruitment, trenches and death.

*****

We reject conscription not only because we ourselves do not want to die in the trenches, but because we do not want anyone to die in the trenches. We oppose conscription because it is part of a spiral of war that destroys ever more human lives. 

*****

The escalation of the war against Russia, the German government’s support for the genocide in Gaza and the attacks on Iran, show that the strengthening of the Bundeswehr has nothing to do with “defence” but serves predatory imperialist interests.

This raises fundamental political questions. Anyone who claims that the Bundeswehr can be built up as a purely defensive force is claiming that there can be a peaceful capitalism. Two world wars and the acute danger of a third demonstrate that there can be no such thing as peaceful capitalism.

War does not arise from the malice of individual politicians at the top of society, but from the objective contradictions of capitalism. The contradiction between a world market and its division into rival nation-states leads inevitably to the struggle for markets and raw materials, which takes the form of war.

As long as capitalism exists, there will be war. A “peaceful Bundeswehr” is therefore impossible and a dangerous illusion.

*****

From this, decisive conclusions must be drawn. A fight against conscription means a fight against war and against its root—the capitalist system. We therefore fight for the building of an independent movement of the working class, based on the political principles elaborated by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) in its 2016 statement “Socialism and the Fight Against War”:

  • The struggle against war must be based on the working class, the great revolutionary force in society, uniting behind it all progressive elements in the population.
  • The new anti-war movement must be anti-capitalist and socialist since there can be no serious struggle against war except in the fight to end the dictatorship of finance capital and the economic system that is the fundamental cause of militarism and war.
  • The new anti-war movement must therefore, of necessity, be completely and unequivocally independent of, and hostile to, all political parties and organisations of the capitalist class.
  • Above all, the new anti-war movement must be international, mobilising the vast power of the working class in a unified global struggle against imperialism. The permanent war of the bourgeoisie must be answered with the perspective of permanent revolution by the working class, whose strategic goal is the abolition of the nation-state system and the establishment of a world socialist federation. Only in this way can the world’s resources be rationally planned and developed to eradicate poverty and raise human culture to new heights.

We call on all young people: organise yourselves in schools, universities and training centres against the reintroduction of conscription. Discuss this statement with your classmates, fellow students and colleagues. Make contact with us and join the IYSSE.

15. Jeremy Corbyn attacks Zarah Sultana’s demand for nationalisation against the billionaires

Zarah Sultana’s call at Your Party’s founding conference for the nationalization of the entire economy and for the working class to run society has come under vicious attack from party leader Jeremy Corbyn and political scoundrels Owen Jones, George Galloway, and Tariq Ali.

Speaking at the founding conference in Liverpool last Sunday, Sultana stated:

“We are not here for tweaks of a broken system. We are not here just to lower some bills and sprinkle a wealth tax. We are here for a fundamental transformation of society to replace capitalism with socialism.

“That means democracy in every workplace, every community, every corner of life. So yes, we will reverse the failed experiments of Thatcherism by taking water, energy, our railways, transport and communications back into public ownership. But that cannot be the limits of our ambition. We must seek new horizons— the banking industry, food production, construction and so much more. Because we know this fundamental truth, the working class can run society better than the billionaires, the profiteers and the war criminals who rule over us today.”

*****

Millions of workers and young people would likely agree with Sultana’s sentiments. This year’s Sunday Times Rich List reveals 156 billionaires in Britain hold a combined wealth of £772.8 billion, while 21 percent of the UK population (14.3 million people) live in poverty. Globally, 3,028 billionaires hold $15.8 trillion, and 81 have more wealth than the bottom 50 percent of the world’s population.

Public support for re-nationalizing Britain’s railways, post, buses, water, and energy companies—privatized and run into the ground by successive Tory and Labour governments—is overwhelming. Capitalism is widely discredited, with 38 percent of the population supporting socialism, according to YouGov. Among 18–34-year-olds, 56 percent believe socialism would improve life, and 20 percent of 18–24-year-olds view communism favorably (compared to just 2 percent who have a favorable view of fascism).

*****

Calls for “renationalization” have long been a staple of Labour “left” backbenchers and trade union bureaucrats. However, Sultana linked her call for public ownership to capitalism’s replacement by socialism, insisting it was a “fundamental truth” that the working class can run society better than billionaires. 

*****

Britain’s leading “lefts” attack Sultana because they fear the working class, especially its youth, breaking from the Labour Party and turning toward socialism. This process of reorientation is forcing a confrontation with fundamental historical and political questions. That is why, in response to Sultana’s calls for nationalisation against the billionaires, her critics rush to declare that any such discussion must be closed down.

In doing so, they attack Sultana for upholding the reformist agenda they themselves once championed and which the Labour Party, at least nominally, still upheld until 1995, when Tony Blair’s New Labour repudiated Clause 4 of the party’s constitution. This defined Labour’s ultimate aim as follows:

To secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service.

Sidney Webb drafted Clause 4 in November 1917, in direct response to the Russian Revolution. He worked with Independent Labour Party (ILP) leaders Arthur Henderson and Ramsay MacDonald to revise Labour’s program, constitution, and structure to better channel the working class away from revolution and toward what Henderson called “ordered social change through constitutional methods.”

The worldwide impact of the Russian Revolution was immense, and Britain was no exception. Labour leader Aneurin Bevan later recalled seeing Welsh miners “rushing to meet each other in the streets with tears streaming down their cheeks, shaking hands and saying, ‘At last it has happened’… the revolution of 1917 came to the working class of Great Britain, not as social disaster, but as one of the most emancipating events in the history of mankind.”

Nationalization of industry and production from above, whether carried out by reformist governments or (more extensively) by the Stalinist regimes in Eastern Europe after World War II, cannot bring about socialism. It requires the conscious revolutionary mobilization of the working class to overthrow the capitalist state and establish workers’ power.

During the 20th century, and especially after World War II, the British ruling class depended on the Labour bureaucracy to promote the vista of a parliamentary road to socialism. The 1945 Attlee Labour government nationalized one-fifth of Britain’s industry. It established the welfare state, including free universal healthcare, public housing, and state pensions, not out of altruism but to stave off revolution and divert the working class from Marxism. That period has ended. Today, neither Corbyn nor Labour’s discredited “left” make such promises. The urgent task is to resolve the crisis of working-class leadership and to build a genuine mass socialist party that unites workers worldwide and completes the epoch of world socialist revolution that began in 1917.

16. Bosch Rexroth workers in Scotland to strike for a week against pay cuts

Over 280 workers at Bosch Rexroth’s manufacturing plant in Glenrothes, Scotland, are set to strike for a week from December 8-15 against a cut in pay and working hours by up to 22 percent. A 95 percent majority, based on a high turnout, voted for strike action, rejecting the company’s latest proposal. The strike follows “a collective conciliation meeting”, hosted by arbitration service ACAS.

*****

The Glenrothes site, highly integrated into Bosch Rexroth’s global operations, is the company’s worldwide design and production center of its MCR series hydraulic motors used in construction, forestry, material handling and other heavy industries. 95 percent of the output from its skilled workforce is exported worldwide. The Bosch group employs some 6,300 people in the UK, including at manufacturing the R&D sites, which is also the company’s fourth largest market worldwide and the second largest in Europe after Germany. 

*****

The assault on conditions in Glenrothes is part of a desperate global attempt by Bosch Rexroth parent company, Robert Bosch GmbH, to increase its profits at the expense of its workforce.

Worldwide, the Baden-Württemberg headquartered company employs around 418,000 people in around 60 countries. More than half of these, 230,000, are in the Bosch automotive parts supply wings, whose primary customer is the European car industry, which is in deep crisis. This September, Bosch announced 22,000 were to be eliminated in Germany alone—the largest in the company’s history.

*****

Over the last year—besides Bosch—Volkswagen, Mercedes, ZF, Porsche, Ford, Audi, Stellantis/Opel and many smaller outfits have idled production lines, shut down plants, gone bankrupt, and make tens of thousands of workers redundant. Last year, VW announced 35,000 job losses by 2030, pay cuts and flexible working while threatening plant closures. Audi is cutting 7,500 jobs in Germany alone.

