May 12, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today:

1. Trump and Xi to meet amid global eruption of imperialist war

In the six months since their meeting on the margins of the APEC summit in South Korea, the United States has kidnapped the president of Venezuela, launched a war against Iran and blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, triggering a global energy and food crisis. China is the largest destination for oil exports from both Iran and Venezuela, and the wars Trump has launched against these countries are the opening clashes of a global conflict targeting China itself.

Amid the worldwide conflagration launched by Trump, the New York Times led its Monday edition with an article titled, “As Trump Heads to Beijing, China Is ‘Locked and Loaded’ for a Fight.”

In fact, it is Trump’s White House that is “locked and loaded.” For months, the US military has been blowing boats out of the water in the Caribbean and Pacific, massacring civilians on the claim that they were smuggling drugs, and seizing tankers in international waters on the pretext that they were carrying “sanctioned” oil. American forces have killed more than 3,000 Iranians, and on April 7 Trump threatened that “a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.” 

*****

 In traveling to Beijing, Trump will bring with him a variety of carrots and sticks. On the carrot side, he has in tow a retinue of top CEOs and finance chiefs, including Tim Cook (Apple), Elon Musk (Tesla), Larry Fink (BlackRock), Stephen Schwarzman (Blackstone), David Solomon (Goldman Sachs), Jane Fraser (Citi), and executives from Boeing, Cargill, Meta, Micron, Qualcomm, Visa and Mastercard. Various deals will be proffered, beneficial to both sides.

Underlying everything, however, is the constant threat of a major escalation of economic and military action against Beijing.

*****

The Trump–Xi summit takes place amid the basic strategic dilemma confronting the US ruling class: The protracted erosion of American economic supremacy, which Washington has sought to offset through ever more aggressive military force, has coincided with—and been intensified by—the continued growth of China.

The corporate media plays a central role in this turn, presenting China’s economic and technological development, carried out through trade, investment and industrial expansion, and within the formal framework of the “free trade” rules the United States itself promoted for decades, as a physical threat that allegedly “justifies” coercion, blockade and war.

Years of escalating tariffs and technology bans have not strangled Chinese industry. They have instead imposed vast costs on American workers through higher prices and economic dislocation, while failing to alter the underlying trajectory. China’s industrial position is demonstrated in the most concrete figures: The automaker BYD outsold Tesla globally in 2025 by more than 600,000 vehicles, shipping 2.26 million fully electric cars—kept out of the American market only through an extraordinary 247.5 percent tariff. 

Chinese firms now ship roughly four out of every five humanoid robots produced worldwide, with Unitree alone aiming for 20,000 units this year after shipping 5,500 in 2025. The drone manufacturer DJI dominates the American consumer drone market and holds a commanding share of commercial drones internationally. In AI, open-source Chinese large language models have closed to within a benchmark point of America’s “flagship” systems at a fraction of the cost.

But the publications of American imperialism never ask the obvious question: Why is China so rapidly approaching, and in some areas overtaking, the US economy? After all, the United States had a massive head start. In 1980, it accounted for about 25 percent of world GDP, while China’s share was 2 percent.

For decades, American policy has been driven by one purpose: The engorgement of the ruling elite at any cost. American imperialism pursued a policy of financialization that enriched that class, presided over the destruction of US industry and waged wars across the world. The federal debt now approaches $40 trillion, fueled by American wars, militarism and the endless bailouts of the rich. 

*****

The American oligarchy will not accept a diminished position in the world. Whatever the specific outcome of the summit, US imperialism is preparing for what Trump’s actions this year have pointed toward—a war against China itself, for which the conflicts in Iran, Lebanon, Ukraine, Venezuela and the Caribbean are the laboratory, the rehearsal and the opening clashes.

The Democratic Party has criticized the Trump administration for being insufficiently concentrated on the confrontation with Beijing. Democratic Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, told Fox News Sunday that “President Trump is going into this meeting terribly weakened,” adding: “There’s a stalemate now. The Iranians are holding 20 percent of the world’s oil at risk.” 

The Democrats’ concern is not the criminality of the war, but that the debacle in the Middle East diverts resources and credibility from the central objective: escalating the conflict with China.

The Chinese bureaucracy offers no progressive way out. It is bound to the world capitalist market and to the defense of national state interests, and it has repeatedly sought an accommodation with imperialism—an accommodation that Washington is increasingly unwilling and unable to grant. 

The crisis can be resolved only through the independent intervention of the international working class, uniting workers in the United States, China and throughout the world in a common struggle against war, dictatorship and the capitalist system that produces both.

2. Mamdani faces backlash after NYPD aids ICE at Brooklyn hospital

Community members in the Bushwick neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York, spontaneously protested the presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers at Wyckoff Heights Medical Center last week. 

In response, the New York Police Department (NYPD), overseen by police commissioner and billionaire heiress Jessica Tisch, attacked and arrested protesters, clearing the path for ICE operations. This collaboration between NYPD and ICE directly violates New York City’s sanctuary laws and has led to a wave of denunciations of Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

According to reports, federal immigration agents brought Nigerian immigrant Chidozie Wilson Okeke to Wyckoff hospital for medical assistance for injuries sustained during ICE’s violent arrest. In a video of the arrest that has circulated on social media, Okeke is tasered in his car and screams, “Somebody help me! They are killing me!”

Hundreds of residents gathered outside the hospital late Saturday night as word spread that ICE was preparing to remove Okeke. NYPD officers arrived in force, issued dispersal orders and moved against the crowd. Videos show a masked agent pepper-spraying protesters and police officers shoving demonstrators, throwing them to the ground, restraining them and clearing a path for federal agents to leave while dragging Okeke away in restraints. Nine protesters were arrested. 

The hospital reportedly barred Alex Franco, an immigration and human rights lawyer contacted by Okeke’s family, from entering the emergency room and speaking with their client. Franco told the New York Times, “They basically said that they had to medically clear the person, the detainee, before I was allowed access. And I explained to them, ‘Look, I’ve done this before, show me where that policy is. Because as soon as he’s discharged, ICE is going to take him away. So, you are essentially denying them the right to counsel.’” 

In response to these events, Mamdani, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), told a press conference that there was no prior coordination between the NYPD and ICE and framed the incident as merely a matter of public order. He said the NYPD was simply “responding to 911 calls regarding a protest outside the hospital” and that “our laws leave no room for interpretation about the fact that our NYPD will not participate in civil immigration enforcement.” Mamdani thus denied the facts: The NYPD had actively facilitated the removal of an ICE detainee. Following Mamdani’s logic, ICE only has to call 911 whenever they need the NYPD to secure an area to carry out ICE raids.

City Council member Sandy Nurse, who was at the protest, wrote on X that she witnessed “direct coordination between ICE and the NYPD, with officers cordoning off the ambulance bay to allow ICE to move the individual into their vehicles and leave.” Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso also accused the police department of supporting a deportation operation: “escorting and supporting ICE as they brought the detainee into the car, helping them close the door to the car.”

A group of “progressive” Democratic supporters of Mamdani, including Nurse, Reynoso, US Representative Nydia Velázquez, New York State Senator and DSA member Julia Salazar and City Council member Jennifer Gutiérrez issued a letter to the mayor stating that police “coordinated on the ground with ICE agents” and called for NYPD reforms. But rather than demanding that the mayor resist ICE raids in New York City, they wrote, “Officers arriving at a scene where federal agents are already operating cannot be left to improvise. They need a bright-line rule, communicated up and down the chain of command, that informs them when to disengage, when to step back, when to refuse a request for assistance and how to document what they observed.”

It is noteworthy that Politico wrote the following about the letter: “The fact that Mamdani’s elected supporters opted to call him out in such a direct way is a strong indication elements of his base are growing frustrated with his handling of public safety issues—and his perceived drift to the political center since entering City Hall.”

Contrary to the Democrats’ claims, however, the NYPD under Tisch is not improvising. The police officers’ actions in Bushwick were not mistakes but the state policy of the ruling class. In December 2025, the NYPD deployed the notorious Strategic Response Group (Mamdani campaigned on the promise to disband the Strategic Response Group but did not) against a similar anti-ICE confrontation in Lower Manhattan. Police used force to clear a path for agents, violently assaulted and pepper-sprayed demonstrators and arrested 12 protesters before ICE retreated due to the protesters’ effective human chains.

Following this episode, Mamdani released a video in which he feigned opposition to the ICE attack but told viewers not to “impede their [police] investigation, resist arrest or run.” As we wrote at the time:

The essential political content of the video is, however, that the NYPD will arrest anyone who interferes with ICE operations. The intended audience of the video is the NYPD brass and the Trump administration. The video seeks to reassure them that a Mamdani government will uphold ICE operations in the city. It is worth noting that since Mamdani met with Trump in November, he has not posted a single item on social media criticizing Trump.

The pact between Trump and Mamdani has a concrete—and chilling—meaning: Mamdani will allow the work of the repressive apparatus of the state in the city, in this case primarily the NYPD, to continue unimpeded.

This is the significance of his reappointment of NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch, the pioneer of one of the most sinister mechanisms of repression aimed at the working class, the NYPD’s mass surveillance tools.

*****

Most recently, Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan warned that if New York state advances measures limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities, the government will “flood” New York with “more ICE agents than you’ve ever seen before.”

Mamdani campaigned on the promise to be “Donald Trump’s worst nightmare” but instead has courted him and openly crafted a cordial “partnership” with the fascist. Following Mamdani’s second White House meeting with Trump, the WSWS wrote that this was “an act of treachery aimed at forging an alliance with the far right.” 

*****

Workers, immigrants and youth rightly see ICE as an armed instrument of state terror. Mamdani and the pseudo-left speak the language of sanctuary while preserving a police apparatus that collaborates with federal agents and suppresses popular opposition. The struggle against deportations, police violence and authoritarianism cannot be waged through appeals for cosmetic NYPD reform or pressure on the Democratic Party. What is required is the independent political mobilization of the working class—uniting workers, immigrants and youth in a common struggle against ICE, the capitalist state, war and dictatorship. 

3. Major global bank takes a private credit hit

According to the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the share of assets under management sourced by retail investors has risen from virtually zero to 13 percent over the past decade. But there is a difference between institutions and retail investors. Institutions tend to invest longer term while individuals want quick access to their money if problem signs emerge. But the investments by private credit are in longer-term, relatively illiquid assets, not easily turned into cash at a profit, they can only provide for limited redemptions of investors’ funds.

The FSB said this situation “could increase potential vulnerabilities related to liquidity mismatches” because notwithstanding disclosures “retail investors may not fully understand the illiquidity of the asset class, which may amplify redemption requests during stress episodes.”

It is not quite a run on the banks, but mass redemptions could turn into the credit market equivalent. A recent article in the Murdoch-owned Australian said the decisions by some major funds, including Apollo and Blue Owl, “to invoke contractual withdrawal limits” marked the “most significant liquidity crisis in alternative credit since the global financial crisis.”

Inflation and the rise in interest rates, generally tightening credit conditions, have focused more attention on the private credit market after it grew at an exponential rate in the period of ultra-low interest rates which prevailed from 2009 to 2022.

One of the practices under scrutiny is the selling of assets by private equity investors. The modus operandi is to buy assets in the expectation they will be able to be sold at a later point realising a profit, after some “restructuring”—above all reductions in labour costs—has been carried out.

But the rise in interest rates has tended to lower the market value of such assets and made them harder to sell at a profit. Consequently, an increasing number of private equity firms are using what are known as continuation vehicles.

These are new funds set up by the original fund to which the assets are then sold, avoiding the necessity to bring them to the open market where they would register a loss. Another advantage is that this practice also generates valuable fees.

One might well wonder how such practices are even legal. But they are becoming increasingly used. The Institutional Limited Partners Association, which represents some of the world’s biggest pension and sovereign wealth funds, has estimated that last year transactions with continuation vehicles amounted to one fifth of all buyout exits.

*****

Last year there were more than $100 billion worth of sales into continuation vehicles, up from $70 billion the year before and just $7 billion or less a decade ago.

Insurance companies have been one of the major backers of private credit because they cannot obtain a sufficient rate of return from their traditional operations in the public market.

This has brought a warning from the former Apollo risk manager, Chak Raghunathan, who told the FT in an interview that some insurance companies would not be able to manage policy holder funds in a downturn.

*****

In 2011, the Senate report on the 2008 financial crisis found that it was the “result of high-risk, complex financial products; undisclosed conflicts of interest; and the failure of regulators, credit rating agencies and the market itself to rein in the excesses of Wall Street.”

Senator Carl Levin, chairman of the subcommittee, which carried out the investigation, said it had found “a financial snake pit rife with greed, conflicts of interest and wrongdoing.”

No one, however, was prosecuted for what was clearly criminal activity in many cases. Goldman Sachs, for example, sold financial products which it knew were going to fail. The Obama administration took the decision that, having bailed out the financial system on the basis that it was too big to fail, it also determined that those responsible were too big to jail.

The outcome of the Senate investigation was the Dodd-Frank Act which imposed some limited restrictions on the financial operations of the banks. But it is in the very nature of finance capital, rapacious in its never-ending search for profit and willing to use all means necessary to achieve this objective, that it found ways around these attempts at containment.

And one of the means developed was the growth of the private credit, which may be as large as $3.5 trillion, and which is starting to exhibit some of the features which characterized the financial system prior to 2008. 

4. Governments downplay pandemic risk as MV Hondius hantavirus cases mount in US, Europe

The hantavirus outbreak aboard the MV Hondius is rapidly unfolding into an unmitigated disaster, exposing capitalist governments’ continued war on public health. In the 36 hours since passengers and crew began disembarking in Tenerife, Spain on Sunday, the number of confirmed and probable cases of the highly lethal Andes virus has jumped from eight to 11, with new infections detected in returning passengers in the United States, France, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Spain. Three passengers—a Dutch couple and a German woman—are dead, two of them confirmed by laboratory testing to have been caused by the virus and a third pending confirmation.