Stellantis is threatening to close plants across Europe, while forcing thousands of its workers to take compulsory days off. The historic Rüsselsheim Opel plant, which once employed 40,000 workers, now hosts about 1,500 production workers, half under gig economy conditions. In the UK in April this year the company closed its van production site in Luton, England—formerly Vauxhall, GM—ending 120 years of vehicle manufacturing in the town axing over 1,000 jobs directly and 5,000 in the supply chain. This is to transfer production to its remaining electric vehicle-only site in Ellesmere Port, Merseyside from 2026.

*****

Not a word explaining this crisis has come from the Unite trade union, of which the striking Glenrothes workers are members. In the union’s last press release, General Secretary Sharon Graham reiterated the blustering and vacuous line. “Unite will not allow our members’ jobs, pay and conditions to be slashed by an extremely profitable company. We will back our members all the way in their fight as they begin strike action.”

A Unite industrial officer, George Ramsey said, “Hundreds of workers are being forced to take strike action by Bosch Rexroth when there are absolutely no financial reasons for them to impose these changes.”

Given these statements, workers could conclude that they were dealing with a greedy local management, inexplicably failing to pay decent wages. All was well with capitalism in Britain and Europe and the Bosch Rexroth board will see sense in due course.

In fact, Bosch remains far more profitable than Unite let on. The Bosch group’s after-tax profit worldwide last year was €1.4 billion on sales of just over €90 billion, down from €2.6 billion profit on €92 billion sales the previous year. Despite this, the company’s balance sheet improved as did the dividend paid to shareholders. But the company employed 11,500 less workers.

Bosch, which is 94 percent owned by a charitable foundation run by ex-corporate officers, industry figures and members of the Bosch family, aims to remain profitable directly at the expense of the jobs and living standards of its workforce.

*****

Bosch workers can only defend themselves by mobilising their independent strength. The fight cannot be left in the hands of the union apparatus who refuse to unify workers against any aspect of the capitalist onslaught.

Both Unite in the UK and the IG Metall union in Germany, exert their bureaucratic influence to blind workers as to the origins of the attacks on them and delay, suppress, confuse and divide workers’ efforts to oppose these attacks. Where struggles break out, the unions work to ensure they remain isolated and ineffective.

*****

Workers are tasked with building new organisations of struggle to defend themselves from the capitalist assault and advance their own interests. The WSWS encourages the formation of rank-and-file committees of action in every factory, office, workplace and institution of education and care. Such committees are posed with unifying workers within corporations and across industries, sectors, regions and national borders. Contact the World Socialist Web Site today to discuss further.

17. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

Bogdan Syrotiuk

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.

Dec 6, 2025

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today: 

1. United States: Trump revokes licenses for thousands of CDL training centers, in sweeping attack on immigrant truckers

In a move targeted at immigrant truckers, the Trump administration has revoked the accreditation of nearly 3,000 CDL (commercial driver’s license) training centers and placed another 4,500 on notice that they must prove compliance with federal Entry Level Driver Training (ELDT) requirements within 30 days.

*****

ELDT requirements include covering the required curriculum, maintaining complete and accurate training records, verifying instructor qualifications, and documenting that the school has the necessary equipment and facilities.

According to federal auditors, the training providers removed from the registry failed to meet the requirements of the ELDT rule. Centers were cited for falsifying or manipulating training data, neglecting to cover required curriculum topics, employing instructors who did not meet federal qualifications, or lacking the necessary equipment and facilities to provide legitimate commercial driver training.

Many failed to maintain complete and accurate records or refused to provide documentation during federal reviews. Some of the removed providers had been inactive for years, a result of a registry system that allowed schools to self-certify without inspection or verification.

But the main target of the move is immigrants. In September, the Trump administration imposed sweeping restrictions on non-domiciled commercial driver licenses after a series of highly sensationalized fatal crashes in Florida, Texas, Alabama and California involving big rigs. Officials focused on the immigration status of the drivers involved and presented these isolated incidents as evidence of a wider safety crisis caused by immigrants.

*****

According to COGO, a commercial trucking insurance firm that analyzes federal crash data, immigrant drivers are involved in a tiny fraction of fatal truck crashes. Only five fatal crashes this year involved non domiciled commercial drivers out of approximately 1,600 fatal truck crashes recorded through July, or three-tenths of one percent.

Immigrant and foreign born drivers make up between 16 and 20 percent of the trucking workforce, a share far out of proportion to their minuscule representation in fatal collisions.

The crisis in CDL training is the result of decades of deregulation. The ELDR rule was originally developed to end the fragmented system in which each state determined its own standards, producing wide variations in training quality. Industry lobbying stripped the rule of its core provisions before implementation.

Mandatory training hours were removed. Behind the wheel requirements became optional. Instructor qualifications were weakened. Training centers could join the federal registry by submitting an online form without inspection, credential verification, or proof that they possessed equipment or instructors.

For decades, Democratic and Republican governments alike allowed the trucking industry to shape federal regulations to its benefit, repeatedly delaying implementation, weakening enforcement mechanisms and resisting any measures that would impose real oversight on CDL training programs. The result is a nationwide patchwork of state-based standards easily exploited by operators.

*****

Immigrant workers are being targeted as scapegoats to expand the government’s powers over the workforce as a whole. Measures first directed at immigrants will later be applied more broadly to stem the rising tide of social unrest in the face of the accelerating crisis of capitalism. The defense of jobs and democratic rights requires the development of independent rank-and-file committees that unite immigrant and “native-born” workers in a common struggle against these escalating attacks.

2. Israel bulldozed the bodies of unidentified Palestinians into mass graves in Gaza

On Wednesday, CNN published the findings of an investigation showing that Israeli bulldozers pushed Palestinian corpses into mass graves near the Zikim crossing and buried dozens of unidentified victims in Gaza’s sand.

The CNN investigation, along with earlier reporting of mass burials of unknown Palestinians, exposes evidence of war crimes committed by the Israeli military with the full support of US and European imperialism and the complicity of the Arab bourgeois regimes.

*****

Through analysis of videos, photos, satellite imagery and interviews with drivers and local witnesses, the report establishes that Israeli forces used military bulldozers to push bodies into the earth, creating unmarked or barely marked graves along the aid corridor.

The investigation links these scenes to a broader pattern of desecration, documenting the bulldozing of cemeteries and the destruction of makeshift graves across Gaza as Israeli ground forces advanced. Residents describe areas where the dead lay for days under constant fire, unreachable by ambulances, before bulldozers arrived to clear the road and cover the bodies.

*****

The bulldozer graves near Zikim intersect with a second, equally horrific reality: the thousands listed as missing in Gaza whose bodies have never been identified. In late October, the New York Times documented a mass burial in central Gaza in which 54 bodies returned by Israel were interred together because they could not be individually identified.

Hospital staff described remains arriving with numerical tags and minimal information, overwhelming their limited capacity to perform forensic work under bombardment and siege conditions. Families, the Times report noted, searched hospitals and makeshift cemeteries for any sign of their loved ones, often with nothing more than a number or a fragmentary description to go on.

*****

International humanitarian law, codified in the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, imposes clear obligations regarding the treatment of the dead. Parties to a conflict must search for, recover and respect the bodies of those killed, protect them from despoliation and facilitate identification and dignified burial, with information transmitted to families through neutral channels.

Customary law further condemns outrages upon personal dignity, which in practice extends to the handling of bodies and graves.

Bulldozing corpses into unmarked pits, destroying cemeteries or leaving bodies exposed where families cannot safely reach them is a flagrant violation of these laws. When such practices occur in the context of indiscriminate or targeted killing of civilians and a campaign of mass displacement, they constitute war crimes.

*****

The bulldozed mass graves near the Zikim crossing are a component part of the genocidal onslaught. People were killed while attempting to reach aid, in areas under Israeli control, and then buried by Israeli machinery without identification. This fusion of displacement, starvation, mass murder and desecration of the dead is the material content of what the Israeli ruling class and its imperialist backers call “security.”

Washington has provided Israel with the bombs, shells, intelligence and diplomatic cover necessary to wage its war, rushing munitions deliveries even as casualty figures mounted and evidence of mass starvation emerged. In the United Nations, the US has vetoed or gutted resolutions calling for a cease-fire and accountability, while repeating the mantra that “Israel has the right to defend itself.”