The numbers will almost certainly grow. The incubation period for Andes hantavirus may extend to 42 days, meaning every one of the 147 passengers and crew evacuated from the vessel—and every contact they encountered on the cascade of government-chartered flights now dispersing them across Europe, North America, Asia and the Pacific—must be regarded as potentially infected. They have arrived in communities that received little to no prior warning and in many cases have no contact tracing mechanisms in place. This amounts to the deliberate international seeding of a lethal pathogen that has demonstrated human-to-human transmission, with a fatality rate of roughly 40 percent among severely ill patients.

The Andes strain is the only hantavirus known to spread between humans, transmitted through close, prolonged contact with an infected person’s saliva, respiratory secretions or other body fluids. There is no vaccine and no specific treatment; survival depends on prompt hospitalization and supportive care—hydration, artificial respiration, dialysis.

Conditions aboard the Hondius made suppression all but impossible once the outbreak took hold. The Dutch-flagged vessel, owned by Oceanwide Expeditions, departed Ushuaia, Argentina on April 1 on a 33-day voyage to Antarctica and remote South Atlantic islands, carrying around 150 passengers and crew of 23 nationalities in 95 cabins. For weeks, the virus circulated in the closed, high-contact environment in which it spreads most readily. 

*****

Returning passengers of the Hondius are falling ill in the United States and across Europe. Early Monday morning, 15 US citizens and one British national living in the United States landed at Eppley Airfield in Omaha, Nebraska, on a government medical flight and were immediately transported to the National Quarantine Unit. Two more were flown to Atlanta, where they are being monitored at Emory Hospital. Upon arrival, one American passenger tested positive for the hantavirus, and another began showing symptoms, with both traveling in the aircraft’s biocontainment units.

This came alongside an alarming development in France. A French woman who was among five French people evacuated from the Hondius and repatriated to Paris on Sunday also tested positive for the virus. French Health Minister Stéphanie Rist confirmed Monday that her condition is deteriorating.

Cases are spreading across Europe. A passenger of the Hondius who returned home to Switzerland via flights through South Africa and Qatar has now tested positive. The ship’s doctor, who tested positive for the virus, was evacuated to the Netherlands, where 12 staff of the Radboud Hospital in Nijmegen have been placed in quarantine after procedural errors in handling him. In Spain, a Spanish passenger has been placed in isolation at Gómez Ulla military hospital in Madrid after testing positive. 

*****

While the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) classified its hantavirus response as Level 3, the lowest of three CDC emergency activation levels, the protocols it activated tell a different story. Hondius passengers were flown on a government medical flight to Omaha, Nebraska, to be assessed for early-stage hantavirus symptoms, including fever, muscle aches and diarrhea at the National Quarantine Unit at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Anyone who falls ill could be transferred to the nearby Nebraska Biocontainment Unit.

The National Quarantine Unit is described by Nebraska Medicine as the only federally funded quarantine unit in the United States designed to safely house and monitor people who may have been exposed to high-consequence infectious diseases. Its 20 single-person rooms are fitted with negative air pressure systems to contain airborne pathogens. It previously treated patients during the 2014 Ebola outbreak and among the first COVID-19 patients evacuated from the Diamond Princess cruise ship in 2020. 

*****

The French government held an emergency meeting Monday afternoon, after identifying 22 French people exposed to the virus on flights taking Hondius passengers home. These individuals are to be held in a 42-day quarantine, while the cabinet insists the risk is low.

The Spanish Health Ministry insisted “all measures” had been taken “with the objective of breaking potential chains of transmission”—a statement aimed at defusing public anger after protests broke out in Tenerife against the arrival of the vessel. Photos have since emerged of a Hondius passenger on the bus to his repatriation flight with his FFP2 mask pushed down below his nose and mouth, provoking outrage on social media.

The Hondius outbreak is unfolding amid the ongoing dismantling of public health infrastructure in every major capitalist country. The same forces that allowed more than 27 million people worldwide to die in the COVID-19 pandemic are now actively dispersing carriers of a virus many times more lethal than SARS-CoV-2, while telling the public to remain calm. The crisis exposes the incompatibility of public health with the profit interests of the ruling class.

5. “I’m not going to stop using my voice”: Dana auto parts worker fired for exposing deadly conditions at Detroit area plant

Kamara Bond, a production worker at the Dana Incorporated auto parts plant in Warren, Michigan, was fired twice for reporting dangerous working conditions on the shop floor. Chemical exposures, high temperatures and poor ventilation at the Detroit area factory could have very well contributed to the death of her co-worker Anthony King in October 2025 and an unidentified janitorial contract worker in 2024.

The Fortune 500 corporation, which employs 28,000 people in 33 countries, reported $610 million in 2025 profits on $7.5 billion in sales revenue. In an investor call last month Dana executives boasted they achieved $35 million in cost reductions during the first quarter and were on schedule to slash $325 million as part of its Dana 2030 plan.

Dana workers in Warren produce axle, driveshaft, suspension and steering components for some of the most profitable vehicles sold by General Motors, Ford and Stellantis. Far from being protected by United Auto Workers Local 155, workers say union officials have allowed management to sacrifice their health and safety for profit.

Kamara reached out to the World Socialist Web Site to share her story and encourage her coworkers to come forward with information on Anthony King’s death. She said workers had to prepare for a fight when the current UAW agreement expires on May 22.

6. US rural healthcare collapse accelerates under Medicaid cuts and privatization

Rural hospitals are in a continued and escalating state of crisis, impacting the health outcomes for an estimated 60 million Americans. One-third of all rural healthcare facilities nationwide are at risk of closing, according to an analysis from Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform. This represents a staggering 734 rural hospitals.

This crisis is the product of decades of subordinating healthcare to the profit motive. But it is now being dramatically accelerated by the Trump administration’s open offensive against every social program won by the working class in the 20th century. Driven by a frenzy for profit and the demands of imperialist war preparation, the ruling class is demolishing what remains of the public health infrastructure.

The “One Big Beautiful Bill,” signed into law by Trump on July 4, 2025, is the legislative centerpiece of this assault. It authorizes one of the largest redistributions of wealth from the poorest to the wealthiest in American history, making permanent $3.8 trillion in tax cuts overwhelmingly benefiting corporations and the rich, while gutting the social programs working people depend on. 

*****

The crisis extends far beyond hospitals. According to a report released last year by Good RX, approximately 81 percent of counties in the United States are considered healthcare deserts in at least one category, meaning large portions of the population have limited access to critical services like pharmacies, primary care, hospitals, hospital beds, trauma centers or community health centers. Estimates suggest that over 120 million Americans, roughly one in three, reside in counties identified as healthcare deserts. 

*****

The Trump administration is attempting to cover up their demolition of the rural healthcare system. At a House Ways and Means Committee hearing last month, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was asked about the crisis of rural healthcare by Adrian Smith, a Republican representative from Nebraska. Kennedy responded saying, “Last week I went to Arizona to announce an unprecedented $125 million investment in community health centers which are serving 39 million Americans mainly in rural areas around the country.”

Kennedy is trying to claim credit for a $125 million investment in community health centers while simultaneously supporting and defending the gutting of Medicaid, which is the primary source of funding for those very same community health centers. He went on to say, “President Trump made the biggest investment in rural health care in American history, a $50 billion rural health transformation fund.”

The Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP) is not a panacea for rural healthcare. It is an accounting offset designed to facilitate large-scale austerity and the marketization of rural care, while providing political cover for the destruction of permanent public health entitlements. Passed as part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” the $50 billion is distributed over a five-year period and is conditional upon an agreed investment plan between the state and federal government, including restricting access to certain funds for states that are not adopting “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) policies.  

Additionally, the $40 billion in cuts to the HHS last year directly impacted rural healthcare funding through the elimination of grants. The World Socialist Web Site described these cuts as “a deliberate, fascistic effort to destroy the infrastructure of scientific research and public health that underpins modern society. The aim is to return the working class to conditions of social misery and industrial exploitation not seen since the 19th century.”

The Trump administration has made unmistakably clear that the subordination of society to war is their explicit program. At a closed Easter lunch at the White House last month, Trump stated it in plain terms: “Don’t send any money for daycare—we’re fighting wars. ... It’s not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare. ... We have to take care of one thing: military protection.” He dismissed Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid as “little scams.”

7. Federal agents seize Indiana University lab: Witch-hunt against Chinese scientists targets senior US faculty

On the evening of May 7, agents operating under the direction of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), together with university police, barred researchers from entering six rooms in a biology laboratory at Indiana University (IU) Bloomington, halting ongoing experiments and establishing a de facto police occupation of the facility.

The primary target was the laboratory of Distinguished Professor of Biology Roger Innes. A member of the National Academy of Sciences, Innes has pioneered research on plant immune systems that holds the potential of increasing global crop yields and mitigating the need for toxic agricultural chemicals. The sudden closure of his workspace is the latest escalation in a campaign of terror against scientists of Chinese descent. The police state operation is no longer limited to international researchers. It is now directed as well at senior American-born faculty.

This campaign is aimed at whipping up anti-Chinese sentiment in preparation for war against US imperialism’s greatest economic rival, a nuclear power, intensifying the war against immigrants and imposing a fascistic, America-first ideology on university campuses.

The IU administration has not defended Innes. A memorandum issued by IU Vice President for Research Russell J. Mumper stated the university was “notified by the US Department of Agriculture that they will be engaging in activity in a laboratory” and that “the actions taking place are being directed by federal authorities, and the university is cooperating as required.”

The government has targeted this laboratory because Professor Innes has taken a principled and courageous stand against the persecution of Chinese scientists. When the FBI and the Department of Justice began manufacturing “agroterrorism” cases against Chinese researchers, Innes intervened to expose the scientific fraud underpinning the prosecutions. 

*****

Indiana University is deeply integrated into the military-industrial complex through agreements with Naval Support Activity (NSA) Crane and the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Crane Division, the third largest naval installation globally. IU President Pamela Whitten recently renewed an Educational Partnership Agreement with NSA Crane, establishing shared technology spaces on campus. IU has committed $53.5 million to expand research partnerships with defense applications, focusing on artificial intelligence and microelectronics funded by the Department of Defense.

The militarization of campus life is an institutional expression of Washington’s preparations for a catastrophic war. American imperialism must purge scientists with ties to China in order to convert universities into secure nodes of the military-industrial complex.

In July 2025, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced a sweeping “National Agriculture Security Action Plan,” framing American agriculture as a theater of war against China. When asked about the prosecuted U-M researchers, Rollins said, “We’re tracking and very well aware of the Michigan case, but there are others as well.”

*****

What is unfolding at IU and U-M is a concentrated expression of the terminal crisis of American capitalism. The ruling class can no longer tolerate free scientific inquiry and international collaboration and is herding the population toward a catastrophic war against China. This operation can be stopped only through the independent political mobilization of the working class and the building of an international anti-war movement rooted in the working class and based on a socialist program.

8. German imperialism’s third campaign for world domination

Christoph Vandreier's speech begins at approximately one hour and 20 minutes into the video; subtitle translations are available. 

This speech was delivered by Christoph Vandreier, National Secretary of the Sozialistische Gleichheitspartei (Germany), at the 2026 May Day Online Rally, organized by the WSWS and the International Committee of the Fourth International.

9. Youth, conscription and the war on socialist opposition 

Tamino Dreisam's speech begins at approximately one hour and 27 minutes into the video; subtitle translations are available.

This speech was delivered by Tamino Dreisam, Leader of the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (Germany), at the 2026 May Day Online Rally, organized by the WSWS and the ICFI.

10. 61st Venice Biennale: Cultural workers and artists strike and protest against the Israeli genocide in Gaza

Protesters in Venice, May 8

One day before the opening of the 61st Venice Biennale, the massive global art exhibition, thousands of marchers took to the city’s narrow streets to protest Israeli genocide in Gaza and now Lebanon. Marchers included many of the festival’s artists and workers who took strike action and closed for a day an estimated twenty-seven of the Biennale’s 100 national pavilions. Signs on a number of the pavilions read “We Stand with Palestine.”

The strikers and demonstrators were responding to a call from the Art Not Genocide Alliance (ANGA), supported by a number of other activist groups. ANGA announced that the action was the largest of its kind in the history of the Biennale, which runs from May 9 to November 22.

In a press release ANGA declared

Israel has killed over 73,000 people in Gaza, with a further 10,000 missing. It has systematically destroyed hospitals, schools, refugee camps, cultural institutions, and civilian infrastructure. Its leadership faces ICC arrest warrants for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Biennale knows this and it chooses to accommodate Israel anyway. 

*****

While angry resistance to Israeli participation has come from grass-roots organizations such as ANGA, leading European institutions have exerted strong pressure on the Biennale through a combination of political condemnation, funding threats and diplomatic pressure in an attempt to block Russia’s participation at the art festival.

*****

All of this reeks of intense and obscene hypocrisy. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was a reactionary action taken by the Putin regime, but it was a war deliberately and transparently provoked by NATO to weaken Russia and create conditions for its eventual carve-up. As for “democracy,” Zelensky rules in Ukraine as a dictator, who has banned political opposition and locked up opponents. All the NATO powers that instigated the war against Russia and now piously denounce its presence in Venice have enthusiastically supported the mass slaughter in Gaza, the West Bank and now Lebanon. 

*****

The latest demonstrations and protests in Venice confirm that a significant layer of artists and cultural workers are determined to oppose the genocidal policy of Israel supported by Western governments, including the far-right Italian government led by Giorgia Meloni.

11. Amid dozens of spy flights over Cuba, US sanctions drive out foreign companies

Even as the administration of Donald Trump continues its war against Iran—provoking the shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical commercial waterways—the Pentagon is escalating preparations for a devastating regime-change war against Cuba.

A report by CNN based on publicly available aviation data reveals a dramatic surge in US military intelligence flights around the island. “Since February 4,” CNN reported, “the US Navy and Air Force have conducted at least 25 such flights using manned aircraft and drones, most of them near the country’s two biggest cities, Havana and Santiago de Cuba, and some coming within 40 miles of the coast, according to FlightRadar24.” 

*****

The aggressive posture was underscored on May 6 when Secretary of State Marco Rubio was photographed at the headquarters of US Southern Command in Doral, Florida, standing before a map of Cuba.

These flights are not routine patrols, but intelligence-gathering missions designed to map strategic targets that go hand-in-hand with the escalating measures to shut down the Cuban economy and any ability to fend off an attack. 

*****

On May 1, after threatening to “take Cuba immediately,” Trump issued the most aggressive sanctions yet imposed on the island. The executive order threatens to cut off from the US-dominated financial system any company conducting business with Cuba.

Under the order, Rubio announced sanctions last week against the military-commercial conglomerate GAESA, its executive Ania Guillermina Lastres Morera, and the mining company Moa Nickel. GAESA, closely linked to the Castro family, is estimated to hold stakes in roughly 40 percent of Cuban enterprises.

These latest sanctions continue the tactical shift away from earlier licensing arrangements that had permitted US capital to penetrate Cuba through the private sector and through contacts with figures connected to the Castro family and GAESA itself. Washington is now waging all-out economic warfare while preparing broader intervention.

Washington has set June 5 as the deadline for foreign firms to terminate any operations involving GAESA, and Rubio warned that additional sanctions are imminent. 

*****

Washington’s claims that Cuba—a small island nation of fewer than 10 million people—constitutes a national security threat to the United States are transparently absurd. Allegations that Havana harbors Russian or Chinese spy bases, moreover, are propaganda devices aimed at manufacturing public support for aggression. 

*****

As in the cases of Venezuela and Iran, the Trump administration is waging a global counterrevolutionary campaign against any government that challenges, however partially or inconsistently, Washington’s domination over world resources, markets and strategic territories. The target is not merely the Cuban government but the remaining historical legacy of the anti-colonial and social struggles of the twentieth century.

The Chinese Revolution, the Iranian Revolution, the Cuban Revolution and the Nicaraguan Revolution—all of them shaped, albeit in various distorted manners, by the immense influence of the Russian Revolution—represented blows against imperialist domination. Today, US imperialism seeks to erase every remaining social and political consequence of those upheavals.

Rubio himself has repeatedly framed US foreign policy as a crusade against what he calls “godless communist revolutions” and anti-colonial uprisings dating back to 1945. Behind the language of “democracy” and “security” lies an attempt to reimpose direct imperialist domination over the entire world. 

*****

The Trump administration’s blockade and threats of military action against Havana, its bombing of fishermen in the Caribbean and Pacific, and overall onslaught against the region is part of the same strategy that places migrants in concentration camps and orders federal forces to kill protesters in US streets.

US imperialism is responding to its unprecedented crisis by seeking to transform the entire continent and world into a vast killing field, a captive market of cheap labor, plundered resources and surveilled populations administered by puppet regimes answerable not to their own people but to Wall Street.

The working class across the hemisphere, and above all inside the United States itself, must intervene as an independent political force to halt any military aggression against Cuba, to free every migrant held in American detention and to break the stranglehold of imperialism over the continent. 

12. BioNTech: Profit takes precedence over health—and 1,860 employees lose their jobs in Germany

The Mainz-based biopharmaceutical company BioNTech is halting COVID-19 vaccine production in Germany, closing almost all its German production sites and cutting 1,860 jobs. The sites in Marburg, Idar-Oberstein and Singapore, as well as the recently acquired CureVac plants in Tübingen and Wiesbaden, are to be wound up. The group, which has earned billions from COVID-19 vaccines, aims to save €500 million a year with these drastic cutbacks.

This is a severe blow to the affected workers, who have done an admirable job in helping to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the pandemic is far from over. Last year, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) recorded almost 150,000 infections and 2,551 reported deaths linked to COVID-19 in Germany. That is seven deaths per day, although the actual figure is likely to be significantly higher, as testing for coronavirus has virtually ceased. 

*****

For almost two years now, since late 2024, the BioNTech board has been hinting that the cutting of around a thousand jobs was planned, including 300 IT positions. Many workers who had the opportunity subsequently moved to other companies. But now that management is moving towards mass redundancies and site closures, the chances of those made redundant finding new work are significantly worse.

The redundancies come at a time when other chemical giants (BASF, Bayer, Evonik and many others) are also responding to the energy and sales crisis resulting from the war in Iran with mass redundancies. In total, between 40,000 and 50,000 jobs are currently at risk in the sector, and redundancies are also being made in industry, the banking sector and the IT sector.

Hypocritically, BioNTech has offered the redundant staff the chance to reapply for positions within the company’s cancer research division. The group intends to focus entirely on the development of cancer drugs, a move that applies both to the current co-CEOs, Uğur Şahin and Özlem Türeci, and to the remaining BioNTech management in Mainz. Şahin and Türeci plan to set up their own new company for this purpose and will step down from their leadership roles by the end of the year at the latest. 

*****

BioNTech has profited enormously from the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically from scientific research findings that were publicly accessible and deliberately not geared towards profit. The start-up joined forces with the US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer to market its COVID-19 vaccine—the first to receive approval—worldwide. As the WSWS wrote: “The mRNA technology on which the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine is based was developed at publicly funded universities. Private firms only showed interest once huge profits beckoned. And even then, they were generally supported and backed by public funds.”

The entire vaccine development process was only possible because outstanding researchers and scientists such as Professor Zhang Yongzhen in Shanghai sequenced the virus’s genome and made it available free of charge on open-source platforms. It was only such actions that enabled BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna and other pharmaceutical companies to develop their vaccines so rapidly.

As the COVID-19 pandemic spread in 2020, the governments of the EU, the UK and the US provided generous funding for research: In the case of BioNTech/Pfizer, this included a €100 million development loan from the European Investment Bank and a €365 million grant from the German government, alongside advance payments from the US government, which were effectively interest-free loans.

BioNTech’s share price skyrocketed, from €13 in October 2019 to €150 in 2021. On this basis, the pharmaceutical group generated billions in profits. According to the Handelsblatt, sales of the COVID-19 vaccine brought BioNTech just under €19 billion at its peak, of which the company still holds assets worth over €15 billion to €16 billion today.

German politicians, particularly the then-Chancellor Angela Merkel (Christian Democrats), kept a protective hand over the private company. When in 2021 more than 100 WTO member states, led by India and South Africa, called for a suspension of patent protection to enable poor countries to develop vaccines rapidly, the Merkel government opposed the patent suspension with all its might. Angela Merkel is said to have personally phoned Uğur Şahin to reassure him on this matter.

One consequence of the rigid patent protection was, among other things, that barely 2 percent of the population in Africa could be vaccinated, with fatal consequences that have, however, received little public attention. The catastrophically poor reporting systems simply ignored the coronavirus death tolls in large parts of Africa. In Zambia, for example, only ten percent of COVID-19 deaths with a positive PCR test were actually recorded as coronavirus deaths. At the same time, new variants such as Omicron were able to emerge in these regions and spread rapidly across the globe.

At every turn and on every issue, the capitalist logic of profit has been and continues to be prioritized over public health and the public good. Fierce patent disputes between competing pharmaceutical companies mean that scientific discoveries and research findings with immense potential become a bone of contention between competing capital interests. Publicly researched knowledge, which belongs to everyone, is being privatized; the risks are socialised and borne by the taxpayer, while the profits are appropriated entirely for private gain.

13. The end of printing press manufacturer Manroland in Offenbach, Germany and the role of the IG Metall union

Manroland Sheetfed GmbH, once the world’s third-largest manufacturer of printing presses and Offenbach’s biggest employer, will cease operations there on June 1, 2026. The final 744 employees are losing their jobs, 660 on June 1 and the remaining 84 at the end of the year, when the factory is wound down. On March 6, Langley Holdings initiated provisional self-administration proceedings and appointed an insolvency administrator. At a works meeting on April 20, workers were informed of the definitive closure. The works council and IG Metall union are demanding a “transfer company” be established for those dismissed.

It is impossible to speak about the end of Manroland in Offenbach without looking back at the breakup of the corporation 14 years ago. And anyone speaking about the insolvency at the turn of 2011-2012 must also address the role played by IG Metall.

It is thanks to the union that a workforce of more than 6,600 highly trained and militant workers at three sites—Offenbach, Augsburg and Plauen—could be misled, divided, deceived and massively attacked for two months without resistance. The course was set back then for today’s disgraceful ending in Offenbach.

When Langley Holdings, a privately owned British engineering and industrial manufacturing group, took over Manroland Offenbach in February 2012, the company had already been broken into pieces with the Augsburg and Plauen sites separated off and sold. More than 2,000 jobs were destroyed, and the remaining workforce stripped of pension rights and entitlements won through decades of struggle.

At the time, the Frankfurter Rundschau, the Offenbach Post and IG Metall praised the takeover and re-establishment of the firm as Manroland Sheetfed GmbH under the direction of Langley Holdings as “the best solution for Offenbach”. The new owner Anthony Langley was hailed as a “white knight” and “Robin Hood.” The World Socialist Web Site, by contrast, warned on February 7, 2012:

In reality, the new owners are not interested in the production of printing machines, and certainly not in the future of workers and their families. … Realistically, one must assume that the new owners seized the favorable opportunity to acquire the best “crown jewels” for little money. They are primarily interested in conducting financial transactions worth millions.

This assessment has been fully confirmed. At no point did Anthony Langley, chairman and CEO of Langley Holdings, provide any guarantee for jobs at Manroland. Remarking that “The situation is not sustainable,” he has now decided the ultra-modern Manroland production facility, which can look back on more than 155 years of experience in printing press technology, will close on June 1.

Manroland workers, many of whom have been employed there for 30 years or longer, and who built up the Offenbach factory as skilled professional workers, are now losing everything. Langley’s wealth, by contrast, which stood at $368 million in 2011, is today estimated at around $3.6 billion—a tenfold increase in his fortune. He owns two large yachts, a seven-seat helicopter and a private jet, as well as a sailing club.

His fortune had “really taken off steeply from 2005 onwards,” Langley boasted to Forbes. He was referring to the start of his activity as a so-called “locust,” buying up troubled companies, carving them up, selling profitable sections at a gain and bleeding the rest dry.

This development was foreseeable: billions for the capitalists, unemployment and hopelessness for the workers who built everything. It is the result of IG Metall’s refusal at the time to fight for jobs. That is why a look back at the history of Manroland is of the greatest significance today for all metalworkers and engineers—whether at VW, Thyssen, Bosch or other plants threatened with job cuts and closure. It contains vital lessons.

The most important lesson is this: IG Metall will abandon anyone who relies on it. What is necessary is the building of rank-and-file action committees independent of IG Metall and all the unions, capable of acting on the basis of a socialist and international program. 

*****

The WSWS exposed the betrayal and sell-out by IG Metall relentlessly and almost in real time. Its statements circulated from hand to hand in the factory and caused great unrest because workers knew that what the WSWS wrote was true. The sell-out by IG Metall was so obvious that even the Offenbach Post took up the issue. 

On January 21, 2012, its then editor-in-chief Frank Pröse wrote under the headline “Uneasy feelings” about the WSWS article “Manroland is being broken up with the help of the union,” which had appeared the previous day: “Yes, we are moving onto thin ice when we quote Ulrich Rippert of the World Socialist Web Site, who sees the breakup of ‘Manroland’ as a rigged game. But there are good reasons for this assessment.”

*****

The union functionaries of the works council leadership, the shop stewards and the IG Metall headquarters reacted to the intervention of the Trotskyists with anger and hostility. When a WSWS team attempted to attend a meeting on December 7, 2011 concerning the future of the plant, they were denounced as “splitters” and thrown out of the hall.

One union official complained: “You are driving a wedge between the workers and IG Metall,” while a shop steward lamented that he had come directly from a Manroland workshop where the WSWS leaflet had caused great commotion, making it difficult for him to convince workers of IG Metall’s standpoint.

At a meeting of the Sozialistische Gleichheitspartei (Socialist Equality Party), Ulrich Rippert stressed that the right to work and a decent wage as an elementary democratic right stood higher than the profit interests of management and shareholders, and that it was necessary to build action committees and prepare a factory occupation.

Rippert said: “I am not speaking of a symbolic action, a few red flags at the main gate and limited protest actions with radical speeches, but of a serious occupation strike aimed at drawing the other sites and other factories threatened with redundancies into a broad resistance.” The insolvency had to be understood for what it really was: part of a social counterrevolution.

Today this social counterrevolution is far advanced. Many of the Manroland workers now being dismissed are being driven into unemployment and poverty in old age, and, if they are young, perhaps into the Bundeswehr (Armed Forces) and the looming war against Russia. The current Manroland closure is part of a wave of deindustrialisation that has been developing for several years and has accelerated dramatically above all with the escalation of war against Russia. 

*****

Manroland alone still maintains sales and service branches in more than 40 countries.

IG Metall has not considered it necessary to unite workers across different plants—on the contrary. In order to enforce its role as the capitalists’ junior partner, it deliberately and systematically divides workforces by site and by country. 

*****

The World Socialist Web Site and the Sozialistische Gleichheitspartei invite all Manroland employees, all metalworkers and all their supporters to contact us and become active themselves.

14. United Kingdom: Starmer’s “survival speech” only postpones his downfall amid Labour’s collapse

On Monday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer gave what was billed as a “survival speech” following Labour’s disastrous loss in last week’s local elections and elections to the devolved assemblies in Scotland and Wales.

Labour lost almost 1,500 councillors in local elections across England. The party lost power in Wales, after politically dominating it for a century, and its worst-ever result at a Holyrood election returned just 17 of the 129 seats in the Scottish Parliament.

The main beneficiaries from the mass turn-away from Labour by millions of workers and youth were the Greens, who presented themselves as a left alternative, and the far-right Reform UK. 

*****

Starmer tried to don a more populist guise, stressing in his London speech his only policy choice that has had significant support: “If we’d listened to the advice of other parties [a reference to Reform and the Conservatives], right now we’d be stuck in a stand-off with Iran, having been dragged into a war that is not in our interest, and I will never do that.”

Trying to channel popular discontent, he declared, “The British people are tired of a status quo that has failed them. Change cannot come quickly enough. They turn on the TV. They see bombs falling. They go to the petrol station, see prices rising. And they think, how is this happening to us again?”

The response “this time, must be different,” he claimed, convincing no one after almost two years of upholding “the status quo” in office, including by handing over £13–14 billion to Ukraine in military support and loans to fight Russia, and adding around £6 billion a year to the overall UK military budget—to be taken from social spending.