European governments, while occasionally muttering about “proportionality,” have continued arms sales and security cooperation and have criminalized or repressed the mass demonstrations against the genocide.

The Arab bourgeois regimes—from Egypt and Jordan to the Gulf monarchies—have acted as accomplices, enforcing the siege, suppressing solidarity among their own populations and angling for a seat at the table in the post-war arrangements. Their overriding concern is not the fate of the Palestinian masses but the preservation of their own rule and their integration into the imperialist regional realignment plan.

Against this backdrop, talk of a “peace plan” and “reconstruction” for Gaza, driven by Washington and Tel Aviv, is a cynical fraud. The schemes being prepared envisage sections of the devastated enclave rebuilt under permanent Israeli military control, policed by proxy forces and financed by capital from the imperialist and Gulf countries.

For the Israeli ruling class, this offers a chance to solidify its grip and to reshape Gaza’s geography and demography; for the US and its regional allies, it promises profitable contracts and new levels of imperialist domination.

The involvement of figures such as Jared Kushner, the son-in-law of Donald Trump—whose family real estate empire epitomizes parasitic speculation and the financial oligarchy—underscores the class character of these plans. The same system that turned Gaza into a killing field now seeks to turn its ruins into an investment bonanza, from which the survivors are to be excluded except as a super-exploited labor force under the guns of the Israeli occupation troops.

3. Videos: Wayne State University students speak out against ICE raids and inequality

This week, World Socialist Web Site reporters and members of the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE) spoke to students at Wayne State University about the attacks on immigrant workers by the Trump administration.

 

These videos are posted on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Youtube, and Twitter/X. Please like, comment and share them, and subscribe/follow the World Socialist Web Site on each platform for more.

4. Survivors of September 2 boat strike waved for rescue, did not know they had been attacked

The survivors of the US military’s September 2 drone strike in the Caribbean attempted to wave to US military aircraft for rescue and appeared not to understand that the US military had attempted to kill them, the New York Times reported Friday.

The Times, citing people who saw the video following its screening at a meeting before congressional committees yesterday, wrote that “two survivors of the US military’s first boat strike on Sept. 2 climbed atop the overturned hull and waved to something overhead.” The people who saw the video told the Times the “most logical explanation was that the two survivors had seen the American aircraft above them and started signaling for a rescue.”

The report in the Times contradicts the claims of defenders of the Trump administration’s drone murders. “I saw two survivors trying to flip a boat loaded with drugs bound to the United States back over so they could stay in the fight,” said Republican Senator Tom Cotton, in an attempt to defend the killings.

Rather, the video indicates that the survivors had no idea they were in any “fight.” According to the Times, a person who watched the video added that “it is also not clear if the survivors even knew the initial explosion was an attack.”

*****

The American public has the right to view the recording of the strike, which has so far only been shown to members of Congress behind closed doors. It must be publicly released immediately.

The Trump administration, however, will no doubt seek to cover up or even destroy the tape and is counting on the Democrats to help them do it. In 2005, the Bush administration destroyed recordings of the torture of detainees at a CIA black site. At the time, congressional Democrats were made aware of the destruction of the tapes but did not inform the public.

*****

The details of the murder come the same day that the Trump administration published a new National Defense Strategy that places central emphasis on US domination of Latin America, as a base of power projection in the conflict with China and other states.

The document declares, “We want to ensure that the Western Hemisphere … remains free of hostile foreign incursion or ownership of key assets, and that supports critical supply chains; and we want to ensure our continued access to key strategic locations. In other words, we will assert and enforce a ‘Trump Corollary’ to the Monroe Doctrine.”

It demands “a readjustment of our global military presence to address urgent threats in our Hemisphere … to control sea lanes … and to control key transit routes in a crisis...”

It declares effectively, all of North and South America as “our hemisphere,” giving a generality to the seemingly disparate plans floated by Trump over the past year to annex Panama, Greenland and Canada, as well as the massive militarization targeting Venezuela. Control of these strategic territories and waterways would give the United States, the Trump administration hopes, the weight to confront China on the global sphere.

As the World Socialist Web Site wrote in February following Trump’s statement that he intended to annex Canada, there is a direct precedent for Trump’s efforts to unify “our hemisphere” in the Anschluss policy of the Nazi regime. 

*****

This plan for world domination entails criminality on a vast scale, as has been demonstrated by the killing spree in the Pacific and Caribbean.

5. Amnesty International report details torture, abuse at immigration detention camps in Florida

On Thursday, Amnesty International published a report titled “Torture and enforced disappearances in the Sunshine State,” documenting torture carried out by the US immigration Gestapo at detention camps in Florida. The report includes interviews with four immigrants kidnapped and held at the Everglades compound (run by the state in conjunction with the federal government), which Trump has proudly labeled “Alligator Alcatraz,” and at Miami’s notorious Krome detention and processing center, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility with decades of documented abuse and maltreatment.

The report’s most explosive revelations describe torture methods at the Everglades camp that directly mirror the war crimes committed by the US military and intelligence agencies at Abu Ghraib in Iraq and at the Guantánamo Bay prison camp in Cuba beginning in the early 2000s. At those imperialist outposts, the US carried out beatings, forced stress positions, sensory deprivation, sexual humiliation and confinement in boxes and containers, all under the authority of the Pentagon and CIA. The same methods of domination and terror have now been imported wholesale onto US soil and used against immigrant workers.

*****

The use of small-box confinement has long been part of the repertoire of US imperialist torture. Abu Zubaydah, captured by the US in 2002 and still held at Guantánamo, was subjected to prolonged confinement in dark cramped boxes as part of the CIA’s torture program.

The same methods used against alleged “terrorists” are now being deployed against immigrants and will soon be used against workers and citizens that object to ongoing attacks on their living standards and democratic rights.

The Everglades concentration camp opened in July 2025 with the capacity to detain roughly 3,000 people. It is the first state-owned and operated immigration concentration camp in the United States. Located directly in a hurricane corridor, the facility operates without regard to federal rules even though the Department of Homeland Security recently approved more than $600 million in grant money to fund and sustain operations.

Because the camp is state-run, it is not integrated with federal databases, including the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Locator. As of this writing, there is no public record of who is detained there or how many. Lawyers report being unable to contact clients for weeks, creating effective incommunicado detention and conditions that meet the definition of enforced disappearances.

Consequently, not only is there no federal oversight of the facility, but there exists no integration into ICE’s systems or databases. The absence of registration or tracking mechanisms for those detained at “Alligator Alcatraz” facilitates incommunicado detention and constitutes enforced disappearances when the whereabouts of a person being detained there is denied to their family, and they are not allowed to contact their lawyer. 

*****

Amnesty International concludes that people detained in “Alligator Alcatraz” are held in cages of approximately 1,000 square feet, with 32 people per cage and eight cages per tent. “The lights are like stadium lights; they’re always on, they’re never turned off or even dimmed. It’s very cold, the air-conditioning is very strong. There are a lot of mosquitoes,” one man said.

Another described the toilet conditions: “There are three toilets in each cage. There’s no privacy; there are cameras above the toilets. The toilets were clogged a lot and shit overflowed from them. I saw a big snake. A friend was bitten by a spider that laid eggs inside of him.”

One man reported that someone died while he was held there. “I heard a lot of screaming,” he said. “But there’s no way to know what actually happened to the person because we’re not registered in ICE’s system.” Although the state of Florida is required to keep records of deaths and major medical incidents, the Florida Division of Emergency Management provided no such documentation to Amnesty International.

*****

At Krome immigrants faced many of the same cruel, inhuman and degrading treatments. One man said that after a guard punched him in the neck, he was forced into solitary confinement for 24 straight days. “I went nine days without any sort of medical attention,” he said. “My neck hurt; I couldn’t move it. My ribs and ear hurt too. I was finally just given a pill. I went outside only once in 24 days. I was basically incommunicado.” 

Another man described being placed in an overcrowded tent. “There are 126 of us in there. There are only three telephones that we can use for five minutes a day. They count us at least twice a day. When this is happening we have to sit on our cots. The bathrooms are closed during the count which lasts over an hour.”

Another detainee said, “People are extremely stressed. They’re having a hard time, they’re sad, they’re anxious. The guards are racist and hostile. It’s almost like we disgust them.”