Starmer then gaslit the British population, claiming he had already delivered major gains, which workers had simply failed to notice. The tin-eared prime minister said he had spent too much time “talking about what I am doing for working people, and not enough time talking about why or who I stand for”!

His reset would begin with Wednesday’s King’s Speech setting out the government’s agenda for the coming year. But the “examples” he gave only confirmed how emphatically his government is a creature of the ruling class, and how incapable it is of making an even half-serious pitch to the working class. 

*****

For now, Starmer will remain in place. Not thanks to his speech, which confirmed him as one of the politically walking dead and was greeted by several dozen more MPs calling for him to step down, plus the resignation of four junior ministers. He staggers only thanks to the fact that the preferred replacement of his Labour opponents is not in parliament. 

*****

Starmer’s time is up. But the danger is that Labour’s meltdown has been exploited, as in every other country where social democracy has played a similar role, by the far-right. Reform UK has captured the despair of impoverished, mainly ageing workers.

Other, more progressive and generally younger sections of the working and middle class have turned to the Greens as a left-wing opposition.

But neither of these capitalist parties represents a genuine political alternative, which can only be provided by a socialist internationalist program. There is no time to lose. Workers and youth must turn to the building of their own party, the Socialist Equality Party, as the only means of fighting the ruling oligarchy, its wars, austerity and attacks on democratic rights.

15. After Greeley betrayal, UFCW blocks new strike action by Denver, Colorado meatpacking workers

Less than three weeks after United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7 called off the powerful strike of meatpacking workers at the JBS meat processing plant in Greeley, Colorado, meatpacking workers at the JBS beef and pork plant in nearby Denver voted April 27 to authorize strike action.

16.  Rallies oppose Australian Labor government’s massive cut to disability funding

Protests were held in several Australian cities on Saturday, against the Labor government’s onslaught on disability funding. Around 500 people participated in Melbourne and several hundred in Sydney, with a smaller rally in Brisbane.

Labor is slashing funding to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) by more than $35 billion over the next four years, in the largest single cut to a government program in history. Up to 300,000 disabled people are to be kicked off the NDIS, under conditions where there is no alternative to it.

At the rallies, people with disabilities spoke about the dire consequences. They noted that the targeting of tens of thousands of autistic children would have dire consequences. Families would simply be unable to cope, raising the prospect of tragic circumstances, including death. Other speakers noted the degrading character of a new “functional assessments” regime, under which government bureaucrats will scrutinize the disabled with a view to limiting the assistance they receive or kicking them off the NDIS altogether.

The cut to the NDIS is the centerpiece of a broader austerity budget that Labor is bringing down tonight that will also target other essential services such as health, education and public sector jobs. Labor is forcing the working class to pay for a deepening crisis of capitalism and for record military spending, as it supports US-led wars globally, including the criminal assault on Iran and prepares for new catastrophes, above all plans for an offensive against China. 

17. Meetings in Australia and New Zealand to oppose the imperialist war on Iran and government austerity

The Socialist Equality Party and the International Youth and Students for Social Equality are holding a series of public meetings in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Newcastle and in Wellington, New Zealand, to discuss the socialist and internationalist strategy that must be adopted to stop the war against Iran.

The world stands at one of the most dangerous crossroads in modern history. On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched a massive, unprovoked military assault against Iran—a historically oppressed nation that posed no military threat. Iran’s Supreme Leader and dozens of senior officials were killed. A girls’ elementary school was bombed, with scores of children among the dead. Thousands of people have since been murdered by US and Israeli bombs.

The Trump administration is waging this criminal war despite mass opposition from the American working class and the vast majority of the world’s population. Hundreds of millions of people are being plunged into poverty and hunger due to the blocking of the critical Strait of Hormuz supply route.

Meanwhile, Israel wages a brutal war of extermination in Lebanon and is extending its genocide of Palestinians from Gaza into the West Bank. These wars, along with the attack on Venezuela and the ongoing war against Russia over Ukraine, are not isolated conflicts.

The war in Iran is the culmination of a 35 year period which began with the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union. Trump’s threats to “end their civilisation” is the most grotesque expression of the policy of military war to resolve US imperialism’s declining economic situation. This is part of a developing Third World War, in which US imperialism is seeking to seize markets and resources and redivide the globe at the expense of Russia and China.

The capitalist class in Australia and New Zealand are not bystanders: these junior imperialist powers want a seat at the table for the violent redivision of the world. Both governments—Anthony Albanese’s Labor government in Australia and the conservative coalition led by Christopher Luxon in NZ—have lined up squarely behind the criminal US-Israeli onslaught. 

*****

The critical question is: How can the working class stop the global descent into barbarism and war?

These meetings will expose the politically criminal role played by pseudo-left organizations, such as Socialist Alternative in Australia and Socialist Aotearoa in NZ. As they have done throughout the Gaza genocide, these middle class groups are seeking to channel anti-war sentiment behind the pro-imperialist Labor and Green parties and the trade union bureaucracy.

Speakers from the Socialist Equality Party (Australia), the Socialist Equality Group (NZ) and the IYSSE will discuss the origins and driving forces of the US-Israeli war. They will explain the socialist political program that must be adopted to unite the working class internationally to put an end to war and fascist dictatorship by abolishing the capitalist system which is their root cause. 

*****

NEW ZEALAND
When: 6 p.m. Tuesday, May 19
Where: AM101 in the Alan MacDiarmid Building at Victoria University of Wellington (Kelburn campus).
Register here

MELBOURNE
When: 2:30 p.m. Sunday, May 24
Where: Community Hall A, Djerring Flemington Hub, 25 Mt Alexander Road, Flemington
Register here

SYDNEY
When: 2:30 p.m. Sunday, May 31
Where: Community Room 1, Bryan Brown Theatre, 80 Rickard Rd, Bankstown
Register here

BRISBANE
When: 2:30 p.m. Sunday, May 31
Where: Richlands Community Centre, 75 Old Progress Rd, Richlands
Register here

NEWCASTLE
When: 1 p.m. Saturday, June 5
Where: VG07 University of Newcastle (Callaghan campus)
Register here

18. Workers Struggles: The Americas

Bolivia:

Political crisis deepens as strikes and blockades continue

Canada:

British Columbia nurses poised to join growing struggles of health care workers across Canada

Haiti:

Workers, peasants and youth protest for wages and a better life

United States:

Workers at event center in Tulsa, Oklahoma petition for better wages, threaten strike
 
Breakthru Beverage drivers and warehouse workers in Illinois and Missouri strike over wages and contract language protections
 
Ironworkers rally over stalled contract negotiations at Cives Steel facility in Maine 

Uruguay:

Intellectuals and Artists Network denounces Cuba blockade
 
19.  Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!
 

The fight for the Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist's freedom is an essential component of the struggle against imperialist war, genocide, dictatorship and fascism.

May 11, 2026

Headlines at the World Socialist Web Site today:

 1. This week in history: May 11-17

  • 25 years ago:
 Italian general election brings Silvio Berlusconi back to power 
  • 50 years ago:

Terry Tyler, brother of Gary Tyler, framed by Louisiana police

  • 75 years ago:

    Battle of Soyang River in Korean War

  • 100 years ago:

British Trade Union Congress betrays general strike 

2. Starmer’s antisemitism summit deepens right-wing slander campaign against the left and Muslims

The stabbing of three men on April 29, of which two were Jewish and one Muslim, by a mentally ill man has been used by the Labour government to declare a national emergency over antisemitism.

Starmer organized a summit at Downing Street Monday calling for a “whole of society response” before an audience of “leaders from the business, civil society, health, culture, higher education and policing sectors”. Among these were trade union officials. The media has put its shoulder to the wheel of the campaign to present British society as in the grip of runaway hatred against Jews.

This is a right-wing campaign, pressing the same buttons used to attack former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters. Similar attacks are already being ramped up against Green Party leader Zack Polanski.

Left-wing, anti-Zionist, anti-imperialist sentiment is to be intimidated and criminalized by associating it with the crime of antisemitism. Running through the whole affair is a barely disguised Islamophobia. 

*****

Slander on the scale now being mounted by the government and the media is preparation for sweeping political repression. No area of life went unmentioned in Starmer’s opening speech Monday, promising a host of measures to combat alleged antisemitism.

They included “stronger powers to deal with protests, ensuring intimidation is not tolerated on our streets” and “working to speed up sentencing for offenses”.

The government had also “commissioned independent reviews into antisemitism in education and health services”, investing £7 million “to tackle antisemitism” in “our schools, colleges and universities”. Starmer added that “We will now expect them to publish the scale of the problem on their campuses, as well as the specific steps they have taken to clamp down on it.”

In “cultural venues and spaces”, where “public funding is being used to promote or platform antisemitism, the Arts Council must act, using its powers to suspend, withdraw and claw back funding”. The government would be “stopping those who spread hatred from entering the country and giving the Charity Commission stronger powers to act against organizations that enable it”.

Recent years, especially those of Israel’s genocide, have already shown what this means. Protests have been rerouted and cancelled, and thousands of protesters arrested—including under counter-terror laws in connection with the proscription of Palestine Action.

An “Index of Repression” set up by The European Legal Support Centre (ELSC) and Forensic Architecture records 964 instances of repression against pro-Palestinian speech and protest in the UK between January 2019 and August 2025. Regular targets already include students, teachers and academics, public sector workers and cultural figures. 

*****

As in France, the Labour government’s campaign is carried out in alliance with the most right-wing forces. Depictions of Islam as a fifth column threatening “British values” dovetail with fascist conspiracy theories of the “Great Replacement” of Christian whites with Muslims.

This line-up was made clear when Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch openly defended seeking a ban of an upcoming demonstration commemorating the Nakba (the mass expulsion of the Palestinians by Israel) while refusing to do the same for a far-right march planned the same day.

They were, she said, “not the same”. Tommy Robinson, a self-proclaimed Zionist, and his band of Islamophobic fascists were engaging in legitimate “criticism of religion”, whereas with anti-genocide protesters: “It’s not the faith that’s being attacked, it’s the people.”

As before, Robinson’s “Unite the Kingdom” march will see a forest of Union Flags and St George’s Crosses interspersed with Israeli state flags—an accurate reflection of the political company the Israeli government keeps.

An International Conference on Combating Antisemitism held in Jerusalem last March was attended by leading representatives of the far-right French National Rally, Brothers of Italy, Spanish Vox, Sweden Democrats, Dutch Freedom Party and Hungarian Fidesz, plus Argentina’ Javier Milei. Robinson himself was welcomed in October.

It is revolting to be lectured to by these people on antisemitism. They are racist representatives of the nationalist sewer which spawned all the horrific ethnic violence of the 20th century, fought against by the socialist working class and the Marxist movement.

As David North, chairman of the International Editorial Board of the World Socialist Web Site, explained in his lecture series “The Logic of Zionism”:

Zionism, which emerged as an offspring of imperialist colonialism and as an enemy of socialism and a scientific conception of history and society, necessarily based itself on the most reactionary elements of nationalist politics and ideology.

The socialist left rejects with contempt the campaign to malign and criminalize it by people responsible for the historic crime of waging genocide in the name of the Jewish people, for the rise in antisemitism which has resulted and for boosting the Islamophobic far-right.

Starmer is providing his support to these reactionary ends by cracking down on democratic rights in the name of combating antisemitism. He must be opposed.

3. Bosch to eliminate 1,400 jobs in Türkiye

Bosch's plan to cut 1,400 jobs at a facility in Turkey, in addition to the 22,000 job cuts at its facilities in Germany, raises the need for workers to organize an international fightback.

4. Extradition requests for top politicians deepen US-Mexico crisis

Late last week, the Mexican government of President Claudia Sheinbaum was slapped with an extradition request from Washington D.C. for ten prominent politicos from the central Pacific Coast state of Sinaloa, including the state’s governor, Rubén Rocha, and its sole federal senator, Enrique Inzunza Cázares. 

This came a week on the heels of revelations that CIA agents, without the federal government’s knowledge, were operating in the northern border state of Chihuahua, in direct violation of Mexico’s constitution and sovereignty.

Rocha is a senior member of Sheinbaum’s ruling “left-wing” Morena (Movimiento Regeneración Nacional) party, as are the other nine serving and former politicians and security chiefs who are also subject of the extradition requests. 

If Sheinbaum complies, she risks opening the floodgates to more US extradition requests, and fissures in her party. If she doesn’t, she risks aggression from an increasingly unhinged Trump administration.

5. Nexteer auto parts workers condemn new tentative agreement

Last month, Nexteer auto parts workers in Saginaw, Michigan voted down a tentative agreement presented by the UAW bureaucracy by more than 96 percent. The reaction from the shop floor to a new TA brought by the union last week is broadly one of anger and disgust. Workers who spoke to the World Socialist Web Site this weekend left no doubt where they stood.

6. India’s ruling far-right BJP makes gains in state elections amid wave of anti-government working class protests

The results of the five Indian state and territorial assembly elections announced Monday, May 4, point to a deepening crisis of bourgeois rule and the urgency of arming the working class with a revolutionary socialist program and strategy.

7. Türkiye, the war on Iran and the resurgence of the class struggle

Ulaş Sevinç's speech begins at approximately one hour into the video; subtitle translations are available 

This speech was delivered by Ulaş Sevinç, Chairman of the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal (Socialist Equality Party – Fourth International), at the 2026 May Day Online Rally, organized by the WSWS and the ICFI.

8. Rank-and-file rebellion and the unity of the working class 

Will Lehman's speech begins at approximately one hour and eleven minutes into the video

This speech was delivered by Will Lehman, candidate for president of the United Auto Workers (UAW) and member of the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC), at the 2026 May Day Online Rally, organized by the WSWS and the ICFI. 

9. Reckless disembarkation of hantavirus-stricken MV Hondius exposes collapse of public health

The recklessness of the operation to evacuate the MV Hondius, anchored off Tenerife in the Canary Islands on Sunday morning, exposed itself before the day was out. As the first French repatriation flight from the hantavirus-stricken cruise ship descended toward Le Bourget airport outside Paris in the late afternoon, one of the five French passengers on board began showing symptoms of infection. 

*****

Just hours earlier, Spanish health authorities and the World Health Organization (WHO) had insisted that every passenger leaving the vessel was asymptomatic and had been screened before being put on a plane. The first French passenger to develop symptoms did so while airborne, in a sealed cabin with four other exposed travelers, on a flight authorized under those very protocols. The operation, in other words, immediately produced precisely the cross-border transmission risk it was supposed to prevent. 

This was an entirely predictable outcome of an evacuation governed by political rather than epidemiological logic—a logic that finds its most extreme expression in the response of the Trump administration. 

Acting Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Director Jay Bhattacharya, a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration and a primary architect of the “herd immunity” strategy that contributed to more than 1.5 million American COVID-19 deaths, appeared Sunday morning on CNN’s “State of the Union” to assure the public that “this is not COVID, this is not going to have—lead to the kind of outbreak,” while confirming that the US will not require quarantining or contact tracing of Hondius passengers.

The CDC has confirmed it will not quarantine the 17 Americans being flown back from the Hondius and will not test asymptomatic passengers. “We are not quarantining anybody,” a CDC official stated on Saturday, adding that “it is not recommended to test people that do not have symptoms.” 

Americans repatriated from a ship on which three passengers have died of a 30-50 percent case-fatality pathogen will be evaluated at the National Quarantine Unit in Nebraska, then permitted to “opt to go home and watch for any potential symptoms for 42 days.” This is not quarantine. It is voluntary symptom self-monitoring of a disease whose prodrome—fever, headache, body aches—is indistinguishable from a common cold. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has not held a single press conference on the outbreak, entirely consistent with the administration’s disastrous response to COVID-19 in 2020 and since. 

*****

Spain is holding 14 of its nationals at Gomez-Ulla military hospital with PCR on arrival and again at seven days. Ireland has imposed roughly five weeks of isolation. France is requiring 72 hours of hospitalization followed by 45 days of home quarantine. The 42-day American self-monitoring window is itself scientifically indefensible. Andes virus incubation can extend to 56 days, as multiple published studies confirm. Passengers who develop symptoms in weeks seven and eight will fall outside the CDC’s window entirely. 

Officials are also categorically asserting that asymptomatic individuals cannot transmit the virus, which is contrary to the scientific record. The CDC’s own journal Emerging Infectious Diseases concluded in 2005 that “the most probable period of virus spread would be during the days before medical attention is sought.” A 2014 CDC study identified the early prodromal phase—when symptoms are vague and easily missed—as the period of greatest transmission risk. The official assurance to the contrary is propaganda.

The pattern of the past 39 days makes the consequences of this dereliction concrete. On April 24, 13 days after the first fatality, 30 passengers freely disembarked at the remote British territory of Saint Helena with no testing, no disease notification, and no quarantine instructions. Among them was the wife of the index case. Already likely infected, she boarded a commercial flight the following day to Johannesburg and on to Amsterdam, deteriorated mid-flight, and died in a Johannesburg hospital on April 26. A British physician who treated her is now in critical condition in that same hospital. A Swiss passenger from the Saint Helena group tested positive after self-referring to a hospital weeks later. 

Earlier, between April 13 and 15, just two days after the first death, the Hondius had anchored at Tristan da Cunha, where passengers and crew mingled freely with local islanders. A British man who boarded at the island is now hospitalized with suspected hantavirus. The island has roughly 250 inhabitants, no hospital, and is accessible only by a six-day boat ride.

The global dispersal of Hondius passengers constitutes a textbook violation of international law. Under the 2005 International Health Regulations, the Maritime Declaration of Health legally obligates the officer in charge of a vessel to notify port authorities immediately upon suspicion of an unusual health event. A man dying of acute febrile respiratory illness five days after departing a known hantavirus-endemic region easily meets that threshold. Yet the World Health Organization was not notified until May 2, 21 days after the initial death. 

A highly lethal pathogen with confirmed human-to-human transmission was allowed to disperse to 12 countries before the world was even told it existed. Captain Jan Dobrogowski assured passengers the first death was from natural causes, while Oceanwide Expeditions claimed ignorance of the danger for weeks. What began on April 1 as an expedition for 130 affluent tourists departing Ushuaia has morphed into a global crisis. 

10. New York transit and LIRR workers: Build rank-and-file committees—prepare a united strike!

A major class and political confrontation is looming in New York City as labor agreements covering more than 40,000 subway and bus workers expire May 16, the same day a 60-day cooling off period ends for 3,500 Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) workers across five unions. A combined strike against the state-run Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) would shut down transit for four million daily subway and bus riders and 300,000 LIRR commuters, bringing the “Capital of Capital” largely to a halt.

Transit workers, many drawn from the city’s massive immigrant population, have played a critical role in the history of the class struggle in New York City. Because of this, the Democratic-controlled political establishment has used anti-strike laws and the trade union bureaucracy to prevent transit workers from spearheading a broader working-class movement against Wall Street’s repeated efforts to impose financial crises on workers’ backs.

LIRR workers have voted overwhelmingly to strike—members of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen voted 476 to 5 for strike authorization, with the other four unions voting similarly. On two occasions—September 15, 2025, and mid-January 2026—the union leadership nullified those votes by appealing to the Trump White House to appoint a Presidential Emergency Board. Trump obliged; the MTA rejected the PEB’s findings; nothing was settled; and state and city authorities gained eight months to prepare a strikebreaking operation.

Any strike would immediately pit workers against the Democratic Party, including Governor Kathy Hochul and the city’s social-democratic Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Under the Taylor Law, New York public employees can be fined one day’s pay for every day on strike. LIRR workers fall under the federal Railway Labor Act, long used by both parties to suppress strikes.

There would be enormous public support for transit workers if they defied these anti-democratic laws. Millions are struggling in the metro area: median home prices in Brooklyn are hitting nearly $1 million, average housing costs run $5,500–$7,500 a month, and rents for a two-bedroom apartment reach $3,900–$5,900. To rally this support, rank-and-file transit workers must take the struggle out of the hands of the Transport Workers Union (TWU) and LIRR union leaderships and build independent rank-and-file committees. 

*****

The MTA is demanding workers pay for a fiscal crisis they had no hand in creating. The authority holds approximately $49 billion in long-term bond debt—consuming 15 to 20 percent of its operating budget in debt service to bondholders—accumulated through decades of deliberate underfunding stretching back to the 1970s fiscal crisis.  

*****

In New York State alone, 154 billionaires collectively hold nearly $1 trillion in wealth. Michael Bloomberg, who deployed police against the last transit strike in 2005, holds a personal fortune of $109 billion. Across the US, the largest transit systems have accumulated a $6 billion deficit since pandemic relief money ran out—a pittance compared to the Trump administration’s proposed $1.5 trillion military budget.

Mamdani was elected on promises to tax the rich and deliver free buses. In four months he has dropped the free bus proposal, replaced a wealth tax with a token fee on secondary residences, and is managing a $4.5 billion budget deficit through pension delays and cost-cutting that will fall directly on transit workers. He has made two friendly visits to the Trump White House and endorsed Hochul for re-election.

Hochul, who oversees the MTA, vetoed legislation requiring two-person train crews, handing management a future job-cut weapon. When 15,000 New York City nurses struck earlier this year, she signed executive orders allowing unlicensed scabs to break the strike. She is now openly preparing the same against any LIRR walkout, relying on the TWU bureaucracy to keep city bus drivers off the picket lines.

For subway and bus workers, the MTA has budgeted a provocative 2 percent annual raise—half the city’s 4 percent annual inflation rate as of March 2026. TWU Local 100 officials have filed 37 contract demands but refused to put specific numbers behind their call for “substantial” raises.

The five LIRR unions have already conceded the same 9.5 percent over three years accepted by other MTA unions and are now asking 5 percent in the fourth year. The MTA has offered 3 percent—or 4.5 percent, contingent on work-rule “productivity” concessions, which simply means more work for less. In the context of Trump’s tariff escalation and ongoing cost-of-living increases, even a 5 percent raise could become a real-wage cut before the ink dries. 

*****

In 1966, New York City transit workers conducted a historic 12-day strike, defying anti-strike injunctions and the jailing of TWU President Mike Quill by Mayor John Lindsay, winning major pay raises for 33,000 workers. In 1968, the MTA was established and pensions put in a public retirement system, which allowed those hired before 1973 to retire at the age of 55 with full benefits.  

In April 1980, more than a year before Reagan smashed the PATCO air traffic controllers with no resistance from the AFL-CIO, transit workers launched an 11-day strike demanding 15 and 10 percent annual raises to address runaway inflation costs. The walkout ended after a fact-finding board recommended a 23 percent wage increase over two years—paid for by raising subway fares, fining the TWU $1 million, and docking workers two days’ pay for every strike day. The deal was opposed by Ed Winn, a member of the Workers League—forerunner of the Socialist Equality Party—whom rank-and-file workers had elected to the TWU Local 100 executive board on a socialist program and the principle of political independence from both capitalist parties.

The TWU would not call another strike for 25 years. In December 2005, transit workers walked out again, but the leadership shut the powerful strike down in three days. Beyond a $2.5 million Taylor Law fine, the union lost automatic dues check-off. In a court affidavit, TWU President Roger Toussaint pledged that the union “does not assert the right to strike against any government” and would not participate in any strike against a “governmental employer”—now or in the future. In return, a state Supreme Court judge restored dues check-off, authorizing the transit agency to deposit approximately $1.5 million a month in union dues directly into the union treasury.

The current leadership has followed the same path of political subordination. In April 2022, TWU Local 100 held a rally where members chanted “Kathy, Kathy!” and officials waved “Labor for Kathy” signs. Union president John Samuelsen—who now calls Hochul “the bosses’ governor”—actively participated. He previously backed Governor Andrew Cuomo for years, even as Cuomo embedded Tier 6 into state law, requiring public employees hired after April 1, 2012, to work longer, contribute more, and receive less. His claim that the union never formally endorsed Hochul is ludicrous: it is inconceivable that TWU Local 100 staged that rally without his full support. 

*****

Workers need immediate, substantial wage increases—not a carefully negotiated crawl toward poverty. The restoration of the Cost-of-Living Allowance surrendered by the TWU in 1982 must be a central demand. Workers have been discussing this openly on social media; the union leadership will not raise it—not because it is unrealistic, but because fighting for it means confronting the Democratic Party to which the bureaucracy is organically tied.

The decisive question is not whether the union leadership will call a strike on May 16. It is whether workers are organized independently of the union apparatus and capable of fighting regardless of what the bureaucracy does. New York transit and LIRR workers must build rank-and-file committees—democratically run, answerable to the membership, and completely independent of union officials, the Democratic Party and management’s political allies—uniting subway workers, bus operators and LIRR and Metro-North workers, and reaching out to riders, nurses, postal workers, teachers and every section of the working class fighting the same ruling class across the metro region.

The specific demands that must anchor this fight: immediate double-digit wage increases to offset years of inflation and concession contracts; 100 percent COLA pegged to the real cost of living; rejection of all work-rule concessions; fully paid pensions and retiree medical benefits with elimination of all inferior pension tiers (2 through 6); two-person crews on all passenger trains; and no fare hikes—transit must be funded by taxing the oligarchs, not the four million workers who ride the system daily.

The struggle of New York transit and rail workers is not a local labor dispute. It is one front of a global class war. The same ruling class gutting transit in New York funds the destruction of cities in the Middle East and provokes confrontation with nuclear-armed states. The answer is the international unity of the working class against a capitalist system that produces war and austerity as its twin products. Transit workers should contact the World Socialist Web Site to get information on building rank-and-file committees. The question before every worker is: who controls this struggle—the bureaucracies that have surrendered over and over, or the rank and file?

11. Germany: Defend every job at VW!

Volkswagen is preparing the next round of mass job cuts. Plants in Emden and Zwickau, the commercial vehicle plant in Hanover and the Audi plant in Neckarsulm face closure. All together, 40,000 people work at these plants. 

*****

The plans go far beyond the previous agreement to cut 35,000 jobs at the core VW brand and a further 15,000 in the overall corporation, which the IG Metall union and the works council had signed at the end of 2024. At that time, they justified their agreement to the job cuts and severe wage cuts with the claim that plant closures were thereby moved off the table. But now the executive board is planning exactly that.

Audi boss Gernot Döllner is even threatening the closure of the entire German car industry. He is quoted in an employee information bulletin as saying: “It has long since ceased to be about a single model or about market shares here or there. It is about the continued existence of the German automobile industry.” Some 720,000 people currently work in the car and supplier industries. In addition, there are up to 1.8 million jobs that depend on this directly or indirectly.

The corporate plans make clear that if VW workers do not take up the struggle against this madness, the cuts will know no bounds. Forgoing wages and accepting dismissals do not secure plants, but prepare for their closure. Management wants to cut jobs en masse and enormously increase the exploitation of the remaining workers in order to boost profits, position the corporation for the escalating trade war and convert the German economy to war. 

*****

VW has a special significance here. In no other German corporation is the collaboration between the owners, the state and the trade unions as close; no other corporation shapes the entire world of work so strongly. The state of Lower Saxony holds 20 percent of the voting rights, and the IG Metall union is involved at all levels of management. On this basis, an example is being made of VW that the whole car industry is to follow.

Yet the problem is not that VW is no longer selling cars. The corporation’s turnover has risen from €254 billion in 2020 to €322 billion in 2025. “VW continues to sell many cars, but earns significantly less money from them,” said Lazar Backovic, mobility lead at Handelsblatt.

The aim of the restructuring is therefore not to build better and more cars, but to exploit auto workers more intensively in order to increase the profit margin per vehicle. Wage cuts, job cuts and plant closures serve this purpose. 

*****

Workers and their families are supposed to bleed, forgo wages and lose their employment in order to increase the return for shareholders. This principle is to be enforced as the new normal throughout the industry.

At the same time, production is to be converted to a war economy. For the plant in Osnabrück there is already said to be a letter of intent from an Israeli arms company to produce weapons beginning 2027. There have also been talks with major German arms manufacturer Rheinmetall.