*****

The horrors described in the Amnesty International report are not aberrations and not the product of a single administration. The torture, enforced disappearances and inhuman detention conditions at “Alligator Alcatraz” and Krome express a bipartisan policy developed and expanded over decades. The torture methods pioneered under George W. Bush and acknowledged by Obama with his infamous admission, “We tortured some folks,” have now been brought onto US soil and turned against immigrant workers.

This has been made possible only because of the criminal complicity of the Democratic Party. Far from opposing Trump’s fascistic attacks on immigrants, the Democrats have facilitated them. They joined Republicans to pass the “Laken Riley Act” which expands the mass detention and deportation of immigrants. Senior Democratic figures, including Bernie Sanders, have praised Trump’s mass deportation operation and echoed his claims that immigrants pose a threat to the nation and US workers.

As resistance grows towards the raids against immigrants, the conditions in the Everglades and at Krome are a warning to workers and students that the methods of imperialist torture abroad are being brought home for use against the working class.

6. Painter Robert Rauschenberg (1925-2008) at New York’s Guggenheim Museum: “Life Can’t Be Stopped”

”Revolver II,” 1967

Rauschenberg belonged to a generation of artists (such as his friends and romantic partners Cy Twombly and Jasper Johns) that emerged between the twilight of Abstract Expressionism in the mid-1950s and the dawn of Pop Art in the early 1960s. Alongside his peers, Rauschenberg deepened the Abstract Expressionists’ turn away from political engagement and even abjured serious ideas and large human problems as the basis for artwork. His passive stance spoke to the harmful social indifference that had become the norm in the art world after the traumas and tribulations of the 1930s and 1940s.

This was not the doing, much less the fault, of the individual artists, many of whom were both sincere and skilled but rather the objective consequence of disorienting events: above all, the terrible degeneration of the Soviet Union and the various Communist parties and its demoralizing influence on intellectual and cultural life. The confidence of artists and others in the perspective of society moving to a higher stage had been dealt damaging blows.

*****

These traumas were followed by the slaughter of World War II and the nuclear incineration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States. America became the dominant world power. The postwar boom raised the population’s living standards but also spawned a banal consumer culture fueled by an expanding mass media. Anticommunism became the state religion, and social conformity the rule. The imperialist powers made deals with Stalin and the Soviet bureaucracy but also took advantage of the latter’s totalitarian character to terrorize the population with the danger of the “Red menace.” 

*****

Faced with the brutality and philistinism of capitalism and mistakenly believing that “socialism” had failed, many artists lost hope in the prospect for radical social change. They largely lacked the capacity to recognize the restabilization of capitalism as temporary. Meanwhile, the anti-Marxist Frankfurt School and related trends, though putatively leftist, encouraged demoralization and withdrawal. The Abstract Expressionists sought “timeless,” “universal” themes often in the iconography of ancient religions and Jungian psychology. Though they produced dynamic, heroic work in some cases, theirs ultimately was a current of despair.

Other changes in the art world were contributing to a crisis within modernism itself. The gallery system was expanding, and art was becoming integrated into the culture industry. Museums, galleries and the art market were beginning to professionalize and absorb the postwar avant-garde.

Rauschenberg’s work emerged from these complex, often painful processes. Though an acquaintance and admirer of the Abstract Expressionists, he rejected their earnestness and their grand, existential (and Existentialist) themes. In fact, his work sometimes poked fun at their project without proposing new values or goals. By “debasing” his art with everyday materials, Rauschenberg showed more of a kinship with Dada, which had emerged during and after World War I. Yet he quite deliberately eschewed Dada’s caustic social criticism.

*****

Unlike his near-contemporary Andy Warhol (1928-1987), whose silkscreen paintings depicted celebrities and consumer products, Rauschenberg continued to embrace everyday life. But neither artist viewed his subjects critically. Neither suggested that society in Cold War America needed to be changed—or even could be changed. Rauschenberg, undoubtedly a thoughtful, gifted individual, foreshadowed Pop Art’s deplorable glorification of an unmediated surface reality. 

*****

In 1964, Rauschenberg won the Grand Prize at the Venice Biennale, a prestigious international cultural exhibition. This victory was interpreted not only as an official embrace of Pop Art but also, and more fundamentally, as a Cold War triumph for the US. At the time, the US State Department and CIA made use of artists, musicians and others as part of its propaganda warfare against “Soviet communism,” contrasting the supposed freedoms artists enjoyed in the “democratic” West, including the freedom to create experimental art, with repressive conditions in the USSR. None of the artists, rendered vulnerable by their indifference or active hostility to larger political concerns, objected to this fraudulent campaign. 

In 1966, in opposition to the Vietnam War, Rauschenberg, a life-long pacifist, provided much of the funding for the “Artists’ Tower of Protest” built in an empty lot on the Sunset Strip in Hollywood. Four years later, again in an anti-war protest, Rauschenberg withdrew from the US pavilion at the Venice Biennale.

*****

The world had passed through major upheavals between “Barge” and “Easter Lake (Galvanic Suite).” However, artists like Rauschenberg, committed to an approach that consciously rejected a concern with concrete historical and social development, could not in their work valuably, richly reflect or make sense of the enormous social shocks. A detrimentally static, frozen element makes itself felt. Rauschenberg’s artistic technique and his political semi-abstention remained fundamentally the same. 

*****

The Guggenheim exhibition does not fully convey Rauschenberg’s complexity as an artist. Still less does it examine the era of artistic, economic and political shifts and transitions during which he emerged.

In important respects, Rauschenberg foreshadowed artists’ turn toward postmodernist subjectivism and pessimism. His supposed demystification of the artwork (e.g., in the Combines) inspired the Conceptual artists who followed him, for whom the “Concept” was “the most important aspect of the work.” They de-emphasized artistic form and aesthetics, arguing, like Sol LeWitt, that “execution is a perfunctory affair. The idea becomes a machine that makes the art.” But artists such as LeWitt, Joseph Kosuth and Lawrence Weiner moved away from the sensuality of Rauschenberg’s work toward colder, language-based forms. Their work was more rarefied and even less socially engaged than Rauschenberg’s.

*****

Overall, Rauschenberg’s efforts convey an appealing warmth, physicality, spontaneity and embrace of human culture in various forms. He inevitably reflected the conditions and contradictions of his time, which were not conducive to artwork that took on titanic questions or challenged the status quo. Rauschenberg’s acceptance of the world as he found it was a symptom of the historical difficulties and a general retreat by the artists from social reality and commitment.

7. Brazilian postal workers set to strike against attacks by Lula government

Postal workers in the state of São Paulo, Brazil’s richest and most industrialized state, voted on Thursday for a strike to begin December 16 amid deadlocked negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement for next year. 

More significantly, they are also fighting against a “restructuring plan” presented on November 21 by the government of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Workers Party – PT) that will accelerate plans to privatize one of Brazil’s largest public companies.

Assemblies have also been called by the other 35 local unions, and in the coming days workers in other regions and states of Brazil may approve further strike action.

The Lula administration’s “restructuring” establishes a Voluntary Dismissal Plan (PDV) for 10,000 of the 83,000 employees, the closure of 1,000 agencies, and the sale of Brazil’s Post Office properties. In addition, it provides for a loan of 20 billion reais (US$3.7 billion) to supposedly “modernize” the postal service and bring it into line with business interests.

*****

The Post Office has existed for 360 years in Brazil, operating in all 5,500 of its municipalities, offering services ranging from postal and delivery services to banking and the distribution of vaccines and food to poor families. It is this unique logistical capacity that has attracted the interest of companies such as Amazon and Fedex from the US, Germany’s DHL, China’s Alibaba and Argentina’s Mercado Livre.

To meet the growing interests of these and other companies, successive Brazilian governments have been cutting staff, wages, and rights, making working conditions more precarious, and advancing the privatization of the Post Office. Today, only the postal service is a monopoly of the Post Office, while parcel delivery has been open to free competition in Brazil since 2009.

*****

The Lula administration, despite claiming to be against the privatization of the Post Office, is implementing measures that will pave the way for it. In addition to the recently announced “restructuring plan,” these measures include opening up certain areas to competition from private companies and reducing funding. 