VW workers are thus supposed to produce the weapons with which their children or they themselves are sent to war to kill workers of other countries and die for the interests of German imperialism. Volkswagen is returning to its original traditions. Founded in 1937, the company did not produce the previously announced “Peoples Car” (Volkswagen) during the war, but military vehicles for Hitler’s war of annihilation. It exploited forced laborers for this.

Today’s conversion to a war economy is part of comprehensive war preparations. With the government’s new military strategy, Defense Minister Pistorius is planning an open war against the nuclear power Russia. To this end, trillions are being spent on the Bundeswehr to make it the largest armed force in Europe. This madness is financed by ruthless cuts to health, education and pensions.

The proxy war that Germany and the other NATO powers are waging against Russia in Ukraine has already had grave consequences for industry and workers’ living standards. The attack on Iran, supported by Chancellor Merz, has further exacerbated this. High energy prices are driving up production costs and leading to further sackings. At the same time, real wages are melting away with rising inflation.

Now this is to be pushed even further to strengthen Germany’s position in the global trade war and align society as a whole toward war. VW serves as the benchmark for this.

In the struggle to defend jobs, VW workers therefore face not only the owners and management, but also the government and the entire ruling class. They can win only if they oppose the logic of capitalist profit and warmongering and launch a common struggle with workers all over the world. 

*****

The biggest obstacle in this struggle is the IG Metall union. It works most closely with management and acts as a police force in the workplace to suppress any resistance to the mass cuts.

The latest cutbacks are supported by IG Metall. Its first reaction to the corporation’s declaration of war on the workforce consisted of playing things down and denying the obvious, so that no resistance developed among the workers. 

*****

In the 1970s, workers could still fight for important rights as part of the system of “co-determination”—which provides so-called “employee representation” on company committees and boards—and compel high wages and good working conditions. But to the extent that globalization has intensified international competition and fueled the pro-war policy, the role of “social partnership” as a straitjacket for the workers has fully emerged. It binds workers to the company’s profit maximization logic and the government’s nationalist policy of making Germany an attractive production location, and serves to enforce the cuts against the employees. The universally known corruption of the IG Metall functionaries is only an expression of this deeper development. 

*****

In order to develop resistance against the cutback plans, employees must organize themselves completely independently of the IG Metall union and its works council reps, that is, in the VW Action Committee. This rank-and-file committee pursues the goal of uniting all those who wish to fight—production workers, salaried employees, core and temporary staff. Trade union functionaries have no place in it.

The action committee is organized democratically, i.e., the members have the say. It does not strive for well-paid posts in the co-determination bodies, which are committed to maintaining secrecy and industrial peace. It will, however, use all possibilities—including works council elections—to stand up for its aims.

The action committee defends all jobs at all locations as a matter of principle. It fundamentally rejects concessions on wages, pensions and working conditions. It is not the corporation’s cash position, but the struggle that decides the preservation of jobs.

One of the most important tasks of the action committee is linking up with other production locations at home and abroad. It does not allow the corporation’s various locations and brands to be played off against each other with the help of the trade unions, to drive a wedge between the workforces in Germany, China, Mexico, the US, the Czech Republic or Spain.

The VW Action Committee is part of the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC), which coordinates the growing resistance in workplaces across industries and worldwide.

We recommend VW workers follow the campaign of IWA-RFC member Will Lehman, who is running for the presidency of the American autoworkers union, the United Auto Workers (UAW). Lehman works at the Volvo subsidiary Mack Trucks in Pennsylvania. His goal is not to replace the current UAW apparatus with another, but to abolish the apparatus and hand control over to the members. His campaign is meeting with a strong response among US autoworkers.

***** 

When workers take up the struggle, they are inevitably confronted with political questions. The corruption of the trade unions, the jobs cull in industry and the development of war are not simply due to the actions of a few degenerate individuals. They are an expression of the deep crisis of the capitalist system, which has nothing to offer humanity other than poverty, dictatorship and war.

Karl Marx once compared capital to a vampire whose thirst for blood constantly grows. “Capital is dead labor, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks,” he wrote. This vampire has grown into a global colossus. Securities, financial instruments and foreign exchange worth trillions circulate daily on the international stock exchanges. The concentration of wealth at the top of society has reached gigantic proportions. Elon Musk is on the verge of becoming the first dollar trillionaire in world history.

These massive concentrations of capital search all over the world for “living labor” they can suck in. They use every wage difference and every competitive advantage to increase profit margins. Technological advances that could raise the living standards of all humanity and make work easier—the international division of labor, e-mobility, robots and artificial intelligence—are used instead to destroy jobs, intensify levels of exploitation and increase profits.

Financial and economic crises are piling up. The bitter struggle for markets and raw materials has, as in the First and Second World Wars, once again taken the form of violent military conflicts. This is the reason for the wars that the US and the European powers are waging against Russia and against Iran, and for their war preparations against China. They want to control the energy resources of the Middle East and the raw materials of Russia in order to dominate the world economy and blackmail their rivals. The imperialist powers are fighting for a redivision of the world and are prepared to plunge all of humanity into a nuclear inferno for this purpose.

But globalization has not only exacerbated the crisis of capitalism. It has also welded the international working class together into a powerful revolutionary force. Today, it encompasses billions worldwide who are closely connected to each other through the production process and social networks, and who come into open conflict with the globally operating corporations, the capitalist governments and their allies in the trade union apparatus.

*****

The struggle to defend jobs can be waged successfully only if it is guided by a perspective that places the social needs of the working class above the profit interests of the corporations, and becomes the starting point for an international struggle against capitalism and war:

  • For the expropriation of VW under the democratic control of the workers.
  • For a workers’ government that does not submit to the dictates of the banks and business associations.
  • For the reorganization of society on a socialist basis.

The working class needs a party that represents its interests. The Social Democratic Party (SPD) has not done this for decades, and the Left Party, which goes back to the Stalinist state party in the former East Germany, has never done it.

The Sozialistische Gleichheitspartei (SGP, Socialist Equality Party), the German section of the Fourth International, stands in the tradition of Marx and Engels, August Bebel, Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht, Lenin and Trotsky. It has defended and further developed the perspective of international socialism. 

12. Trump calls Iranian response to negotiations “unacceptable,” as Israel continues Lebanon bloodbath

US President Donald Trump declared Iran’s reply to his negotiation terms “TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE” on Sunday, threatening renewed military escalation four days before his summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.

In two posts on his Truth Social platform, Trump accused Tehran of “playing games” for “47 years (DELAY, DELAY, DELAY!).” At a Cabinet meeting Sunday morning, he told reporters he was no longer certain Washington wanted a deal at all.

Iran’s reply to the Trump administration, delivered Sunday through Pakistani mediators, offered to transfer Tehran’s stockpile of 60 percent-enriched uranium to a third country and demanded that the US blockade of Iranian ports be lifted before further talks. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi described the demand to dismantle enrichment facilities as non-negotiable. Trump’s terms had required immediate suspension of enrichment for 12 years.

In a televised interview Sunday with the journalist Sharyl Attkisson, Trump repeated his threat to bomb the Iranian uranium stockpile if any country assists Tehran in moving or hiding it: “If anybody got near the place, we will know about it. And we’ll blow them up.” On May 7, Trump warned that the United States would soon have to “look at one big glow coming out of Iran”—a remark widely read as a threat of nuclear strikes.

The administration is signaling a return to direct combat operations. Trump told reporters Friday that he was preparing to resume the U.S. Navy operation in the Strait of Hormuz, suspended on May 6, “with other things.” The US military has three carrier strike groups in the region; the blockade has now redirected 61 commercial ships and is holding more than 70 tankers in custody.

As Trump escalated his threats, the Israeli bombardment of Lebanon entered its bloodiest weekend since the cease-fire that began on April 16. Israeli forces killed at least 24 people in Lebanon on Saturday and at least 39 more on Sunday, according to Lebanese health officials, in what officials described as the deadliest single day of strikes since the cease-fire began. The Lebanese health ministry has now recorded 2,846 dead and 8,693 wounded since the resumed Israeli bombardment began March 2. 

*****

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam has filed a complaint with the U.N. Security Council. Hezbollah responded with a drone attack on northern Israel that wounded three Israeli reservists. The Trump administration issued no condemnation of the Israeli strikes; a third round of US-mediated Israel-Lebanon talks is to be held in Washington on May 14 and 15.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in an interview broadcast Sunday on CBS’s 60 Minutes, declared that the war on Iran was “not over” and demanded that Tehran dismantle its enrichment facilities and surrender its uranium stockpile. Asked whether Israel would remove the stockpile by force, Netanyahu declined to rule it out.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff met Qatar’s prime minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, in Miami on Saturday in emergency consultations that produced no announced result.

Trump’s confrontation with Iran will be carried directly into his Beijing summit, scheduled for Thursday and Friday. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed the war would dominate the agenda. Roughly four out of every five barrels of Iran’s seaborne oil exports go to China, which has refused to participate in the US blockade and whose commerce ministry has issued a blocking statute ordering Chinese firms to ignore the US sanctions regime. 

The Iran war is now in its 72nd day. Brent crude is at roughly $101 a barrel, gasoline above $4.50. US intelligence has found that the renewed combat operations did little additional damage to Iran’s nuclear program; the roughly 440 kilograms of 60 percent-enriched uranium Iran is believed to hold, material sufficient for some 10 warheads if further enriched, sits in underground facilities US munitions cannot reach.

Democratic Party officials who appeared across the Sunday morning talk shows did not oppose the war. They demanded that Trump prosecute it more aggressively. 

*****

All factions of the US political establishment support the global war drive and the aim of subjugating Iran to US domination. 

13. US Steel contests OSHA fines for deadly Clairton Coke Works explosion

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) fined US Steel and its contractor MPW Industrial Services $180,000 for the deaths of Timothy Quinn and Steven Menefee.

14. United States: Paterson, Camden and other New Jersey school districts lay off over 1,000 teachers and support staff

As in the rest of the United States, New Jersey is experiencing a wave of layoffs of educators and school workers because of budget shortfalls.

15. Harvard graduate workers strike enters fourth week: Build rank-and-file committees to break the UAW’s isolation

The Harvard Graduate Student Union–United Auto Workers (HGSU-UAW) walkout, which began April 21, is not a local dispute over a few percentage points of salary. It is a concentrated expression of the deepening crisis of capitalism as it penetrates the university and the conditions of intellectual and scientific labor.

Graduate student workers occupy a peculiar and deliberately obscured position in the contemporary capitalist university. They are simultaneously enrolled students and full-time workers, a dual status that universities exploit to suppress wages, deny benefits and undermine labor rights.

As Teaching Fellows (TFs), they stand at the front of undergraduate classrooms, lead discussion sections, design curricula, administer exams and provide the individualized instruction that constitutes the actual educational experience of tens of thousands of undergraduates.

As Research Assistants (RAs), they run the laboratories, collect and analyze data, write code and generate the scientific and scholarly output that earns universities billions in federal grants and private donations. In the humanities and social sciences, they are the primary intellectual interlocutors for entire cohorts of students. In the sciences, a tenured professor’s lab would simply cease to function without them.

This is not peripheral work. It is the core of what a university does, and it is performed by workers who, at Harvard, earn between $18 and $21 per hour—so little that many qualify for government food assistance programs.

This is a national condition. At the University of Maryland, a graduate assistant in the College of Information takes home roughly $2,100 a month after taxes while paying around $2,000 for a one-bedroom apartment near campus. At the University of Michigan, the research assistant “stipend” sits roughly $6,000 below what a living wage calculator estimates is needed for a single adult to cover basic costs.

A 2025 survey at the University of Colorado Boulder found that only 37 percent of graduate students receiving financial support said their stipend adequately covered the cost of living. This figure should be understood not as a local management failure but calculated exploitation for financial gain.

More than a quarter of graduate students nationally report suffering from housing or food insecurity. They are working in some of the most intellectually demanding environments in the world while rationing food, taking on debt to cover rent and deferring medical care because the university’s benefit funds—which at Harvard have been inaccessible since the previous contract expired in June 2025—do not adequately cover the costs of basic health needs. 

*****

Among the demands that Harvard’s administration has most conspicuously refused to engage in is the protection of non-citizen workers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). International graduate students make up a substantial proportion of the workforce in STEM fields at every major research university.

At Harvard, as across the country, they are among the most exploited and most vulnerable members of the academic labor force carrying the same workloads and enduring the same poverty wages as their domestic colleagues, while simultaneously navigating a federal immigration apparatus that has become increasingly hostile, arbitrary and weaponized.

The Trump administration’s assault on international students has been systematic. Visa revocations have swept campuses across the country. The Department of Homeland Security proposed last August to end the longstanding “Duration of Status” policy for F-1 visa holders, a change that would replace open-ended educational status with a rigid four-year limit, introduce new restrictions on changes to a major or degree level and require students to file for extensions through an immigration bureaucracy that is openly hostile to their presence.

Social media screening has been mandated for all F and J visa applicants. Roughly 17 percent fewer new international students arrived in the United States in fall 2025 compared to the previous year.

The human consequences are not abstract. Kennedy Orwa, a University of Washington graduate student and UAW Local 4121 member, was deported along with his 13-year-old son in April. The Trump administration is expediating its plans to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student, for opposition to the US-back Israeli genocide in Gaza. These are stark demonstrations of what federal policy means in concrete human terms for the workers whose research Harvard and every other major institution depend upon.

When Harvard’s administration refused to include protections for non-citizen workers in contract negotiations, citing a desire not to interfere with its “relationship with the federal government,” it made a political declaration. It chose its institutional relations with the fascist administration over the safety and rights of its own workers.

The striking Harvard workers’ insistence on these protections is not simply a labor demand. It is, as Will Lehman, a rank-and-file Mack Trucks worker from Macungie, Pennsylvania, running as a socialist candidate for UAW president, rightly noted, a political demand bound up with the defense of democratic rights and academic freedom against the integrating logic of university administrations and the imperialist state. 

*****

No analysis of the Harvard strike is complete without an examination of the role being played by the United Auto Workers (UAW) bureaucracy, a role that is one of containment, delay and betrayal.

Members of HGSU-UAW voted by 96 percent to authorize strike action in near-unanimous expression of class anger building for more than a year of fruitless bargaining under UAW supervision.