*****

The approval of the strike notice for December 16 by São Paulo postal workers comes after a series of local protests and walkouts throughout Brazil this year. 

The major obstacle to advancing these struggles is the nationalist and pro-corporate perspective of the postal workers’ union federations, which have a record of dividing workers, isolating them from other sectors of the federal public service, and diverting their struggles into empty appeals to the courts to break collective-bargaining deadlocks.

*****

What postal workers need is not to defend national sovereignty to guarantee their interests, but to advance a struggle independent of the Lula government, the PT and its pseudo-left satellites, and the unions controlled by them. This means forming rank-and-file committees affiliated with the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC) to unify their struggles with their brothers and sisters internationally. 

In countries such as the US and Canada, where postal workers are facing the same threats as their Brazilian counterparts and have staged protests and strikes that have been betrayed by the unions, these committees have been formed to oppose job cuts, the intensification of working hours and the consequent increase in workplace accidents, along with the root cause of these attacks: the capitalist system. We call on postal workers in Brazil who are beginning their struggles to join this movement.

8. Sri Lanka: JVP/NPP government uses emergency powers to curb free speech as popular anger mounts over Ditwah cyclone disaster

Determined to suppress growing public anger over the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna/National People’s Power (JVP/NPP) government’s catastrophic mishandling of Cyclone Ditwah, which has left nearly 1,000 dead, a senior JVP/NPP minister has ordered police to invoke emergency regulations against critics.

The measure, framed as a response to an “extremely malicious attack” through social media campaigns targeting President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and several ministers, is in fact a blatant attempt to silence dissent.

Sri Lanka has been under a draconian state of emergency since Dissanayake declared it immediately after Cyclone Ditwah devastated large sections of the island. In a televised address on November 28, he justified the move as necessary to “provide legal protection and financial allocation” to “rebuild our country better than before.”

Notably, opposition figures such as Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) leader Sajith Premadasa had urged the declaration of an emergency, underscoring the bipartisan support within the ruling elite for using repressive laws to preempt social unrest.

Although Dissanayake pledged in his speech last Sunday that emergency powers would not be used repressively, the World Socialist Web Site warned they would be deployed to enforce deeper austerity under the guise of “rebuilding.” The latest statement by his minister confirms that the government is quickly moving in that direction. 

*****

The minister’s remarks were swiftly condemned by journalist associations and civil liberties advocates. The Sri Lanka Working Journalists’ Association (SLWJA) denounced the directive, stating: “The very people who once championed freedom of speech and expression are now issuing orders to abolish it, showing the government has embarked on a path against democracy.” The SLWJA also pointed to several incidents over the past year that threatened media freedom under the JVP/NPP.

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) endorsed the SLWJA’s statement, calling on the government to respect the public’s right to information and uphold freedom of expression.

Since taking office late last year, the JVP/NPP government has mounted a series of attacks on press freedom and journalists.

*****

The Cyclone Ditwah disaster has completely exposed the bankruptcy of the JVP/NPP government and the capitalist system as a whole. It has triggered a profound political crisis—not only for the government, but also for the opposition parties, which are scrambling to disassociate themselves from responsibility for what is ultimately a man-made disaster rooted in decades of neglect and corruption.

Successive governments failed to invest in modern forecasting systems or to develop infrastructure that could have saved lives and mitigated the cyclone’s impact. Now, while making empty phrases over the catastrophe, both government and opposition are united in fear of the growing outrage in the working class and among the oppressed masses.

The JVP/NPP government remains focused on fulfilling its pledges to the International Monetary Fund. President Dissanayake and his ministers have made clear that not even a natural catastrophe of this magnitude will shift their commitment to brutal austerity. Officials insist that working people must bear the burden of recovery costs, now estimated in the tens of billions of dollars. Anticipating resistance, the government has responded by imposing emergency regulations to punish even modest criticism of its failures.

9. Jacobin’s defense of the Trump–Mamdani pact and the capitalist state

In the aftermath of New York mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s White House meeting with Donald Trump, in which the so-called “democratic socialist” and the fascist would-be dictator exchanged pleasantries and mutual praise, Jacobin, the unofficial organ of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), has published a series of articles hailing the meeting and praising Mamdani’s capitulation to Trump as a political tour de force. 

One of the most significant of these articles is a commentary by Christopher Marquis headlined “Trump and Mamdani Agree on the State, Not on Whom It Serves.” In the course of the article, Marquis, a professor of management at the University of Cambridge, argues that the capitalist state is not intrinsically hostile to the interests of the working class and can, through prodding from the “left,” be either pressured to serve the needs of working people or captured outright by them.

*****

Marquis defines the “underlying issue” as “economic governance” (emphasis in the original). This is a false statement that could be taken from the talking points of any run-of-the-mill Democratic politician.

In reality, the underlying issue is the social relations of production under capitalism, in which the capitalists own the means of production, and the workers, who produce all of the wealth, own nothing but their ability to work, which they must sell to their exploiters in return for a wage. These relations generate an irreconcilable class struggle, leading either to the revolutionary overthrow of capitalism by the working class and the establishment of a workers’ state and socialism, based on common ownership of the means of production, equality, and production for social need rather than private profit, or a descent into fascist barbarism and nuclear war.

There is not a hint of class struggle or working class revolution in the Jacobin article, or in the politics of the DSA and Mamdani. On the contrary, this is their greatest fear, which leads them into the arms of the fascist representative of the oligarchy, Trump.

It is striking that Marquis’ presentation of the political situation, couched in abstract, academic jargon, provides no sense of the staggering and unprecedented levels of wealth concentration and social inequality in today’s America. It says nothing about Trump’s fascist pogrom against immigrants, his unconstitutional deployment of troops to major cities, his assertion of dictatorial powers, his support for genocide in Gaza, or his illegal military attacks on Iran, Venezuela and other countries.  

*****

The class function of the state has never been more naked, rendering absurd the DSA’s politics of tinkering around the edges of the capitalist status quo.

Marquis’ argument is not merely wrong in theory. It serves a definite class function. Jacobin is an organ of the DSA and a broader affluent middle class layer clustered in academia, NGOs and the trade union bureaucracy. This milieu has grown socially and politically dependent on the capitalist state: on public grants, tenured posts, foundations, and the managed “left” spaces supplied by the Democratic Party. Its material interests bind it to the preservation of the existing order, even as it cultivates a left‑wing image through rhetoric about “democratic socialism” and identity politics.

*****

The objective conditions for socialist revolution are maturing rapidly. The same technological and economic processes, such as AI, which have driven the rise of the oligarchy are also creating the material basis for the mass political radicalization of the working class. The decisive issue is the building of a revolutionary leadership capable of turning this objective movement into a conscious struggle for power.

10. By abstaining on the pensions package, Germany’s Left Party supports the reactionary policies of the Merz government

The announcement by the Left Party (Die Linke) that it would abstain in Friday’s Bundestag (parliament) vote on the pensions package of the Merz government, thereby ensuring its adoption, exposes it once again as a pro-capitalist party loyal to the state. Confronted with growing social and political opposition in Germany and across Europe, it is doing everything it can to keep in office the most right-wing government since the founding of the Federal Republic—a government that is rearming Germany on a scale not seen since Hitler, organising massive social attacks, implementing the policies of the fascist Alternative for Germany (AfD) and thus paving its way into government.

The Left Party tries to cloak its support for Merz in social phraseology. “We will not accept that pension levels are pushed down even further,” declared faction leader Heidi Reichinnek. The introduction of a “guard rail” should not fail because of her party, she said–referring to the government’s plan to continue the expired minimum pension level of 48 percent until 2031.

A brief look at reality shows how cynical this justification is. In view of massive price increases and continuing inflation, this “guard rail” amounts to a cut. Germany’s pension level is already among the lowest in Europe and will continue to fall in the coming years—not despite, but because of the pensions package, which explicitly aims to make the social devastation more inevitable.

*****

The anti-working class and reactionary character of this collaboration can only be understood against the backdrop of the social and political offensive of German imperialism.

Barely a week ago the government adopted the 2026 budget—the largest war budget since the fall of the Third Reich. At over €108 billion and still rising, it breaks all previous limits and drives militarisation forward with unprecedented speed. The logic of the budget is clear: the hundreds of billions flowing into armaments must be clawed back from the population through social cuts.

The pensions plans are therefore not isolated, but part of a social counterrevolution. The assault on pensions, healthcare, care provision, basic welfare and wages is one of the domestic pillars of Germany’s new great-power policy. And the Left Party demonstratively stands behind it.

The Left Party’s support also comes at a moment when the Merz government is consciously acting as a springboard for the fascist AfD. Merz already cooperated with the AfD ahead of the last federal elections. Now the coalition led by him, together with the SPD, is organising mass deportations, sharply expanding the police and intelligence agencies and adopting open Nazi rhetoric—such as Merz’s agitation about refugees “disfiguring” the “urban environment.”

The new budget even includes a direct bridge to the far right: €250,000 [$US291,000] are being channelled to the right-wing think tank “Republik 21” (R21), founded by former Merz adviser Andreas Rödder and former Family Minister Kristina Schröder (CDU)—a project that officially seeks “dialogue” with the AfD and is preparing its political integration at federal level.

That the Left Party supports Merz in parliament under these conditions reveals its true character. It is not a bulwark against fascism and militarism, but the political lubricant for strengthening the far right and implementing its agenda.

*****

Pseudo-left forces play the same role around the world. The election victory of Zohran Mamdani in New York reflects the leftward shift of workers and youth in the heart of world imperialism. But Mamdani and the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), to which he belongs, have since worked feverishly with the Democratic Party machine, Wall Street boardrooms and the state apparatus to recapture and suppress the political anger that propelled him into office. The provisional climax of this effort was Mamdani’s repulsive and humiliating subordination to the fascist President Donald Trump in the Oval Office on November 21.

How is this rightward shift of pseudo-left forces to be explained? Regarding the Left Party, we wrote in an earlier analysis:

Despite its name, the Left Party has never been a socialist or even left-wing party. It has always been a bourgeois organisation representing the interests of the state apparatus and a wealthy upper-middle-class strata, defending German capitalism and imperialism and being rewarded for this with ministerial posts and state subsidies running into the millions. 

None of the Left Party’s verbiage can hide the fact that its predecessor organisation, the Stalinist party of state in the former East Germany (SED/PDS), supported the introduction of capitalist relations there, thereby laying the foundations for the return of German militarism and fascism.

*****

There is only one clear conclusion. Anyone who wants to fight war, rearmament, fascism and social devastation needs a completely different perspective from the servile grovelling of the Left Party. It is necessary to organise opposition independently of all bourgeois parties and the pro-capitalist trade unions tied to them and to develop it based on an international socialist strategy.

The central task here is to build the Sozialistische Gleichheitspartei (Socialist Equality Party, SGP—the German section of the Fourth International) as the revolutionary leadership of the working class. Only on this basis can the war course of German imperialism and the turn of the ruling class—including its “left” representatives—towards fascism and war be halted.

11. United States: In major attack on public health, CDC recommends delaying Hepatitis B vaccine at birth

In what public health experts are calling the most consequential attack on disease-prevention policy in modern US history, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), under the control of the Trump administration, has voted to delay the Hepatitis B vaccine for newborns. 

The decision effectively dismantles the decades-long standard of administering the first dose within the first 24 hours of life, a cornerstone of the universal immunization strategy that has protected millions of infants from a lifelong, incurable viral infection. The “birth dose” is needed because maternal infection is often asymptomatic, and screening fails to identify all infectious mothers. This critical vaccination has helped reduce pediatric Hepatitis B infections by more than 95 percent since 1991.

This vote by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is part of the Trump administration’s campaign, led by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to dismantle public health in the United States. What is being implemented under the guise of “health freedom” is, in fact, the demolition of the very institutions and structures that have protected millions from infectious disease.

The path to this outcome was paved through a calculated dismantling of the public health advisory structure, a central component of the Trump administration’s broader war on science. Earlier this year, Kennedy took the unprecedented step of firing all 17 members of the existing ACIP panel—historically composed of experts in vaccinology, infectious diseases, epidemiology and immunology—and replacing them with anti-vaccination advocates.

*****

The consequences of this policy shift have already been modeled in detail, and the projections show a significant rise in preventable illness, cancer, death and long-term healthcare costs.

In a preprint study titled “Economic Evaluation of Delaying the Infant Hepatitis B Vaccination Schedule,” Eric W. Hall of Oregon Health & Science University assessed the lifetime clinical and economic impact of delaying the birth dose for the 2024 US birth cohort. The model incorporates the realities of the US healthcare system, including “imperfect adherence”—the well-documented fact that when the birth dose is not administered in the hospital, the likelihood of completing the full vaccine series drops sharply.

According to Hall’s modeling, even a brief delay of the first dose until two months of age for infants born to mothers not known to be infected would result in 1,437 additional preventable acute Hepatitis B infections in children, 304 additional cases of liver cancer, 482 additional HBV-related deaths, and $222 million in excess healthcare costs annually.

*****

The vote to delay the Hepatitis B vaccine is the most advanced expression of the broader restructuring of American public health by the Trump-Kennedy administration. With far-right anti-vaccination activists now installed across the Health and Human Services (HHS), CDC and ACIP, the administration has created the machinery to revise, and ultimately dismantle, the entire childhood immunization schedule and the scientific norms that once governed it.

This is part of a broader war on the working class and all remaining social programs. The Trump administration is pursuing the same strategy in every sphere: gutting environmental regulations, dismantling public education, militarizing police forces and criminalizing political opposition.

This transformation, however, did not begin with Trump. The Biden administration played an indispensable role in creating the political and institutional framework for the present collapse of public health. It was Biden who prematurely declared in 2022 that the pandemic was “over,” dismantled all mitigation measures, ended federal funding for testing and treatment, blocked mask requirements and forced millions back into unsafe workplaces and schools.

The bipartisan “forever COVID” policy normalized mass infection, sickness and death—abandoning the basic principle that society has a responsibility to protect public health. This cultivated the political environment in which Trump and Kennedy can move openly to destroy all that remains of evidence-based policy.

*****

The defense of public health is inseparable from the defense of all democratic and social rights. It cannot be entrusted to either faction of the ruling class. The independent political mobilization of the working class is the only force capable of halting this descent into dictatorship. The defense of science—real science, grounded in evidence and dedicated to human welfare—requires the overthrow of the capitalist system that subordinates life to profit.

We urge scientists, health care workers, educators, students and all workers who recognize the danger of this moment to join this fight for socialism.

12. United States: FedEx to close Dallas, Texas-area facility, impacting 856 jobs

FedEx is laying off all 856 employees at its FedEx Supply Chain Logistics & Electronics center in Coppell, Texas, 20 minutes northwest of Dallas. The layoffs are beginning in “phases” starting in January, with the facility fully closing in April. This comes amid an ongoing job slaughter, with 32,000 jobs being cut in November and 30 percent of US corporations planning holiday season layoffs.

The explanation given by the company is that “this action is necessitated solely by our customer’s decision [an undisclosed business] to transition its business to a new location that will be managed by a new third-party logistics provider.” A similar explanation was given in the announcement of the layoff of 611 workers at a Memphis Fed Ex Supply Chain center.

The layoffs were detailed in a WARN (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notice) notice to the Texas Workforce Commission. The WARN Act requires that private employers give notice 60 days in advance to relevant state authorities and employees for layoffs affecting more than 50 people. Recent notices in Texas notices are viewable on the TWC website here.

The WARN Act does not cover contractors, however. Given the large number of independent contractors that FedEx relies upon for shipping and other aspects of operating the site, the announced layoff numbers are likely an undercount of the closure’s real impact.

*****

FedEx launched a $2 billion cost-reduction plan in 2023 called “Network 2.0,” aimed at combining 650 Fedex Express and 650 FedEx Ground locations into 850 to 900 combined locations. This plan, modeled on a similar one by the company in Canada, seeks to slash jobs and close facilities, consolidating the company’s operations into a smaller number of highly automated facilities. The plan is reportedly 25 percent complete and expected to be completed in May. Previously, FedEx has stated it intends to close 30 percent of package facilities as part of the plan.