The apparatus delayed the walkout for months after their strike mandate was delivered, keeping workers at the table with an administration that had no intention of offering a fair settlement, while the previous contract’s benefit provisions—covering childcare and medical expenses—remained inaccessible.

The record of the UAW apparatus with academic workers is consistent. The 2021 HGSU-UAW strike was settled after three days on terms that, adjusted for inflation, amounted to a real wage cut of 1.2 percent, which the apparatus nonetheless declared a victory.

At the University of California, when academic workers moved to strike in defense of pro-Palestinian protesters facing arrest and administrative repression, the apparatus surrendered immediately upon receipt of a strikebreaking injunction.

At Columbia University, UAW Region 9A Director Brandon Mancilla—a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, the political organization that performs the essential function of channeling left-wing sentiment back into the Democratic Party—intervened directly to suppress strike action and pressure the Student Workers of Columbia (SWC) to abandon political demands, including protections for non-citizen workers, limits on campus surveillance and divestment from military contractors.

Before the local union complied, the apparatus threatened trusteeship. Even after the SWC leadership capitulated and watered down the political demands the UAW International still refused to authorize a strike. Mancilla was the former president of HGSU-UAW at Harvard itself—the very union whose strike he is now helping to strangle.

Meanwhile, at Harvard itself, the leadership of the Harvard Academic Workers-UAW (HAW-UAW)—the union representing non-tenure-track faculty—unilaterally cancelled planned coordinated strike action that 53 percent of attendees at a general meeting had voted to launch immediately. 

*****

UAW President Shawn Fain, who publicly backs Trump’s tariff policies and framed the union as a partner in wartime industrial production, has done nothing to mobilize the broader UAW membership in support of the Harvard strikers. The entire apparatus functions, as Lehman stated plainly, as the “labor lieutenant” of the Harvard Corporation and the corporate-political establishment it serves. 

*****

The Harvard graduate workers’ strike is a focal point of the class struggle in American academic life. But it cannot be won if its direction remains in the hands of the UAW apparatus, whose institutional interests lie in reaching a settlement—any settlement—that takes the workers off the picket lines and produces a contract the bureaucracy can present as a victory while Harvard’s administration locks in another cycle of wage suppression.

The demands of the HGSU-UAW strikers—living wages, protection for non-citizen workers from ICE, independent arbitration for harassment and discrimination complaints, academic freedom protections, divestment from military contractors and weapons manufacturers and opposition to campus surveillance—are fully justified and deserve the support of the entire working class.

But these demands can only be secured through the independent organization of the workers themselves, in rank-and-file committees that are democratically controlled by the strikers and accountable to no institutional interest other than the workers’ own.

Such committees must reach beyond the Harvard campus to their class brothers and sisters in other bargaining units—the HAW-UAW non-tenure-track faculty whose own planned strike was sabotaged by the apparatus, the Columbia graduate workers whose political demands were suppressed and the clerical workers whose leadership just accepted a one-year holding contract that amounts to a real-wage cut in everything but name, a flat $2,300 raise on a one-year contract. For a worker earning around $55,000, this is barely a 4 percent raise, well below inflation. 

The fight must be extended to autoworkers, healthcare workers, educators at every level and the broader working class mobilizing against exploitation, war and the assault on democratic rights. This is an international struggle led by the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC) and committees should affiliate to it to develop a joint fight with workers internationally. 

16.  Sri Lanka: 12 men sentenced to death over killing of MP prepare to appeal

Twelve people sentenced to death over the killing of former government parliamentarian Amarakeerthi Athukorala and his police guard in May 2022, during the country’s mass uprising, are preparing to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Their convictions and sentences, based on threadbare evidence, are a travesty of justice. The 12 men are being punished to intimidate all who took part in the uprising, which ended with the ousting of President Gotabhaya Rajapakse.

The men are currently being held at Welikada Prison in Colombo, following a verdict delivered by the Gampaha High Court Trial-at-Bar on February 1.

The court found the 12 guilty on charges including “murder” and “unlawful assembly.” The case involved 43 defendants. Several received suspended prison sentences for related offenses, while a number were acquitted due to insufficient evidence. 

*****

The four-month mass uprising in Sri Lanka, during which MP Amarakeerthi was killed, erupted in April 2022, involving millions of workers, rural poor and young people across the country. The mass protests were in response to crushing attacks on living conditions by the Rajapakse government to make working people pay for the economic crisis fueled by the COVID-19 pandemic and the NATO proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. People faced severe shortages and skyrocketing prices for fuel, medicine and other essential commodities, and hours-long power cuts.

Beginning on April 9, Galle Face Green in Colombo became the center of the protest movement, with thousands occupying it. On April 28 and May 6, millions of workers engaged in one-day general strikes. The second strike was supported by millions of others in a hartal, or general shutdown of businesses.

Shocked by these developments, then Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapakse, the elder brother of the president, called thousands of supporters to his residence, including ministers and MPs belonging to the ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) on May 9. Amarakeerthi appears to have been a participant at this meeting.

After speeches by the prime minister and other SLPP leaders, their supporters attacked protesters near the residence and then marched to Galle Face Green, violently assaulting the unarmed occupiers. The police and military allowed the marauding thugs to proceed. Some SLPP ministers, MPs and area leaders were seen directing attacks on protesters and the destruction of their encampment.

As many as 150 protesters were injured, several seriously, and treated at the Colombo National Hospital. This violent attack marked a turning point in the mass uprising, drawing in more layers of workers, youth and the rural poor. Outrage spread across the country and demonstrations took place in many towns and cities. Thousands of postal, health and port workers struck work and marched. 

Later that evening, in Nittambuwa, about 40 kilometers from Colombo, hundreds of people had gathered in protest. Amarakeerthi’s vehicle got stuck in the crowd. According to local accounts, his police bodyguard opened fire on the demonstration, killing one youth and injuring another. The MP and the bodyguard then sought refuge inside a nearby building, where their dead bodies were later found.

The prosecution case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence. CCTV footage was apparently used to identify some of the accused, but no direct video evidence or eyewitness testimony was presented to establish who carried out the killings. Cameras had only been installed on the ground and first floors, not the second floor where the MP and his guard were killed. This glaring lack of evidence did not stop the court from convicting and imposing the death penalty on 12 people.

Most of the 12 come from poor and lower-middle-class families devastated by Sri Lanka’s economic collapse. World Socialist Web Site reporters spoke to family members of some who were preparing to file appeals. Their lives have been shattered by the arrests, years of remand detention and mounting legal costs. 

*****

While severe punishments have been imposed on ordinary people caught up in the turmoil of 2022, many ministers, MPs and other political organizers connected to the attacks on anti-government demonstrators have been exonerated. According to some reports, they have also obtained insurance payouts involving huge sums disproportionate to any damage caused.

This double standard exposes the class character of the capitalist state and its legal system.

The mother of one of the accused said her son had left home on May 9 merely to observe the tense situation developing in the town. “He was not a criminal,” she said. “We are poor people. We have no power, no money and no influence. We are only asking for justice.” 

*****

The court verdict and sentence have serious implications for the entire working class and the country’s oppressed people. The 12 people found guilty are victims of a ruling class that lives in fear of the mounting opposition from the masses and wants to set an example to intimidate working people.

For decades, Sri Lanka has maintained a moratorium on the death penalty, although courts continue to hand down death sentences. Human rights organizations have repeatedly criticized the practice, pointing to the dangers of wrongful convictions, political interference and unequal access to legal defense.

All the capitalist parties—the government and the opposition—have remained silent on the fate of the 12 men and their families. None has raised any concerns over the fairness of the trial, the divided verdict or the reliance on circumstantial evidence in imposing death sentences.

The bourgeois media, meanwhile, has largely portrayed the Nittambuwa incident as an isolated criminal act detached from the broader upheavals of 2022. Television channels and newspapers repeatedly highlighted the deaths of the MP and his bodyguard while paying little attention to the social desperation and political anger that fueled the nationwide protests. 

The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) categorically opposes the 12 convictions and the death sentences. Capital punishment is a barbaric instrument historically used to intimidate and suppress the oppressed.

The SEP calls on workers, students, youth and everyone who defends democratic rights, in Sri Lanka and internationally, to demand the dropping of all charges over the killing of the SLPP MP and the release of the 12 wrongfully convicted men. The real criminals on May 9, 2022—those who organized violent attacks on unarmed protesters—are the ones who must be prosecuted.

17. New Zealand government ramps up anti-immigrant measures

A proposed “citizenship test” seeks to portray migrants as a threat to New Zealand “values,” while other legislation will significantly expand the ability of the state to deport people.

18. A Sad and Beautiful World: “When things get better, we’ll come back to Beirut”

The first film from the recent San Francisco film festival that we commented on, Inside Amir, was shot in and focused on Tehran. The second, discussed here, A Sad and Beautiful World (Nujum al’amal w al’alam), directed by Cyril Aris, takes place in Beirut.

Both cities have been subject recently to savage imperialist bombardments by the US and its vicious attack dog Israel.

If anything, Beirut has fared worse, according to media reports, having suffered more frequent and devastating attacks. The city and its southern suburbs, where many of the poor live, have been subjected to repeated, brutal Israeli bombing raids throughout the conflict. Three thousand people have been killed in Lebanon so far. The strikes have forced more than one million Lebanese to flee. At least 35 percent of those displaced are estimated to be children. The UN reports that 620,000 women and girls have been driven from their homes.

A Sad and a Beautiful World follows Nino (Hasan Akil) and Yasmina (Mounia Akl), childhood friends, who reunite as adults, marry and have a child. The present-day social and political crisis in Lebanon threatens to tear them apart.

*****

There are amusing and telling sequences here, but, overall, the film is far “softer” than the horrific Lebanese and Middle Eastern situation demands. A little complacent, fatalistic and wistful. Inside Amir from Iran, although it also treats a layer of the middle class, is more penetrating, troubling, urgent. With A Sad and a Beautiful World, one feels that the director has adopted the not-very-useful program of “Making the Best of Things.” 

*****

The recent history of Lebanon is very difficult. In the 1975-1990 civil war an estimated 150,000 people were killed, with another 300,000 injured and an estimated one million people displaced. At present, Israel is attempting to transform southern Lebanon into another Gaza. 

Unfortunately, like a number of Lebanese films, A Sad and Beautiful World leans toward treating this history as a natural catastrophe, as something incomprehensible (this “absurd war”) that befell the country. A series of more or less heartfelt films, 1982, West Beirut, Around the Pink House, Skies of Lebanon, Costa Brava, Lebanon and numerous others (Capernaum, which depicts the social misery of the population is somewhat different) legitimately bewail the ghastly civil war and the carnage it produced, but never hazard an analysis as to the roots and sources of the decades-long conflicts.

The Lebanese situation is complex, with different powers and parties taking part, with shifting alliances and so forth, but, as the World Socialist Web Site noted some years ago, under the Bush administration, imperialist policy had been aimed at reversing

the outcome of the Lebanese civil war, which raged from 1975 until 1990. The US, Israel and other imperialist powers, notably France, played a central role in inciting that long and bloody conflict and keeping it going, including the introduction of American and French military forces and an Israeli invasion in 1982 that was followed by an 18-year Israeli occupation of the south. Washington’s chief ally was the fascistic Phalange, which headed a coalition of right-wing forces arrayed against an alliance of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Lebanese Left.

Imperialist intrigue and intervention succeeded in driving the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) from Lebanon, but the eventual settlement curtailed the power of the Phalange, on the one hand, and saw the rise of the Iranian and Syrian-backed Hezbollah on the other. This is what Washington is determined to change.

And then as now

The Israeli offensive is above all a war against the Lebanese poor. The more affluent residential neighborhoods of Beirut and other parts of the country have been largely spared. This is in keeping with US and Israeli policy during the civil war, when they were allied with the Phalange against the Shiite masses and the Palestinian refugee population.

On April 8, 2026, a particularly black day, reports the BBC, “a deadly wave of [Israeli] strikes [began] at 14.15 local time and saw about 100 targets across Lebanon hit in the space of just 10 minutes.” The death toll “for the day reached 361, according to the Lebanese authorities, with more than 1,000 injured.”

As a result of the day’s bombing,

In the southern suburbs of Beirut, the neighbourhood of Hay el Sellom is barely recognisable. What was once a densely populated, lively community is now a landscape of collapsed concrete, twisted metal and exposed wires. Homes have been reduced to layers of rubble. Staircases lead nowhere. The sounds of everyday life have been replaced by silence.

We refer to these events only to underscore the fact that the middle class soul-searching and to-ing fro-ing in A Sad and Beautiful World is very distant from this and inadequate to the devastation. Yasmina and other professionals may be able to leave, for Dubai, Saudi Arabia, Germany and points beyond, but the poor in southern Beirut have no means of escape. As the same BBC report notes, explaining why the April 8 attack was so deadly,

Beirut’s southern suburbs had faced repeated Israeli evacuation orders and air strikes since the start of the war, but residents told us few people left Hay El Sellom, as they had nowhere to go. (emphasis added)

The filmmakers need to keep various things in mind, including this. A sensitive, humane approach is a starting-point, but actual social and historical knowledge as well as an angry, partisan stance are indispensable too.

19. How workers can fight the wave of AI layoffs

Mass layoffs are spreading across the global economy, as corporations move to destroy jobs, drive down wages and declare millions of workers redundant as a result of the introduction of AI technologies.

On May 7, tech security company Cloudflare announced layoffs for 20 percent of its workforce. The 1,100 affected workers were told by email that their roles had no future in what CEO Matthew Prince called “the agentic AI era.”

The company’s internet security services and Content Delivery Network plays a central role in the architecture of the internet, servicing more than one-fifth of all websites. Cloudflare claims it is used by 35 percent of all Fortune 500 companies and has numerous contracts with the US Department of Defense and intelligence agencies. In February, it was announced as one of the contractors for the Missile Defense Agency’s $151 billion SHIELD program, part of Trump’s “Golden Dome” program.

The layoff announcements landed on the same day the company reported its highest-ever quarterly revenue—$639.8 million, up 34 percent year over year. When an analyst asked why such deep cuts were necessary after a record quarter, Prince replied: “Just because you’re fit doesn’t mean you can’t get fitter.” 