More than 1.1 million layoffs have been announced so far by US corporations this year, the highest level since the start of the pandemic and approaching the figure from the first year of the Great Recession in 2008. While the largest components come from the government (as part of the Trump administration’s attack on social programs and corporate regulators) and technology firms, logistics is also playing a leading role.

FedEx’s main private competitor UPS is carrying out a similar plan, the “Network of the Future,” aiming to close 200 facilities and introduce technology with the potential to automate 80 percent of its warehouse jobs. While FedEx is nonunion, the UPS job cuts are being carried out with the support of the Teamsters union; the cuts began almost as soon as a sellout contract passed in 2023. This year alone, UPS has axed 48,000 jobs.

The United States Postal Service (USPS) is in the midst of its own “Delivering for America” consolidation program, which aims to close hundreds of post offices and thousands of routes and automate much of its operations. Related systems are being introduced to impose speedup on letter carriers through the use of Amazon-style AI-tracking programs.

*****

Behind all of the logistics layoffs is the rapid rise of Amazon’s competing logistics network. The company, which only began offering last-mile delivery around a decade ago, leads the industry with 25 percent of the total US parcel volume, more than combined volume of FedEx and UPS. Other alternatives besides Amazon—such as Walmart, Target, and smaller carriers—have also grown their market share by 3 percent at the cost of FedEx and UPS, accounting for 10 percent of the market by 2024.

The use of third-party contractors (or “Delivery Service Providers” as they are known at Amazon) and Uber-style deliveries using private vehicles marks the further shift towards the highly exploited “gig” economy.

*****

Tariffs and relentless cost-cutting will contribute to accelerating layoffs across the US and the world.

In response, workers must launch a global counter-offensive through the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC). The IWA-RFC is organizing workers independent of the sellout union bureaucrats to fight for the right to a good-paying job, workers’ control over safety, the defense of immigrant workers and other basic social and democratic rights.

FedEx workers must join this growing movement by founding rank-and-file committees at their own workplaces, comprised of the most trusted workers, to prepare a fight against layoffs.

13. Australia: Mass arrests of protesters at Newcastle coal port

Over 8,000 people from across Australia attended the “People’s Blockade” in Newcastle, New South Wales (NSW) over the weekend of November 27 to December 2, voicing hostility to the escalating climate catastrophe and the refusal of successive governments to curb Australia’s vast coal and gas exports.

Australia is the world’s second-largest exporter of thermal coal and a major LNG producer, with Newcastle hosting the largest coal port in the world in terms of export volume.

Participants were motivated by the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events attributed to rising greenhouse emissions including soaring temperatures, intensifying bushfires and storms. Under these conditions, coal and gas companies enjoy tens of billions in revenue with some paying virtually zero tax according to experts.

Taking to kayaks and other small craft over the weekend, protesters blocked three coal ships and rescheduled 10 according to organisers, crossing a “maritime exclusion zone” imposed by the NSW Police. On Sunday around 2 p.m., the port authority was compelled to announce the cancellation of all shipping movements.

Over this time, police carried out a coordinated crackdown on protesters arresting 181 people. Sixteen of these were detained on Monday morning, including one juvenile, for entering the restricted areas of the coal terminal nearby and chaining themselves to coal loaders and conveyor belts for three and a half hours.

The police operation included marine units, drones, rapid-response teams and mounted patrols aimed at preventing even symbolic interference with the movement of coal ships. While draconian anti-protest laws were not formally invoked, which can carry up to two years’ imprisonment for disrupting major economic activities, police relied upon the exclusion zone to carry out the detentions.

Whilst many in attendance were genuinely opposed to the actions of the Labor government, the politics that lead the “protestival,” of appealing to the government to change course, are bankrupt.

This is the third year that the People’s Blockade by “Rising Tide” has run, and the response of both the state and federal Labor governments has been to solidarize with the coal and gas giants whose operations dominate the Hunter region (where Newcastle is based).

*****

While the Newcastle event pointed to growing anger over the climate crisis, definite political lessons must be drawn. The environmental catastrophe will not be halted through yet more appeals to capitalist governments, or protest stunts aimed at placing pressure on them.

Climate change is a product of capitalism, an outmoded social order hurtling to catastrophe, including the threat of a nuclear war. The climate crisis cannot be resolved under conditions where society’s resources and productive capacity by a tiny corporate and financial elite. It is, moreover, an inherently global issue which cannot be addressed within the framework of rival capitalist nation-states, each representing their own capitalist class.

What is required is the development of an international movement of the working class, completely independent of the governments and political establishments responsible for the climate crisis. Such a movement must be socialist, aiming at nothing less than the reorganisation of society from top to bottom on a world scale, so that the immense resources that exist can be harnessed to address social need, including by addressing the climate catastrophe, not the accumulation of vast private profit.

14. Union sells out New Zealand high school teachers

The Post-Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) announced on Thursday that secondary school teachers had voted to accept the New Zealand government’s revised pay-cutting offer.

Teachers will receive pay rises of 2.5 and 2.1 percent over the next two years—significantly below the 3 percent inflation rate and 4.7 percent increase in food prices.

The deal is a blatant sellout of teachers, who have undertaken repeated strikes since August in opposition to the National Party-led government’s moves to slash wages and starve schools of staff and resources.

The PPTA’s 20,000 members joined the October 23 “mega strike” involving more than 100,000 public sector workers including primary school teachers, nurses, doctors and other healthcare workers. With 3.5 percent of the country’s workforce involved, it was New Zealand’s biggest strike since 1979 and part of a growing upsurge of the working class internationally. 

*****

The PPTA’s sellout confirms the Socialist Equality Group’s warning, in a statement distributed to workers during the October 23 strike, that the union leaders were determined to block a genuine struggle against austerity and militarism.

The only way to fight the government’s agenda is in a rebellion against the union apparatus, which enforces the dictates of big business and the government. This requires the building of new workers’ organizations: rank-and-file committees, controlled by workers themselves and independent of the unions and all the capitalist parties.

*****

The union has not revealed how many teachers voted for and against the revised deal. In the Reddit forum r/newzealand, one teacher commented: “A lot of teachers are disappointed, this was a really divisive vote from what I see—I think a lot of people were just afraid that there wouldn’t be a better offer/that the govt would insist on more clawbacks in any future offer, even if the salary offer was improved.”

A primary school teacher added: “They’re obviously going to use this to try push through basically the same [deal] for primary on the grounds [that] secondary accepted it.”

The primary teachers’ union NZEI will certainly use the PPTA’s sellout to pressure about 30,000 primary teachers to accept the same deal. Following nationwide strikes in 2019 and 2023 both unions used similar tactics to persuade their members that they had no alternative to accepting what were essentially pay freezes demanded by the then-Labour Party government.

In a provocative move, the New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union released a statement titled “NZPFU congratulates PPTA on settlement.” Around 2,000 low-paid firefighters have taken strike action in recent weeks to oppose a below-inflation pay offer (5.1 percent over three years) and now the union leadership is publicly applauding a real wage cut for teachers. The NZPFU echoed the government’s propaganda that teachers are highly paid and privileged.

The New Zealand Nurses Organisation, the Public Service Association (PSA) and the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists will likewise use the PPTA’s agreement to insist that nurses, doctors and other healthcare workers must accept a pay cut.

*****

The union bureaucracies called the October 23 strike with extreme reluctance. They did so not to launch a real industrial and political campaign against government austerity, but to try and maintain control over tens of thousands of workers, who are deeply outraged over soaring living costs and unbearable conditions in public hospitals and schools.

No further joint strikes were scheduled. Instead, the unions went back into separate negotiations with the government behind closed doors, designed to isolate and demoralise workers.

Unions and pseudo-left groups are also encouraging illusions that workers can reverse the current attacks by voting for the Labour Party and its allies in next year’s election. The last Labour Party government lost the 2023 election in a landslide precisely because it had overseen worsening social inequality, poverty and homelessness, as well as attacking health and education workers.

*****

The Socialist Equality Group repeats its call for workers to build rank-and-file committees in schools, hospitals and all workplaces. These committees must expand the fight against austerity to all sections of the working class, in the public sector and private industries, in opposition to the unions which are doing everything to prevent such a unified struggle.

They must also forge links with workers in Australia and other countries who confront the same attacks.