*****

This is a global war on the working class, which must be answered with a globally coordinated campaign in defense of jobs. The central issue is to take control of powerful new technologies out of the hands of the corporate oligarchy. The International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees encourages, and is organizing, mass resistance to the accelerating jobs massacre.

According to the outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, American employers have announced more than 300,000 job cuts in the first four months of 2026. The technology sector (85,411 jobs) ranked first, more than double the second place transportation sector (33,479). For the second consecutive month, AI was cited as the primary reason for layoffs.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ latest figures, the “information” sector has seen 16 consecutive months of job losses, shedding 342,000 jobs or 11 percent from its peak in November 2022.

By and large, the tech firms slashing jobs are not only profitable, but play central roles in the AI boom. Facebook’s parent Meta is eliminating 8,000 positions while canceling 6,000 open roles. It also plans to spend $145 billion in capital investment this year, overwhelmingly directed at AI infrastructure. Microsoft launched the first voluntary buyout program in its 51-year history, targeting up to 8,750 workers. Oracle is eliminating up to 30,000 employees—including, workers told Time magazine, people who had spent their final months training the AI systems that then rendered them redundant.

The stock market is rewarding major layoff announcements, particularly when it is tied to AI restructuring, ushering in what the Wall Street Journal is calling the “era of the mega-layoff.”

While the tech industry combines booming profits with mass layoffs, the ruling class is also using bankruptcies as a time-tested means of destroying jobs overnight. This was the case with Spirit Airlines, which collapsed overnight last week, leaving 17,000 workers unemployed. The immediate trigger was the doubling of fuel prices due to the war against Iran. The White House refused to bail Spirit out in order to accelerate the next round of mergers and consolidations in the airline industry.

Mass layoffs are also underway in other sectors where AI is a less immediate factor. In logistics, UPS has eliminated or targeted 68,000 positions through automated mega-hubs; it has recently announced 26 more facility closures for later this year. In auto, Volkswagen is aiming for 50,000 cuts by 2030, Renault is cutting 15 to 20 percent of its engineering workforce and US automakers are laying off thousands. 

*****

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei predicts AI will write essentially all software code within a year. Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google parent Alphabet, says three-quarters of Google’s new code is already AI-written. Investor Vinod Khosla forecasts that by 2030, “80 percent of all jobs will be capable of being done by an AI.” 

AI itself is not the problem. It is an extraordinary technology with the capacity to eliminate drudgery and vastly improve productivity, to reduce the working day to a theoretical minimum while vastly accelerating the potential for human learning.

The critical question is who controls this technology. It must be freed from the shackles of private ownership. The development and training of AI systems is social labor in the fullest sense of the word, and its benefits must be available to all.

They were built from the accumulated labor, knowledge and creative output of millions of workers—the code written by software engineers, the conversations handled by customer service agents, the analyses produced by researchers and data scientists.

AI also fatally undermines the foundations of the capitalist system itself. When Khosla predicts that the amount of necessary labor could be reduced by 80 percent within a few years, or when tech executives speak of AI-generated “abundance,” they are describing, without understanding it, a state of affairs in which capitalism is hopelessly obsolete.

In reality, the potential of this technology can never be realized under capitalism, because capitalism must restrict, distort and weaponize it to survive. In place of abundance, it produces mass unemployment. In place of liberation from drudgery, it produces intensification of drudgery for those who remain. In place of human development, it produces a generation declared redundant by systems built from their own knowledge.

Meanwhile, control over the new technology, and the resources and supply chains needed to develop it, has become an increasingly central factor in the growth of imperialist war—today against Iran and Russia, tomorrow against China.

A progressive response to this offensive is possible only through a frontal assault by the working class on the unchallenged “right” of capitalist property itself. Those on the pseudo-left who respond by demanding that AI be regulated, halted altogether, or subjected to union-management boards are diverting from the central issue of class, and in many cases directing opposition into a reactionary attack on technological progress itself.

*****

A mass, worldwide working class movement requires new forms of organization: rank-and-file committees, built independently of the existing apparatus, capable of preparing and coordinating action without seeking permission from bureaucracies whose interests lie elsewhere. The International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees is advocating for and building these organizations on a world scale, with active committees in industries all over the world.

The central demands of such a movement must be:

  • Not a single layoff due to artificial intelligence! If AI genuinely increases productivity, then the gains belong to the workers who produced them. The workweek must be shortened proportionally, with no loss in pay.

  • Workers’ control over the introduction of new technology. Workers must have full information, genuine veto power and real control over how productivity gains are allocated.

  • Good-paying, fulfilling jobs for all workers already laid off for any reason, including Spirit workers and the hundreds of thousands laid off in the tech sector.

  • Expropriation of the major technology corporations, banks and financial institutions, and their transformation into publicly owned utilities under the democratic control of the working class, including democratic control and ownership of AI technologies.

The fight against layoffs and “AI restructuring” cannot be waged plant by plant or country by country. The corporations operate globally, shift work across borders, and use nationalism to pit worker against worker. The only answer is the international unity of the working class—linking workers in tech, logistics, manufacturing, education and every sector into a common struggle.

20. War, genocide and the weaponization of healthcare: An interview with Bilal Irfan

Irfan has participated directly in medical missions to Palestine and Pakistan and continues to engage with health systems across the Eastern Mediterranean region and South Asia. He is among a small number of researchers who have continued to document the medical realities of the Gaza genocide in real time, maintaining contact with healthcare workers on the ground through the destruction of the health infrastructure they are embedded in.

The World Socialist Web Site spoke with Bilal Irfan, amid an accelerating regional catastrophe that has transformed the Middle East since our previous interviews in November 2024 and June 2025. This interview, conducted on April 26, 2026, was edited for brevity and clarity.

*****  

Bilal Irfan (BI): People are still being killed almost every week. There are people being massacred. And what we’ve seen now—from on-the-ground reports as well as international media—is that the so-called yellow line, which was supposed to encompass approximately 53 percent of Gaza, has been steadily and incrementally expanding in some sectors.

It’s not marked clearly. A lot of people who thought their houses were quite far away from the supposed line find themselves incrementally closer to it. So, some people are not sending their children out in the streets—often not even to school—because of the risk of being shot. We now see so many testimonies from Israeli soldiers about shooting unarmed people crossing arbitrary, often undelineated lines.

*****

BI: There are several humanitarian groups conducting medical missions. One thing that is different about Lebanon compared to Gaza is that Beirut’s airport is functional to some degree. Some people have been able to come in and out, and Lebanon’s land border with Syria makes refugee flow and humanitarian medical access somewhat easier. 

We also must understand Lebanon’s history and the sociopolitical landscape it operates in. Part of the reason Lebanon is treated differently by international media and European governments compared to Gaza is the deeper ties Lebanese institutions, civil society, cultural groups and academic centers have with European and American counterparts. It is also a full member state of the United Nations, Palestine is also recognized as a state under international law but has been under occupation for much of its existence and has never been able to meaningfully exercise full sovereignty over its territories and borders. Lebanon’s colonial history also plays a role, as France has deep ties to the region.

And we must be frank about the religious dynamic. Israeli leaders and early Zionists, even when they came in as part of a settler colonial project within Mandatory Palestine, were often quite explicit about trying to divide and rule, by elevating certain groups above others and attempting to pit groups against one another. You see the messaging: open calls for ethnic cleansing against Shias in southern Lebanon, while more conciliatory messages are sometimes sent toward Christians or Druze. Israel even sent messaging condemning the attacks on a statue of importance to Christians by its soldiers. One would be hard pressed to find something like that with respect to reprimands for the burning of the Qur’an. This is not to say that Israel does not kill Christians; they have indiscriminately bombed and killed populations in Palestine and Lebanon regardless of faith and have often struck churches. But messaging calling for people of other faiths to expel Shias is part of trying to separate the people of the region from one another to expand the colonial foothold.

It’s also worth noting that while Lebanon and Iran have rightly drawn international attention, Israel has used that shift in focus to continue its human rights violations in Gaza. Many humanitarian medical organizations have been forced to reduce the number of teams they send, which cut down in capacity, due to arbitrary restrictions imposed precisely while much of the world’s media attention is elsewhere.

It is important to also discuss who is bearing the cost of this war in the region. Take the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as an example. South Asian, Southeast Asian and West African migrant workers, living in many cases in systems of severe exploitation through the kafala system, constitute most of the UAE’s population, while Emirati Arabs represent only a small percentage. Much of the country runs on the labor of migrant workers. These workers are now also caught in the crossfire of the UAE’s decision to host imperialist military bases and enable these wars. It is often not the Emirati elites in their palaces, mansions or villas who bear that cost, but rather it is the average worker. That dynamic, where the people who help build a country’s wealth and infrastructure are paying the price of the wars it engages in, runs through many of the themes we’ve discussed. 

*****

BI:  I think much of what we’ve spoken about today points to the same fundamental conclusion: The destruction of healthcare infrastructure, the suppression of data, the targeting of journalists and physicians—these are not incidental to these wars. They are increasingly weapons of war and direct aims on it. And until the people who are often most impacted by these policies—working people in the Middle East, in the United States, across the world—recognize that their struggles are connected and build the kind of independent political movement capable of confronting the class that profits from all of this, the devastation may likely continue. 

 21. Farrer by-election deepens existential crisis of Australia’s Liberal Party

The plunge of the Liberal vote to just 12 percent, in a seat held by its previous leader, indicates that the traditional conservative party of the ruling elite is on the brink of collapse. 

 22. Australia: Health Workers Rank-and-File Committee opposes Labor’s attack on disability services

The meeting of health and disability workers unanimously passed a resolution opposing the cuts to the National Disability Insurance Scheme and discussed a campaign to mobilize health workers against Labor’s brutal austerity agenda. 

23. United States: After Greeley betrayal, UFCW blocks new strike action by Denver, Colorado meatpacking workers

Less than three weeks after United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7 called off the powerful strike of meatpacking workers at the JBS meat processing plant in Greeley, Colorado, meatpacking workers at the JBS beef and pork plant in nearby Denver voted April 27 to authorize strike action.

24. Ukraine: New linguistic expertise deepens debacle for prosecution of Bogdan Syrotiuk

In the case against 26-year old Ukrainian Trotskyist Bogdan Syrotiuk, a third linguistic expert opinion requested by the court further undermines the case of the prosecution based on charges of “state treason under martial law.” If convicted under those charges, Bogdan faces between 15 years to life in prison. Even though clearly aimed at finding as many potentially damaging statements as possible, this latest linguistic analysis found not a single formulation to support the charges of “state treason under martial law” under Article 111 of the Ukrainian penal code. 

The expert opinion was requested after a report commissioned by Bogdan’s lawyers and authored by one of Ukraine’s leading criminologists completely refuted the accusations of the state prosecution. It put the prosecution in such a difficult position that the court took the unusual step of requesting a third expert opinion. 

In cases of alleged state treason under martial law—an article that has been invoked to prosecute thousands of workers and youth in recent years—such linguistic reports are of great legal significance. The prosecution often relies primarily on such reports which analyze statements made by the accused. More often than not, the accused’s statements are interpreted in a way that justifies their conviction as “traitors to the state”.

Like the previous two reports this new 84-page long report examines 14 articles and statements published on the World Socialist Web Site and authored or translated by Bogdan Syrotiuk. Among them are multiple statements by the Young Guard of Bolshevik-Leninists, a Trotskyist youth organization in the former Soviet Union that Bogdan founded in 2018, articles by Bogdan on the history of fascism in Ukraine, WSWS articles on the war, and statements by the chairperson of the World Socialist Web Site and the Socialist Equality Party (US), David North. 

Authored by Natalia Kondratienko and Daria Krivenchenko, the linguistic analysis of these statements repudiates the principal basis for Bogdan’s persecution. They found that 

​There are no direct calls for the undermining of the national security of Ukraine, its interests, the liquidation of its statehood or the destruction of Ukrainian identity and the conduct of disintegrating activities in the informational sphere; [there are no calls] for the overthrow of the constitutional order or the seizure of state power, the change of territorial borders of Ukraine, aggressive war, the development of a military conflict or propaganda for war.

Later on, their report states, that none of the articles examined contained statements suggesting

​the approval of the military aggression of the RF [Russian Federation] against Ukraine, …[there is no] justification or legal recognition or denial of the temporary occupation of a part of Ukrainian territory, [there is no] glorification of individuals who have realized the armed aggression of the RF, of representatives of the Russian armed forces, illegal military formations, mercenaries and the occupation administrations of the RF. [There is no] propaganda, directed toward supporting the armed forces of the RF against Ukraine.

This conclusion completely undermines the prosecution of Bogdan for “state treason under martial law.” The relevant article in the Ukrainian penal code defines high treason as an “act intentionally committed by a citizen of Ukraine to the detriment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability, defense capability, state, economic or information security of Ukraine: joining the enemy during martial law or in the period of armed conflict, espionage, providing assistance to a foreign state, foreign organization or their representatives in conducting subversive activities against Ukraine.”

The conclusion also repudiates the indictment of the prosecution, which specifically alleged that Bogdan had been working on behalf of the Russian government, describing the World Socialist Web Site as an “information agency” of the Kremlin. 

That the report found no evidence to support any of these claims is all the more remarkable since it was clearly written in an attempt to find as many potentially damaging formulations as possible and interpret statements in a way that can make them the subject of criminal prosecution.

*****

This latest expert opinion further undermines and discredits the Ukrainian state’s prosecution of Bogdan in a dual sense. It proves, once more, that the charges of “high treason under martial law” and collaboration with the Russian government are groundless. What the linguistic experts “found” are “thought crimes”: Bogdan’s courage to tell the truth about the war and the role of the imperialist powers, the history of Ukrainian fascism and the state of Ukrainian society, and his Marxist perspective for socialist unification of the working class in Ukraine and Russia. His prosecution is an indictment of the war propaganda that Ukraine is a democracy. He has been subjected to a deliberate, politically motivated persecution by the Kiev regime because he is a Trotskyist.

25. Free Ukrainian socialist and anti-war activist, Bogdan Syrotiuk!

Bogdan Syrotiuk in 2015

"Peace for the world! Down with war!"