This fight requires a socialist strategy. Workers should base their demands not on what the government, the corporate media and the unions claim is “affordable” or “realistic,” but on what workers actually need, including an immediate 30 percent pay increase to make up for decades of stagnant wages.

15. Australian state Labor government to impose life sentences on children as young as fourteen

The Labor Party government in Australia’s second-largest state Victoria, headed by Premier Jacinta Allan, announced on November 12 that it will introduce laws allowing children as young as 14 to be tried in adult courts and sentenced to life imprisonment. The so-called “Adult Time for Violent Crime” legislation, to be introduced by the end of this year, marks an escalation in the assault on democratic rights being carried out by Labor and Coalition governments across Australia.

The laws target children from 14 to 17 charged with offences including home invasion, carjacking and causing injury. Under the current Children’s Court system, the maximum sentence for any offence is three years. Under the new regime, children will be dragged before the County Court, where the same offences will carry the threat of adult penalties up to life imprisonment.

The basic legal principle that detention should be a “last resort” for children—enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child—will be effectively abolished. Judges will instead be directed to prioritise “community safety,” a deliberately vague formulation that subordinates children’s futures to the political requirements of a government seeking to posture as “tough on crime.”

*****

The measures will worsen the very problems they purport to address. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data show 51 percent of young offenders who serve their first sentence in detention return to offending before turning 18, compared to 41 percent when community-based sentences are used. Dr Susan Baidawi of the Monash Criminal Justice Consortium warned the legislation “will at best have no impact on their future risk of crime, at worst, it will inflate” it.

Victoria Legal Aid chief executive Toby Hemming noted that many children before the courts “have committed violent crimes, and many have been victims of crime themselves. These children are in urgent need of support to help them build stable, positive lives and avoid reoffending, which the adult justice system is not designed to do.”

Exposed by researchers but ignored by the government is the phenomenon of “child criminal exploitation”—organised adult criminals grooming impoverished and disadvantaged youth to commit offences on their behalf. Rather than targeting these criminal networks and the social conditions that make such exploitation possible, the Labor government seeks to imprison the exploited children.

The Allan Labor government knows its laws will not reduce offending. Their real purpose is to construct new mechanisms and infrastructure of state repression under conditions of a deepening social and economic crisis, and to channel legitimate popular anger over deteriorating living standards into support for authoritarian measures directed at the most vulnerable layers of the working class, above all youth.

The social conditions producing desperation among working-class youth are a matter of public record. The 2023 Australian Youth Barometer report found 90 percent of young Australians experienced financial difficulties in the preceding 12 months, 72 percent believe they will never own a home, and 21 percent experienced food insecurity.

Young workers are grossly over-represented among the unemployed, comprising 15.7 percent of the workforce but 25.2 percent of the long-term jobless. Only 22 percent work full-time, while 67 percent require financial support from family. The psychological toll is immense: 97 percent reported feelings of worry, anxiety or pessimism.

These are the conditions over which successive state and federal governments, Labor and Coalition alike, have presided. The Allan Labor government has deepened them. Its response is not to address the housing crisis, restore secure, well-paid employment or reverse decades of social spending cuts. It is to imprison children.

*****

The Allan government’s crime laws are only its latest assault on the democratic and social rights of workers and youth. It has viciously denounced school students striking against the Gaza genocide, joining the official campaign to suppress opposition to Australian imperialism’s complicity in Israeli war crimes. It has participated in escalating attacks on the right to protest, including a ban on face coverings at demonstrations and leaving intact the repressive apparatus used against climate, anti-war and pro-Palestine protesters. Meanwhile, it is overseeing the demolition of public housing estates amid the worst housing crisis in decades.

The bipartisan adoption of authoritarian methods by Australian state and federal governments is part of an international shift towards dictatorial rule, epitomised by the fascistic Trump administration. Confronted with a growing social and economic crisis, capitalist governments worldwide are turning to the most repressive measures.

Defending the democratic rights of children and workers in general can only be achieved through a struggle against all the major parties of capitalist rule in Australia and globally. That requires the independent mobilisation of the working class against the entire political establishment and the capitalist system it defends. The laws targeting children today will be extended to workers, students and all those who oppose Labor’s agenda of war and social devastation. The urgent task is to build a socialist leadership in the working class to wage this political struggle.

16. Teaching staff at Bacup secondary school in north-west England strike against virtual teaching introduced by Star Academies Trust

Teaching staff at a secondary school in Bacup, Lancashire north-west England, took their first day of strike action on Wednesday to protest pupils being taught by a virtual teacher (VT). The walkout takes place amid a deepening recruitment and retention crisis as public education faces an existential breakdown after decades of underfunding by successive Conservative and Labour governments.

Members of the National Education Union (NEU) voted by an 82 percent majority on a 75 percent turnout to strike, expressing the deep opposition among staff. Further strike action is planned for December 10 and 11, and next term from January 6 to 8.

In July, management at the Star Academies Trust imposed distance learning for top-set pupils in Years 9–11 at The Valley Leadership Academy, citing a chronic shortage of maths teachers which it could not recruit locally. A well-attended picket of around 25 staff gathered outside the school with NEU placards reading “No virtual teachers—our children deserve better”, alongside a mock-up cardboard dummy labelled “What next-Robot Teachers ?”. Passing cars beeped in their support of the strikers. The teachers’ opposition has broader community support: the BBC reported that a confidential union petition opposing the new arrangement received 500 signatures in August.

A reporting team from the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS) spoke with teaching staff about their concerns and why they have decided that strike action was necessary.

*****

The WSWS reporting team also distributed the article “Teachers in secondary school in Bacup. England to strike demanding face to face qualified teacher in the classroom” which was widely taken up on the picket line. It outlined the broader context of the dispute and the need for a wider fightback to defend public education.

The introduction of VTs at The Valley follows two “very limited” pilots at Highfield Leadership Academy in Blackpool (English) and Laisterdyke Leadership Academy in Bradford (Maths), and parallels developments in the United States where private firms profit from virtual staffing due to the shortage of qualified teachers.

Government data shows widespread secondary teacher vacancies in the UK, especially in maths, physics, computing and languages. The Labour government has pledged to recruit 6,500 teachers by 2029, but National Foundation for Educational Research data shows little progress. Special Educational Needs and Development (SEND) funding faces a £6 billion shortfall, and the government is preparing a white paper to “bring costs down”.

Virtualisation is not educational innovation but an austerity measure benefiting business-oriented academy trusts. The groundbreaking developments with technology, the internet, AI and digital tools could support learning, but only under the control of trained, qualified teachers—not as a substitute for them or to mask the recruitment crisis engineered by government policy.

*****

To defend high-quality, fully funded education, educators must build independent rank-and-file committees, linking their fight with workers across public services. This is a political struggle against a Labour government committed to austerity and defending corporate interests—including academy trusts reshaping schools for profit.

17. Workers Struggles: Asia, Australia and the Pacific

Australia:

Queensland public health professionals walk out over proposed cuts 
 
Monadelphous engineering workers in Queensland strike for improved pay offer
 
Northern Territory public health workers strike for improved pay offer 

South Australian public sector workers continue action for improved pay offer 

South Australian public health nurses and midwives strike for higher pay 
 
Tasmanian public sector health and community services workers demonstrate 
 
TK elevator technicians in Western Australia continue industrial action
 
Pacific National rail workers in Queensland strike for better pay and conditions
 
Greater Melbourne Cemetery Trust workers strike 
 
Victorian public sector health workers strike for pay rise
 
Victorian forestry firefighters’ wage dispute enters second year
 
Experience Co skydiving instructors to stop work to protest pay cut 

Bangladesh:

Primary school teachers strike for higher pay and promotions
  
Bangladeshi health sector employees continue action

India:

National Health Mission workers in Punjab strike over delayed wages

Outsourced power workers in Punjab strike against privatization 

Punjab bus transport workers end four-day strike
 
Punjab: Jalandhar Municipal Corporation workers strike for higher wages and permanent jobs 
 
Assam National Health Mission authority cuts protesting workers’ pay

New Zealand:

Teachers’ union settles pay deals 

Philippines: 

School teachers hold national strike

South Korea: 

National rail and Seoul Metro workers to walk out
 
Public school non-teaching staff strike for better pay and conditions

18. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

Bogdan Syrotiuk

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.